But over the years, thanks to the producers, directors, and photographers (mainstream and porn) of the world, my foot fetish had to evolve to keep me from being frustrated so much.
You know how it goes. A toe lover sees a girl dangle her shoe from her toes, hoping the shoe will fall off so he can see them. But alas, it never happens. A sole lover sees hot girls getting banged in videos, and only gets to see the tops of their feet thanks to the girls and the camerapeople.
I came up with The Eight Wonders of the Foot.
These are parts of focus for feet: instep, outer contour of the foot, tops of toes, under the toes, balls of the feet, arches, soles, and heels.
I have eight parts or angles to choose from when I look at girls feet. As long as a camera or my eye can focus on at least one of those areas, I can get some sense of satisfaction unless the girl's feet are totally unacceptable to me.
Has your foot fetish evolved, or do you like what you have always liked?
Posted by dougiezerts (Member # 6829) on :
I used to have a hang-up that I'd only be attracted to a girl's feet if she wore her street clothes. Bathing suits and nude didn't count! Why? I guess I prefered to see her barefoot fully clothed. I no longer feel that way, but I do prefer to see a girl barefooted than in shoes--even flip flops!
Posted by Footman9 (Member # 1100) on :
Yes. I am like a great bottle of wine. I get better with time. I have become more refine with my taste in foot beauty and beauty in general. I have learned to appreciate the true fullness of such beauty and continue to as I travel on my journey. Being here at WU has helped me appreciate many types of foot candy there are out there .
[ April 29, 2006, 02:40 AM: Message edited by: Footman9 ]
Posted by Lou Gojira (Member # 983) on :
I've evolved in this department too. It's hard to fathom when I try to think about it...but there really was a time when dirty bare feet were a turn-off for me! Now I'm practically obsessed with girls who hate shoes and go barefoot anywhere and everywhere.
I also find myself appreciating nylons...but only a little! Time was any indication of nylon didn't do anything for me...but now I'm attracted to girls who wear white nylons. No tan nylons...no black nylons...but white nylons have been known to trip my trigger on occasion.
I used to think red polish was the do-all end-all, but now it seems so uniform and routine that I'm indifferent to it.
Otherwise, I'm pretty much set in stone. Still don't care for any kind of shoes on a girl...I'm still not a sniffer...socks have never done anything for me...I'm a total pushover for foot-jewelry (anklets in particular)...don't go for the dominatrix/trampling stuff...
I think it's like you say Jedi...we have to evolve, or we risk constant frustration. Adapt and survive! Posted by Dazzz (Member # 12539) on :
yes about five years ago all i cared about was painted toes now i am more attracted to large feet 10-14 not that small feet turn me off and i dore soles now
Posted by feetluvr (Member # 1570) on :
Though evolution can indicate very small changes, I prefer to think of my fetish as becoming more refined, but either term will do. The basic scope of my desires has not changed very much, but I find my interests honing in on specific things from time to time. I guess that's natural as we become "experts" at the fetish after exposing ourselves to all the "research" that we do.
Posted by Calico Jack (Member # 2299) on :
quote:Has your foot fetish evolved?
Neanderthal checking in. hehe Mine hasn't evolved, and if anything I'd have to say that it has actually devolved in a sense because my fetish today is far more narrowly-focused and much more challenging to satisfy than it ever was years ago when I started out as a fledgling fetishist. Luckily for me, I was forthright about my fetish from the very beginning and always went full throttle after exactly what I wanted, so I never really had to encounter that sense of frustration that jedi spoke about. The aspects of foot fetish that I was most drawn to also happened to be rather mainstream by fetish standards when compared to much of the other stuff that's out there, so I was fortunate to be able to have all of my desires satisfied without much difficulty. Somewhere along the way I became so overly-immersed in foot activity that I actually became desensitized to much of it. Since then, my fetish has continued to get more and more specific as my tastes have grown more discriminating. I'm still into the same exact aspects of the fetish that I always was, but now it's practically on a sub-atomic level. For instance, my fascination with nailpolish has always been there since day 1, but whereas any nailpolish color would've turned me on back in the day, I now have very particular visual needs that have to be met, and there are some colors that I absolutely hate today which can sometimes singlehandedly cause me to pass up a gal's feet altogether. Nailpolish isn't my only criteria either. I've got lots of other things that I pay very close attention to when engaging in my contemporary "screening process", such as foot size, toe plumpness, nailbed shape & fullness, thigh thickness & calf curvature, presence of tattoos or anklets, etc. So, while I would definitely say that my foot fetish today is stronger and more intense than it's ever been before, I'd have to admit that it's also made me a much tougher customer and that my scope is anything but broader.
Calico Jack
Posted by Neo (Member # 1891) on :
Mine has evolved and grown into new areas, mostly thanks to WU and this wonderful site!
We all learn from and are introduced to new things by each other.
Posted by RPM (Member # 2895) on :
i've found that i'm not as 'stuck' on feet as I used to be. I can better 'manage' the impulse to stare and drool in public. i like a wider taste, but my fav parts to see has gotten more refined!! i know very specifically what does it for me in all aspects of the feet. but i've grown more accepting of a larger mix of types of feet. so, in one way, i've evolved.. in another i've gotten more expert like.
had i not 'evolved' i'd have some issues with my lady's feet. but because i'm mmore specific, some parts of her feet appeal to me a whole lot more than it would have. so.. works for me. works with other feet too!!!
RPM
Posted by Benji (Member # 1757) on :
I think I have always been drawn to toes more than anything else. Their shape, their color, their size... and most of all (and the most rare) their taste... I do admit over the years I have now grown a fondness for soles as well as an attraction to french pedicures specifically after my ex had her toenails done perfectly by herself and grew them long for me... good times.
Posted by nylonfootsniffer (Member # 3488) on :
I think for me, my fetish has changed very little over the years. Same preferences.
Posted by Zamora (Member # 1236) on :
It seems that there are some of us who are born with ff, and others who have developed it over the years. I believe the "natural" foot lovers have a more rigid foot fetish, whereas those who deeveloped the ff are more "open" to further development.
I am part of the first group, and I cannot determine which aspect of my foot love that I am in now was not there when I was four year old. Smelly but neat, big and fleshy, long toes for shape..... sucking , licking, tickling, bastinado and sniffing for actions.
Maybe the only major development would be giving pedicures, which for some reason I am not into now.
Posted by vineofthorns (Member # 1313) on :
Mine definitly has,but not by too much.when I was a child,I was all about soles(as I still am lol).as time went on nail polish became a factor(now its a MUST)into my fetish as well.now my last evolution of my fetish involves foot odor.I think that became a factor in the past 5 years or so...I find it rather intresting that unlike breast or ass men,our fondness for our favorite evoles.suprised noones ever done a study on this
Posted by Calico Jack (Member # 2299) on :
quote:Originally posted by Zamora: It seems that there are some of us who are born with ff, and others who have developed it over the years. I believe the "natural" foot lovers have a more rigid foot fetish, whereas those who deeveloped the ff are more "open" to further development.
I totally appreciated reading about Zamora's theory but I'm afraid that I'm a case study that punctures a hole in it right off the bat. Unlike Zamora, I fall into the 2nd group that he mentioned - the people who develop their foot fetishes over the years rather than having been born with it. My earliest interest in feet coincided with the onset of puberty around age 13 and the sexual fascination really centered around one particular pair of feet at the time which belonged to a teacher of mine. That was the beginning for me. However, despite the fact that I'm a group 2 resident, I don't feel that I'm more open to further development, and as I said in my last post on this subject, my interest in feet has actually become increasingly more rigid, specific, & narrowly-defined as time goes by. Leave it to me to toss a monkeywrench into the works.
Calico Jack
Posted by Zamora (Member # 1236) on :
Thanks CJ, your comment is also very appreciated.
Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
Neanderthal checking in. hehe Mine hasn't evolved, and if anything I'd have to say that it has actually devolved in a sense because my fetish today is far more narrowly-focused and much more challenging to satisfy than it ever was years ago when I started out as a fledgling fetishist.
Same here, CJ. Only a relative few really make me go gah gah these days.
Posted by GimmeFeet (Member # 13817) on :
I'd say mine has de-evolved as well. I used to be obsessed with beautiful, petite, well-taken care of feet and toes. Ya know, smooth with a very fresh scent of lotion or berries. The very sight of pretty, young (legal) girls' feet used to give me a hard-on everytime!! Now I've changed... I'm so partial to mature, un-pedicured, large, nasty, somewhat dry feet, toes, and SOLES. And if they smell really, really sweaty and bad, then the better it is for me. I'm ashamed of my foot fetish, but it's alright. Just dont go the route that my fetish did.
I sure do miss the urge to pursue beautiful, model-worthy, fresh-scented feet...
Posted by Salvy_Mic (Member # 13384) on :
Never be ashamed of your foot fetish. Never.
Anyways, according to Zamora, I'm a Class 1 footman, and as such, my preferences really haven't changed much. I do appreciate soles a whole lot more than I used to, probably because you barely see them in public.
Something that's stayed with me since the very beginning is the way I experience feet. My favorite to way to view feet, live or otherwise, is when she is either sitting, or laying on her back. In actual experiences, she'll never be in any other positions than those. As well as that I want her feet to be side by side practically the whole time. On top of that, my spot to enjoy her feet is always laying besides her, facing the tops of her feet. The only other one I like is some sort of sole view if I'm unable to actually lay next to her.
Posted by The Champ (Member # 14891) on :
ive always been a heel and sole kind of guy. nut now since i compliment mature older woman on there toes, im just as much a toe lover as a heel and sole lover
![[Mad]](cuss.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
.![[Drool]](graemlins/drool.gif)
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Cry]](cry.gif)