posted
Have you ever seen a pair of feet that were to die for and then a few months later you see them again and they don't seem like anything special? Have you ever seen natural feet that really turned you on but then you see them later with a nice shiney pedicure and they don't do anything for you? What about age? Are feet that are great at 20 still great at 30 or even 40? Is the opposite ever true, have you ever seen feet that you thought were ugly only to see them again some time later and get a boner by looking at them?
posted
little5, everything that you stated can be true or not. There could be nice natural feet that look bad w/ a pedicure (ive never seen one myslef). And age absolutly plays a part. Some feet are like wine, they get better w/ age. But most arent. But most 40 y/o who have nice feet, have had nice feet all their lives.
-------------------- "Nina, this is my house, you work for me, and I want to suck your toes." -Big Trouble (2002) Posts: 1855 | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Certainly, feet that are neglected can go from spectacular to shameful in very little time.
Time and/or age inevitably takes its toll. Keep in mind that the greatest amount of wear & tear sustained by the human body is going to be on the feet (I suppose one must exclude the heart); this can't be good.
Feet can change very rapidly depending on the stresses put on them. For example, a woman who wears high (over 3 inches) heels for 8 to 10 hours a day is going to beat-up her feet quickly; clear changes will take place in just a few weeks (very rarely for the better).
The nature of her employment has an influence. One gal with whom I was intimate over the course of a decade is a great example, she had lovely feet. She & I worked together in a very nice restaurant; her shifts were never more than 6 hours (usually 3-4) and she wore well constructed "sensible" shoes. Though there was the occasional blister or callous, her feet remained quite pretty (long, straight, elegant toes and a beautiful flowing curve to her arches). She took a job as a medical service operator, which kept her off her feet; if anything, her feet became more exquisite than any other I have ever known. At length, she started to work in a large "party bar" as a bartender where her shifts were 8-10 hours long. Her feet looked as if they had undergone some arcane Asian torture (toes swollen, bent and hammered-out - no discernible arches).
Part of the problem, incidentally, is that she wore sneakers for the job, making the same mistake that so many people do who assume that such shoes are designed for things other than running - they're not. If you do a lot of standing or walking you need to look for the above mentioned sensible shoes (like Florsheim's for men).
So...to answer the original question: Oh yeah, feet do change.
Posts: 5067 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Feet definitely can change- for better or for worse depending on how she cares for them, how and where they're used, and how the gal's body naturally ages. IMHO, overall, feet are usually one of the better aging parts of a woman's body.
My wife's certainly an example: (and don't take my comments as disparaging- she still "rocks my world". She has more lines on her face, she's lost some body tone but her feet are virtually unchanged as far as size and shape. They're actually in better shape now because she takes better care of them because of my fetish.
Posts: 9728 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
There is always that rose colored glasses effect where everything you see is great at first then the picture diminishes after time. As with feet we see so many that it is hard to say which is the best pair ever as the next ones to come along may be the best ever and so on. But as for feet they definitely change do to age and care.
posted
yes feet age with time just like everything else
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
my feet have changed in some ways. they need far more attention these days...in fact, sorry to be pushy butwhy dont you check them out... http://www.flickr.com/photos/uk40/ i know some of my photos are too colourful but i dont think my feet are bad for over 40. i havn't particularly looked after them, havn't had any pampering or many massages or pedicures...never done a foot job... i think i am taking more care of them lately, knowing they are being appreciated on the net through the photos i have taken. i guess there is just something sexy and undefinable about most feet of most ages and in different ways to open minded people. i think the foot can be a work of art at any age. i spent the afternoon sitting in the park and ended up barefoot with 3 younger guys with beautiful feet. i wondered if any of them had a foot interest but was too shy to ask. i did enjoy the view and it was so hot in the park... oops, i digress, anyway, im happy with my feet and i dont think thy have changed much over the years either. J x
-------------------- small and sexy Posts: 46 | Registered: Aug 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by krazyspatula: ^^ yeah they arn't bad at all.
as for the question, with age skin gets tougher on the feet and a 45 year olds soles won't be as smooth as a 20 years olds soles, thats just fact.
same with face/breasts and body tone in general - in these areas skin becomes thiner and more elastic.
I think you mean with age skin becomes LESS elastic...(eg.breast sag) Also feet are the only area of the body where with age there is less fat.. so the heel and foot might be less cushiony..
Posts: 830 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
