Ever look at a pair of feet on here or anywhere that someone took pictures or video of and think "they're just feet". As in those feet don't have that magic in them that triggers the spark in your brain that elevates them past the things you walk on. Suddenly you can identify with people that don't "get" the foot fetish.
Then there are other pics of feet that trigger that spark and suddenly you wonder how anyone couldn't be entranced by their beauty.
Of course the former is far more prevalent than the latter in my life.
Posted by redcard (Member # 28390) on :
i think that's the quality and grace and sexiness of the feet talking. i mean, i love asses too but it doesn't mean i wanna see your mom's ass....well unless it's a hot ass.
quality rules!
Posted by nusuth (Member # 7372) on :
absolutely GQ. for example using a celebrities, lindsay lohan can be really sexy (in a trashy slutty way) but yet her feet elicit no sexual response, yet some who is less attractive, like tori spelling, well get a very positive response from me to her feet. too weird.
Posted by Groovyfacey (Member # 35475) on :
Yeah, definitely.
Posted by catsman (Member # 10269) on :
I agree with all of the above. I think it's what makes our fetish what it is. Some feet posted here, expecially shots of soles do nothing for me, but show me some sexy toes dressed in a pair of sexy high heel sandals or mules and I go gaga.
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
There's absolutely no difference, in my view, between feet being "just feet" (like when you see some very average looking or dumpy 45-year-old woman and her feet are just blah) and a woman's face being "just a face."
There are the pretty and special ones, and there are the myriad plain, average ones. I think the rarest foot fetishist of all is the one who loves all feet and will gladly worship all feet just because they are feet. I am not that kind of fetishist, although in truth my fetish has blossomed in the last 15 or so years to include a lot more "types" of feet than it ever did for a long time.
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
quote:Originally posted by nusuth: absolutely GQ. for example using a celebrities, lindsay lohan can be really sexy (in a trashy slutty way) but yet her feet elicit no sexual response, yet some who is less attractive, like tori spelling, well get a very positive response from me to her feet. too weird.
Personally, I think Jennifer Aniston is kind of cute, but her feet--not so much. (In fact, not at all.)
Posted by DeadGoon (Member # 24278) on :
quote:Originally posted by Pjay: I think the rarest foot fetishist of all is the one who loves all feet and will gladly worship all feet just because they are feet.
*shudder*... could never be like that, as there ARE some feet that literally make me want to spew. Which is funny how they differ from breasts for me. Can't say there are ANY breasts that would make me feel that bad.
And then the NICEST feet turn me on waaaaaaaay more than the nicest breasts...
Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
quote:Originally posted by DeadGoon:
quote:Originally posted by Pjay: I think the rarest foot fetishist of all is the one who loves all feet and will gladly worship all feet just because they are feet.
*shudder*... could never be like that, as there ARE some feet that literally make me want to spew. Which is funny how they differ from breasts for me. Can't say there are ANY breasts that would make me feel that bad.
And then the NICEST feet turn me on waaaaaaaay more than the nicest breasts...
Thats where i'm at. You really can't go too wrong with breast. I havn't personally seen a terrible pair. I have seen some terrible feet though. An adorable set of peds will drive me crazy though. There's something that is so genuinely feminine about them. Can't really put my finger on it!
Posted by nusuth (Member # 7372) on :
quote:You really can't go too wrong with breast. I havn't personally seen a terrible pair.
Whoa. Those pics are pretty wild! When I said personally...I meant in person. And it's true...i've lead a pretty blessed life.
Posted by nusuth (Member # 7372) on :
quote:When I said personally...I meant in person.
my apologies. there is definitely a huge difference. i have to say that i have seem some unattractive boobs. one of my GFs when i was a teen had A cups that were more nipple than boob. blech.
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
Absolutely, GQ. I seem to be far more selective (or is that picky?) than most of the fellow foot fetishists I encounter. It's rare that a pair of feet really make me go gah gah.
Posted by goodguyneighbor (Member # 2824) on :
Yeah definitely. The longer you're into anything, the more of a connoisseur you become. Eventually enthusiast content of faceless models with "meaty" soles will no longer do.
When I'm out hunting for feet, I never know who I might run across, or even what exactly I'm looking for since hot girls come in all different looks. All I know is that I know talent when I see it.
Pass by all kinds of pretty Plain Jane types until the girls that are instantly recognizable as, "Ooh yeah! I'd love to see her soles."
Sometimes walk around all day without meeting anyone who moves me.
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
Funny that people have brought up breasts too. I myself have never been a real heavy fan of breasts, I can pretty much take or leave them. In some cases, yes, I have seen UNattractive breasts. Not really so much in person as in pictures.
The funny thing is, when you look at enough porn you realize that there is potential for a girl's genitalia to be anywhere from drop-dead gorgeous to look at, to OMG WTF died and latched onto your crotch?! And in my life, I have been lucky enough to be involved with no vaginas that I thought were unattractive. Some were, in fact, pretty fuckin' gorgeous.
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)