posted
Was just thinking about the days when I ran short of breath just buying a copy of leg show magazine. Now, with everything in video, just wondering if anyone stills enjoys photos. If so, would you ever pay for photos again? If so, would you buy something like a magazine type publication, or prefer actual photographs from an amateur?
-------------------- I love "Toes that Wiggle; Naturally" Posts: 323 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by NoBigDeal81: Interesting question.
I actually prefer photos to video. Of course I enjoy watching videos, but what I love about pictures is that I can zero in on that perfect image and go to town on it. With video, the image is constantly changing, so I might be waiting through a less-interesting part to get to the part that really drives me wild. So if I hunt around and find the perfect picture, I can spend all my time looking at precisely the image that arouses me most. Make any sense?
I wonder if I'm the only one like this...
I understand what you're saying about the pics, i feel the same way.That is why when watching movies i sometimes search for screencaps for the same reasons you mentioned.
However,when it comes to footjobs i prefer video,i like to see her feet in action & like to see her feet work him to completion.Looking at fj pics(cock)does nothing at all for me.
-------------------- JURARRI 818 says: I think all latin american countries have beautiful feet, also the natural beauty that some womens feet come with, i feel is present all over latin america. Posts: 3262 | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
1. Depends on the model and what's available. 2. sometimes pictures are a lot less annoying than many videos that are produced (they smell like corn chips hyuck hyuck! cheesy dom videos, etc) 3. Being that I don't have much money, I have to really want a set or video. 4. As previously stated quality is also imperative. If the pictures look better than the video and vice versa. 5. Depends on what's being shown. If I want to see dirty soles, I'd probably rather get pics because then I can focus on that and not have to watch a long video of some chick just walking around before seeing what I want. Opposite for worship, that's always better on video.
Just my opinions
Posts: 676 | Registered: Apr 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Kokaith: 2. sometimes pictures are a lot less annoying than many videos that are produced (they smell like corn chips hyuck hyuck! cheesy dom videos, etc)
quote:Originally posted by NoBigDeal81: Interesting question.
I actually prefer photos to video. Of course I enjoy watching videos, but what I love about pictures is that I can zero in on that perfect image and go to town on it. With video, the image is constantly changing, so I might be waiting through a less-interesting part to get to the part that really drives me wild. So if I hunt around and find the perfect picture, I can spend all my time looking at precisely the image that arouses me most. Make any sense?
I wonder if I'm the only one like this...
I prefer the constant changing of video. I like to see the feet move and flex. Nothing like seeing the soles go from smooth when flexing to wrinkly when scrunching them. Plus seeing a foot go from dry to wet after getting licked is the best. But I do enjoy looking at pics very much.
Posts: 3359 | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by ArcheyMoore: Anyone else noticing animated GIFs increasing in popularity as of late? Kind ofa mix of video and photos.
I love GIFs.. Tumblr is on a whole-nother level when it comes to animated GIFs. I prefer photos because you can come up with your own scenarios in your head about the scenery of the picture. Still am a huge clips4sale consumer but videos tend to get old after watching them so many times
posted
@acebg: I to was into feet back in the days of print, before the days of digital. Hell, I was wacking it to magazines in the days before video tape! LOL. Even in the early days of the internet, pictures ruled because of connection speed (and computer storage space) I could get by with pictures. Now, with huge bandwidths and storage, it's all about movies for me. I'll buy movies but I won't pay for pictures anymore.
quote:Originally posted by Jiao: @acebg: I to was into feet back in the days of print, before the days of digital. Hell, I was wacking it to magazines in the days before video tape! LOL. Even in the early days of the internet, pictures ruled because of connection speed (and computer storage space) I could get by with pictures. Now, with huge bandwidths and storage, it's all about movies for me. I'll buy movies but I won't pay for pictures anymore.
Haw, started as a little kid with the Sears catalog.
posted
I recall the Sears catalog well. Also, I used to go through the Sunday circulars and cut out all the pantyhose ads and whack off to those. I had them all hidden in a Simon & Garfunkle album. Just realized I'm old:(
-------------------- I love "Toes that Wiggle; Naturally" Posts: 323 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
By the way, is everything just download? Seems to me DVD is better as the quality is great on HD TV (of course you don't get the instant gratification of a download). Anyone here order DVD's anymore.
-------------------- I love "Toes that Wiggle; Naturally" Posts: 323 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by acebg: By the way, is everything just download? Seems to me DVD is better as the quality is great on HD TV (of course you don't get the instant gratification of a download). Anyone here order DVD's anymore.
I thought of doing Blu-ray discs once I had enough clips to fill a disc. Not sure if people would be interested though, so I wouldn't want to waste my time.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Bow Down]](graemlins/bowdown2.gif)
![[Jerkoff]](graemlins/jerkoff.gif)
