quote: i don't consider your 2nd tiers to be a fetish, there has to be a sexual arousal for it to be a fetish
That's your opinion, but the original question or debate was you thought 95% of guys hated or simply didn't like feet at all which is incorrect.
If you're referring to him saying that there has to be sexual arousal for it to be a fetish is an opinion, it's actually a fact. The psychological definition of the word states it results in exactly that.
No, that was just something you concocted to move the argument (as usual) in a direction other than the main topic and the stated comment he posed, being the other 95% of men in the world hating feet or not liking feet being a wholly fallacious and purely speculative opinion. You don't have to have a "fetish" to "like" feet or admire their beauty. Obviously not everyone gets off on feet.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18347 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yes, and those people don't have a fetish. So why are you tying to lump them in with fetishists to support your claim that foot fetish is common?
Posts: 1326 | Registered: Feb 2013
| IP: Logged |
posted
Correct. So those people don't apply to the argument that a foot fetish is common because they don't have one if they're not sexually aroused by feet, as the definition of a fetish clearly states.
Posts: 1326 | Registered: Feb 2013
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84: Correct. So those people don't apply to the argument that a foot fetish is common, because they don't have one.
No they do in this instance because his claim was essentially 95% hate feet or didn't like them which wasn't true based on either fetish or lite admiration of feet.. Again, you're steering this into unnecessary waters. Let it go.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18347 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote: i don't consider your 2nd tiers to be a fetish, there has to be a sexual arousal for it to be a fetish
That's your opinion
Based on the psychological definition of the word, what MP stated wasn't an opinion; it's a fact. That's all I was pointing out.
Your 2nd tiers wouldn't be considered a foot fetish, ergo, non applicable in an argument that claims a foot fetish, not merely looking at feet here and there and not being repulsed by them, is common.
Posts: 1326 | Registered: Feb 2013
| IP: Logged |
quote: i don't consider your 2nd tiers to be a fetish, there has to be a sexual arousal for it to be a fetish
That's your opinion
Based on the psychological definition of the word, what MP stated wasn't an opinion; it's a fact. That's all I was pointing out.
Your 2nd tiers wouldn't be considered foot fetish, ergo, non applicable in an argument that claims a "foot fetish", not merely looking at feet here and there and not being repulsed by them, is common.
It's his opinion that's it's not, just as it's mine that there are in fact 2 tiers of "Foot Admiration". In fact, there's at least 50 shades of grey when it comes to feet..I guess being in the know sometimes it's hard for me to explain that to anonymous commentors online.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18347 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote: i don't consider your 2nd tiers to be a fetish, there has to be a sexual arousal for it to be a fetish
That's your opinion
Based on the psychological definition of the word, what MP stated wasn't an opinion; it's a fact. That's all I was pointing out.
Your 2nd tiers wouldn't be considered foot fetish, ergo, non applicable in an argument that claims a "foot fetish", not merely looking at feet here and there and not being repulsed by them, is common.
It's his opinion that's it's not, just as it's mine that there are in fact 2 tiers of "Foot Admiration". In fact, there's at least 50 shades of grey when it comes to feet..I guess being in the know sometimes it's hard for me to explain that to anonymous commentors online.
posted
95% don't hate feet. I don't care about the online laboratory definition of "fetish" means. It means different things to different people when it comes to feet. When you deal with as many customers and requests for photos and videos as I do on a daily basis you see this. But I wouldn't expect you to understand.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18347 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: 95% don't hate feet. I don't care about the online laboratory definition of "fetish" means. It means different things to different people when it comes to feet. When you deal with as many customers and requests for photos and videos as I do on a daily basis you see this. But I wouldn't expect you to understand.
Translation: I won't let facts get in the way of a "good" post on a foot fetish forum.
Posts: 1326 | Registered: Feb 2013
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: 95% don't hate feet. I don't care about the online laboratory definition of "fetish" means. It means different things to different people when it comes to feet. When you deal with as many customers and requests for photos and videos as I do on a daily basis you see this. But I wouldn't expect you to understand.
Translation: I won't let facts get in the way of a "good" post on a foot fetish forum.
Reflecting much? Answer the 95% hating feet, that's the core of the discussion. You are essentially assuming only 5 million adult males in the USA have full blown foot fetish? ha.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18347 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
