posted
We all know it's the feet that matter but for all the F/M foot worship clip critics on the forum, does it matter if the male is masked or unmasked?
I remember the days when it seemed as if the majority of foot content featured the submissive as a masked individual but nowadays more & more of the submissive roles are going unmasked.
Possibly a sign that foot fetishism is becoming much less 'taboo' or a sign those involved aren't afraid of displaying their affection for feet openly/publicly because it's less taboo?
So I ask the people at Wu's, does it really matter to you? Masked or unmasked?
Poll Information
This poll contains 1 question(s). 18 user(s) have voted. You may not view the results of this poll without voting.
The #1 site for foot domination and sensual foot worship. Sexy Foot Mistresses all over the U.S. Check Us Out! Posts: 729 | Registered: May 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's not that much of an issue but unmasked.The masks look stupid too
-------------------- JURARRI 818 says: I think all latin american countries have beautiful feet, also the natural beauty that some womens feet come with, i feel is present all over latin america. Posts: 3262 | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
unmasked. in my opinion, there was never really any reason in the past to give the appearance that it is shameful nor is there any reason today to support the same notion.
why hide one's true enjoyment or disgust? we would hardly support the same notion with the women, although the amount of people who enjoy faceless feet pics sort of alarms me.
there should be no shame nor indication of shame with our fetish. i know alot of people out there will talk the big talk and say they have no shame, but reality and actions don't always coincide.
we need more unmasked foot fetish participants. an increase in this trend would be more congruent with the social belief that we have nothing to be ashamed of, otherwise, masked videos only indicate that some people still have something to hide. it is shameful, really
quote:Originally posted by Tyler D.: unmasked. in my opinion, there was never really any reason in the past to give the appearance that it is shameful nor is there any reason today to support the same notion.
why hide one's true enjoyment or disgust? we would hardly support the same notion with the women, although the amount of people who enjoy faceless feet pics sort of alarms me.
there should be no shame nor indication of shame with our fetish. i know alot of people out there will talk the big talk and say they have no shame, but reality and actions don't always coincide.
we need more unmasked foot fetish participants. an increase in this trend would be more congruent with the social belief that we have nothing to be ashamed of, otherwise, masked videos only indicate that some people still have something to hide. it is shameful, really
Good point Tyler. Personally, I feel like the people who are hiding behind the mask just aren't as comfortable with their fetish displayed publicly (And thats fine) BUT some of these individuals also find it hard to tell a significant other which causes a lot of trouble down the road.
I've come across so many people that would rather go OUTSIDE of their relationship to get a pair of feet just because they're too embarrassed or scared of the reaction from their wife or girlfriend. It's always a sad situation because more times than not their wife/girlfriend has a good-looking pair of feet. The logic is very backward to me but I digress. When it comes to foot fetish clips an unmasked submissive adds more realism to the setting but maybe its just me
The #1 site for foot domination and sensual foot worship. Sexy Foot Mistresses all over the U.S. Check Us Out! Posts: 729 | Registered: May 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's very difficult to get a submissive booked for a shoot without them eventually asking about a hood or otherwise. I've not located anyone brave enough to go in the frame. Mind you no-nudity.
I think unmasked is better as it shows off the facial expressions, masked is good for a specific effect - as it makes the sub 'irrelevant' which is a different effect than "shameful/hiding" more so, not a primary focus of the video being subservient and hidden etc..
But try shooting a opening story of introduction or meeting or a setup with the sub wearing the hood, it's already moot if they are hooded from the start. :-(
quote:Originally posted by np: i AM FROM iNDIA. i WANT MYSELF TRAINED AS FOOTSLAVE.CAN U SUGGEST ME A FOOT MISTRESS.
pricess ceara will make a true slave out of you while teaching you humility and also taking all your hard earned money as you learn your place below her.
i suggest her for your online foot mistress. she will teach you
I TOTALLY AGREE! It has always amazed me that people would rather go outside of a relationship for fear of a wife or a girlfriends reaction. I mean, WTF, there is obviously NO communication there. Isn't the relationship already destined to fail? Blah at the people of the world that "settle".
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
