ok guys and girls, i was talking to a guy 2day who confidently told me that if a girls hands are short and stubby then so will her feet be, same as if a girls fingers r long and skinny then so will her toes b, is this true or not?
add ur thoughts, cos i am not too sure about this one x
Posted by Elvzz (Member # 14178) on :
Pretty close to the real thing - I love slender hands and it is usually a precusor to asking them out.
I like to get most models hands in the shots - none of them have man hands - check them out.
"Sometimes, sometimes things are exactly as they seem."
Posted by xxmadisonxx (Member # 24593) on :
mmmmmmmmmmm interesting hun, i am happy with my hands and feet but winge about everythin else lol
Posted by Toe Sucker II (Member # 1720) on :
yeh, it is quite true!
thats why when i cant get to the gold....... LOL
ill have a look at her hands...... and from that i make my judgement. Posted by RPM (Member # 2895) on :
true most of the time, but not all of the time. still have to see the total package to know how that is.
RPM
Posted by Hal (Member # 3484) on :
Yes, there are definately some exceptions to that rule.
-Hal-
Posted by MRSPIN73 (Member # 29205) on :
YES THAT'S NOT ALWAYS TRUE THERE'S THIS GIRL AT MY JOB WHO HAS SOME LITTLE NUBBY, NOT TO ATTRACTIVE FINGERS BUT HER TOES ARE PERFECT.
Posted by toelicker91 (Member # 7658) on :
I had this experience the other night. The girl I was talking to had real long fingers. After a little bit I told her I had to ask a question. She said ok . I said being you have such long fingers are your toes long and skinny as well? She said no I dont think so. She took off her shoe and showed me her feet. Her toes were a normal length. Not real long , not real short but to me just right. Unfortunatley her feet were very ticklish, as she pulled them away and told me I tickled her.
Posted by Dave888 (Member # 13797) on :
hands and feet are definitely connected, but not on every single person to the same degree.
Posted by Cain (Member # 8492) on :
I would say that from what i see around that that is pretty accurate. I like to go for the happy medium... medium length toes, feet and hands.
Posted by Toetapper (Member # 6473) on :
These are genetic traits that commonly go together but, with the interplay of dominant & recessive genes, there is no assurance. A person can inherit one parent's hands and the other parent's feet - and they may be nothing alike. The mingled attributes can certainly be finer than that.
It occurs to me to ask if you have ever met someone with one blue eye and the other brown? No kidding, they're out there. Genetic combinations are truly amazing and far more unpredictable than a craps-shoot.
Posted by ozboy (Member # 518) on :
I have always thought there IS a link between a girls hands and feet. Interesting that you have mentioned this cause when I meet a girl and cant see her feet, I always look at her hands and fingers and gauge a feeling for what her feet n toes must be like -)
Posted by Solelvr2009 (Member # 20632) on :
I'm starting to believe that hands and feet are connected most of the time, either by finger/toe length or palm/sole texture or both...
[ April 05, 2008, 06:12 PM: Message edited by: Solelvr2009 ]
Posted by mikeyagogo (Member # 22899) on :
carnie hands = carnie toes!
Posted by Xero (Member # 15476) on :
Heh a pine tree is a pine tree from the top to it roots. lol, what I mean is that our genetic code that we get from out parents tell us that we are to grow a certain way, minus any mutations that we develop along the way.
And as we can see in many cases, evolution favors the simpler design, in some ways our genomes reflect this. It is far simpler to modify certain things, than to come up with something new every time. Fingers and toes are digits so they should be similar in appearance. Minus that whole genetic aberration thing.
But as for my personal experience: long fingers = long toes, Soft plump hands = soft plump feet.
Posted by footgirl0226 (Member # 29201) on :
quote:Originally posted by mikeyagogo: carnie hands = carnie toes!
That was funny!
Posted by ambrose (Member # 17196) on :
I have hear this but I think in most cases its true but not all cases
Posted by Mighty Mike (Member # 1922) on :
i don't think there is any relation
Posted by xxmadisonxx (Member # 24593) on :
interesting comments guys, il do a pic later of my hands and feets and c if u guys think they resemble each other.x
Posted by footntoesmassager (Member # 12132) on :
I've found that to be true most of the time, but not all. I generally go towards the women with the long slender fingers (see here for an example), but I give every foot the opportunity to grab my attention.
Posted by femsolelover (Member # 1584) on :
Personally, I find that looking at a person's entire body style helps. I'm actually a foot-virgin, but when you look at a person in whole, you find many similarities in body style and body type simply because of what the foot was made to do.
So, a person with lighter weight and taller will more than likely have longer soles and toes. Granted, this doesn't work with everybody, but I think as a general standard it works. I think the same goes with hands vs. feet, too.
Posted by FtLckr26 (Member # 13998) on :
I think its true, most of the time.
Posted by sotiny (Member # 25607) on :
Originally posted by mikeyagogo: carnie hands = carnie toes!
![[Smile]](smile.gif)