posted
Now, I'm not saying this about ALL foot fetish models. Many are wonderful.
But let's face it: There's quite a few things here that are bothersome.
1.) After a survey and posts about foot guys wanting FACES with their FEET, why are there STILL so many models not doing this? Look. I'm not going to wank off to feet when I don't know who they belong to, just like I'm not going to eat some random person's unwrapped candybar. Or drink their thrown away coke.
2.) Goth/Punk. How many posts here have been "Man, I LOVE punk/goth girls." Where are they? Don't tell me these models can't dress up to please the fans if they really like having their feet admired?
3.) Cash cows. Oh yeah. This is a big pet peeve for myself and many here. Those who love 'feet and financial dominance.' You can pay somebody to call you names. Man, that's hot! Wait. No it isn't, because you can hire a hooker to do the same thing for much cheaper, or just go up to a woman and say something stupid so she can call you stupid! Wow!
Anyway, as far as fetishes go, many models are just cashing in on the attention, it seems. Not cashing in money, but cashing, like I said, in attention. Obviously, there are MANY models that prove this wrong, and by NO MEANS am I trying to say that every model has done this. I can't count the magnificent models that have come through Wu's.
But, there's a line here to be drawn, I think. If we, as the potential admirers, stop being like "WOW. More of those unfaced feet!" then they'll stop doing it.
- Girlgotsole
P.S. This excludes, of course, posters who put up their girlfriend's/wife's feet for comment and enjoyment. That's a whole different ball game.
Posts: 201 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
well said Girlgotsole, although about the not showing faces thing, some of these girls like showing they're feet for a little attention and positive feedback but are not comfortable about showing they're faces. I have to respect this, because I've posted a few threads of my gf's feet without her face simply for that reason. But it's a different story if its a pay site without showing the face.
posted
I have to say from a woman's perspective I have to agree with Shook on this one. My website does not show my face, that is not what the site is about or the erotica. It is about feet. There will be a pic that shows my body and a slight view of face but not full. Some of us have other careers and we need anonymity, these are real woman, the girl next door type, who are not paid to model but do this because they enjoy it. I do respect your points though girlgotsole.
posted
at the risk of repeating what was said before.. my wife and friends who model for me don't want their face on a site where men will wank-off to them. yet, they let me take pics because they know i like it and it's for me they do it. (so.. if i'm to post a pic up, i either crop it down out of respect, or just shoot the feet).
RPM
p.s. on non-fetish sites, a few friends let me post full shots, but the emphasis isn't on feet at that point
posted
I hardly know any sites that don`t show the model`s faces. I can only think of a couple, as oposed to those hundreds or even thousands of websites that show faces.
As for the punk/goth topic: I agree, but personally (coming from a punk/hardcore background) I wouldn`t want to see some blonde bimbo dressing up as a gothic or punk model. That would just be embarassing, and I´ve seen it a few times on the net....it usually looks pretty bad. But I agree that there is a high demand for REAL punk/goth girls. I am astonished though that there aren`t loads of gothic girls starting their own Clips4Sale store or paysites. It would be a HUGE market! Weird enough, many of those girls will rather work some crappy job which pays them minimum wage instead of running a (non-nude) fetish site that may add up to a decent income, and they wouldn`t even have to model in the nude (as oposed to "Suicide Girls", which is a great site but you have to pose fully naked).
Personally I´ve always been a bit proud to feature some more "unconventional" models at Toes-in-Action...punk, hardcore, gothic, hippy, straight edge, metal, etc. I would love to see more foot models like this on other sites.
posted
I agree with practically everything "girlgotsole" said. The first point he said about girls not showing their faces was the icing on the cake. That is one of my biggest pet peeves. I assume men like hot women. So when you get off to feet whose face does not appear in the picture, how do you know she's very attractive? You can't assume that because you like the feet, that the girl who's not showing her face is just as hot. I SWEAR this is like a hot girl you bring home to have sex, only to find out it has an organ attached between the legs. The next thing you know, you're on Jerry Springer, or Maury Povich getting humiliated in front of the world. That girl who you THOUGHT was great looking, might be a great disappointment.
I have a hard time digesting the reasons who girls opt not to show their faces. I usually say, "So what. If you went this far to organize a website, then you have to show your face."
If there were two foot fetish websites left in the world, where one showed faces of every model and the other does not (for whatever reason), which site do you think will be more popular?
11 times out of 10 I will go to the one with the faces. That right! I said 11 out of 10, not 10 out of 11. That means more than a 100% satisfaction for all of us.
Another analogy: If I told you that you are going to eat her pussy, you would want to know who I'm talking about, right? If I don't give you an answer, you will lose interest in the deal. If I showed you who she was, you will have a better idea of how to approach the situation. Your interest will go from zero percent (with the no face) up to at least 50 percent (after you know who the girl in question is).
Am I being over-dramatic? Perhaps. But that's how I (and at least "girlgotsole") see it.
quote:1.) After a survey and posts about foot guys wanting FACES with their FEET, why are there STILL so many models not doing this? Look. I'm not going to wank off to feet when I don't know who they belong to, just like I'm not going to eat some random person's unwrapped candybar. Or drink their thrown away coke.
many foot guys don't care if their woman wears a paper bag over her head, as long as she has nice feet
the faceless foot models are still getting the male attention they possibly don't get in real life, so why change?
quote:2.) Goth/Punk. How many posts here have been "Man, I LOVE punk/goth girls." Where are they? Don't tell me these models can't dress up to please the fans if they really like having their feet admired?
i don't think they are that popular with most guys
quote:3.) Cash cows. Oh yeah. This is a big pet peeve for myself and many here. Those who love 'feet and financial dominance.' You can pay somebody to call you names. Man, that's hot! Wait. No it isn't, because you can hire a hooker to do the same thing for much cheaper, or just go up to a woman and say something stupid so she can call you stupid! Wow!
they are catering to their market, many foot guys are submissive and love a dominant woman
quote:Anyway, as far as fetishes go, many models are just cashing in on the attention, it seems. Not cashing in money, but cashing, like I said, in attention. Obviously, there are MANY models that prove this wrong, and by NO MEANS am I trying to say that every model has done this. I can't count the magnificent models that have come through Wu's.
no there are not models that "prove this wrong" they are all in it for the male attention, the additional spending money is just a bonus
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by charlotte: I have to say from a woman's perspective I have to agree with Shook on this one. My website does not show my face, that is not what the site is about or the erotica. It is about feet. There will be a pic that shows my body and a slight view of face but not full. Some of us have other careers and we need anonymity, these are real woman, the girl next door type, who are not paid to model but do this because they enjoy it. I do respect your points though girlgotsole.
many women model bathing suits and lingerie and have real careers
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Girlgotsole: Now, I'm not saying this about ALL foot fetish models. Many are wonderful.
But let's face it: There's quite a few things here that are bothersome.
1.) After a survey and posts about foot guys wanting FACES with their FEET, why are there STILL so many models not doing this? Look. I'm not going to wank off to feet when I don't know who they belong to, just like I'm not going to eat some random person's unwrapped candybar. Or drink their thrown away coke.
2.) Goth/Punk. How many posts here have been "Man, I LOVE punk/goth girls." Where are they? Don't tell me these models can't dress up to please the fans if they really like having their feet admired?
3.) Cash cows. Oh yeah. This is a big pet peeve for myself and many here. Those who love 'feet and financial dominance.' You can pay somebody to call you names. Man, that's hot! Wait. No it isn't, because you can hire a hooker to do the same thing for much cheaper, or just go up to a woman and say something stupid so she can call you stupid! Wow!
Anyway, as far as fetishes go, many models are just cashing in on the attention, it seems. Not cashing in money, but cashing, like I said, in attention. Obviously, there are MANY models that prove this wrong, and by NO MEANS am I trying to say that every model has done this. I can't count the magnificent models that have come through Wu's.
But, there's a line here to be drawn, I think. If we, as the potential admirers, stop being like "WOW. More of those unfaced feet!" then they'll stop doing it.
- Girlgotsole
P.S. This excludes, of course, posters who put up their girlfriend's/wife's feet for comment and enjoyment. That's a whole different ball game.
1) I think maybe one of the main reasons why some women/foot models won't show their faces is because they have a little something called a career besides showing their feet on the internet and they could get in trouble if the wrong people found out about it - i.e. their employer. Somewhat related, I submit as evidence Michelle from the former website ohmyhose, whose husband got fired from his job because he was running the website and taking the pictures. Foot fetishism is not "mainstream" by any stretch of the imagination and, for the forseeable future, it won't be, so for those wanting it to be mainstream, deal with it. Because there may be jobs and careers at stake, especially in this economy, I respect that women may not want to show their faces.
2) As far as the whole punk girls thing goes, it doesn't phase me one way or the other. I've seen pics of punk models that I both liked and didn't like. It's not a real deal breaker for me one way or the other. There probably is a niche for something like that though. It's anyone's guess how big it is.
3) Personally, I'm not one for the "feet and financial dominance". It's not me. As a result, I stay away from those websites. It do find it a little annoying that some women feel they can get, or deserve to get, money out of a guy by using their feet and female dominance. By the same token though, the guys paying the women are enabling them to do it so whose fault is it really - the women who know they can get away with it or the guys paying them/enabling them to get away with it? I think what irks me more is an assumption by some websites who don't really know about foot fetishism. Those sites stick out like a sore thumb because of their assumption - they equate a foot fetish with being submissive. While that may be what some guys are into, it isn't an accurate depiction because every guy doesn't like that. For those who don't like it, all people can do is click to find something else and don't support it/enable it in any way.
-------------------- "I like feet... A lot!" Posts: 2167 | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Girlgotsole: Look. I'm not going to wank off to feet when I don't know who they belong to, just like I'm not going to eat some random person's unwrapped candybar. Or drink their thrown away coke.
This is so very true. Who wants to end up wanking off to some transvestite on the internet that gets off on shaving his legs and painting his toenails so that he can get all kinds of positive attention from what Mike P. described as the type of guys who probably don't mind paper bags over their girlfriends faces in real life.
I'd take this risk no more than I would take the risk of getting herpes by drinking someone's unfinished coke or eating someone's half eaten snickers bar in the bathroom. I guess these kinds of things just depend on how risk averse a person is.
I'm a man who likes to play life a little safe at times, although i admit i have done alot of things like almost get myself killed for picking up hooker feet many times. So who am i to judge?
posted
Hi Michael You ask why have a website at all? This is because foot erotica is something I enjoy on a regular basis and I wanted to share that with other people. Some of the wives/g/f's also have children who could accidently find the stuff on the Internet. I do understand and respect your viewpoint though.
posted
Some sites don't due to business reasoning if I remember right, and I don't have a problem with that. If it's going to cause a real life problem, then why bother with that? Let's remember they're FOOT Models. Who are recognized for their FEET.
While I agree that I'd like to see a face as well, I'd like to think of it this way: If I were in a porn flick or a video for anything, I wouldn't want my face in it, or maybe not even my voice. See where I'm coming from?
As for the goth/punk thing, I rather see the real deal, instead of someone trying to portray that style when it isn't someone normally into it.
Financial dominance IS retarded, and I can't imagine paying anybody for anything like that, it can be a pretty big turn on to be belittled, but I'm not gonna dish out cash for it, and no one else should either.
I'm sure that a lot of models are in it for money, and that's why they have their websites, but a lot of them also communicate with their fans, especially within this forum, and hey, if they're willing to chat with people REGULARLY(as well as whatever else),and even allow photo requests, I see nothing wrong with it.
hope this makes sense/doesn't offend anyone!
Posts: 504 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Fate111: ]1) I think maybe one of the main reasons why some women/foot models won't show their faces is because they have a little something called a career besides showing their feet on the internet and they could get in trouble if the wrong people found out about it - i.e. their employer. Somewhat related, I submit as evidence Michelle from the former website ohmyhose, whose husband got fired from his job because he was running the website and taking the pictures. Foot fetishism is not "mainstream" by any stretch of the imagination and, for the forseeable future, it won't be, so for those wanting it to be mainstream, deal with it. Because there may be jobs and careers at stake, especially in this economy, I respect that women may not want to show their faces.
[/QB]
michelle is not a good example, she didn't have a foot fetish site, she had a porno site
her husband worked with children
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
