posted
Clip Store 4188 Title: Big Amazon Feet Clip Date: 07/19/08
If you have any decency and morals, do not buy this clip!!!
This scumbag has reached all new heights.
I admit, I understand the fellow says what he needs to say to get these girls and women to show him their feet, and to allow him to touch them. People lie everyday to get what they want and need.
I understand he has a male feet clip store, even though he is not into male feet. People produce shows, commercials, and movie everyday even if they are not into what they produce.
I cannot understand this fellow shooting foot fetish content while a child, minor, baby, is clearly in view of the scene! He didn't have the decency to ask her to place the child in the stroller prior to shooting video and stills. It wasn't until she had her stockings off, had her feet propped up and showing them off, did he try to get her to place the child in the stroller. She didn't want to put the child in the stroller, as the child needed comforting. As the video progressed, the child wasn't being cooperative. You could see her feet and his sneakers at the same time while she changed foot positions for this dude. Finally, she put the child in a stroller, and the child starting whining. On top of that, the child is still in the scene while whining.
Long story short, this dude really has no problem with shooting fetish content with minors in his scenes.
The reason I bought the clip was because of the woman's high arches and the way the undersides of her big toes are shaped (kinked). She was not a looker in the least, but I bypassed that for the sake of her feet. Hey, lots of us have seen mediocre women with pretty feet, so lets be real about that. In good faith, despite the clip description, I expected the dude to allow the woman to put the child away first before he began shooting her feet.
-------------------- You must do what you feel is right, of course-Obi Wan Kenobi Posts: 2662 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
why did you say Pedophile Content? There a kid in the scene, no one did anything to the kid.
-------------------- "Nina, this is my house, you work for me, and I want to suck your toes." -Big Trouble (2002) Posts: 1855 | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Seriously misleading Topic title. You should be careful you don't go throwing these accusations around to the wrong people. What you describe does not constitute pedophilia, just poor taste.
posted
exactly lol...that's no pedophile.i was thinking he posted a clip of a clearly underage girl & her feet or something.
Posts: 729 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
That guy really shoulda made sure the kid was placed out of view before filming, or at the least edit those parts of the video out.
However, I do know the guy to be a photographer who goes on the hunt with a fake storyline as his premise for getting these women to do this stuff. So it's possible he might not have made a showstopper issue of filming the woman's feet until the kid was out of view.
Imagine her asking we he would have to pull a showstopper until the kid is out of view. "Well maam, it's to be in compliance with adult film regulations" LOL
Her: "Didn't you say this was for your reflexology class or something?!"
Anyway, ur right about people doing whatever they have to do to get feet sometimes. Just read some desperate stories on foot message boards for those who think this concept is uncommon in foot fetish.
posted
I thought more than twice about posting this warning, as I know some readers would not understand or realize the gross negligence on this character's part.
The interesting thing was the woman offered to show the child's feet, and he declined. But he had no trouble with ruining his fan's want or need to get off while a child was in view, and while the child was in view and whining.
Some fans won't even attempt to pleasure themselves while a child is in sight. Meanwhile, others will start pleasuring themselves the moment the woman starts taking off her shoes, and will continue to do so until fruition.
I know most of us are into feet, but some of us are into that, and more. For those into pedophilia, that clip will do it for them.
According to Wikipedia, this is the most common definition of a pedophile.
[In common usage, the term refers to any adult who is sexually attracted to children or who sexually abuses a child].
So before anyone thinks the title is wrong, please do research on the topic before firing off. Its the half-cocked gun that usually goes off prematurely.
The fellow really should have passed on her, even though her feet were a great find. Unfortunately, the great find was also a great loss based on the child being in the scene. He could have simply asked she put the child in the stroller, as it might restrict her leg and foot movement because the child was sitting on her lap.
-------------------- You must do what you feel is right, of course-Obi Wan Kenobi Posts: 2662 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
So if an animal happens to be in the foot pics/clips, that counts as bestiality, right? And if a dude is in picture, then that has to be gay porn.
It's not that serious.
Posts: 25 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
He is always ranked, so he must be doing something right - but yea we all need to be super careful.
The girls gone wild guy got busted by a woman who had a fake id that said she was 18...a kid is definitely different. But don't know first hand about this video.
posted
although he produces some sexy foot clips, he goes by doing it the wrong way. Fair enough if he gave them away for free, I just watch his clips on youtube and theres some nice feet. I wouldnt dream of going about giving that guy my money, but its not really pedophile Content. I do think however that he gives foot fetishes a bad name and he should be shut down
Posts: 18 | Registered: Jul 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
i haven't seen the clip but maybe he could've filmed her feet from a different angle or something ..i know i dont wanna look at no kids no matter what the situation...i saw a girl the other day that was so fine so i walked right up to her & asked her if i could film her feet she was like "sure" her kids were around but they were in the car & if they had've got out i woulda just cut that part out.
Posts: 729 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Maybe this guy, and others like him, should just leave women alone if they are sitting on a bench with their child/children. And stop making up B/S to get his clips.
Personally, being a mother and a foot model, I don't agree with having your kids or anyone else's in clips or photos. There's just no reason to mix the two. Posts: 1549 | Registered: May 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
bad on his part cause it shows his level of decentcy is very low.i dont think hes a pediphile,jus desperate to get that vid made,but still man,some shit is jus wrong.its also bad on his part cause who the fuck would want to buy a footclip with a child in the mix.this guy is not bright
Posts: 924 | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I 100% agree with Eliza here - also being a mother and foot model myself. Children should not be presented in a foot fetish clip - meant for obvious adult reasons.
Adding to the thoughts on the clip itself ... I agree the filmer could have chosen a better model. One that was by herself and more available for his shoot. I am sure that besides the point of the child actually being in the clip - was the fact that the child whined and cried the entire time. Ever tried having sex with a crying baby in the next room?? That is damn near MISSION IMPOSSIBLE!!
Yet, coming onto a forum and posting a "critique" of a clip is a touchy subject. You have to be careful with how you present your opinion. What one person sees as offensive - others may not. In turn - the subject of slander (in this case the written form would be considered libel.) comes up. You must use caution in HOW you present your "warning".
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Mad]](cuss.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
