I'm not a fan of the NY Post, since they usually post a lot of stuff that shouldn't be news and their form of reporting is terrible. This was posted as a lead story on their website. Interesting read, but they make out these customers to be fat men with gray hair.
Ok, this was a different article than the one I once read. It featured a columnist who decided to go undercover to work as a domme to make extra money. From what I remember, she wasn't up for it, and when it came to a foot session, she bailed!
I agree with you, it was an interesting read.
The reality is the majority of bdsm and fetish patrons are older guys. They usually are well-established in their communities and have families. But they need outlets for their pleasures. And having the resources they do, paying handsomely for these outlets is no prob.
Remember the big case involving that infamous madam? Her client list was full of older, prominent, well-heeled men. Most younger guys with looks can get their kinky rocks off with hot girls--for free.
I wonder who titled the article, the NY Post writer, or the student.
Why couldn't it have been..."My feet pay my bills--literally" or "Toes for tuition"?
Posted by houseshooz (Member # 10572) on :
This is a fine example of why I can't comprehend how any woman can claim to be broke. So many fetishes to entertain, pick one and cash in.
When you think about it, this one is pretty innocent too. No need to get all coked up in order to get through the night, just stick your feet in a guys face a few nights a week and you just made your rent.
Posted by oneagain (Member # 35859) on :
I could use a foot hooker right about now...
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
quote:Originally posted by octoberbaseball: they make out these customers to be fat men with gray hair.
it happens (or will eventually happen) to the best of us, LOL! but we all still need them feet either way, and it's at least a relief on some level that these girls won't discriminate. Posted by octoberbaseball (Member # 20977) on :
quote:Originally posted by jediofthefeet: Ok, this was a different article than the one I once read. It featured a columnist who decided to go undercover to work as a domme to make extra money. From what I remember, she wasn't up for it, and when it came to a foot session, she bailed!
I agree with you, it was an interesting read.
The reality is the majority of bdsm and fetish patrons are older guys. They usually are well-established in their communities and have families. But they need outlets for their pleasures. And having the resources they do, paying handsomely for these outlets is no prob.
Remember the big case involving that infamous madam? Her client list was full of older, prominent, well-heeled men. Most younger guys with looks can get their kinky rocks off with hot girls--for free.
I wonder who titled the article, the NY Post writer, or the student.
Why couldn't it have been..."My feet pay my bills--literally" or "Toes for tuition"?
I agree with you with everything, except for one thing. I'm a young guy, but still can't get my rocks off with hot girls for free, lol. That does make sense now that you bring up the financial part how they can afford that stuff.
Regarding women not being broke, we can't just say resort to a fetish. I am happy for foot models and those who do enjoy it, but I'm sure every woman out there doesn't want to strip or have her feet worshipped to pay the bills.
Posted by oneagain (Member # 35859) on :
I am glad the article wasn't a negative slant on the scene and that the men were respectful and she was cool with it and willing to go back.
I am curious...since it was a Nydia party...any chance the 'host ' of the party is on Wu's?
Posted by houseshooz (Member # 10572) on :
quote:Originally posted by octoberbaseball: Regarding women not being broke, we can't just say resort to a fetish. I am happy for foot models and those who do enjoy it, but I'm sure every woman out there doesn't want to strip or have her feet worshipped to pay the bills.
Relax, it was a light hearted response to the topic at hand and I wasn't suggesting that all women should resort to fetish clubs for income. My point in that was highlighting just one of the numerous options women have to create income for themselves.
Whether they want to get in this type of industry or not, I'm sure the same percentage of women would be equally unhappy working two minimum wage jobs just to make ends meet. Only difference is that sex or fetish based businesses are deemed immoral and demeaning to women, and for what?
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)