This is topic Young girl with to die for feet what you would do? in forum Foot Fetish Talk at Foot Fetish Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=013567

Posted by muleslicker (Member # 3049) on :
 
Hello all,
I was in a shop in my town on saturday when a group of girls were in buying some things, a young girl at a guess possibly 17 maybe a little younger was wearing some black ballet flats with a skirt, she was standing with her friends when suddenly she decided to let her left foot slip out for some air, you could hear her foot slip out of her flats and then she displayed an awesome sight for any guy into womens feet, her toes were painted black and her toes and soles were red in patches and when she lifted her foot up her soles were just wonderful she had some red patches underside of her toes and her sole area. I could not help notice her flats were well worn with toe prints visible.

Now tell me any guy on here who would not have looked at her feet when stood right by her and not ogled her feet, I know she was young but could you resist a look only?
 
Posted by UK_luckyguy (Member # 15149) on :
 
well 17 is above the age of consent over here so I'd have had no problems eyeing her up

my ex gf was 17 when I first got my hands on her [Wink] damn good age
 
Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :
 
Yeah, 16 is the AoC here in Michigan, so I wouldn't have felt as guilty looking at her.

[ August 29, 2011, 06:12 PM: Message edited by: Rider Aldebaran ]
 
Posted by Peter, Peter (Member # 40235) on :
 
That would have made my head exlode, I can only imagine the goodness that would have come out from there.
 
Posted by Fwrinkledsoles (Member # 101) on :
 
To young for me!
 
Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
 
Ehhh. Might look. Wouldn't speak of it. Wouldn't pursue it. Biology doesn't know age. Not sure what the age of consent is in my state but 18 is my standard. And even hooking up with an 18 year old is a world of trouble.

GQ
 
Posted by Salvy_Mic (Member # 13384) on :
 
You know, I'm not even sure I'm attracted to the barely legal-type girls anymore. I'm 26, I'm a grown man. They look like little girls to me.
 
Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Salvy_Mic:
You know, I'm not even sure I'm attracted to the barely legal-type girls anymore. I'm 26, I'm a grown man. They look like little girls to me.

Most do! But there are exceptions. I was in Vegas a few months ago and hooked up with this crazy and hot blond. Great body, beautiful face, sexy little black dress, hanging out at one of the coolest clubs in Vegas for her sisters bachelorette party. Lo and behold after hooking up with her she's only 19. Not even old enough to enter the club!

Usually style is the kicker for me. If her hair is weird and her sense of style sucks I can assume she's still a kid. But when she's dressed like a grown up with a real job with hair and make up done right.....it's tough to tell the 19 year old playing dressup with her 27 year old sister.... and well, her 27 year old sister! Haha. Good times. Hooked up in her bathroom at the trump hotel.....wouldn't reccomend that hotel. Tacky.

GQ
 
Posted by toesucker84 (Member # 18338) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Salvy_Mic:
You know, I'm not even sure I'm attracted to the barely legal-type girls anymore. I'm 26, I'm a grown man. They look like little girls to me.

Agreed. Then again I'm 27 and have a sister that's 20. So women that are under 21 look really young to me.
 
Posted by octoberbaseball (Member # 20977) on :
 
I would probably run away. Too young.
 
Posted by dbacks (Member # 26882) on :
 
Maybe she was older, remember he just guessed her age.
 
Posted by Salvy_Mic (Member # 13384) on :
 
I've actually felt like that for awhile, but these days it's even more so. My little sister turns 16 this year. So now more than ever, the concept just feels hideously wrong.
 
Posted by Maverick Matrix (Member # 2989) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Rider Aldebaran:
Yeah, 16 is the AoC here in Michigan, so I wouldn't have felt as guilty looking at her.

It's true. Being in the Detroit area there are those young girls that have nice feet and look great but I can't do it. For me, it's not just the age, it's the maturity factor. High schoolers don't do it for me. Never have, never will. Even when I was in high school, that mentality didn't do anything for me. If it's your thing, that's cool. I just can't get with it.
 
Posted by aka.footjoyboy (Member # 32751) on :
 
Yea, let's be honest here, I'd have reflexively peeped.
 
Posted by Wrinklesguy (Member # 732) on :
 
18 is the legal age here, and should be everywhere. Or at least the same everywhere. Anything younger than that is pushing the P word.
 
Posted by Salvy_Mic (Member # 13384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wrinklesguy:
18 is the legal age here, and should be everywhere. Or at least the same everywhere. Anything younger than that is pushing the P word.

Agreed. 90% of the time, there's a huge difference between a 16-year old and an 18-year old, physically and mentally.
 
Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
 
I would have looked yes, a quick reactionary glance that I give anytime I notice a girl in sandals but once I was able to guess that she might possibly be under the age of 18 I would have kept going about my business.

If you have to question how old a girl is(in terms of legality issues) then chances are she is too young. [Smile]
 
Posted by canIsmellYourFeet (Member # 11183) on :
 
Don't some of these AOC laws (if not all of them) have a 4-6 year grace period? Meaning if she's 16, you need to at least be 4-6 years older (depending on that state) or else you'll be violating the law?

For instance, if State X has the AOC at 16, and the grace period is 4 years, if you're older than 4 years you can still get turned in for statutory rape. Meaning, in this example, 17 to 20 is okay, but if you're 21 on up = jail.
 
Posted by mjl1717 (Member # 2939) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by GQguy:
Ehhh. Might look. Wouldn't speak of it. Wouldn't pursue it. Biology doesn't know age. Not sure what the age of consent is in my state but 18 is my standard. And even hooking up with an 18 year old is a world of trouble.

GQ

Yes GQ.. You and the late singer Lou Rawls could not have said it any better.. (lol)

"A Woorld of Trouble"
 
Posted by aka.footjoyboy (Member # 32751) on :
 
...."if you're older than 4 years you can still get turned in for statutory rape. Meaning, in this example, 17 to 20 is okay, but if you're 21 on up = jail."
Comment by cIsYF

I really don't think that this thread is talking about having sex with a girl who might, MIGHT be underage, it's about maybe, MAYBE someone just taking a gander at her feet.
 
Posted by Wrinklesguy (Member # 732) on :
 
Doesn't matter, we're talking about a foot fetish here which is sexual in nature and anytime a minor is involved it should be a crime.
 
Posted by chillstatus (Member # 41089) on :
 
Im going to say no..i wouldnt approach..notice them and walk far away..things could get ugly quick..Some one else sees you talking to her, what the convo is about too..Whew! it could be a reynolds for you and your freedom. I lived in lower Texas for a long time. They have lovely latinas down there...alot look like they could be early 20s..truth is most are not..this cutie moved in right next door with her sis and sis boyfriend..looked of age till i asked..17! DAMN! found out by her sis boyfriend, that she had the hots for me..he called it a lil crush. Anyway she loved the CHIEF, so i let her join me from time to time..this girl had beautiful little feet..fives..loved wedges and flops.(sigh) this could get long, dont want to bore anyone...but theres more. Almost got in trouble with this one..anyway, i think of those feet from time to time..
 
Posted by canIsmellYourFeet (Member # 11183) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy:
...."if you're older than 4 years you can still get turned in for statutory rape. Meaning, in this example, 17 to 20 is okay, but if you're 21 on up = jail."
Comment by cIsYF

I really don't think that this thread is talking about having sex with a girl who might, MIGHT be underage, it's about maybe, MAYBE someone just taking a gander at her feet.

Then why are people bringing up AOC if it doesn't matter and not talking about sex? Can't have it both ways.

*I* didn't bring it, I simply clarified, cause I always notice when people bring it up they leave out the 4-6 year grace period, mostly cause they didn't know it existed or bothered to look deeper into it. Its just 16-17 = legal = "yay, I can look/fondle/have sex her!" And no, its not that simple. It seems bringing up AOC is some way to assuage guilt over looking at a young girl's feet or it wouldn't have been brought up at all, if what you're saying is true and no one is talking about sex. Right? Again, can't have it both ways.

Its a slippery slope that I wish people wouldn't get on.
 
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Salvy_Mic:
You know, I'm not even sure I'm attracted to the barely legal-type girls anymore. I'm 26, I'm a grown man. They look like little girls to me.

I never have been into them for the same reason - isn't wanting to fuck a girl that looks 12 essentially the same as wanting to fuck a girl who is 12?

Idk, but still, that's my basic reason.

[ September 04, 2011, 06:24 PM: Message edited by: Andy-Laa ]
 
Posted by canIsmellYourFeet (Member # 11183) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Andy-Laa:
quote:
Originally posted by Salvy_Mic:
You know, I'm not even sure I'm attracted to the barely legal-type girls anymore. I'm 26, I'm a grown man. They look like little girls to me.

I never have been into them for the same reason - isn't wanting to fuck a girl that looks 12 essentially the same as wanting to fuck a girl who looks 12?

Idk, but still, that's my basic reason.

I think you may be on to something. Its wish fulfillment. Can't legally fuck a 12 year old, so why not fuck one who LOOKS like a 12 year old! How many porn websites exist that brag about Teen Girls, Teen Sex, etc etc. They exist for a reason, and they're also billion dollar money makers for a reason...
 
Posted by BlackHxC88 (Member # 15094) on :
 
idk, been having that problem lately. got invited by a friend to a house party and it was crawling with 18-19 y/o girls with nice feet, got uncomfortable and left
 
Posted by kingler (Member # 40920) on :
 
That's above the age of consent here so if that happened here, why not? The human brain does a few checks to see if a woman is "of the age to have sex with" or more technically "able to and healthy enough to produce kids". 16 is fine, mentally they might not be, but when I was 16 all my female friends were off having sex.

At 14-15 they had sex with people their age.
At 16+ they had sex with people their age and up to 30's.
At 18+ anything goes.

quote:
Originally posted by Wrinklesguy:
18 is the legal age here, and should be everywhere. Or at least the same everywhere. Anything younger than that is pushing the P word.

Nope.
I'm not sure why some US states impose that, as the body and majority of minds are mature enough at 16 to decide who they want to have sex with. According to studies I used to read (as part of my BSc once upon a time) that weren't written by right wing, religious, American research groups.
 
Posted by Sinnister (Member # 2394) on :
 
That story grosses me out. Age of consent or not...morality. Mine dont allow me to be attracted to a girl...only a woman. It's really that simple.
 
Posted by sportfan85 (Member # 24801) on :
 
If she still uses the my first pedicure playset to paint her toes... She's too young for you bro!
 
Posted by kingler (Member # 40920) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sinnister:
That story grosses me out. Age of consent or not...morality. Mine dont allow me to be attracted to a girl...only a woman. It's really that simple.

Morality is a fairly modern and unique construct for humans. No other creature on earth demonstrates it.
It's all biology, paedophiles get aroused by those younger than the age that you're meant to find attractive (those who can't have kids, because that's all sexual attraction is - something in your brain says that you want to have sex with them because they can give you a child. Secondary notions come into play like your current situations, but that goes beyond biology and into psychology). But for the vast majority of people 16-35 are the ideal age ranges, individual tastes and your own age alter this of course. But your upbringing, your programmed morality, tell you no.

You don't have a special power.
 
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackHxC88:
idk, been having that problem lately. got invited by a friend to a house party and it was crawling with 18-19 y/o girls with nice feet, got uncomfortable and left

That's...depressing. Why?
 
Posted by barefootlover75 (Member # 36928) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by bluetoelover:
I would have looked yes, a quick reactionary glance that I give anytime I notice a girl in sandals but once I was able to guess that she might possibly be under the age of 18 I would have kept going about my business.

Agreed. Sexy feet? Check

Sexy legs? Check

Age appropriate? Negative ghost rider the pattern is full

Move Along
 
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
 
Do any of you guys ever get suspicious of those recurring moralists we come across in life who constantly get in your business and dictate to you what not to do?

Yes, looking at underage feet is wrong, but imagine if it was like 3 minutes before her 18th birthday and you looked.

OMG, I think some of the hardcore worry-warts out there might be shouting sins at us in order to detract from their own desires for inappropriate content.

Keep it sane fellas. Always beware, always be vigilant, and always be suspicious of those whom something doesn't seem right! [Thumbs Up]

[ September 04, 2011, 09:58 PM: Message edited by: Tyler D. ]
 
Posted by National (Member # 8568) on :
 
I would look away if the girl in question is seven years of age. But if the girl is sixteen with feet to die for, not only would I look, I would have my way with her (and her feet) if given the opportunity. I think the age of consent in my state of New York is eighteen, but I do know that if I go across the Hudson River into New Jersey, the age of consent there is sixteen. This has nothing to do with wanting to be in a meaningful relationship with her. All it is is that if her feet look sensational, I'll be there.
 
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
 
Tyler - have to say: I like the new avatar hahaha
 
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Andy-Laa:
Tyler - have to say: I like the new avatar hahaha

thx Andy, ima try to link to the clip sometime where this image was pulled from cuz it was golden. she turns her head back to look at me and then looks back at the camera and goes from a normal look to a completely confused look in a split second LOL [Big Grin]

[ September 05, 2011, 08:23 AM: Message edited by: Tyler D. ]
 
Posted by larrrr (Member # 42092) on :
 
I don't think there's anything wrong with looking. I mean how revealing a lot of underage girls dress I usually look down as they approach me anyway bc if I look up I may run right into them. Now if you would of offered her candy, then you would of probably needed professional help.
 


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.0