posted
Some of you guys might remember beautiful and sexy Eliza, with whom I worked a few years ago. The one and only shoot we did went very well, and I was planning to bring her back, but she suddenly moved to the West Coast, and then the Midwest so that was that. Well, she's coming back to NYC next month to stay for a couple of weeks and she reached out to me yesterday, and even though I no longer have The Fair, I'm kind of tempted to do a shoot for old times sake, and my personal collection of course. Needless to say that this would be an expense, right after the holidays, and even though I can afford it, I'm not completely sold on the idea. What would you guys do, is Eliza worth the time and money? Would love to hear your opinions.
posted
Id love to see her pretty plump toes again. i remember her nail being short and polish black. i fell in love. Bring her back!
Posts: 489 | Registered: Dec 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
what She lacks in the arch department She MORE than makes up for in the plump, meaty toes and soles category!
Posts: 91 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by John Jones: I 2nd "Meh."
Now now boys, in my opinion, a woman doesn't always have to have high arches to be insanely sexy. Case in point is beautiful Regina, with whom I worked with only a couple of times, and whose flat feet gave me a raging boner every time. If I was on a stranded island, Mona Lisa would still be my first choice, but it they "forced" me to take Regina, I would be just as happy, just so you guys know.
posted
And Grace is another "flat footed" model whose feet I find insanely sexy. I could worship Gracie's perfect toots 24/7 - I find them that irresistible. Yes, I'm a high arches guy, and will always be, but I have known plenty of girls with small arches, whose feet found ridiculously erotic. Gracie and Regina, just to name two, fit the bill. There are plenty of other "Fair Girls" who would fit this description, can you guess who they are?