posted
You have to show something to prove its a women's feet. Face and/or breasts(covered works) to prove its a woman. Otherwise it could be a small, lithe man, and no guy here wants that(I hope.)
As long as you have proof of feminism your site should do well. If not, then, at least I won't be there.
Posts: 40 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
go for it. wish I had gals wishing to model for me like that! but... please.. don't every consider passing guys feet on your site as women's feet.. really not cool.... lol!
quote: I wonder if face fetish guys like to see feet in their face pictures
That's a good question I think most of the guys here agree that seeing a face is nice, but at least seeing some more of the model can be just as good. Once again, Sasha is the perfect example. We've never seen her face and yet there is no doubt that she is a beautiful woman with a kickin' body (oh, and great feet too). So I don't think it should be a problem Audry.
Posts: 475 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bidit: You have to show something to prove its a women's feet. Face and/or breasts(covered works) to prove its a woman. Otherwise it could be a small, lithe man, and no guy here wants that(I hope.)
As long as you have proof of feminism your site should do well. If not, then, at least I won't be there.
I remember back in the day when nighthawk's feetlinks had this link to a site of Carol's Naughty Toes. Then one time, when she was asked to proove she was a woman, she got banned from the site. Does anyone here remember that?
-------------------- Just because you're "popular", doesn't mean I have to like you. Posts: 782 | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Absolutely I have to see face. The main thing I like to see when I join a site and show when I shoot for mine, is the model looking the camera straight on. Showing exactly what she looks like. Making eye contact and smiling. She is letting the viewer know that she knows he is looking at her feet and masterbating, and she approves and will tease him with her feet. So no sunglasses or covering of the face, or just all close ups, just isn't a turn on.
The exception is if they are doing footjobs, handjobs, sex etc. Then I can understand the model wanting to be hidden. If they want to wear a mask, wig, sunglasses that's fine. It doesn't matter to clearly see face as much since seeing or receiving the sex act is the most important. What isn't a turn on is just a pair of feet giving a footjob. Never will know what or who those belong to.
posted
I despise this. What is so embarrassing about modeling your feet?
there is much more to a girl than just feet
saying you only need feet is basically saying you don't mind if your girlfriend walks around with a paper bag on her head
I've seen tons of girls with great feet and body yet they had a terrible face, which means they were completely unattractive
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Its always fun to connect the face to the feet but it won't stop me from looking if there is no face either. Lets face it usually pretty feet mean a pretty face. Don't see too many ugly chics with hot feet.
quote:Originally posted by coedfeet: Absolutely I have to see face. The main thing I like to see when I join a site and show when I shoot for mine, is the model looking the camera straight on. Showing exactly what she looks like. Making eye contact and smiling. She is letting the viewer know that she knows he is looking at her feet and masterbating, and she approves and will tease him with her feet. So no sunglasses or covering of the face, or just all close ups, just isn't a turn on.
I totally agree. It's just not much of a turn-on for me without seeing the girl's face.
-------------------- WhiteMalesAnonymous.com - A survival guide for white males living in the U.S. Posts: 105 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by mason: i think the mystery is erotic in its own way.
You are so right. Sasha does a geat job of this in her presentation. It (faceless game) can be done well with some creativity and imagination. I do love a pretty face, but we come here for their (women) pretty feet.
-------------------- V/R, FM9 aka Mr. Footbooty "She had real pretty feet. I was always a sucker for pretty little feet... Outside of her being pretty and hip, with a good body, her feet is what attracted me." - p. 39 of "Miles" (Davis) The Autobiography Posts: 8821 | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
I think most of the guys here agree that seeing a face is nice, but at least seeing some more of the model can be just as good. Once again, Sasha is the perfect example. We've never seen her face and yet there is no doubt that she is a beautiful woman with a kickin' body (oh, and great feet too). So I don't think it should be a problem Audry.
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
