Just reply with the letter of the girl and a link to your pic.
Also I hope this is the correct section. But in the other ones images are not displayed. And because it is my first post, please contact me if something is not okay with this post.
posted
They are all so beautiful , but you should show some feet pics to make this more interesting if not easy.
Posts: 440 | Registered: Jul 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
But then here in this post my question would make no sense. Because I was asking how you guys imagine their feet, not me
Posts: 10 | Registered: Jan 2018
| IP: Logged |
posted
Aww, man! The images are gone. I was itching to get to this post, as it correlates to something I said elsewhere about a method I employ for extrapolating how a girl's feet probably look (pre-exposure). I was even going to give my reasons for not selecting or considering some in favor of others. Oh well, in the respect outlined above, 'A' and 'B' stood out to me for contrasting reasons if memory serves me correctly. I would not consider 'A' because her facial structure and what I gather is likely her neck length each suggest to me that she is tall and "lengthy". In other words, she is not only tall, but she has the assets to back it up as far as bone structure is concerned in places like her feet and hands. She has a Midwestern "farmer's daughter" like appearance. I project her shoe size is at least '9' if not above. I would say at least size '10' if I was a 'bettin' man'. So, this brings us to 'B'.
I would definitely choose her. Based on my observation, she is petite but she has what I like to call 'elongated petite features', simply meaning her bone structure although petite is not compact. In other words, comparatively small torso and long limbs and thus no 'baby feet' like peds. As far as her feet are of concern, I'd say she has narrow size '6' - '7.5' feet featuring comparatively long toes. For an example of who to reference for comparison, think 'April O'Neil' https://www.wikifeet.com/April_O%27Neil. PERFECT FEET in my opinion!