Have you heard the expression" butter-face"?, as in everything looks good but the face. well.yesterday i had a 30 minutes commute with a butter-feet. This ASIAN woman sitting right across from me was ugly,ugly,ugly yet, her feet were just to die for. Her feet were just perfect. how add i thought. What a waste of feet, in my view.
Posted by Keyfeet (Member # 27313) on :
That would still be considered a butterface, not butterfeet.
But yeah, I feel ya. It is a waste.
[ September 11, 2011, 04:01 PM: Message edited by: Keyfeet ]
Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :
Yeah, that's still a butterface.
"Butterfeet" would be if everything on her were great except for her feet.
Posted by 2nd. To God In Power (Member # 23391) on :
LOL
Posted by skaramunga (Member # 11914) on :
Had the same thing happen to me on friday night...went to my buddies birthday party and there was this chic there with a below average looking face and her body got two thumbs down from me but her feet???
OH MY GOD...beautiful, beautiful, well polished toes, with this dark polish that really made them pop and she had a toe ring on her right foot...she probably wore like a size 9 if i had to guess...beautiful skin...i was salivating...
Posted by babeflover (Member # 2953) on :
Oh shit. I meant to say reverse butter-face. I meant to say that everything was ugly but the feet, which would make her a reverse butter-feet.
Posted by canIsmellYourFeet (Member # 11183) on :
I thought you meant butter in the shape of feet for some reason.
Butterface > Butterfeet of course. Unless she looks like Skeletor or Jabba The Hut's daughter or something crazy.
Posted by WaZsGuRll (Member # 42532) on :
So would u rather marry a beautiful woman who everyone around you considers model like but doesn't have nice feet or a woman with outstanding feet but everything else is ughh lol.
Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
quote:Originally posted by WaZsGuRll: So would u rather marry a beautiful woman who everyone around you considers model like but doesn't have nice feet or a woman with outstanding feet but everything else is ughh lol.
I've done both....errr. I've dated the model with mediocre feet(doing it now) and i've also dated the cute girl (not ugggh by anymeans) with the great feet. The "model" girl wins looks wise everytime. Now if the cute girl could cook and talk about nerdy stuff too? Then i've found my wife! Till then the model chic that can't cook, with ok feet and listens to my nerdy talk will do. *sigh* where is the female equivalent of GQguy?
random tangent...but GQ magazine covers everything from relationships, career, world events, cooking, drinks and style. While the "opposite" cosmo only focuses on style, some world events...and some career...and guy advice that's lame. OOne might wonder...why do you give a shit about a woman's magazine that 3% read...well it seems to embody the women I meet. While I feel I embody the GQ ideal. The two aren't equal. Anyway..a little drunk.
GQ
Posted by National (Member # 8568) on :
For one thing, I'm strongly against the institution of marriage for so many reasons that it'll take this conversation off topic. But back to the topic at hand. If given the choice between some model chick with ugly feet and some and an ugly girl with outstanding feet, I'd choose neither. But if a gun was put to my head, I'm siding with the model with unappealing feet all the time. Being with a woman who's just as luxurious as the newest Mercedes-Benz, even with one flaw (in this case, her feet), is better than someone with an infinite number of flaws with her body. Besides, having attractive women around you makes everything else attractive and can greatly boost your ego ... just like the way a Mercedes-Benz can.
Posted by Keyfeet (Member # 27313) on :
quote:Originally posted by National: For one thing, I'm strongly against the institution of marriage for so many reasons that it'll take this conversation off topic.
in interested in hearing about this. you should made another thread about that, maybe in the misc forum.
Posted by missangelcrush (Member # 43698) on :