What do you think about having a section for pics of just high arches? I know we're all foot lovers but I know alot of us are really into feet with high arches. Just a thought...and if this is a repost of something similar...sorry.
I also want to thank the people who post pics and label them in the title as "high arch"...very cool of you to do. I know those are the pics I look for first.Just a thought of how cool it would be to have a "high arch" section. or maybe not....what do you think?
Posted by Hal (Member # 3484) on :
quote: Just a thought of how cool it would be to have a "high arch" section
Thanks for your input, Lopey.
I think it`s cool the way is because everybody has their own personal preference. If we would start a "high arches" section that would mean we would also need a "soles" sections, as well as a "toes" and "footwear" and "legs" section. Probably even more --- like worship, barefoot, crush, etc.
I really like the posts best that show it all --- toes, soles, arches, foot jewellery, nailpolish. All in one post.
With sections we would have to start splitting our picture posts into different segments. That would be quite annoying.
Cheers, -Hal-
Posted by lopey (Member # 11430) on :
True....I can see how it would get annoying.That would definately suck having a million sections,but hey,as long as people keep letting us know by putting "high arch" in the title of their posts,like they're doing,I'm happy.
It was just something I was thinking about while checking out the pics. Thanks for the response.
Posted by Calico Jack (Member # 2299) on :
I think Hal pretty much summed it up the best so there isn't much I can add except to say that I love how all the pics are lumped together into one big delicious stew that's bursting with all the various spices and flavors that make up the different sub-divisions of foot fetish. The topic lines alone serve adequately to allow for quick identification of what lies within. I always end up looking at everything anyway. hehe
Calico Jack
Posted by Toe Sucker II (Member # 1720) on :