posted
I always see these threads claiming "the best feet ever" and i'm always disappointed. Here are two models posing their feet that are literally 1 in 1000
High arches are a must. These are my ideal feet.
-------------------- If she won't indulge your fetish, I bet you that cuter, smarter girl across the bar will. Lets go find out. Posts: 1877 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Really? The one on the right I really like, and the Blue toes and high arches are my favorite combo but the one on the left is a bit too extreme for my taste. I don't really find that foot attractive at all. I'm diggin' the one on the right though, big time.
posted
It is a fantastic pic showcasing extreme arch height and lovely rounded heels too. I would really like to see what their soles look like too. From what I can see, both also have sexy toes, and great nail beds as well. Of course the major selling point are their amazing high arches...which I am a fan of this trait.
Truly a stunning pic of their sexy feet, and a great find.
-------------------- If she won't indulge your fetish, I bet you that cuter, smarter girl across the bar will. Lets go find out. Posts: 1877 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Drunk_24-7: Really? The one on the right I really like, and the Blue toes and high arches are my favorite combo but the one on the left is a bit too extreme for my taste. I don't really find that foot attractive at all. I'm diggin' the one on the right though, big time.
I'm not sure how you figure that the foot on the left is more extreme than the one on the right (unless you're dyslexic). They're both interesting, that's for sure. They're not my ideal feet, though. I'm looking at the point where the heel becomes the arch, and the one on the right looks like she could clench a dollar bill in that crease there! (Not so much, for the one on the left.) I'm curious about why you feel that the foot on the left is more extremely arched.
-------------------- You give pleasure to the feet, you give pleasure to the person. Posts: 1297 | Registered: Jul 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's because of the instep popping. The one on the right looks like her arch flex is almost natural and her instep while torqued for the pose still looks smooth and natural like she could pull this pose at anytime with little to no effort and I love her blue toes combined with an increadable arch so erotically like that.
The one on the left also has a great arch but it seems to me like in striking this pose she looks almost like she dislocated something as her instep is popping in what to me looks like a bit of an unnatural way and the metatarsal bone connecting her big foot to her big toe appears like it's being overworked significantly to hold the pose. To me she doesn't look nearly as natural or comfortable as the one on the right who is amazing and sees to pull it off with ease and is extremely sexy. Could also be just that I find the one on the right's foot to be far prettier overall, as in looking at the picture again and a bit longer and more closely, perhaps the one on the lest is not as strained as she appeared to be on my first glance. It could just be that I find the one on the right to have a far prettier foot overall so when looking at them comparitively I see a big, big difference in the level of attraction for myself. The one on the right to me offers a foot that is so much more attractive than the one on the left, I may have been overly harsh on the one on the left. If it was just a 1 sided photo of the girl on the left, I may have actually found it more attractive but when put side by side with that gorgeous sculputre of perfection on the right, the one on the left to me looks almost out of place.
-------------------- If she won't indulge your fetish, I bet you that cuter, smarter girl across the bar will. Lets go find out. Posts: 1877 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
