posted
Now, I'm no homophobe. But, I can assume we're all good, female feet loving guys (and gals) here.
So, I'm going to say one of my worries and paranoias.
When a manly girl gets on here and posts her "size twelve" feet? Does that make any of you wonder? Like. I'm a size 11 in mens, and, converted, that's, I think, about a size twelve in womens.
I just wonder if any of you worry, as well, that we're targeted by transvestites because we're not looking at their crotches?
posted
if a manly girl shows her feet here, i would personally judge them by how manly she was and how manly her feet looked.
fortunately or not, size is not a factor in that determination.
& as my personal motto goes, "the bigger the better" boyz!! keep the dream alive
and i think you hit on a really good point when ya mentioned trannies trying to pray on innocent foot pervs. yes there probably are trannies adn i would almost guarantee that trannies show up in those posts where there are feet shown but no face. not all faceless feet posts are trannies mind you but i guarantee that ALLLLLLLL tranny posts are faceless feet, so word to the wise
posted
Lately a whole lot of galleries on Flickr have been popping up showing male feet with foot jewellery, polished toes & pedicured feet. Itīs pretty gross...and sometimes quite difficult to hold apart from female feet at first glance.
posted
that why faceless foot "models" should be ignored
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Girlgotsole: Now, I'm no homophobe. But, I can assume we're all good, female feet loving guys (and gals) here.
So, I'm going to say one of my worries and paranoias.
When a manly girl gets on here and posts her "size twelve" feet? Does that make any of you wonder? Like. I'm a size 11 in mens, and, converted, that's, I think, about a size twelve in womens.
I just wonder if any of you worry, as well, that we're targeted by transvestites because we're not looking at their crotches?
Just a curious worry.
Thanks,
Girlgotsole
A lot of that goes on but it's not limited to transvestites. There are also guys who get a laugh out of it, and particularly when they go back to read the glowing comments. This is why I don't pay any attention to photos with no face in them ... photos with feet only, saying "here's asian feet i met", etc.
If the poster is a board regular who posts regularly of course, it's quite a different story.
It's not to say they are all like that, by any stretch, but knowing there will always be some in there keeps me steering clear (and ignoring). I'm not sure size is at the heart of this matter, but your point is well-received and well-taken.
[ October 29, 2008, 02:48 PM: Message edited by: Ben Del Amitri ]
-------------------- Respectfully,
Ben
Malory in Signature Posts: 5772 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mikey P: that why faceless foot "models" should be ignored
Absolutely.
-------------------- Respectfully,
Ben
Malory in Signature Posts: 5772 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
bluetoelover
unregistered
posted
I always have in the back of my mind that time here on Wus that a dood posted as a "chick" and a butt fuck load of guys posted saying how they wanted to fuck and suck the shit outta "her" peds...and then the GUY posted showing his full body pic...so I always inspect the peds if there is no face pic so I can't be "one of those guys"...
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bluetoelover: I always have in the back of my mind that time here on Wus that a dood posted as a "chick" and a butt fuck load of guys posted saying how they wanted to fuck and suck the shit outta "her" peds...and then the GUY posted showing his full body pic...so I always inspect the peds if there is no face pic so I can't be "one of those guys"...
LOL Whoa, when the hell did that happen? You got a link to that? LOL
-------------------- I'm 2nd. to God's power. I'm the semi-supreme being!
posted
I do like big girl feet, but to the true connoisseur, the difference is obvious in terms of structure, plus, if you see the lower legs too. Its not that hard to tell them apart
Posts: 111 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Not really but I could see your point i guess.
-------------------- New Ship but she's got the right name. You treat her like a lady and she'll always bring you home. Posts: 4051 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bluetoelover: I always have in the back of my mind that time here on Wus that a dood posted as a "chick" and a butt fuck load of guys posted saying how they wanted to fuck and suck the shit outta "her" peds...and then the GUY posted showing his full body pic...so I always inspect the peds if there is no face pic so I can't be "one of those guys"...
That's happened more than once, it happens in various forums. In the end, the guy and all his (non foot-loving) college buddies are gathered around the computer, hooping it up.
There's a variant on this where they find photos of a specifically hideous female. She IS a female, but it's the ugliest one they could possibly find - often morbidly obsese as well, and almost always with manly characteristics (and hideously ugly feet). Guess what? Those posts STILL get glowing comments and the guys who posted get just as much a (sick) kick out of it as the fake female posts.
-------------------- Respectfully,
Ben
Malory in Signature Posts: 5772 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I never worry about it cause I'm partial to the femininity of womens feet rather than the dominance aspect. So that generally pushes me towards smaller more pettite feet.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
