This is topic An article on Foot Fetishism, may find interesting in forum Foot Fetish Talk at Foot Fetish Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=010996

Posted by LuckyTeen (Member # 30822) on :
 
http://www.drsusanblock.com/footfetish.htm

Don't know if you guys have seen it. Don't agree with her view on toe sucking though.
 
Posted by footjoyboy (Member # 26478) on :
 
Interesting.
 
Posted by feetdickfeet (Member # 129) on :
 
Very interesting. I find almost 100% of that article to be true.
 
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
 
Awesome article, written from a position of profound understanding. I like her work! [Thumbs Up]


Is she a member here?
 
Posted by Keyfeet (Member # 27313) on :
 
i didnt read the article, but why do you read articles about this? you live normally with it (i hope), so why do you need someone's perspective on it who probably doesn't even have a ff.
 
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
 
I didn't say I needed to read anything on it. It's a matter of want. I'm open to new learning, and I am hungry for it. Maybe it'll be nothing I didn't already know. Maybe it'll be something I didn't already know. How will I know unless I read it?

Do you really believe that you have your own life so sewn-up that no one could possibly lend their own perspective on life and give you insights that maybe had not occurred to you?
 
Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Keyfeet:
i didnt read the article, but why do you read articles about this? you live normally with it (i hope), so why do you need someone's perspective on it who probably doesn't even have a ff.

Nothing wrong with reading it. You don't have to agree with things or feel like it is an attack. It peeks some people's interest to see something written that isn't the typical, "that wierdo that likes feet," story. I actually found this informational since it was a woman who did a little bit of research to see what it's all about and was willing to explore things that even some of us foot lovers haven't experienced. You could always read it yourself and see that it's not a blast fest. [Smile]

Patrick
 
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
 
LuckyTeen, I agree with you--she is far off the mark about sucking a woman's toes being a substitute for sucking a man's cock. WTF?! But even William Rossi opined along those lines, I think. Who knows where they get that idea.

When I suck a woman's toes, it's because I fucking LOVE TO SUCK A WOMAN'S TOES!!!!! [Laugh]
 
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
 
The author said, "Some people enjoy foot sex just because it's not serious, but kind of silly and childlike, much more innocent than adult genitalia. Max likes to talk to each of my toes as he plays with them, treating all ten as individual "girls" with distinct personalities. He handles them like puppets in a Punch & Judy Show with the rest of my foot as the stage. Maybe he should do an act: A Foot Lover & His Favorite Foot...

Foot hedonists like me tend to be playful with our feet. Sometimes, I use my feet like I might use my hands to play with, stroke and even spank Max while we make love. I like to caress his muscular butt with my foot while he goes down on me, and give it a good foot-spanking when I want him to lick me faster."

I loved that section. First of all, it seems like it would be fun to do the "each-of-the-toes-is-a-separate-girl" thing. Not sure I'd do the "make-them-act-out-a-scene" thing like she describes, but...

I'm seriously into the "lick-me-faster!" thing!! [Drool] Fuuuuuck this chick is cool!
 
Posted by LuckyTeen (Member # 30822) on :
 
Yeah that view about toe sucking is rediculous. (in my opinion)

I read stuff like that because I find it interesting to find out other people's views (particularly women) on foot fetish. It has nothing to do with feeling I am looking for some level of reassurance. I have never felt that way about it.
 
Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
 
A ton of psychologists have used that toe sucking equation. I don't buy it either. I think she only brings it to light because of how many people have stated it.

Patrick
 
Posted by LuckyTeen (Member # 30822) on :
 
That view is so closed minded though. It's like can't a man just enjoy sucking a woman's big toe? There doesn't have to be an explanation for it.

Sometimes psychologists are so stupid. [Laugh]
 
Posted by Janet Mason (Member # 24724) on :
 
That article is really no more than an ad for her own videos. books, etc. Plus she offers no research references to back up the "studies" she quotes from...typical of most online "science".

As a 42 year old woman who has been into foot fetishism since I was 14 or 15, I also disagree with the toe-sucking analogy to that of sucking a pseudo-penis.

In the end this article is typical of most one finds online...very shaky at best, designed more to titillate the reader or push a product than to educate him/her.
 
Posted by Toetapper (Member # 6473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Janet Mason:
That article is really no more than an ad for her own videos. books, etc. Plus she offers no research references to back up the "studies" she quotes from...typical of most online "science".

As a 42 year old woman who has been into foot fetishism since I was 14 or 15, I also disagree with the toe-sucking analogy to that of sucking a pseudo-penis.

In the end this article is typical of most one finds online...very shaky at best, designed more to titillate the reader or push a product than to educate him/her.

Well said! The article is virtually all speculation and theorizing with nothing to substantiate her claims. Still, it is nice to see her try to be understanding.


Boy, howdy, did she miss the mark (the whole damn barn) on toe sucking.
 
Posted by dougiezerts (Member # 6829) on :
 
Is she a REAL doctor? I kinda doubt it, as she also runs a phone sex service.
Interesting article, though.
 
Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
 
I wouldn't call this an article, it's more of a column, or what people nowadays call a blog, which is the writer's experience and views. From someone who used to be a journalist, I am not saying this piece is deserving of an award, I just state that it is interesting to see what someone, especially a female, has to say about all of this. And I know a ton of people who write blogs, or own blog sites to express their views, but also use it to serve as advertisement for their sites/products - quite a few of them are on this board as well. I don't knock her for that.

Patrick
 
Posted by Weekend_Warrior (Member # 2662) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LuckyTeen:
Don't know if you guys have seen it. Don't agree with her view on toe sucking though.

Overall, her 'blog' was a serious page turner! I actually enjoyed it. But I agree with ya there, LuckyTeen! Her views on toe-sucking are somewhat twisted.
 
Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Weekend_Warrior:
quote:
Originally posted by LuckyTeen:
Don't know if you guys have seen it. Don't agree with her view on toe sucking though.

Overall, her 'blog' was a serious page turner! I actually enjoyed it. But I agree with ya there, LuckyTeen! Her views on toe-sucking are somewhat twisted.
Those are FAR from her views. That's a very common reason psychologists use, dating all the way back to Frued. It has become the quick and easy answer to describe it. But as with Frued, it was always about penises. I think he had an obsession with them, if you want to know my view.

Patrick
 
Posted by KarateChris (Member # 34894) on :
 
I tend to like articles like this because it helps me understand my attraction to female feet by hearing someone else's perspective. It doesn't seem as scientific as I would have liked, though. I've always wondered why is it that I can look at a woman's pedicured foot and get as turned on as when a regular guy sees a naked woman. I can remember all the way back to having an attraction to girl's feet in kindergarten. It's something that's been with me for a while.
 
Posted by Weekend_Warrior (Member # 2662) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Patrick:
Those are FAR from her views. That's a very common reason psychologists use, dating all the way back to Frued. It has become the quick and easy answer to describe it. But as with Frued, it was always about penises. I think he had an obsession with them, if you want to know my view.

Patrick

Whoa! [Eek!] I honestly had no idea. I must've misunderstood her interpretation. Is that similar to penis envy? I'm much more interested in what SHE thinks--not who she can quote or paraphrase. Thanks for clearing that up, Patrick. Frued and his 'penis theories' always creaped me out.
 
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
 
Well if you like toes, you clearly love a big, juicy cock. [Roll Eyes]

It's clear really... [Wink]
 
Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Andy-Laa:
Well if you like toes, you clearly love a big, juicy cock. [Roll Eyes]

It's clear really... [Wink]

I heard if you like pussy, it actually means you want to have butt sex with a dude... according to Frued. Is he a closet homosexual?

Patrick

[ October 14, 2009, 10:50 AM: Message edited by: Patrick ]
 
Posted by Drunk_24-7 (Member # 21781) on :
 
Great article all around. The toe sucking thing seems way off based but she's entitled to her theories, and missing the mark once or twice in such a well done and comprehensive review isn't too too bad in my opinion, although when she misses the mark, she really misses the mark. lol.
 
Posted by flipfloplick (Member # 21954) on :
 
let me know if you agree, i like to suck a womans toes with the same techniques ive seen my own cock sucked. ii wanna pleasure their toe like they pleaure me
 
Posted by DeadGoon (Member # 24278) on :
 
Does she think a perky woman's erect nipple is deemed as a pseudo penis too??
 
Posted by Fwrinkledsoles (Member # 101) on :
 
I haven't read that article but she sound like she like wam bam thank you me instead of fore play that many women as asking their lover to provide. To me, sucking and licking a woman feet is fore play!
 
Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DeadGoon:
Does she think a perky woman's erect nipple is deemed as a pseudo penis too??

I think too many people are focused on this part of the piece, which is only brought up because over the last 100 years, psychologists have made that statement. She doesn't say that it is the reason why, just states some of the opinions out there. When I took a psychology class back in college, I remember reading this whole dick sucking thing with the fetish and pretty much anything else, when it came to the Frued and some of his followers.

This is my two cents, if you don't think that is the reason you like sucking toes, than enjoy the rest of the piece because it isn't at all bad.

Patrick
 
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Patrick:
A ton of psychologists have used that toe sucking equation. I don't buy it either. I think she only brings it to light because of how many people have stated it.

Patrick

It's as asinine as saying that guys who own guns do so to compensate for penile shortcomings.

Both comparisons are monumentally stupid, one-size-doesn't-actually-fit-all bullshit put forth by people who don't actually know a fucking thing about what they're talking about.
 
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LuckyTeen:
That view is so closed minded though. It's like can't a man just enjoy sucking a woman's big toe? There doesn't have to be an explanation for it.

Sometimes psychologists are so stupid. [Laugh]

It begs the question, "When a woman sucks on a man's penis, what is it that she is using the penis as a substitute for?"

Right?
 
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Fwrinkledsoles:
I haven't read that article but she sound like she like wam bam thank you me instead of fore play that many women as asking their lover to provide. To me, sucking and licking a woman feet is fore play!

To me, it doesn't make sense to at once admit to not having read the article, and then conjecture about what the author is all about... [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by temp1234 (Member # 33411) on :
 
Don't agree on the toe thing either. i don't see or want them to be nipples or penis'! I just like them for what they are.

I agree with most of it though. before me and my girlfriend became intimate she used to ask to have her feet massaged.

heh. they were excellent days actually. i realised i liked feet but hadn't met anyone to talk about it with. then suddenly i met her, she was great and all but when i went to her place she walked around barefoot! was great! then she asked for a massage. over time i worked my way up too.
she still loves foot massages too. but i guess theres no reason to stop liking them when they feel so good!
 
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pjay:
quote:
Originally posted by LuckyTeen:
That view is so closed minded though. It's like can't a man just enjoy sucking a woman's big toe? There doesn't have to be an explanation for it.

Sometimes psychologists are so stupid. [Laugh]

It begs the question, "When a woman sucks on a man's penis, what is it that she is using the penis as a substitute for?"

Right?

AN ERECT NIPPLE!
God! Get it sorted, Pjay! [Big Grin]

Psychology is easy [Smile]
 
Posted by lynard (Member # 20188) on :
 
Sorry - she turned me off from the first paragraph when she claims "But unlike breasts, legs and buns, the charms of feet are rarely examined, except by podiatrists, pedicurists, foot fetishists, foot hedonists and shoe salesmen."
I think any woman who has ever had a pedicure, any woman who has ever applied polish to her toes, knows exactly how sexy a foot CAN be. Just like a breast or ass or leg.
 
Posted by Arch-Mage (Member # 23167) on :
 
Good article! Bookmarked! [Cool]
 
Posted by markn (Member # 13818) on :
 
The author is entitled to her views, and I appreciate her sharing them in print. Some conclusions she drew did not seem very feasible. Reading her definition of a foot fetishist, I must comment that most who frequent wu's site are not foot fetishists, but foot lovers. Most of those who would not be interested in the subject matter here would consider it a foot fetish site. Ignorance trumps the dictionary due to convenience. The romantic mind is not a butterfly specimen pinned to a piece of cardboard with a label. The romantic mind is as boundless as the universe, undefinable in a mere article. Deep space stuff, huh?
 
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
 
I dig it, maaaaan! [Joint]
 
Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by lynard:
Sorry - she turned me off from the first paragraph when she claims "But unlike breasts, legs and buns, the charms of feet are rarely examined, except by podiatrists, pedicurists, foot fetishists, foot hedonists and shoe salesmen."
I think any woman who has ever had a pedicure, any woman who has ever applied polish to her toes, knows exactly how sexy a foot CAN be. Just like a breast or ass or leg.

I totally disagree. Having asked a good number of girls to pose, I've heard quite a few mention that the only reason they wear cute shoes and get pedicures is because they find feet repulsive and wouldn't pose because they just hate feet. That line isn't meant for a foot fetishist, it's meant for the non-foot lover out there who might be reading it. It says, "Hey, ever think about this?"

Patrick
 


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.0