This is topic Be thankful you love girls feet in forum Foot Fetish Talk at Foot Fetish Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=004727

Posted by jediofthefeet (Member # 1463) on :
 
After Ellen Degeneres and Rosie O' Donnell came out, being homosexual is "IN".

It's better to be gay, or even bi, than to have a foot fetish.

I thought about this after reading my post about the woman who dated a guy with a foot fetish, and bashed him for it. Ironically, she titled one of her blog threads "I painted my toenails for this..."

My thought was this. We foot admirers do not make up the majority of murders, rapists, drug abusers, alcohol abusers, woman beaters, child abusers, kidnappers, molesters, and so forth. Its the t & a guys of the world...the ones deemed normal because they get turned on by the obvious and societally acceptable parts of the female anatomy.
 
Posted by dougiezerts (Member # 6829) on :
 
Good thinking, jediofthefeet.
So we dig girl's feet, so what! I'll bet there are more of us out there than meets the eye. That woman is probably very stuck up.
 
Posted by Mighty Mike (Member # 1922) on :
 
ther is nothing wrong with a foot fetish but it definitly isn't normal
 
Posted by Lyrical (Member # 6603) on :
 
What is "Normal" ? Is there a specific thing that says feet aren't normal while breasts are. Feet are made for walking but breasts were made for feeding babies. Who was it to decide that breasts should be looked at froma sexual perspective anyway? Probably some open minded person who discovered a awesome reaction from there lady friend while poking and prodding, kissing and licking. So I ask again what is "Normal" thinking someones feet are pretty is a natural thing. I am a firm believer that if women did not want to be noticed for their feet, they might not take the time to pamper themselves or wear open toes possibly. A girl at work said that she had no oddities meaning anything outside of societies scope of what is acceptable for sexuality. When I asked if she would freak out if her husband kissd her foot, she said no. I think t is just like anything else. What one person may find funny, another may not. What important to one may not be important to another. so as long as nothing happens illegal, what is "normal" ?
 
Posted by guitardrew (Member # 6635) on :
 
Yeah, its all about how the individual wants to go through life in my opinion. If you want to consider a part of your identity as 'abnormal' and you are happy that way, cool. If you choose to consider it 'normal' and you are happy thats cool too. BTW there is def. a difference in having a 'denial mode' attitude of thinking its normal if you really believe that it isnt and that bothers you, you wont be happy. I accept and firmly believe that my foot fetish is a perfectly normal part of who I am, realizing that not everyone is as open-minded, and I am a damn happy person when it comes down to it. Lyrical you got it.
 
Posted by spartanguy (Member # 6990) on :
 
The number of "Foot Related web sites speaks for itself. Can't be just a handfull of us patronizing them.

The other thing I think people assume about us foot guys is that just ANY feet will do. Most of us are very picky and in fact we find many many feet as gross as most of them. Most feet do nothing for me. I'd say I find at most, 20% of female feet sexy and attractive, another 20% I could take or leave and 60% totally unattractive.

Finally, I think sucking another guys cock is TOTALLY GROSS AND DISGUSTING!!
 
Posted by Mona (Member # 8351) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrical:
What is "Normal" ?

hmm for humans? id say anything that could have been done in the garden of eden could be considered normal.luckily for you guys eve had feet!
 
Posted by Dazzz (Member # 12539) on :
 
i agree there is nothing worse than people who hate us cause we like feet .well paedophiles,women abusers, child abusers,rapists they are worse scum of the earth to be percice
 
Posted by Calico Jack (Member # 2299) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by guitardrew:
I accept and firmly believe that my foot fetish is a perfectly normal part of who I am, realizing that not everyone is as open-minded, and I am a damn happy person when it comes down to it.

Ditto!

[Cool]

Calico Jack
 
Posted by Bondo (Member # 1403) on :
 
"Normal" = spoon

"There is no spoon"

Bondo
 
Posted by guitardrew (Member # 6635) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mona:
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrical:
What is "Normal" ?

hmm for humans? id say anything that could have been done in the garden of eden could be considered normal.luckily for you guys eve had feet!
[Laugh] Funny

Bondo you are the man!
 
Posted by BGfootlover (Member # 14043) on :
 
Lyrical,
I completely agree with you but unfortunately there are very very few people who think like us.Great statement!
 
Posted by Mighty Mike (Member # 1922) on :
 
I once saw a statistic that said 18% of guys had a foot fetish

that means 82 out of a 100 guys have NO fantasy of cumming on a girls feet

that sounds like a big number to me

like I said before nice breasts indicate that a woman is fertile which subconsciously makes a man attracted to them

i'm willing to bet all footboys like breasts, they may not be considered "breast men" but they still like them
 
Posted by Mighty Mike (Member # 1922) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrical:
. I am a firm believer that if women did not want to be noticed for their feet, they might not take the time to pamper themselves or wear open toes possibly.

I disagree here very few women expect their feet to be noticed no matter how her pedicure is

for one thing wearing open toed shoes is a style

they wear sandals because they are comfortable (ever wonder why guys wear them?) and they pedicure them nicely just so they don't look ugly

the last thing a girl expects to attract a guy is her feet, read the foot model interviews here none of them thought their feet could actually attract a guy until they met some foot dude

to them a pedicure can be like a guy combing his hair just to make sure a few hairs aren't out of place

no guy thinks those few hairs being in place will help him get laid, it's just something that can make him look slightly better

it's a finishing touch

that's how girls think of their feet
 
Posted by Footman9 (Member # 1100) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Calico Jack:
quote:
Originally posted by guitardrew:
I accept and firmly believe that my foot fetish is a perfectly normal part of who I am, realizing that not everyone is as open-minded, and I am a damn happy person when it comes down to it.

Ditto!

[Cool]

Calico Jack

100%! I'm a very normal and healthy male that loves pretty feet (with a side of fresh booty [Wink] ) [Cool] [Thumbs Up] . WTF is wrong with that? Not a d*** thing in my book. [Nut Kick]
 
Posted by ilikesoftpeds (Member # 9269) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mighty Mike:
I once saw a statistic that said 18% of guys had a foot fetish

that means 82 out of a 100 guys have NO fantasy of cumming on a girls feet


I somehow think that statistic is too low. I bet that 50% of all guys have some level of foot fetish.

Just look around in the gas station, supermarket, whatever when there are women and men around. You will see about half of them look down at female feet (if they are in sandals or flip-flops).

You'll notice men looking at pretty peds in the most common places....
 
Posted by guitardrew (Member # 6635) on :
 
Mighty Mike since you 'know' so well every detail of what girls want and dont want, like and dislike you should be all set lolll
 
Posted by guitardrew (Member # 6635) on :
 
sorry about that, that comes off very rude and I cant delete it from here, lolll. I guess I just have a problem with these wide blanket statements because the truth is they are not really realistic, yes what you say COULD be true of SOME or a lot of girls/guys, but 'could' and'some' are the key words here. You cant pin anything down one way or another, thinking anything is just 'one way'. Man that is what closed mindedness is all about. The only reason I have a problem with and feel the need to refute these things when people say them is because other people may actually think its 'right' or 'fact' when it is really just a way of thinking, or a way of looking at things. I believe people need to, and are little by little 'waking up' and thinking for themselves. It is imperative to realize that studies, theories and stats/surveys are not really that important concerning such subjective topics as this, but one better than realizing that is just not to care at all, to ignore them altogether. Man, seriously who cares at all about what some stats say about how many people have foot fetishes, lolll what does that say about anything?
 
Posted by Mighty Mike (Member # 1922) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ilikesoftpeds:
quote:
Originally posted by Mighty Mike:
I once saw a statistic that said 18% of guys had a foot fetish

that means 82 out of a 100 guys have NO fantasy of cumming on a girls feet


I somehow think that statistic is too low. I bet that 50% of all guys have some level of foot fetish.

Just look around in the gas station, supermarket, whatever when there are women and men around. You will see about half of them look down at female feet (if they are in sandals or flip-flops).

You'll notice men looking at pretty peds in the most common places....

just because they look at them doesn't mean they want to play with them

I have friends that like their girls to have nice feet and notice them but have no desire to put them in their mouth
 
Posted by Mighty Mike (Member # 1922) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by guitardrew:
sorry about that, that comes off very rude and I cant delete it from here, lolll. I guess I just have a problem with these wide blanket statements because the truth is they are not really realistic, yes what you say COULD be true of SOME or a lot of girls/guys, but 'could' and'some' are the key words here. You cant pin anything down one way or another, thinking anything is just 'one way'. Man that is what closed mindedness is all about. The only reason I have a problem with and feel the need to refute these things when people say them is because other people may actually think its 'right' or 'fact' when it is really just a way of thinking, or a way of looking at things. I believe people need to, and are little by little 'waking up' and thinking for themselves. It is imperative to realize that studies, theories and stats/surveys are not really that important concerning such subjective topics as this, but one better than realizing that is just not to care at all, to ignore them altogether. Man, seriously who cares at all about what some stats say about how many people have foot fetishes, lolll what does that say about anything?

I just think alot of guys here have a delusional way of thinking. They believe only what they want to believe.
 
Posted by GimmeFeet (Member # 13817) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mighty Mike:
They believe only what they want to believe.

To be fair, this statement applies to everyone on the planet.
 
Posted by Lyrical (Member # 6603) on :
 
Maybe some women Mighty Mike but I have come into contact with more than a few that were more than aware that their feet were pretty and wanted guys to be attracted to them. Maybe my statement about women and getting pedicures is not absolute but then neither is your statement about how girls see their feet. I just don't think there are absolutes.
 
Posted by markn (Member # 13818) on :
 
I am particularly offended by the term "foot fetish" as it is a label of something not normal. The foot is one of many attractive parts of the female and it is a part many of them spend a lot of time and money on to make them more attractive with pretty shoes, pedicures, and such. I believe we admirers of the female feet respect women more than the caveman types with "normal" fixations. The most gruesome crimes I am aware of our fellow foot guys commiting is a theft of Marla Maples' pumps and the "Golf Course Caper" inwhich a fiend nabbed Malory's socks.
 
Posted by middleman9 (Member # 13541) on :
 
People who rape or molest children might have a reason.

Those rapists might get excited because they need to do it forcefully or something? And child molesters might do it because they like kids?

Of course there are those who do it because their victim's are helpless (not all), like women and children.
 
Posted by Dazzz (Member # 12539) on :
 
IT DOESNT MATTER IF CHILD MOLESTERS LIKE KIDS OR RAPISTS GET OFF ON FORCEFULLY HAVING SEX WITH A WOMEN. WHAT THESE PUTRID ANIMALS DO IS CRUEL AND DISGUSTING I DONT THINK EXCUSES SHOULD BE MADE FOR THEM.HAVING A FEET THING IS NORMAL AND SHOULD BE ACCEPTED PAEDOPHILES AND RAPISTS ARE NOT AND DONT DESERVE TO LIVE AS FAR AS IAM CONCERNED
 
Posted by guitardrew (Member # 6635) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrical:
Maybe some women Mighty Mike but I have come into contact with more than a few that were more than aware that their feet were pretty and wanted guys to be attracted to them. Maybe my statement about women and getting pedicures is not absolute but then neither is your statement about how girls see their feet. I just don't think there are absolutes.

Excactly. An absolute statement is the only thing in my opinion that could ever be really taken into account when it comes to this stuff. And it is not absolute unless there are no exceptions in my opinion. If there are exceptions to a statement, then it is immediately reduced to just being a belief, an opinion. If there are exceptions to a so-called fact, then it is not an indisputable fact, really, just a belief, opinion, etc. I, like Lyrical I think, happen to believe that such is life, there are no absolutes that account for all of perception. To me to think anything is one way is ludicrous. So as far as foot fetishism MightyMike all I can see is that you seem intent to get everyone into YOUR belief that foot fetishism is 'not normal' or even 'not intended for humanity' which would be more rediculous as an argument to me. I think the issue for you doesnt have to do with foot fetishism, it has to do with whether you personally want to look at it as a positive or a negative. Thats your own decision and applies to noone else.
 
Posted by guitardrew (Member # 6635) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by GimmeFeet:
quote:
Originally posted by Mighty Mike:
They believe only what they want to believe.

To be fair, this statement applies to everyone on the planet.
My own thinking aside (I happen to think that everything is 'what you want to believe' more or less) this applies hugely to something like foot fetishism that there are really no facts as to its 'nature'. It truly is up to people to believe what they WANT to believe about it, and there is nothing else.
 
Posted by Mighty Mike (Member # 1922) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by guitardrew:
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrical:
Maybe some women Mighty Mike but I have come into contact with more than a few that were more than aware that their feet were pretty and wanted guys to be attracted to them. Maybe my statement about women and getting pedicures is not absolute but then neither is your statement about how girls see their feet. I just don't think there are absolutes.

Excactly. An absolute statement is the only thing in my opinion that could ever be really taken into account when it comes to this stuff. And it is not absolute unless there are no exceptions in my opinion. If there are exceptions to a statement, then it is immediately reduced to just being a belief, an opinion. If there are exceptions to a so-called fact, then it is not an indisputable fact, really, just a belief, opinion, etc. I, like Lyrical I think, happen to believe that such is life, there are no absolutes that account for all of perception. To me to think anything is one way is ludicrous. So as far as foot fetishism MightyMike all I can see is that you seem intent to get everyone into YOUR belief that foot fetishism is 'not normal' or even 'not intended for humanity' which would be more rediculous as an argument to me. I think the issue for you doesnt have to do with foot fetishism, it has to do with whether you personally want to look at it as a positive or a negative. Thats your own decision and applies to noone else.
I look at a foot fetish as somewhat unique. It has both neagative and postitive qualities. It can be a postive because it can spice up the bedroom and make things more interesting. It can be a negative because some girls would be completely freaked out by having their toes in a guys mouth.

Ever meet a girl that seemed perfect and then while you are fooling around with her you put her feet near your mouth and she flips out? Devastating [Confused]

also can you imagine how messed up women's feet were thousands of years ago before shoes and pedicures? guys like you and me would probably had been burned at the stake for liking feet [Smile]

they weren't meant to be played with [Confused]

we're weird, that's not necessarily a bad thing but we are weird [Wink]
 
Posted by pedactor (Member # 12893) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mighty Mike:
quote:
Originally posted by guitardrew:
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrical:
Maybe some women Mighty Mike but I have come into contact with more than a few that were more than aware that their feet were pretty and wanted guys to be attracted to them. Maybe my statement about women and getting pedicures is not absolute but then neither is your statement about how girls see their feet. I just don't think there are absolutes.

Excactly. An absolute statement is the only thing in my opinion that could ever be really taken into account when it comes to this stuff. And it is not absolute unless there are no exceptions in my opinion. If there are exceptions to a statement, then it is immediately reduced to just being a belief, an opinion. If there are exceptions to a so-called fact, then it is not an indisputable fact, really, just a belief, opinion, etc. I, like Lyrical I think, happen to believe that such is life, there are no absolutes that account for all of perception. To me to think anything is one way is ludicrous. So as far as foot fetishism MightyMike all I can see is that you seem intent to get everyone into YOUR belief that foot fetishism is 'not normal' or even 'not intended for humanity' which would be more rediculous as an argument to me. I think the issue for you doesnt have to do with foot fetishism, it has to do with whether you personally want to look at it as a positive or a negative. Thats your own decision and applies to noone else.
I look at a foot fetish as somewhat unique. It has both neagative and postitive qualities. It can be a postive because it can spice up the bedroom and make things more interesting. It can be a negative because some girls would be completely freaked out by having their toes in a guys mouth.

Ever meet a girl that seemed perfect and then while you are fooling around with her you put her feet near your mouth and she flips out? Devastating [Confused]

also can you imagine how messed up women's feet were thousands of years ago before shoes and pedicures? guys like you and me would probably had been burned at the stake for liking feet [Smile]

they weren't meant to be played with [Confused]

we're weird, that's not necessarily a bad thing but we are weird [Wink]

A: yes they were meant to be played with, if not back then, now more than ever.. ESPECIALLY if they are real soft or just been pedicured... if a foot wasnt meant to be played with, then why can foot fetishists convince girls to give it a try and in the end they like it??? Why have commercials for lotions that make feet smooth and soft?? why invent the pedicure, specifially the pumice dead skin remover??? or better yet, why does it turn some girls on???? why are some girls in love w/ their feet?????. If anyone likes hip hop (if you dont, please dont get into it), theres the song by Ludacris "i wanna lick lick lick lick you from your head to your toes...."if certain girls dont like us because of a foot fetish and cant open up, then fuck them, their loss and they are IGNORANT on many levels (few exceptions, maybe) especially if they like their ass crack licked/ being defficated on. why else would God make woman beautiful ALL OVER?? feet wouldn't be meant for playing with ONLY if woman didn't come with feet. also about your comment made about women only painting their toes and wearing shoes out of fashion sake, well consider the fact that with fashions like skin tight pants, girls obviously wear it to show off their ass and they know guys look... the same applies to feet and if some dont know it, they soon will. even if its to not make their feet look ugly... Need i elaborate??!...thus it is pretty inacurate that painting toes is merely fashion statement, im paraphrasing your words, so forgive me if they arent right all the way mike... as a counterexample, Asian culture is BIG on feet.... And furthermore, why else do you hear people say sexy shoes?? because they either consciously or subconsciously recognize some power of any feet related element.

B: i agree that having a foot fetish is unique, as i have 1 myself, but not wierd... Its only the misunderstood individuals w/ good intentions and also the creepy ones w/ bad intentions that make it APPEAR wierd. the only fetishes that are cateogrized a wierd are fat chicks suffocation, grannies and the like, when you search for foot related shit, you see a "foot "category... we are not under the "wierd / bizzare" category. thus we are not wierd. Just remember good comes w/ bad w/ everything... you can be called a wierdo for liking feet just like you can be smacked in the face for oogling over a womans breast and saying something about it as well as smacking a womans ass. I believe w/ the exceptions of the permanently closed minded and ignorant. Its all about approach...

Its not about what you like, BUT WHETHER OR NOT YOU GET IT!!!! , and trust me i am not attacking anyone here when i say that. that is all.. tell the haters stop hating.

I am done and apologize for any spelling mistakes, as well as the long winded post so please dont bust my chops cuz im sure youll get my point. laterz

[ May 04, 2006, 03:08 PM: Message edited by: pedactor ]
 
Posted by jediofthefeet (Member # 1463) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mighty Mike:

also can you imagine how messed up women's feet were thousands of years ago before shoes and pedicures? guys like you and me would probably had been burned at the stake for liking feet [Smile]

they weren't meant to be played with [Confused]

we're weird, that's not necessarily a bad thing but we are weird [Wink]

I disagree with you on the "messed up" part.

Women in biblical days adorned themselves with oils, wore jewelry, and made up their faces. That was highly event in "The Ten Commandments", "Cleopatra", "David", and other biblical movies. Prior to them, I am sure women, even the poorer ones, found ways to keep up their appearances. It is in their nature to do so.

But I do wonder about like feet back then. I am sure it happened, just as homosexuality did.

Men were allowed pleasures women were denied. It was unheard of for a woman in the Puritan days, and early modern days to seek pleasure. Even today, society has trouble accepting that women enjoy sex.
 
Posted by guitardrew (Member # 6635) on :
 
"Men were allowed pleasures women were denied. It was unheard of for a woman in the Puritan days, and early modern days to seek pleasure. Even today, society has trouble accepting that women enjoy sex."

Yeah it is a real shame looking back on history, and seeing how the beliefs of some in power have been tyrannically spread and forced upon society as a whole until rediculous things became 'right' or whatever, but with the age of science and stuff somewhat devaluing 'beliefs' as a rule to be applied to entire societies (despite the backstep weve had in the US with who we have 'in power', though after these people get out of office I think America will enjoy a period of incredible open-mindedness and 'liberal' forward thinking) I think we are coming out into the clearing on this stuff.


"also can you imagine how messed up women's feet were thousands of years ago before shoes and pedicures? guys like you and me would probably had been burned at the stake for liking feet "

This statement just supports the things Ive been saying about how there are no absolutes. Things are constantly changing and shifting, 'foot fetish' just like everything else in history has never been constantly present, or constantly unpresent. Therefore its not 'right' or 'wrong' or whatever, it cant be held under labels. it is just part of our evolution on many levels. Its just something unique that evolved from human sexuality.
 
Posted by guitardrew (Member # 6635) on :
 
I would add Jedi that Its pretty evident now that the earliest cultures and religion viewed sex and sexuality as a holy thing, and many women were seen as initiates for certain religious sects, having sex with men to initiate them into the teachings. Sexuality, (all forms even homosexuality) women, and women's sexuality were seen not only as the opposite of 'taboo', 'evil' and "sinful" lolll, but they were seen as the actual way to come into contact with spirituality, (god, or the gods etc.), it was certain other religious movements (cough cough) that made it known from their beliefs that sexual acts were shameful and bad things, and then proceeded to force these on society through all sorts of means, not that their hasnt been violence and people forcing beliefs on groups of people all through history, I just mean specifically with the women and sexuality things. After so many centuries I think these things are finally turning around in modern society.
 


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.0