posted
Can someone please tell me the difference between mature soles and non mature soles. There is no difference to me. Soles don't age. If you never saw the girl's face would you be able to tell how old the feet were just by their soles? Please someone let me know.
Posts: 235 | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
um no brother man tim, there is huge difference, skin, usually smoother feet are younger and rougher are older,specially the soles. and allot more calleced. there is a difference my pal. i reckon.
Posts: 269 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Soles are part of the feet which are all the time in contact with ground (bottoms of shoes etc.) so skin there is most thickest. Older the soles, more in contact with ground equals rougher soles. There's nothing like young soles.
One thing that scares me is when I get older, females of my age will have rougher feet.
-------------------- Avatar: My gf's sexy feet Posts: 123 | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by painter: um no brother man tim, there is huge difference, skin, usually smoother feet are younger and rougher are older,specially the soles. and allot more calleced. there is a difference my pal. i reckon.
i agree
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
I can defintely tell a difference and usually without seeing a face, ifd be able to tell... but there are rare instances..
Posts: 155 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by painter: um no brother man tim, there is huge difference, skin, usually smoother feet are younger and rougher are older,specially the soles. and allot more calleced. there is a difference my pal. i reckon.
i agree
Mike you are like 25 right? How many old chicks have you been with?
Posts: 1470 | Registered: Feb 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Sorry Ledaemon I just don't see how people can tell the difference. Does not matter I guess I like all feet
Posts: 235 | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
My 2 cents on mature Feet, my favorite subject...
timothy99, I like all Feet too, but there is a difference. I've come to understand, from viewing porn and looking at Foot oriented material, the term "mature" refers to Women that range in age from late 30's to 50's (and even 60's.) The majority of porn and Foot oriented material viewed on the net features Women who are in their early to late 20's (rare cases, early 30's). I guess the term "mature" was necessary to differentiate the "older" women from the "young" Women for people who enjoy that sort of niche.
Perfect examples of "mature" Feet are these threads that were recently posted here, from feetoverforty dot com:
I think there definitely is a difference between "mature" and "non mature" Feet. IMO, older or "mature" Feet tend to have more character visually. In some cases, you can tell from looking at the skin on the tops of the Feet; in other cases, as some have pointed out, the Soles may look a bit rougher, or "leathery" as pedactor stated. However, these characteristics aren't exclusive to mature Feet. (The Feet in my avatar pic belong to my ex girlfriend's mother... She's in her early 50's!)
Even if a Woman considered "mature" has smooth Feet and Heels, even without seeing her face, you can just look at them and tell that they are not the Feet of a 20 year old.
quote:Originally posted by Sole_Solution: My 2 cents on mature Feet, my favorite subject...
timothy99, I like all Feet too, but there is a difference. I've come to understand, from viewing porn and looking at Foot oriented material, the term "mature" refers to Women that range in age from late 30's to 50's (and even 60's.) The majority of porn and Foot oriented material viewed on the net features Women who are in their early to late 20's (rare cases, early 30's). I guess the term "mature" was necessary to differentiate the "older" women from the "young" Women for people who enjoy that sort of niche.
Perfect examples of "mature" Feet are these threads that were recently posted here, from feetoverforty dot com:
I think there definitely is a difference between "mature" and "non mature" Feet. IMO, older or "mature" Feet tend to have more character visually. In some cases, you can tell from looking at the skin on the tops of the Feet; in other cases, as some have pointed out, the Soles may look a bit rougher, or "leathery" as pedactor stated. However, these characteristics aren't exclusive to mature Feet. (The Feet in my avatar pic belong to my ex girlfriend's mother... She's in her early 50's!)
Even if a Woman considered "mature" has smooth Feet and Heels, even without seeing her face, you can just look at them and tell that they are not the Feet of a 20 year old.
OMG I am 33 -- you think I am in the mature section? I am going to go kill myself now. lol
Posts: 1470 | Registered: Feb 2008
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Cry]](cry.gif)
![[Mmm]](graemlins/mmm.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
