posted
At what age do you consider feet to be deemed mature. I've seen some where mature was 30. Am I the only one who thinks 30 isn't mature as far as feet go? I figured it would at least go a bit beyond the 28 mark.
Posts: 411 | Registered: Jul 2016
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by longhitter04: There is no one answer.
It is purely subjective depending on the individual.
Definitely. Its also relative to your age I believe. When I was a freshman in college at 18 I was shocked at all the "old" people in some of my classes. Like the 25 year old that was sitting next to me in a studio art class.
I guess a rule of thumb may be 30 is the starting point that could be considered as mature for guys in their 20s or younger. At my age now people under 40 are "kids."
posted
Agreed. It depends how old you are, what you may find mature. In general, I think 40 is the dividing line, and the real beginning of mature feet!
Posts: 560 | Registered: Aug 2014
| IP: Logged |
posted
All relative, one thousand percent correct. Under 45 is a kid, to me as well. I'd say 60+ we can start considering them "mature".
-------------------- Feel free to message me anytime to discuss and look at photos of my wife and mother-in-law's gorgeous feet! SKYPE: FEETFIRST86 Posts: 79 | Registered: Nov 2014
| IP: Logged |
posted
I would say 40 and up. At my job my boss is in her 50's. Looks good for her age. Looks like Judith Light. I've seen her feet several times, but she doesn't paint her toes. They still look good
Plus I think she saw me looking at her feet before because she keeps them tucked under her desk When I come to her office. But if she has wears boots or regular shoes you can't slip out off she has them out.
Yesterday we were in a meeting and she was talking about how her and her sister went to get their toes painted. She responded to a lady who liked the color of her fingernails. I wanted to see her feet so bad since she never paints them. she had hose and stockings on. I didn't get to see them.
I had to do a training with her today. I already knew she would have pants and boots on. Went in her office and I was right. smh
Posts: 194 | Registered: Oct 2016
| IP: Logged |
posted
I suppose that her feet are considered mature when the rest of her is.
My last GF was 47 and her feet were as lovely and sexy as when we dated when she was 19. I never thought of her as being mature, age-wise. Hell, she was a white-water rafting guide, rock climber, and competition karate fighter among her many accomplishments.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
