Ever see a woman who looks like straight HELL from the waist up but once you look down you find that she has some seriously hot feet?? I'm sure we all cross paths with such women here and there.
With that said, I'd like to know how many of you would go or have gone for an 'ugly' woman just because she had sexy feet? Did her tantalizing toes, awsome arches, or scrumptious soles prompt you to overlook her not- exactly- adorable face?
I ask that everyone answers honestly and also please note that this thread is not intended to offend or cause any negative conflict so let us not pass harsh judgement on the next person for his/her answer...
Posted by dougiezerts (Member # 6829) on :
Personally, I think that if she has nice feet, that makes her prettier!
Posted by A&F_FootDude_05 (Member # 2999) on :
Absolutlely....when she has stellar feet you look up at her again and realize she's not so ugly anymore Posted by Gameon (Member # 20877) on :
I need to the face to match the feet for a girlfriend, for masturbating i.e porn wise, I'll be busy looking at the feet not her hairy lipped face.
Posted by FootLover36 (Member # 22908) on :
If I don't find the woman attractive at all then I won't go for her, even if she has amazing feet. The face/rest of her has to be at least fairly attractive/average.
Posted by jg24fans (Member # 18305) on :
I guess it all depends on just how ugly you are talking. If a woman is average or below average but has nice feet I probably wouldnt kick her out of bed, but if she is nasty ugly then the feet probably wouldnt be enough.
I have a friend who has a very overweight wife and with a really not so great face, but I have noticed her feet are actually pretty good, but even still I just couldnt imagine doing anything with her and cant understand how he can.
Posted by Soopaman Lova (Member # 2743) on :
I think this to myself everyday. I work in a rather "Redneck" part of town and see these grundle-ugly ass women with amazing feet. Oh, for those that don't know, a grundle is that skin that connects your ball bag to your poop shoot. But anyway.. yea, i've seen plenty women that aren't so pretty as most with nice feet. But this brings me to another question. Do you guys think the feet of a not so attractive woman are easier to get than a woman that society would find attractive? If you think so...then why?
Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
Long as the chick ain't a fat chick then yeah I'm all over the peds, even if they are fugly Posted by Brek (Member # 28601) on :
quote:Originally posted by FootLovinJazzMusician: With that said, I'd like to know how many of you would go or have gone for an 'ugly' woman just because she had sexy feet? Did her tantalizing toes, awsome arches, or scrumptious soles prompt you to overlook her not- exactly- adorable face?
Most definitely. Some of the most beautiful feet I've seen, are on average to below average looking women. And some of the ugliest feet I've seen are on drop dead gorgeous women. So yes..
quote:Do you guys think the feet of a not so attractive woman are easier to get than a woman that society would find attractive? If you think so...then why?
I wouldn't think so. There self esteem is probably low, and wouldn't take you serious.
Posted by Robotron2084 (Member # 33263) on :
Like Brek I've found many attractive but not "hot" women with nice feet more often than not. There are of course exceptions on both sides of the fence.
A long time ago when I worked in a dining facility, two gorgeous clinic workers visited often. I saw them in winter and couldn't wait for the summer, but I was bitterly disappointed when they came in with sandals revealing totally unattractive feet. Posted by Robotron2084 (Member # 33263) on :
quote:Originally posted by A&F_FootDude_05: Absolutlely....when she has stellar feet you look up at her again and realize she's not so ugly anymore
Yeah pretty feet have a way of transforming a girl don't they?
Posted by JustJoe (Member # 9641) on :
I would rather be with a woman who is not all that and a bag of coffee beans with hot feet than a really hot beautiful woman with very ugly feet. And you know what I mean too...bunions, crooked toes from wearing too many high heels. I hope the ladies are listening here. Wear shoes that don't hurt your feet and will make your feet look pretty when your fifty. Just an FYI.
Posted by LuckyTeen (Member # 30822) on :
I think I would have to somewhat like the girl.
Posted by GimmeFeet (Member # 13817) on :
It's all about the feet. If she is ugly with nice feet, I'd still pursue her ugly ass.
Posted by lovesize7s (Member # 34342) on :
I cant tell you how many times I kiss fat chicks or ugly girls feet.Nowadays I laugh when I see them!I complimented a fat ugly girl on her feet about a year ago and she got an attitude.So I immediately asked her if she had received any compliments lately and she just stared at me.I guess I caught her off guard.
Posted by FootLovinJazzMusician (Member # 33322) on :
Thanks everybody for your thoughts on this topic. I myself have gone for women with not so great looks just because their feet were drop dead gorgeous...
And to answer your question Soopaman Lova- yes, an ugly woman's feet are easier to get simply because her self esteem may not be too high and she'd be happy that she's receiving some type of attention. I speak from my experience with such women.
Posted by footjoyboy (Member # 26478) on :
It all depends on what I want out of the relationship; if I'm looking long term, then I require some looks. If I'm just looking for some foot action, then Hell yeah, ugly chicks with nice feet fill the bill....done it plenty of times.
But in either case, I require "nice" (the type I prefer) feet.
Posted by aerodrew (Member # 2682) on :
It really doesn't matter how hot a chick is... if she has ugly feet I'll probably rule her out quick... But a chick with marginal looks, maybe on the heavy side will always have potential if her feet are hot!!
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
I have to find the woman's face and body appealing in order to fully appreciate her feet.
Posted by mmmtoes (Member # 30792) on :
Its not all about the feet for me. I am into the whole package and if I find something unappealing then it doesn't matter how hot her feet are.
Posted by freebird (Member # 3796) on :
quote:Originally posted by Brek: Most definitely. Some of the most beautiful feet I've seen, are on average to below average looking women. And some of the ugliest feet I've seen are on drop dead gorgeous women. So yes..
I absolutely agree with Brek. Don't get me wrong, butt ugly is a turn off regardless of the feet, but average to slightly below average with great feet is actually my preference.
Posted by mmmtoes (Member # 30792) on :
quote:Originally posted by freebird: I absolutely agree with Brek. Don't get me wrong, butt ugly is a turn off regardless of the feet, but average to slightly below average with great feet is actually my preference.
This really piques my curiosity. So, let's say you had a choice between two woman who had equally beautiful feet and equally wonderful personalities where
- the first was fit, had nice figure with a pretty face - the second was slightly out of shape, slightly dumpy with an average face
you would prefer the second??
How come? To be clear - I am not saying I do not understand someone being happy with the second.
I am saying in this situation, why would you choose the second?
Posted by skipperbob (Member # 28525) on :
It's all about the feet with me but in the situation you describe I think I would go with the second girl because she would appreciate the attention more. I have been with women who were rather plain, even a little frumpy looking but had wonderful feet and believe me, they loved the attention of having their feet worshiped and would do anything for me. My best foot jobs were from women who wanted to please me as much as I did them.
Posted by mmmtoes (Member # 30792) on :
I totally get that and 100% agree with it. I have a really hard time enjoying myself if my partner is not enjoying the experience. The more my partner enjoys and appreciates the experience the more I enjoy it. But that was not a factor in my question.
I am in the minority in that looks always matter to me. I fully understand that looks are more important to some but what I don't understand is the preference for someone less attractive.
Is it a self confidence thing?
You sort of answered my question but you twisted it (or I wasn't really clear).
Assuming all other things equal, including appreciation/enthusiasm why would someone not prefer the more attractive woman. Perhaps I am just too hung up on looks so I won't get it.
Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :
No. Both her face and her feet need to be attractive enough before I consider dating her.
The feet part may become a problem when I court a cute girl but haven't seen her feet yet (like in the winter).
Posted by National (Member # 8568) on :
Out of everyone who posted comments on this thread, "mmmtoes", "Fiasco", Rider Aldebaran and "bluetoelover" are the only ones who made sense. Everyone else makes it sound as if only hot girls have ugly feet while the ugly ones always have nice feet. "GoodGuyNeighbor" said it so accurately one day when he answered someone's question. I forgot what the question was, but his answer was "If the woman is hot, common sense tells you that her feet are very nice."
If you throw a foot fetish party where (I'll have to borrow the two classes of women "mmmtoes" mentioned in an earlier post) the girls are slightly out of shape, slightly dumpy with average faces, and I throw a party where the women are fit, had nice figure with cute and hot faces, which party do you think will draw a bigger crowd? C'mon now, let's get real here.
Some of the answers in this thread play right into the stereotypes people have of foot fetishists. When I hear people say that foot fetishists will worship the feet of just about any girl, I think they're right after having read some of the things in this topic. If this woman http://www.commentbuddy.com/comments/Ugly-Women/seekcodes_227_5921.jpg had the SEXIEST feet you'd ever seen in your life, would you pick her over any girl in Californiabeachfeet.com, for example?
I don't know how people can say some of these things and then WONDER why foot fetishists get a bad rap?
--National
Posted by Beautifulfeetonline.com (Member # 13717) on :
wasn't there another thread along these lines a couple of days ago?
Posted by blackHxC88 (Member # 15094) on :
quote:Originally posted by National: "GoodGuyNeighbor" said it so accurately one day when he answered someone's question. I forgot what the question was, but his answer was "If the woman is hot, common sense tells you that her feet are very nice."
--National
this is very true, no lie. as far as i'm concerned, i base it on which girl would i realistically be able to get. as much as i'd go for the pretty female with equally pretty feet anyday of the week, i'd have no problem with the mediocre looking girl with nice feet either. if i had to choose, i'd choose the cute girl with cute feet. but, in reality, the not so cute one would actually give me the time of day. doesn't mean i won't drool over GGN's pics Posted by skipperbob (Member # 28525) on :
National - you need to stop judging other people just because you don't like their answers. I have seen many so called "hot" females who had ugly feet (to me). Each of us have different likes and dislikes on what is ugly and what isn't and you don't have a monopoly on judging such things or making comments about other people's choices. Some answers don't make sense to you? OK, but theirs are just as valid as yours and they have as much right to say them in this forum as your childish reply.
Posted by mmmtoes (Member # 30792) on :
Answers are valid so long as they are honest. I agree with national and think that some are not being honest, perhaps even with themselves.
It really sounds like a confidence thing. Those who lack confidence have already decided all they can get are the average to below average looking woman so they convince themselves that that is what they prefer. There is nothing wrong with that, but it is not really being honest. And it is a little sad because you really never know until you try.
You seem very defensive. No one said people don't have different likes and dislikes. Of course that is true.
I am still waiting for a response to my original question. Since we aren't pulling punches in this thread - I call bullsh!t. No one is going to prefer "average" over what they find attractive when all other factors are equal.
Mind you - I carefully chose the word attractive because attractive is without a doubt better then average, yet the word does not have any specific connotations about physical features that make a woman attractive to you.
[ May 08, 2010, 05:18 PM: Message edited by: mmmtoes ]
Posted by mmmtoes (Member # 30792) on :
Upon re-read of this thread I now see that my original question did mention specific physical features. I used myself as a gauge of what is attractive and I acknowledge that others have other preferences. I realize that although there is some acceptance of what most men find attractive there are those that have alternative preferences.
The intent of that question was to nicely get an admission that no one prefers average when attractive is available. I am not going to change the phrasing in the original post as it might confuse others trying to read this thread.
Posted by National (Member # 8568) on :
quote:Originally posted by skipperbob: National - you need to stop judging other people just because you don't like their answers. I have seen many so called "hot" females who had ugly feet (to me). Each of us have different likes and dislikes on what is ugly and what isn't and you don't have a monopoly on judging such things or making comments about other people's choices. Some answers don't make sense to you? OK, but theirs are just as valid as yours and they have as much right to say them in this forum as your childish reply.
What's wrong? Some people here were bashing the more attractive women, making the suggestion that a lot of them have ugly feet. Of course no one is going to pick ugly feet over hot ones. It does not make sense to think that most hot women have ugly feet. The comments here come across as saying that feet is ALL that matters. In other words, even if her face and/or body looks less than appealing, you'll still worship the feet because they're "hot"? How creepy does that sound? Beautiful women with ugly feet is an extremely rare combination. Less than attractive women with less than attractive feet go hand in hand.
So when it was said that when you see a hot woman, common sense tells you that her feet are hot, are you saying that's a lie? How come it's okay for people to say that they'll worship her hot feet even if she looks like hell from the waist up, but it's not okay for someone else to say that in doing so would be crazy? I can see how someone would pick a cute girl over a hot one, even if both have hot feet or if the cute one had better feet than the hot one. But like I said, no one is going to pick putrid feet. However, the question that started this topic was not talking cute women. It was making reference to less than attractive women. If you're saying there's nothing wrong about worshiping an ugly girl's foot even if her feet look hot (as unlikely as that combination is), then I don't how else I can help you.
If a girl is going to have her hot feet worshiped by me, it is a MUST that the rest of her is cute or hot. That includes her face.
--National
Posted by Mechanixx (Member # 32620) on :
I'd much rather worship a pretty girl with average feet's feet, then an ugly girl with super hot feet's feet. My mind can't get rid of the knowledge of the unattractive girl, in the same way I would rather have sex with a beautiful faced girl with small breasts and no ass then an ugly one with perfect boobs and a perfect ass. Obviously you'd like to get the body parts and the face to be attractive, but the face is generally what I'm least likely to compromise on.
Posted by DetroitBoy75 (Member # 39179) on :
Yeah I've definitely seen some sexy feet on a woman who wasn't considered cute. And yes I would overlook the face for the feet. Nothing above the ankle matters. I also remember I saw a woman who was about sixty walk in a storage facility where my friend worked and her feet were in flip flops looked like they belonged to a thirty year old. I would have worshiped those 60 year old feet.
Posted by DetroitBoy75 (Member # 39179) on :
Yeah I've definitely seen some sexy feet on a woman who wasn't considered cute. And yes I would overlook the face for the feet. Nothing above the ankle matters. I also remember I saw a woman who was about sixty walk in a storage facility where my friend worked and her feet were in flip flops looked like they belonged to a thirty year old. I would have worshiped those 60 year old feet.
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Cry]](cry.gif)
![[Drool]](graemlins/drool.gif)