posted
Okay, so everyone is different; however, I don't see why anyone would pay for porn. Isn't there enough porn on the Internet you can get for free? If all you want are foot fetish videos, YouTube has a ton of stuff. If you want nudity, you can just go to PornHub or YouPorn and then watch and even download most of the videos. So, why would anyone pay for it?
Paying to worship a girl's feet is different because I don't see how you can get it for free...... at least not on a regular basis. I have done it for free but that is EXTREMELY scarce and should been seen as pure luck and not the norm.
Posts: 1189 | Registered: Dec 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Everybody has their own opinion. Me for exactly - I've got some favourite foot sites, but I'd rather like modelling not porn. It doesn't cost much (15-20$ a month) and I know I support my favourite producer so he/she can develop the site, I've got best quality, smooth records. I for example can't imagine paying girl for foot worship as I've never had trouble with that. But I guess everyone's got different situation.
posted
True Ace, there is alot of free porn or stolen porn that is being shared...but sometimes there is a star or some scenes you see snippits of that somewhere but not complete...then yeah, people will pay for that...or maybe a free scene is in poor quality and someone pays to get a higher quality
...and some people that are fans to certain portals or sites like the simplicity of nit having tonsearch all over and in one spot is what they like
Posts: 2341 | Registered: Jul 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Okay, I started fining free internet porn when I bought my first computer and put it in my bedroom at home. I was a teen and it was a windows 95 machine, that used AOL, over my phone line. It was harder to find porn back then, and I had to go to channels and then to yahoo and then look for the neighborhood that had a porn page. Now, when I have an itch, I go to imagefap and find what I need.
But, foot porn is different for me. I can get the same internal feeling from looking at a sexy foot model, clothed, than I can get from looking at some sexy porn scene. I will say this: while you can find enough free foot porn to choke a whale, I think that the quality foot porn is what is on the paid sites. You can find sun tanned 20 something year old girls in bikinis showing off their feet, but they all have this same "dead inside" look, like they were being paid to show off their feet, but they are not into it. But for the look and for those girls who are into it, I pay. I would pay for the sites that show off Taylor Raz worshiping Honey's feet, or the smiles and teasing looks of the girls from solesofsilk or even the dominating looks of Lil Miss Leah.
Posts: 118 | Registered: Jan 2017
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by masmak: Everybody has their own opinion. Me for exactly - I've got some favourite foot sites, but I'd rather like modelling not porn. It doesn't cost much (15-20$ a month) and I know I support my favourite producer so he/she can develop the site, I've got best quality, smooth records.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18304 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
As a foot model and clip store owner, I think that people must understand the fact that it takes a lot of time, patience, and some investment to produce high quality content no matter if it is porn or just foot fetish content. So I think every model deserve to earn something from that. If nobody would pay for that, nobody would share it too.
quote:Originally posted by tintin19153: If we all thought like you,then porn would stop being made. The same as music and movies.
Being a producer of commercial "foot porn" stuff myself, I would say that your reasoning is correct, sir. However, "DIY amateur foot porn", shared for free on the web by exhibitionist couples etc., is experiencing an unprecedented growth. And - unfortunately for "old-style foot porn geezers" like me - if it's true that most of that stuff is pure crap from a photographic quality standpoint.. this is not true for ALL such stuff (some is deffo good, I have to say). And even most important.. in the era of cellphone pics, "selfies" and social networks.. most people really cannot tell shit from chocholate, as far as photography is concerned. You can see it every day on this forum.. a lot of people here does not give a fuck if the pictures are out of focus, blurred, badly under- or overexposed, terribly framed etc. ... provided that the subject is something vaguely resembling a female foot.. they will go out with a flood of "woah!" "fantastic!", "supersonic!" etc. These are deffo tough times for the Dinosaurs of Foot Porn like me, sir..
quote:Originally posted by AceCorr: Paying to worship a girl's feet is different because I don't see how you can get it for free...... at least not on a regular basis.
quote:You can see it every day on this forum.. a lot of people here does not give a fuck if the pictures are out of focus, blurred, badly under- or overexposed, terribly framed etc. ... provided that the subject is something vaguely resembling a female foot..
That's what sets amateurs and professionals apart, and I'm glad for it. There's nothing "dinosaur" about taking pride til the end (whenever that may be) in your craft. There's still a huge gap in function between social media snaps and a professionally taken photo and there's still more people out there who care about the latter than you might realize.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18304 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:You can see it every day on this forum.. a lot of people here does not give a fuck if the pictures are out of focus, blurred, badly under- or overexposed, terribly framed etc. ... provided that the subject is something vaguely resembling a female foot..
That's what sets amateurs and professionals apart, and I'm glad for it. There's nothing "dinosaur" about taking pride til the end (whenever that may be) in your craft. There's still a huge gap in function between social media snaps and a professionally taken photo and there's still more people out there who care about the latter than you might realize.
To your point NorCal, I closed my site for several reasons, but one of the main ones was that I don't have the time to shoot the high quality content that I demand of myself. Sure, I'll do the occasional camera phone set with Marien, just for fun when we're hanging out, but that's not the standard of quality that I want to be remembered by...
quote: To your point NorCal, I closed my site for several reasons, but one of the main ones was that I don't have the time to shoot the high quality content that I demand of myself. Sure, I'll do the occasional camera phone set with Marien, just for fun when we're hanging out, but that's not the standard of quality that I want to be remembered by...
I remember how just about 2 years ago or more, it was considered the end of a "Professional" (dinosaur's) career if he didn't have the latest greatest, fastest, highest HD, largest .JPEG files on the planet so people could zoom in to see DNA and Mitochondria on the bottom of a foot model's foot.
My my, how times have changed and that old notion (in this business) has turned into a rusted heap in a field due to how Un-demanding and disinterested the younger generation of foot enthusiasts has gotten in quality due to social media snaps. This plateau or "bar" that I set for myself for a certain amount of gear and quality in post production is still (luckily) better by leaps and bounds than the social media snaps yet it's not so advanced that it isolates people from using their Smart Phones to enjoy the photos either. The fine line in the sand has been drawn and it still works.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18304 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:You can see it every day on this forum.. a lot of people here does not give a fuck if the pictures are out of focus, blurred, badly under- or overexposed, terribly framed etc. ... provided that the subject is something vaguely resembling a female foot..
That's what sets amateurs and professionals apart, and I'm glad for it. There's nothing "dinosaur" about taking pride til the end (whenever that may be) in your craft. There's still a huge gap in function between social media snaps and a professionally taken photo and there's still more people out there who care about the latter than you might realize.
Hello amico.. it goes without saying that I am ultra-proud to be a stubborn.. "Podopornosaurus Erectus"!!! Extinction may come for us, but sure we are gonna put on a brave fight.. And yes, there still are people who appreciate efforts towards giving value for money.. I guess that we have most of them on board in our own paysites..
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Cry]](cry.gif)
![[Evil Grin]](graemlins/evilgrin.gif)
![[Nut Kick]](graemlins/nutkick.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
