Foot Fetish Forum: "You may contribute ONLY one set per week."

This is topic "You may contribute ONLY one set per week." in forum Foot Fetish Talk at Foot Fetish Forum.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=016079

Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :

Why do I see this rule/guideline being broken?

Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :

I'll look into it for you Rider.

Posted by peg3rdleg (Member # 44584) on :

Haha! Let's not get all bent out of shape over MORE FEET that we all come here to admire and enjoy!

Posted by FootLongSub Zero (Member # 19380) on :

I didn't know this was a rule [Eek!]

Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :

quote:
Originally posted by peg3rdleg:
Haha! Let's not get all bent out of shape over MORE FEET that we all come here to admire and enjoy!

I'm sure the point of the rule is for variety's sake. I mean, more feet is fine, but it'd get boring if most of the content were from the same people, and even the same model with little variation in the pics themselves.

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

I'm just glad Phil ALSO mentioned " Sets that contain poor photography or inadequate lighting will not be posted". That one had my vote.

Posted by GORMEE (Member # 45672) on :

I'm confused, posting in the CONTRIBUTIONS area? Or the foot pictures forum?

Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :

quote:
Originally posted by GORMEE:
I'm confused, posting in the CONTRIBUTIONS area? Or the foot pictures forum?

Contributions.

Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :

I cannot speak for Phil as the main site and how it works is being done as a "what works best for BHE" type of thing. What I mean by that is since Wu passed, this is another site, along with the others they also work on under their umbrella, is one they have to tend to now.

I'm guessing the rule was put in place so the same people didn't appear every few lines on the listing, as is happening now. The way Wu used to do it was he'd recycle old contributions and replace older photos - thus keeping the same model from appearing over and over and over. That requires a lot of manual work and isn't something automated, like what's in place now.

I understand why he posted the rule, but I also figured it was more of a suggestion as the computer automation doesn't actually watch out for that. It would require a person to do so. If you believe it is out of hand, or have a suggestion on how it might be done better, Phil told all of us to contact him in several posts back when we learned of Wu's passing. Shoot him an email as I can only explain what I "think" his views and limitations are with running this site. I don't want to speak for him, but just offer my opinion.

Patrick