posted
Hosiery of any kind is unappealing or at the very least as appealing as a pair of underwear. You may briefly marvel at a woman in her panties, but really you want them to come off. A present can have a similar effect, minus the arousal. You become excited, because you know the present is for you, naturally you size it up as you fondle the pretty packaging but eventually you unwrap the present. The adulation for the foot seems backwards and out of place in the case of nylons. Why do I even bother then? Why don’t I just keep on moving if I am not interested? Aside from the fact that I can’t wrap my brain around why anyone would be interested in nylons, they are a hindrance to me and others that feel the way I do about nylons. For every woman that I have ever seen wearing nylons, I was robbed of seeing her without them, which goes without saying. But my beef with nylons does not end at the foot. Nylon cloaked legs are cloaked in deed. I have come a cross many a woman that when I first met was wearing nylons. But meeting a woman, more specifically her legs, for the first time is really when her legs are bare and not in nylons. The same holds true for the foot. I hate nylons because they are insincere and boringly generic. They force all legs and feet to assume one color and act as a barrier to the true beauty that may lie beneath. The multitude of natural color, which varies from woman to woman, is eliminated and in its place is a sham made from nylon. As if that were not enough, that isn’t the only reason why I have an axe to grind for nylons. In a similar fashion nylons ruin the feel of a true leg and foot. Are her feet soft or somewhat rough and thick because she has been around bare foot a lot? Or do they feel like a stupid manufactured fabric called nylons?
At this time I would like to pay homage to a fallen fellow from the nylon brigade, whose life was taken by nylons, he died in a nylon blaze. Another fellow almost had the life chocked out of him with a nylon but he survived.
The committee for nylon burning is now accepting members, and we are still awaiting the appointment of the new viceroy. Also it appears that the position of chancellor may become vacant soon.
-------------------- The Foot Connoisseur says: who would have thunk that feet would equal a treat. Posts: 252 | Registered: Mar 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yea I'm not a fan of nylons, but I'm not against those who do like them, so along with footjoyboy- to each his own.
Posts: 2004 | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
to each their own.. i can re-write your speech and use your arguements in most high support for nylons and why they're the best thing to hit woman's fashion. but i won't. not necessary
RPM
p.s. I credit nylons for introducing me to the beauty of feet. had nylons not been involved, i might not ever be on Wu's!!!!
posted
Not able to discern if this is intended to be satirical or if serious. Nylons are, of course, inanimate objects, and therefore I'm not understanding how they can become the focus of contempt (hate???).
The poster states "For every woman that I have ever seen wearing nylons, I was robbed of seeing her without them, which goes without saying". How does seeing a woman in nylons "rob" somebody (anybody) of seeing her without them? If she had been wearing JEANS instead (or jeans OVER the nylons), would you then hate jeans? Or if she were in an automobile but did not get out of it, would you then hate automobiles? What about women who don't leave their homes? Should we then hate houses, because they rob us of of seeing ANYTHING at all. No feet, legs, nylons, no female, period.
Not that it matters (because in my view, it doesn't) ... but I have always seen nylons and stockings of all kinds as an embellishment to feet, rather than obstruction.
Thinking more positively, why not view them (as I believe them to be) as a prelude to feet. A thinly-veiled sheath, which clearly displays the feet they have adorned ... and the heady reward that follows removal.
-------------------- Respectfully,
Ben
Malory in Signature Posts: 5772 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I personally love nylon-clad feet and legs. I think they're ultra feminine, sheer (so virtually the next best thing to bare feet because they hide nothing), and have their own wonderful distinctive smell seperate from, say smelly socks. yes indeed, may nylons live forever on pretty feet Posts: 99 | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Because hosiery adds additional sex appeal to womens leg's. Much like when a women wears sexy underwear. Your arguement could say that all women shouldn't wear underwear as we want to rip it off anyway.
I love hosiery as it defines the womens leg and feet, holds the sweat and smell in and in general it turns me on when she takes them off slowly!
Posts: 251 | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I like stockings/hose on feet. I like the way they change the color of the foot, and the way they make the foot silky smooth. I don't care for opaque stockings, or socks, though. If you can't see the toes through them, then I don't care for that.
-------------------- "You have very nice feet!" Posts: 3711 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote: Not able to discern if this is intended to be satirical or if serious. Nylons are, of course, inanimate objects, and therefore I'm not understanding how they can become the focus of contempt (hate???).
I find it hard to believe that one would not be able to take this for anything other than banter. What i dont understand is why anyone would go out of their way to make half of your post about how badly composed my writing is. I guess i should never post anything on Wu's that is not absolutely flawless.
I don't hate anything. So don't break my balls.
I don't like my woman in nylon.
-------------------- The Foot Connoisseur says: who would have thunk that feet would equal a treat. Posts: 252 | Registered: Mar 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't really like them either. I definitely prefer feet to be bare. But, I'll take them over socks or worse still, shoes!
Posts: 229 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I've found kissing/licking nylon clad feet is nowhere near as good as doing the same when the are bare, but I love how nylons look sexy and I love taking them off my gf (see that? You can take nylons off ... if you're close enough to a woman to feel the 'stupid manufactured fabric' of her nylon clad legs surely you're close enough to ask her to take them off...).
They're just nylons dude calm down they will be here for ever, any high end office environment and most schools require women to wear them.
-------------------- 'Toes all painted, feet all out, it's the aphrodisiac for tommorow without a doubt' - Keith Murray Posts: 154 | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Mad]](cuss.gif)
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
![[Hump]](graemlins/hump.gif)
![[Tongue]](tongue.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
... if you're close enough to a woman to feel the 'stupid manufactured fabric' of her nylon clad legs surely you're close enough to ask her to take them off...).
