posted
To all who know about video processing and editing.(Producers especially) I was wondering what you all use to edit and create your videos for your websites, and mostly how if you are shooting in HD or Ultra HD you are avoiding the compression once your film is edited and saved? I am going to be using a full 1080 HD/60p camcorder now for shooting Norcal videos for 2016 and am doing some tests but all the clips get compressed in half through the current editor. How do I retain the 'raw' quality while still being able to edit? Thank You.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18311 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Just Windows Movie Maker for now, it's a simple and effective editing tool when you produce as much content as I do, but I need to switch to retain the raw quality. Thanks for the advice.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18311 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I know there is a sony editor people rav about but since I have worked in the Adobe world for so long with photoshop, illustrator, after effects, audition, encore...just made sense to keep it all in the family.
It sucks in a way Adobe is pushing that cloud crap but hey, now you could try premier pro for a month for a low cost and see how you like it
posted
I did find a hidden HD quality custom settings bar in WMM that seems to retain the 60p..this might just work. Now whether or not BHE can support these files is another story.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18311 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
You know I read this a few days ago and it made me question my use of Sony Vegas. I've only just started using it and I've basically been rendering everything as WMV 1080. I never even considered 1080 with 1440 or 1920 or whatever. I'll tell you this: it certainly has 1080 settings that include 60 and the files came back HUGE.
I've yet to decide if any of my footage has been shot good enough to benefit from the high quality rendering but its definitely something I'll be experimenting with the next couple months.
posted
If you shot it less than 60 fps, I don't think you can render it UP to 60 fps. The format is reverse render-able but not progressive. Is that what you meant by 60?
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18311 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah I just don't know what rate the camera shoots at so I was just playing with the settings. And when I put it on 60i or 60p, a way bigger file came out than with the standard 1080 setting. The video did not appear any different though when I looked at it.
I have a lot to learn so excuse me while I sit here not knowing what I'm talking about yet. I'm used to just posting unedited poorly lit videos that were filmed spur of the moment.
quote:Originally posted by edelbrock: Yeah I just don't know what rate the camera shoots at so I was just playing with the settings. And when I put it on 60i or 60p, a way bigger file came out than with the standard 1080 setting. The video did not appear any different though when I looked at it.
I have a lot to learn so excuse me while I sit here not knowing what I'm talking about yet. I'm used to just posting unedited poorly lit videos that were filmed spur of the moment.
You're not talking about the Canon T5 or whatever you bought right? 60p will be a bigger file and better quality, but didn't think any Rebel series shot over 30 fps in 1080?
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18311 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
No this is all files from off the camera phone. LG G3. Shoots in 1080 and 2160. I only just shot my first video on the T5 just a couple hours ago and haven't rendered it yet. I don't know what I'm doing yet.
posted
Ok just found out that the T5 records at 1080 30 fps but it can record at 60 frames on 720. So I'm that much closer to knowing what I'm talking about.
posted
Anytime you add more frames, the larger the filesize will be!
Reason why video was interlaced and at 29 fps max was due to not only what our eyes can perceive but as well as the size if the data/information that needs to be rendered
Posts: 2341 | Registered: Jul 2009
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Cheers]](graemlins/cheers.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
