posted
(Sorry it's been a while since I've last posted. Been busy.)
Anyway. When it comes to seeing foot pics, I need to see the girls face. It adds so much more. Just seeing feet, and this may just me being paranoid that the girl's feet on screen may not belong to. . . a girl. But more so it's that the feet aren't hot if they don't have a face/personality to them. But, man, have the face there with the feet in the camera, long toes, nice soles, and I'm in.
Anyone else feel this way?
Posts: 201 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I also prefer to see the whole girl....at least in some of the pics. I also have a long hair fetish so when I get to see both,
However, one of my favorite sites is "belgianfeet.com". It only has 3 picture sets, and the girl never shows her face. Her feet are almost too much by themselves!! Its also the same site from which my avatar came from.
Posts: 217 | Registered: May 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Girlgotsole: (Sorry it's been a while since I've last posted. Been busy.)
Anyway. When it comes to seeing foot pics, I need to see the girls face. It adds so much more. Just seeing feet, and this may just me being paranoid that the girl's feet on screen may not belong to. . . a girl. But more so it's that the feet aren't hot if they don't have a face/personality to them. But, man, have the face there with the feet in the camera, long toes, nice soles, and I'm in.
Anyone else feel this way?
I totally agree
I don't understand how threads in the pic section turn into multiple pages of "wow that's hot" when all that is shown are a view sole pics, which easily could be a guy
that is one of the reasons foot guys are thought of as weird because many of them seem to not care at all about the rest of the girl
it's like they wouldn't care if their girlfriend walked around with a paper bag over her head
if her face and body are bad I won't care about her feet
if all I see is feet I won't give the pics a second look unless I view them as flawless, then i'll look twice and that's it
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm about 95% agreed with the sentiment so far. I think that's why I can't really say I have a "foot fetish" and think it truthful because I'm more interested in the total package of the girl to which the pretty feet are attached.
Don't get me wrong...those tantalizing close-ups of the girl's feet are always welcome, but it helps to get an overall "feel" for the girl herself before indulging in the gratuitous close-ups. Nothing but close-ups make me feel like I'm looking at some artsy book on anatomical study, and not admiring the beauty of the actual girl.
Now, about that missing 5%...three models instantly come to mind that have never shown their faces, but I still dig their pics. They are Mrs. Infatuated, Nina Collins, and Sultry Sasha...no face shots, but they show enough of the rest of their body to keep the fantasy coming along. Granted I wish they showed the world their pretty faces, but everybody has has their own personal limits, and we have to respect those limits whether we like them or not.
But anyway, yeah, I prefer seeing faces in my foot pics. There's been a trend with some sites (Russian ones at least, being as that's all I tend to regularly keep up with anymore) where they do portrait shots within the sets...that is, they'll dedicate one or two pics to nothing but the girl's face within the set. I hope other sites and photographers are continuing this trend, because I love it. It really helps along the fantasy when you can stop and admire the innocent beauty of girl's pretty face.
-------------------- Like Girls? LikeReal Barefoot Girls?! Then this place is for you! www.dennis-n-mara.com Your best source for some Real Deal Hardcore Barefoot Girls! Posts: 5427 | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I remember my high school girlfriend and I getting into a huge argument over a "Guess" jeans add showing only someone's lower abs and their jeans partially opened. I told her that I could tell that it was a girl's stomach and not a guys. Hard to describe how, but I really felt I could.
Though I feel pretty much the same way about being able to identify a girl's (or guy's) feet, I realize that there have been some dubious photos of guy's feet claiming to be girl's feet that have duped a lot of people.
Though like Hal I prefer to see a face shot then feet closeups for valisity, it's not something I get too worked up about.
Posts: 9728 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
totally agreed with what you guys are saying...feet alone very rarely do it for me...i need to see the girls face and body! its not that i doubt if its girls feet or not...its just that its so much more sexy to see the girls face and body....much more of a turn on.
Posts: 227 | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
bluetoelover
unregistered
posted
Well when I posted my girl's feet in the pics section I didnt take a pic with her face in it due to her protection. I mean come on...god knows who lurks on this and other foot boards and I post a picture of her peds AND face on here and then someone on here knows who she is or maybe see's her right after looking at them when they go to get some groceries and it just so happens my girlfriend is there too and god knows what he will do..especially knowing that she obvioulsy knows of the "foot world"... I know it could be a slim chance but it is still a chance neither I or her wants to take...just be happy there ARE girls that willingly let someone take pics of there feet for us!
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Girlgotsole: (Sorry it's been a while since I've last posted. Been busy.)
Anyway. When it comes to seeing foot pics, I need to see the girls face. It adds so much more. Just seeing feet, and this may just me being paranoid that the girl's feet on screen may not belong to. . . a girl. But more so it's that the feet aren't hot if they don't have a face/personality to them. But, man, have the face there with the feet in the camera, long toes, nice soles, and I'm in.
posted
hey bluetoelover, I think most people here are referring to feet pictures in general and not just the sets here.
I completely agree with you though, I would never post a full pic of my girlfriend on the internet on a site like this.
Posts: 94 | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
When I take pictures of myself, I dont take pictures of my face. I feel like it jepordizes my safety in general, as Ive been raised up to always be safe. Thus making why I dont post pictures of my face; Only my feet.
quote:Originally posted by feetluvr: I remember my high school girlfriend and I getting into a huge argument over a "Guess" jeans add showing only someone's lower abs and their jeans partially opened. I told her that I could tell that it was a girl's stomach and not a guys. Hard to describe how, but I really felt I could.
Though I feel pretty much the same way about being able to identify a girl's (or guy's) feet, I realize that there have been some dubious photos of guy's feet claiming to be girl's feet that have duped a lot of people.
Though like Hal I prefer to see a face shot then feet closeups for valisity, it's not something I get too worked up about.
I completely agree--there have been many on here who say guys have such ugly feet--one guy even said on here that he wished that he 'had no feet at all'. There are plenty of effeminate looking guys out there who can have feet that look like a girls, as well as ass, hair, or abs. It doesnt make us gay if we see just a shot of the prospective body part with no face and think it is a girl.
I've seen all the posts on here--I happen to think I have nice feet. Girls have told me this too.
But back to the subject at hand, I too prefer seeing the girls faces in the picture--its just not complete without it--but I am sick of/baffled by the 'men have ugly feet' argument.
Posts: 1001 | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
i did however hear a pretty funny thing written in my youtube comments once when i posted a clip of a girl who had awesome calves and feet and that's all it showed.
a commenter was asking to see more cuz he wanted to know for sure it wasn't a dude.
i responded that i had nothing more but i assured him i had seen the girl they belong too and she was hot and he might be able to tell by the dress she was a girl.
he responded back to me that if the proof isn't there he just assumes its a guy.
I was quite amused by his policy, but one things for sure --- he won't ever accidentally masterbate to some dude feet since he was so set in his ways
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Drool]](graemlins/drool.gif)
![[Puke]](graemlins/puke.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
