#1 ** image removed - no nudity allowed on Wu's forum. Thank you. **
#2
[ October 28, 2007, 09:47 AM: Message edited by: Bondo ]
Posted by russ (Member # 10866) on :
#1
Posted by GemmaL (Member # 25771) on :
#2 )) sexy soles!
Posted by footjoyboy (Member # 26478) on :
# 1, no doubt. # 2, IMHO, isn't even an attravctive pair of feet.
_fjb_
Posted by Tony The Shredder (Member # 2912) on :
#1 is just TOO GRAPHIC for this forum.
Posted by MC Nolan (Member # 20527) on :
#1 Ditto what Tony said.
#2 Pretty girl but the pose doesn't suit her feet.
That said #2 is more pure than the first IMO. The girl and her feet are the focus. #1 their feet are secondary to the sexual act.
Posted by 1p0d (Member # 13290) on :
Why do you ask? These pix are so different there's not much sense comparing.
I personally prefer #2, because I like soles most of all. Pic #1 is too artificial, and you can't even see so much of the feet in it.
Posted by heelikker (Member # 8271) on :
# 2 ! I think you are inquiring whether nudity with feet iz hotter than just female feet alone. I prefer the latter.
Posted by babeflover (Member # 2953) on :
Which photo do you like better?. most you do this to us, why to ask? i can't decide, they are both, just fucking sexy.
Posted by FootLongSub Zero (Member # 19380) on :
1
Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
I can only see the 2nd pic so # 2 it is. She has some great looking toes and soft soles..mmm...any more pics of her??
Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
Picture 1 has been removed, but picture 2 is very nice. I love her long, flat soles as they'd suit some lengthy tongue baths.
Patrick
Posted by aandarturz (Member # 22904) on :
yeah nice
Posted by oscarthemonkey (Member # 1692) on :
I only see one but I like it!
Posted by Kraken111 (Member # 20682) on :