posted
Well alright charges, it's time to play "Evaluate That Model"
I recently made contact with a local NYC model who is very interested in doing foot fetish modeling for me, as she has done it in the past, and really enjoys it. She's pretty and slender, and at this point I must mention that she's also a dominatrix, which means that she's pretty fearless. After seeing the picture on the top left, I really became interested in her because she obviously has the type of high arches I love.
So far so good, right? Well, not so much as we were texting for the better part of an hour today, and she confessed to me that she has, in her words "A small, fading, almost invisible tat on my left sole"
Well me being me, I asked her to send me some pics of her feet, including her soles showing her ink. What I go was the pics below, and I couldn't help but to show my disappointment because those of you who know me well, know that I'm not an ink guy, specially on the feet, and particularly not on the soles. So now I have a conundrum, I really like this girl, she's very open to doing nude stuff and foot worship stuff, but oh lordy, I can't get past that ink. She tells me that she can always use concealer, but I have had models do that before, and it doesn't seem to work all that well. So what's a guy to do? Check out some of the pics she sent below and judge for yourself. What do YOU think?
posted
The Tat does look a bit stupid (Im not a tat fan) but i think her soles would look lovely wrinkled up.
Posts: 128 | Registered: Sep 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
She has some lovely arches that's for sure . Her soles look superb to me although let down by the tat (in not a tat man either!). What size is she?
-------------------- My Avatar - yep, that's my ladies feet. Posts: 3082 | Registered: Oct 2015
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Footman44: She has some lovely arches that's for sure . Her soles look superb to me although let down by the tat (in not a tat man either!). What size is she?
She's size 7.5, and I'm sorry but that tat is just dopey, plus it's also distracting as all hell. So what I'm trying to find out is if you think she's worth shooting, and given the opportunity, would you shoot her yourselves. This is paid situation, guys, so it's not like I have the luxury of overlooking something that I'm not crazy about because I'm getting a free model.
posted
Adam I'd pass on this one. That dopey tat is a deal breaker considering the time, skill, and money you put into your sessions. If you're having doubts about it there's a good reason why.
quote:Originally posted by John Jones: Adam I'd pass on this one. That dopey tat is a deal breaker considering the time, skill, and money you put into your sessions. If you're having doubts about it there's a good reason why.
I'm leaning that way, JJ, and I texted her to send me a pic or two with concealer on her sole. My experience with concealer is that it's often translucent, and if you apply too much it looks really unnatural, like funeral home makeup. I sent her the pics of Anastasia and Marien so she can see how I love the "clean" look when it comes to soles.
posted
This is a tough one alright! But those arches do deserve to be seen, I would shoot her and just pretend that she had been on a night out and someone had drawn that on her sole in some pen
posted
Well, she texted me earlier today to tell me she has a concealer that really works well, and she promised to send me samples tomorrow. I will keep you guys posted. If she can make that ink "disappear" and make it look natural, we're on.
posted
Adam, this is nice find!!! Was she a dancer at one time? I ask because of the perfect curve in her arch (Pix #3). Again, nice find.
Posts: 440 | Registered: Jul 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well OK, so she sent me this pic this morning, with her sole covered up with concealer, and I must admit it looks better than I thought it would, although I'm still not convinced. I guess I won't be licking her soles.
posted
I wouldn't mind seeing some with and without the concealer. She is an attractive lady. And sometimes having something different isn't a bad thing.
Posts: 98 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by GQguy: You're far more discerning than I am when it comes to women with high arches. I'm a fan! Yes the tattoo is stupid, but it doesn't take away from the beauty of her arch.
That may be, but I just don't shoot arches, as everyone knows, I love real clear, closeup views of clean soles, is all...
posted
Adam,it's been a long time I haven't seen Anastasia.Would you please post some Anastaisa's pictures on this forum and introduce her again please~ Since you shut down Feetfair,there is no chance to see any thing about her.So please ~~