This is topic Do you care if models show their faces or not? in forum Foot Fetish Talk at Foot Fetish Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=009603

---

Posted by High_Arch_Analyst (Member # 28756) on :
 
I want to know who thinks it's a big deal whether models show their faces, who is indifferent and who thinks it's a big deal (and why).

In one of the threads earlier this week, there seemed to be a broad consensus that models who show their faces are better and more successful than their masquerading counterparts.

I for one could not care less. Seeing their bodies is a big plus, but I could really care less about the face. Others clearly feel differently.

I actually think (from an image security and conflict mitigation standpoint) it doesn't really make sense to show your face. Unless your in a position where the world knowing your a foot model could not have a negative impact in any other areas of your life that are fragile and important, or, perhaps, the money you were making as a model rendered what others thought irrelevant.

I use myself as an example. I have a relatively high powered career as a financial analyst. While more progressive today than historically, finance is still quite conservative. Being identified as a foot model/photographer (especially if the content were erotic/pornogrpahic) would destroy my career. Also, you just never know where life will take you. If I make the senior executive ranks one day, or decide to lead a community organization etc., I'd be fucked if people knew I was moonlighting as a foot fetish photographer, let alone being a model. Again, this would only be exasperated by my some of my material being erotic.

So in conclusion, I don't think it makes sense (in most cases) to show your face, unless, you pay your bills as a model/photographer. I advise my models not to show their faces. If my clip/image store were less profitable because of this decision, so be it. As long as the net cost to me remained zero, I would continue to operate because I enjoy the work.

[ December 12, 2008, 10:36 PM: Message edited by: High_Arch_Analyst ]
 

---

Posted by scrunchlover (Member # 21542) on :
 
I don't care, but it does add something too it. Sometimes, a model's feet can make her face pretty to me.
 

---

Posted by tom (Member # 223) on :
 
feet and face is the best.
 

---

Posted by archadmirer (Member # 3142) on :
 
I think your analysis nailed it... the face is just icing for a foot-man. When I get a car, I look at the engine. I may get the power windows if it's an extra $200, but not $2000.
 

---

Posted by Mikey P (Member # 1922) on :
 
read the sig

saying you don't care about the face is like saying you don't care if your girl is Cousin It, as long as she has nice feet

if you have a "high powered" career that could be jeapordized why do it at all? why not just photograph these chicks for your own pleasure?

why would we see YOUR face?

you won't make anywhere near as much money with the "models" being faceless and you know this, so what exactly do you enjoy?
 

---

Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
 
definitely got to see the woman's face. i am all about the whole person concept personally and that include the flesh beyond the woman's foot also known as the woman LOL

i like her eyes and everything. i think one of the things that has often given us a bad name in general is that women think foot fetish guys are obsessed with feet and feet alone.

i think if we can focus on the whole woman concept more often, it promotes a better image for foot fetish in general.

and if we can ever get to this point where foot fetish has a better image, then we won't even have to worry about all this crazy hoopla over hiding faces cuz we are worried about being ostrasized by others.

it seems to be the whole shame factor in the first place that is snowballing us all into a shameful demographic as a whole. be proud of what you like and also be conscientious of the women who's feet we adore and let's try and view them as more than just a bodypart.

that's my thoughts on the whole matter. and as far as profiting goes between face vs non-face, i agree that face & feet will make more. but like i was alluding earlier, if we can promote a better impression of foot fetishists as a whole, then i think all profit margins of the different kinds of sites will go up simply because there are gonna be more viewers open to the sexual idea of feet. just plain and simple economics as I see it.

more face & feet equals better long term potential for all of us
 

---

Posted by High_Arch_Analyst (Member # 28756) on :
 
Well Mikey, I've found the easiest way to find models is to pay them. That can become very expensive, very quickly. Turning over the content online allows for finding models to finance itself. Also, secondary to the above stated reason, I do like sharing content with others and getting feedback.

Why do it at all, because frankly, the low probability that anybody will find out I'm The High Arch Analyst is low. However, the upside of being able to engage beautiful women with hot feet frequently is very valuable to me (but in a different way than making money). So in short, the reward is greater than the risk.

I agree there is more to a women than just feet. But when I'm looking for foot fetish content, I'm not looking for the whole package, I'm looking for sexy feet. Seeing the whole package, is therefore not necessary for me.

Regarding not seeing my face, you're right, you won't see my face. That was my initial point -- I believe in general, models AND photographers have a vested interest in maintaining their anonymity.

The claim that models and webmasters making more money because the models show their faces may or may not be true. I have no evidence to really make a determination. I would assume your position is correct (showing faces is more profitable). Nevertheless, that assumption is based on nothing other than a handful of opinions I've heard here, which is hardly enough to make a conclusive judgment.

Lastly, excuse me if my use of the term "high powered" when referring to my career came across as smug to you. That was not my intention.
 

---

Posted by redd (Member # 7848) on :
 
seeing the face is nice, but if that prevent a model from showing her beautiful feet, i would rather to have seen her feet than none at all.
 

---

Posted by Kwiksand1 (Member # 2390) on :
 
I won't even look at the faceless foot sites.. I am always suspect that there is a dude at the end of those legs!

 

---

Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Kwiksand1:
I won't even look at the faceless foot sites.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tyler D.:
definitely got to see the woman's face. i am all about the whole person concept personally and that include the flesh beyond the woman's foot also known as the woman LOL

i like her eyes and everything. i think one of the things that has often given us a bad name in general is that women think foot fetish guys are obsessed with feet and feet alone.

i think if we can focus on the whole woman concept more often, it promotes a better image for foot fetish in general.

and if we can ever get to this point where foot fetish has a better image, then we won't even have to worry about all this crazy hoopla over hiding faces cuz we are worried about being ostrasized by others.

it seems to be the whole shame factor in the first place that is snowballing us all into a shameful demographic as a whole. be proud of what you like and also be conscientious of the women who's feet we adore and let's try and view them as more than just a bodypart.

that's my thoughts on the whole matter. and as far as profiting goes between face vs non-face, i agree that face & feet will make more. but like i was alluding earlier, if we can promote a better impression of foot fetishists as a whole, then i think all profit margins of the different kinds of sites will go up simply because there are gonna be more viewers open to the sexual idea of feet. just plain and simple economics as I see it.

more face & feet equals better long term potential for all of us

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by High_Arch_Analyst:


Lastly, excuse me if my use of the term "high powered" when referring to my career came across as smug to you. That was not my intention.

---

i'm not calling you smug or anything
 

---

Posted by toelicker91 (Member # 7658) on :
 
I like to see the face. It all just adds up to see just how hot the woman really is.
 

---

Posted by footjoyboy (Member # 26478) on :
 
As long as I'm reasonably sure that they aren't mens feet...I'm good with no face...but I have to see enough of the body to be sure.


 

---

Posted by High_Arch_Analyst (Member # 28756) on :
 
Well, so far, at a glance, it looks like showing faces is a big deal.

If our sample here gets large enough, I'll run off some stats in Excel and see if we have a statistically significant conclusion either way.
 

---

Posted by Tadpole in a Jar (Member # 4402) on :
 
It's nice to see that most agree with me; it's very important. Probably my favorite pose is feet propped up on a desk/chair with the model's face in the background.
 

---

Posted by High_Arch_Analyst (Member # 28756) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tadpole in a Jar:
It's nice to see that most agree with me; it's very important. Probably my favorite pose is feet propped up on a desk/chair with the model's face in the background.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Kwiksand1:
I won't even look at the faceless foot sites.. I am always suspect that there is a dude at the end of those legs!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tadpole in a Jar:
It's nice to see that most agree with me; it's very important. Probably my favorite pose is feet propped up on a desk/chair with the model's face in the background.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by oscarthemonkey:
I post pics here of my wife semi-regularly, and she does not want her face shown. Should all of us with wife's or Gf's who want that stop posting?? I'd really miss some great contributors to this board.

Also- how does this apply to pics with really ugly women showing very attractive feet?

I like a pretty face with pretty feet in pics as much as anyone, and my wife's face is every bit as awesome as her feet. But- I do what I can.

As for this paranoia about seeing guys or trannies feet- how often does this happen to you guys??? It seems to me there are plenty of women posting feet pics on the internet- and like 2nd to God in Power says- can't you tell???

---

quote:

---

As for this paranoia about seeing guys or trannies feet- how often does this happen to you guys??? It seems to me there are plenty of women posting feet pics on the internet- and like 2nd to God in Power says- can't you tell???

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by oscarthemonkey:


.

As for this paranoia about seeing guys or trannies feet- how often does this happen to you guys??? It seems to me there are plenty of women posting feet pics on the internet- and like 2nd to God in Power says- can't you tell???

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:
As a woman, I prefer not to show my face until I am completely comfortable. So it's not that I never will and there are some who might receive a private "face" showing at some point through PM or regular email.

I think if the woman shows enough of herself to prove she's a woman then you don't necessarily need her face...after all -- you probably aren't going to be dating her so if your fetish is for feet - and you've seen enough to know she's truly female .... then you have what you were looking for!

As for bringing personality into it, I think that can be done through comments and sharing little stories when the post is done.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:
I think if the woman shows enough of herself to prove she's a woman then you don't necessarily need her face...

---

Heya pp! Ah yes, if you mean that if the woman shows her genitalia(lips, etc.), so that we know she's truly a woman, then yes, there is no need to show her face then is there? lol Otherwise, you still don't really know for sure then do you? Let me tell ya a lil story ...

Couple of dudes I knew a few years back, went to New York. They said they went out looking on the corners just to see if they could find the hottest looking prostitute they could. Not trying to score, they were just looking for the hell of it.

Well they found what they both thought was a hot woman, so they stopped and started to chat with her. To make a long story short...She pulled up the front of her skirt and even gave them a peek of her pubes, but said that she only did anal sex though.

They both thought this was strange, so they asked her why only anal sex. She told them that unless they wanted oral sex, anal sex was all she "could" do, and then turned around, bent over and showed them how she had tied her penis back between her legs to make her look like a woman from the front! OMFG it's a man, baby! LOL!

Turns out this 'woman' had evidently taken the hormones, gotten implants, pretty much done it all, except for the operation to complete the sex change. And there you have it.

[ December 16, 2008, 07:48 PM: Message edited by: WillJerk4Feet ]
 

---

Posted by 2nd. To God In Power (Member # 23391) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by WillJerk4Feet:

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:
I think if the woman shows enough of herself to prove she's a woman then you don't necessarily need her face...

---

Heya pp! Ah yes, if you mean that if the woman shows her genitalia(lips, etc.), so that we know she's truly a woman, then yes, there is no need to show her face then is there? lol Otherwise, you still don't really know for sure then do you? Let me tell ya a lil story ...

Couple of dudes I knew a few years back, went to New York. They said they went out looking on the corners just to see if they could find the hottest looking prostitute they could. Not trying to score, they were just looking for the hell of it.

Well they found what they both thought was a hot woman, so they stopped and started to chat with her. To make a long story short...She pulled up the front of her skirt and even gave them a peek of her pubes, but said that she only did anal sex though.

They both thought this was strange, so they asked her why only anal sex. She told them that unless they wanted oral sex, anal sex was all she "could" do, and then turned around, bent over and showed them how she had tied her penis back between her legs to make her look like a woman from the front! OMFG it's a man, baby! LOL!

Turns out this 'woman' had evidently taken the hormones, gotten implants, pretty much done it all, except for the operation to complete the sex change. And there you have it.

---

LOL
 

---

Posted by footjoyboy (Member # 26478) on :
 
I'm with perfectpeds on this one.
 

---

Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by WillJerk4Feet:
and then turned around, bent over and showed them how she had tied her penis back between her legs to make her look like a woman from the front! OMFG it's a man, baby!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tyler D.:
I also think the probability of such a deceiptful encounter via the internet is much more probable for most of us than in real life (unless ur just one of those foot fetishists who hang around gay clubs or something). So keep in mind that the internet is full of people who can and will decieve people for their own dimented sexual pleasures.

One of their strongest cover-ups is the fact that the internet can be used as a shield for them to selectively deprive you of critical information which you would otherwise use in real life to make an informed judgement about their true gender.

The internet is a much more difficult place to make this kind of assessment and also a much more likely place to encounter such deceipt. My opinion on this subject is that because of these cards that are stacked against us, we must be even more cautious on the internet than in real life.

That is the main reason why a woman's face is a critical part of my assessment in who she really is as a person as well as gender. To me, my own occurances of masterbation are a replacement form of "real-life" intimacy (a simulation so-to-speak). Just because I like feet and am masterbating via the internet does not mean that I am willing to sacrafice elements of that person had i been with them in real life (like wih a bag over their face or something).

When I have a sexual encounter, be it simulated or in real life, the appropriate gender is the most important element for me. That gender ABSOLUTELY has to be female, and NOT a "percentage chance" (or likelihood) that he or she is female... it has to be 100% chance that she is female. But that's just me.

---

Tyler D! Your best. Post. Ever. Thanks for replying. I feel very much the same also.
 

---

Posted by Toetapper (Member # 6473) on :
 
Gave this some thought before responding. I voted that it was a big deal, though it isn't always a deal-breaker. Still, I much prefer that I see the woman's face; like some above, I want to know to whom the feet are attached. For example, there is a sizable population of Amish in my area and, during the Summer, the women are often barefoot. Some even have very pretty feet, yet there is no desire in me for those feet...I shudder at the thought...and I just thought of it. Eeeek!

I also like the "propped-up" pose, probably my favorite. One of the reasons I like it is that, from time to time, the model will be looking into the camera and I just get the feeling that she just KNOWS there is some guy(s) out there who is going to be cuffing his carrot over her feet. For some reason, I find this very stimulating.
 

---

Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Toetapper:
...cuffing his carrot...

---

 

---

Posted by Sinnister (Member # 2394) on :
 
I'm on the fence. I can see your point of view Analyst, but I can also see the other side where a visual representation (identity) is required to get the full effect of arousal.
 

---

Posted by John Michaels (Member # 4576) on :
 
absolutely. If the girl's not pretty, who cares? The feet AND the girls are important
 

---

Posted by luvfemalefeet (Member # 33017) on :
 
feet most important need 2be good
 

---

Posted by Gameon (Member # 20877) on :
 
Well, from a certified site, I don't mind if I didn't see the models face. I usually don't like seeing that fuzzy covered section to block out the face, it is very creepy.

I've looked for shoe play and hosiery clips on youtube (At college and wus, redtube, footfetish tube etc are banned) and I prefer to see enough of the model to know 100% that it is a woman and not a man!

It usually is pretty obvious when the model in question has insanely large feet and calf muscles but one can be sure where the net gives exposure whilst providing annoyminity for all sorts of people to indulge in.

In summary,

I prefer seeing the models face!
 

---

Posted by perfectpeds (Member # 29295) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by WillJerk4Feet:

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:
I think if the woman shows enough of herself to prove she's a woman then you don't necessarily need her face...

---

Heya pp! Ah yes, if you mean that if the woman shows her genitalia(lips, etc.), so that we know she's truly a woman, then yes, there is no need to show her face then is there? lol Otherwise, you still don't really know for sure then do you? Let me tell ya a lil story ...

Couple of dudes I knew a few years back, went to New York. They said they went out looking on the corners just to see if they could find the hottest looking prostitute they could. Not trying to score, they were just looking for the hell of it.

Well they found what they both thought was a hot woman, so they stopped and started to chat with her. To make a long story short...She pulled up the front of her skirt and even gave them a peek of her pubes, but said that she only did anal sex though.

They both thought this was strange, so they asked her why only anal sex. She told them that unless they wanted oral sex, anal sex was all she "could" do, and then turned around, bent over and showed them how she had tied her penis back between her legs to make her look like a woman from the front! OMFG it's a man, baby! LOL!

Turns out this 'woman' had evidently taken the hormones, gotten implants, pretty much done it all, except for the operation to complete the sex change. And there you have it.

---

Ok - so basically what you're saying is that because I don't show my face to EVERYONE on Wu's then you can't say for sure if I'm a woman from my all my previous posts?

Interesting....I guess people can think what they want.... I think my posts leave no doubt as to whether I am a woman and I have not provided a full face shot.

But this is interesting...

Oh and "2nd power..." - to answer your question as I don't want to appear rude -- YES I did post something.
 

---

Posted by perfectpeds (Member # 29295) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by footjoyboy:
I'm with perfectpeds on this one.

---

You are always there for me!
 

---

Posted by 2nd. To God In Power (Member # 23391) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:

quote:

---

Originally posted by WillJerk4Feet:

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:
I think if the woman shows enough of herself to prove she's a woman then you don't necessarily need her face...

---

Heya pp! Ah yes, if you mean that if the woman shows her genitalia(lips, etc.), so that we know she's truly a woman, then yes, there is no need to show her face then is there? lol Otherwise, you still don't really know for sure then do you? Let me tell ya a lil story ...

Couple of dudes I knew a few years back, went to New York. They said they went out looking on the corners just to see if they could find the hottest looking prostitute they could. Not trying to score, they were just looking for the hell of it.

Well they found what they both thought was a hot woman, so they stopped and started to chat with her. To make a long story short...She pulled up the front of her skirt and even gave them a peek of her pubes, but said that she only did anal sex though.

They both thought this was strange, so they asked her why only anal sex. She told them that unless they wanted oral sex, anal sex was all she "could" do, and then turned around, bent over and showed them how she had tied her penis back between her legs to make her look like a woman from the front! OMFG it's a man, baby! LOL!

Turns out this 'woman' had evidently taken the hormones, gotten implants, pretty much done it all, except for the operation to complete the sex change. And there you have it.

---

Ok - so basically what you're saying is that because I don't show my face to EVERYONE on Wu's then you can't say for sure if I'm a woman from my all my previous posts?

Interesting....I guess people can think what they want.... I think my posts leave no doubt as to whether I am a woman and I have not provided a full face shot.

But this is interesting...

Oh and "2nd power..." - to answer your question as I don't want to appear rude -- YES I did post something.

---

Oh, I must've missed it. *winks*
 

---

Posted by perfectpeds (Member # 29295) on :
 

 

---

Posted by zappa1968 (Member # 27279) on :
 
I like to see feet and face.
 

---

Posted by WillJerk4Feet (Member # 21497) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:

I think my posts leave no doubt as to whether I am a woman and I have not provided a full face shot.

---

lol pp, when you say your posts leave 'no doubt' as to you being a woman, technically that would mean you have visited the adult section of Wu's forum, and then there would absolutlely be 'no doubt'.

Now, I'm not saying that you aren't a female, because I don't know for sure, but then again, neither does anyone else on here. I'm just saying I'm a 100% kind of guy, like a lot of people at Wu's. And you can't expect us 100% kind of guys to drop our guards all the time.
 

---

Posted by perfectpeds (Member # 29295) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by WillJerk4Feet:

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:

I think my posts leave no doubt as to whether I am a woman and I have not provided a full face shot.

---

lol pp, when you say your posts leave 'no doubt' as to you being a woman, technically that would mean you have visited the adult section of Wu's forum, and then there would absolutlely be 'no doubt'.

Now, I'm not saying that you aren't a female, because I don't know for sure, but then again, neither does anyone else on here. I'm just saying I'm a 100% kind of guy, like a lot of people at Wu's. And you can't expect us 100% kind of guys to drop our guards all the time.

---

Well from what I interpreting here is that the only way to prove it is to drop my drawers and I can assure you.... that ain't gonna happen here! That is a privilege that is reserved for relationship only.

Guess I'll just take my chances and hope enough members realize my feminity and continue to enjoy my posts! LOL
 

---

Posted by You (Member # 2107) on :
 
yes, it is a big deal
 

---

Posted by Robotron2084 (Member # 33263) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:

quote:

---

Originally posted by WillJerk4Feet:

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:

I think my posts leave no doubt as to whether I am a woman and I have not provided a full face shot.

---

lol pp, when you say your posts leave 'no doubt' as to you being a woman, technically that would mean you have visited the adult section of Wu's forum, and then there would absolutlely be 'no doubt'.

Now, I'm not saying that you aren't a female, because I don't know for sure, but then again, neither does anyone else on here. I'm just saying I'm a 100% kind of guy, like a lot of people at Wu's. And you can't expect us 100% kind of guys to drop our guards all the time.

---

Well from what I interpreting here is that the only way to prove it is to drop my drawers and I can assure you.... that ain't gonna happen here! That is a privilege that is reserved for relationship only.

Guess I'll just take my chances and hope enough members realize my feminity and continue to enjoy my posts! LOL

---

Hello,

I'm new here and I'm in the feet and face camp. I've seen your feet on previous posts and I agree they're feminine and beautiful. Maybe one day (soon I hope) we can see your face too! Is it true you're not married or have a boyfriend?
 

---

Posted by perfectpeds (Member # 29295) on :
 
Perhaps Santa Clause will leave a present under the tree tomorrow! But once it's unwrapped and taken home - it will be gone!

And yes, Robotron2084, it's true -- no husband and no current boyfriend -- but I don't worry about that because I believe in fate and the right guy is going to find me!

Thank you for your comments in support of my femininity.

Merry Christmas and Welcome to Wu's!
 

---

Posted by domitilo (Member # 1325) on :
 
Certainly, I love to see a beautiful face and beautiful feet in a picture. However, being the foot fetish "purist" that i am, a sexy, clean, well pedicured set of feet are enough to get my attention.
 

---

Posted by ned land (Member # 8065) on :
 
Sticking up for Perfectpeds, some of us have had the divine privilege of seeing her face, and I can assure you, she is ALL female, from her nose to her toes. Whether or not she chooses to reveal that information here in this setting is her choice. Notwithstanding the fact that her posts are dripping with feminine sexiness and a sensibility and intuition that comes through in any of her posts.

It's funny, in another post there was a question of whether or not if you had a chance in passing to see the feet or glance up and check out the face, many opted to see the feet and forgo the face. What's the difference?

Just my 2 cents worth and I'm sure there will be many that disagree, my only response is to get a girlfriend or wife of YOURS to post, see if they want their face out there, and then we can discuss this issue again... ned
 

---

Posted by perfectpeds (Member # 29295) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by ned land:
Sticking up for Perfectpeds, some of us have had the divine privilege of seeing her face, and I can assure you, she is ALL female, from her nose to her toes. Whether or not she chooses to reveal that information here in this setting is her choice. Notwithstanding the fact that her posts are dripping with feminine sexiness and a sensibility and intuition that comes through in any of her posts.

It's funny, in another post there was a question of whether or not if you had a chance in passing to see the feet or glance up and check out the face, many opted to see the feet and forgo the face. What's the difference?

Just my 2 cents worth and I'm sure there will be many that disagree, my only response is to get a girlfriend or wife of YOURS to post, see if they want their face out there, and then we can discuss this issue again... ned

---

My hero...LOL Best to you and your lovely wife, Kay!
 

---

Posted by luv p3rf3ct to3s (Member # 22036) on :
 
im all about the feet. the face winds up as icing on the cake. im one that respects if a woman wants her face shown or not. with the subject matter here it is easy to understand why a woman wouldnt.
 

---

Posted by Mikey P (Member # 1922) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by ned land:


Just my 2 cents worth and I'm sure there will be many that disagree, my only response is to get a girlfriend or wife of YOURS to post, see if they want their face out there, and then we can discuss this issue again... ned

---

a better question would be why would somebody want to post pics of their feet and not show their face?

i don't buy the "i would lose my job" argument, if you are doing nothing more then posing barefoot how is that grounds for firing?

many women have a real job and do modeling on the side like swimsuit, lingerie etc

and they would get fired for posting pics of themselves barefoot?

faceless foot models are almost as insecure as foot guys that can't even tell their wife they like feet

i think they just post pics of their feet to get an ego boost, based on my observation it doesn't take much to impress the average foot guy so it's just another way for them to get male attention, maybe the only way for some of them, hence hiding the face
 

---

Posted by fatpat (Member # 4256) on :
 
i agree with all your points mikey
 

---

Posted by ned land (Member # 8065) on :
 
I'm not worried about work related issues, it is some of the nut-jobs on the internet. Just in case you hadn't noticed, there are a couple of crazy people out on the internet. We don't need to have the guy next door or across the state on a quest to make "contact" with us....

For those who choose to make their faces and personal information known, more power to them. I didn't really have a "dog in this fight" when this thread began, I just saw Perfectpeds being kind of picked on and wanted to support her side.

Anonymity is not always a bad thing. I notice you go by a nickname on here and that your real name, address, etc. is not listed on your profile nor will you put it in your next post. I guess it can't be because of your job or anything else, I mean, you are just on a fetish site, I'm sure all your friends, boss, relatives, etc. are aware of your interests...

And thanks for the explanation of why we post, glad you have it all figured out...

ned
 

---

Posted by climax (Member # 6641) on :
 
for me it is an understatement to stress the importance of the whole of a woman when it comes stuff like this, for me, my fantasies involve 'that' woman in particular, her possible facial expressions and how she would act if my fantasy was real (or rather how id like her to act since its my fantasy). In short, its important because I am physically attracted to the woman as a whole, im not just looking below the ankle, my fantasies involve an intimate session between me and the person in question so i dont like it when the womans face isnt present, its not just about me getting pleasure, its about her enjoyment of engaging in such a thing and picturing her enjoying the fullfilment of such a fantasy,.
 

---

Posted by Mikey P (Member # 1922) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by ned land:
I'm not worried about work related issues, it is some of the nut-jobs on the internet. Just in case you hadn't noticed, there are a couple of crazy people out on the internet. We don't need to have the guy next door or across the state on a quest to make "contact" with us....

For those who choose to make their faces and personal information known, more power to them. I didn't really have a "dog in this fight" when this thread began, I just saw Perfectpeds being kind of picked on and wanted to support her side.

Anonymity is not always a bad thing. I notice you go by a nickname on here and that your real name, address, etc. is not listed on your profile nor will you put it in your next post. I guess it can't be because of your job or anything else, I mean, you are just on a fetish site, I'm sure all your friends, boss, relatives, etc. are aware of your interests...

And thanks for the explanation of why we post, glad you have it all figured out...

ned

---

this is another thing, what are the chances somebody recognizes a chick, let alone likes her so much that he dedicates his life to tracking her down and paying her a visit? is it the insecurity like i mentioned before?

some of these chicks have been showung everything and using their real names (janet mason) for years, some even meet with fans, nobody has killed them and i'm willing to bet they haven't gotten anything more than a creepy email every once in a while

some of you people have seen too many movies, the funny thing is a lot of these faceless foot models probably have a myspace or facebook where they really put themselves out there (face,hometown, full name, place of work) but gotta hide the face from the creepy foot guys on the forums and websites eh

and who here is asking for a full name or address of anybody? many just want to see the face that owns the feet, is that really so crazy?

people do post pics for an ego boost, don't pretend you would continue to post pics if you didn't get "wow your feet made me blow my load" type comments
 

---

Posted by 2nd. To God In Power (Member # 23391) on :
 
I HATE faceless pics, BUT I know a woman when I see a faceless pic. Faceless pics are just stupid. And the whole "I might lose my job" excuse is just retarded.
 

---

Posted by Ophillia (Member # 29787) on :
 
i agree one hundred percent with ned! yes i know that i posted a one day only pic of myself but that was my choice.

people and models choose to post their pics for many different reasons. not everyone wants their face and personal info out there. as far as MYSELF hiding stuff its has nothing to do with foot guys its just CREEPY guys in general! if it was just a matter of a few creepy emails it wouldn't be an issue but it goes beyond that. i have other reasons as well for not posting face pics but they are just that MY reasons. there is no need for anyone to try to analyze another persons reasons for posting and what they post pictures of. just as SOME models choose to post face pics respect that...and just as SOME others don't respect that as well.

you may think that a stated reason is "lame" and "retarded" but thats the way it is guys...accept it and move on. look at the pics or not..its JUST that easy!

on that note i am done commenting on this topic.
 

---

Posted by Tiny Dave (Member # 30771) on :
 
I like to just look at the feet pics. If the model wants to show her face that should be her choice.
 

---

Posted by pacfootluver (Member # 9180) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mikey P:
QUOTE]a better question would be why would somebody want to post pics of their feet and not show their face?

i don't buy the "i would lose my job" argument, if you are doing nothing more then posing barefoot how is that grounds for firing?

many women have a real job and do modeling on the side like swimsuit, lingerie etc

and they would get fired for posting pics of themselves barefoot?

faceless foot models are almost as insecure as foot guys that can't even tell their wife they like feet

i think they just post pics of their feet to get an ego boost, based on my observation it doesn't take much to impress the average foot guy so it's just another way for them to get male attention, maybe the only way for some of them, hence hiding the face [/QB]

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by climax:
for me it is an understatement to stress the importance of the whole of a woman when it comes stuff like this, for me, my fantasies involve 'that' woman in particular, her possible facial expressions and how she would act if my fantasy was real (or rather how id like her to act since its my fantasy). In short, its important because I am physically attracted to the woman as a whole, im not just looking below the ankle, my fantasies involve an intimate session between me and the person in question so i dont like it when the womans face isnt present, its not just about me getting pleasure, its about her enjoyment of engaging in such a thing and picturing her enjoying the fullfilment of such a fantasy,.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ophillia:
i agree one hundred percent with ned! yes i know that i posted a one day only pic of myself but that was my choice.

people and models choose to post their pics for many different reasons. not everyone wants their face and personal info out there. as far as MYSELF hiding stuff its has nothing to do with foot guys its just CREEPY guys in general! if it was just a matter of a few creepy emails it wouldn't be an issue but it goes beyond that. i have other reasons as well for not posting face pics but they are just that MY reasons. there is no need for anyone to try to analyze another persons reasons for posting and what they post pictures of. just as SOME models choose to post face pics respect that...and just as SOME others don't respect that as well.

you may think that a stated reason is "lame" and "retarded" but thats the way it is guys...accept it and move on. look at the pics or not..its JUST that easy!

on that note i am done commenting on this topic.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ophillia:
i agree one hundred percent with ned! yes i know that i posted a one day only pic of myself but that was my choice.

people and models choose to post their pics for many different reasons. not everyone wants their face and personal info out there. as far as MYSELF hiding stuff its has nothing to do with foot guys its just CREEPY guys in general! if it was just a matter of a few creepy emails it wouldn't be an issue but it goes beyond that. i have other reasons as well for not posting face pics but they are just that MY reasons. there is no need for anyone to try to analyze another persons reasons for posting and what they post pictures of. just as SOME models choose to post face pics respect that...and just as SOME others don't respect that as well.

you may think that a stated reason is "lame" and "retarded" but thats the way it is guys...accept it and move on. look at the pics or not..its JUST that easy!

on that note i am done commenting on this topic.

---

LOL I'm sorry, did you post something? You defeated the whole "faceless pic" purpose when you POSTED a pic of your face that 1 time. So, if you have your "reasons" for not posting your face pic, then WHY did you post your face pic a while back? And no, I'm not attacking ya, just confused. And yes, you look good, from what I can remember.
 

---

Posted by You (Member # 2107) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tiny Dave:
I like to just look at the feet pics. If the model wants to show her face that should be her choice.

---

how about a pair of feet chopped out of a body?
 

---

Posted by High_Arch_Analyst (Member # 28756) on :
 
Mikey and 2nd, you guys are just beating at a dead horse.

None of your arguments are going to convince anybody but yourselves that showing your face makes a model anymore superior (or whatever) than those who remain anonymous.

Just because a man can get just as much satisfaction from seeing face-showing and face-less feet pics doesn't mean he has any more or less appreciation for the whole women.

In many careers, modeling on the side could be very career limiting, and/or lead to being fired. Maybe you guys just haven't worked in button down ultra conservative and professional environments, or around dirtbags who might label you for engaging in what you consider erotic fun. Many people do, and they can have their cake and eat it too by remaining anonymous. You don't have to buy it, you think for any body it's a reality, they care who buys it.

Most people who have myspace pages, keep them private so that strangers and roaming HR people can't learn the private info you spoke of.

Obviously we're all gonna have our take on the issue, but nobodies is an authority. The argument is cicular.

If you don't like faceless pics, you don't have to look, buy, whatever.

Regardless, I respect your positions, just have a varying opinion.

Excuse any errors, I typed quickly from out of town on my Blackberry.
 

---

Posted by 2nd. To God In Power (Member # 23391) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by High_Arch_Analyst:
Mikey and 2nd, you guys are just beating at a dead horse.

None of your arguments are going to convince anybody but yourselves that showing your face makes a model anymore superior (or whatever) than those who remain anonymous.

Just because a man can get just as much satisfaction from seeing face-showing and face-less feet pics doesn't mean he has any more or less appreciation for the whole women.

In many careers, modeling on the side could be very career limiting, and/or lead to being fired. Maybe you guys just haven't worked in button down ultra conservative and professional environments, or around dirtbags who might label you for engaging in what you consider erotic fun. Many people do, and they can have their cake and eat it too by remaining anonymous. You don't have to buy it, you think for any body it's a reality, they care who buys it.

Most people who have myspace pages, keep them private so that strangers and roaming HR people can't learn the private info you spoke of.

Obviously we're all gonna have our take on the issue, but nobodies is an authority. The argument is cicular.

If you don't like faceless pics, you don't have to look, buy, whatever.

Regardless, I respect your positions, just have a varying opinion.

Excuse any errors, I typed quickly from out of town on my Blackberry.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by High_Arch_Analyst:
Mikey and 2nd, you guys are just beating at a dead horse.

None of your arguments are going to convince anybody but yourselves that showing your face makes a model anymore superior (or whatever) than those who remain anonymous.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mikey P:
michee mee was not always faceless

michelle got in trouble becuase her site was basically porn, not just FEET MODELING

are the other girls you mentioned really popular? i never see their names mentioned on other foot forums

those girls are clearly selling jerkoff material, they are not modeling

big difference than the faceless foot models who are just modeling their feet

---

Exactly! Those girls are selling pornography, not just showing pics of their feet! Wth, when people can't even tell the difference between selling pornography and simple feet pics being displayed, but they say they know for sure that a woman is a woman because they've seen a pic of his/her face, yet no genitalia. Geezus.

Like I said before in my post, my friends just KNEW FOR SURE that the person on the corner was a woman. They talked to her, observed her mannerisms, body language, even saw her feet and tits! She was hot! UNTIL she bent over and displayed her PENIS!

Feet pics with no face have a very high percentage that, sooner or later, they'll get boring just like tit pics with no face. And don't forget about the Tranny factor! Trannys make the faceless feet pic world go round! Happy New Year damnit!
 

---

Posted by High_Arch_Analyst (Member # 28756) on :
 
Dude, pics of models who show their face get boring too. I believe, in general, people, particularly men, get bored with looking at the same thing - especially women. Showing more is more or less just delaying (or possibly accelerating) the inevitable. I guess that depends on the viewer.
 

---

Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
 
Hmmm. We expect our contributors to post pics of their faces and we don't buy their excuses of not doing it for work/personal reasons. Yet they are th only one's exposing themselves. I'm a guy and I know I don't want my face pics up on this site so how can I expect someone else to.

I dare all the guys that claim that all models should show their faces to change their avatars to their face pics. Lead the way! I'm certain the culture of the forum will change and many would be more open to disclose their appearance!

GQguy
 

---

Posted by perfectpeds (Member # 29295) on :
 
It seems here that there is a fine line between what is being considered a foot "model" and then those who are just contributors as well as trying to discern between foot pictures and/or porn.

I have been called out on occasion for not showing my face in my posts, but I am not trying to pass myself off as a "foot model" nor do I have a site, sell pictures or any other item or generate a profit or income of any kind from my contributions.

I post here for the mutual satisfcaction of ...
1) being appreciated and receiving accolades which of course everyone likes to receive and...
2) to know I have brought joy, pleasure, etc. to others.

I have always enjoyed the feeling of giving and any normal human being enjoys feeling appreciated, respected, and perhaps yes - even somewhat "loved".

But I do not feel I need to show my genitalia to prove my gender. If I so choose to share my full identity with someone it is because a true friendship is developing and there is more interaction and sharing of information that just talking about the fetish aspects or viewing pics of feet. To those I build a level of trust and respect with - they are allowed to see "more of me" but never "all" of me... LOL

I am not here to PROVE myself to those who do not wish to view my posts and to each his/her own! There's enough quality material of all types here at Wu's to satisfy the masses!

I, for one, enjoy being a member and a contributor here in both the pictures and the talks and as long as there are those who enjoy the fact that I am doing it out of pure enjoyment -- I will continue to contribute. This is the only site I participate in and am quite happy leaving it that way.

Best of luck to everyone in 2009! Here's to a year of better understanding and increased tolerance.

Happy New Year!
Perfectpeds
 

---

Posted by Robotron2084 (Member # 33263) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by GQguy:
Hmmm. We expect our contributors to post pics of their faces and we don't buy their excuses of not doing it for work/personal reasons. Yet they are th only one's exposing themselves. I'm a guy and I know I don't want my face pics up on this site so how can I expect someone else to.

I dare all the guys that claim that all models should show their faces to change their avatars to their face pics. Lead the way! I'm certain the culture of the forum will change and many would be more open to disclose their appearance!

GQguy

---

I'd do it except for the fact that I'm ugly! ...seriously!
 

---

Posted by Robotron2084 (Member # 33263) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by perfectpeds:
It seems here that there is a fine line between what is being considered a foot "model" and then those who are just contributors as well as trying to discern between foot pictures and/or porn.

I have been called out on occasion for not showing my face in my posts, but I am not trying to pass myself off as a "foot model" nor do I have a site, sell pictures or any other item or generate a profit or income of any kind from my contributions.

I post here for the mutual satisfcaction of ...
1) being appreciated and receiving accolades which of course everyone likes to receive and...
2) to know I have brought joy, pleasure, etc. to others.

I have always enjoyed the feeling of giving and any normal human being enjoys feeling appreciated, respected, and perhaps yes - even somewhat "loved".

But I do not feel I need to show my genitalia to prove my gender. If I so choose to share my full identity with someone it is because a true friendship is developing and there is more interaction and sharing of information that just talking about the fetish aspects or viewing pics of feet. To those I build a level of trust and respect with - they are allowed to see "more of me" but never "all" of me... LOL

I am not here to PROVE myself to those who do not wish to view my posts and to each his/her own! There's enough quality material of all types here at Wu's to satisfy the masses!

I, for one, enjoy being a member and a contributor here in both the pictures and the talks and as long as there are those who enjoy the fact that I am doing it out of pure enjoyment -- I will continue to contribute. This is the only site I participate in and am quite happy leaving it that way.

Best of luck to everyone in 2009! Here's to a year of better understanding and increased tolerance.

Happy New Year!
Perfectpeds

---

Don't worry about it Perfect Peds...when you're ready I'm sure it will be worth the wait. In my short time here I've noticed more than a few one hit wonders and infrequent drive-bys. You're a regular and deliver the goods without showing your face. All the best to you in 2009!
 

---

Posted by Mikayla's #1 Fan (Member # 2662) on :
 
It all depends. Some model's feet are easily recognized without the face. More importantly, noticing distinctive features (Mommies' tattoos, Tina Marie's high arches, or Mikayla's popsicle toes) have always been my biggest turn on!! All I'm saying is, the FEET speak for themselves. Adding the face in the photo is simply icing on the cake.
 

---

Posted by Mikey P (Member # 1922) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by GQguy:
Hmmm. We expect our contributors to post pics of their faces and we don't buy their excuses of not doing it for work/personal reasons. Yet they are th only one's exposing themselves. I'm a guy and I know I don't want my face pics up on this site so how can I expect someone else to.

I dare all the guys that claim that all models should show their faces to change their avatars to their face pics. Lead the way! I'm certain the culture of the forum will change and many would be more open to disclose their appearance!

GQguy

---

i'm not here looking for any sort of attention to boost my ego, like faceless models are

nobody comes here to see men in any way, shape, or form

so what would be the point of me or any guy posting a pic?

if it becomes a rule for every faceless chick to post a face pic, I will post a pic of my stunningly handsome face

[ January 01, 2009, 03:05 PM: Message edited by: Mikey P ]
 

---

Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :
 
"I want to know who thinks it's a big deal whether models show their faces, who is indifferent and who thinks it's a big deal (and why)."

I have already responded to this part of the thread author's initial post. As I said, I prefer to see a woman's facial features as well as her feet, and don't pay much attention to feet photos if I can't match match those pedal extremities with a woman's face.

I think it's perfectly understandable if some ladies who post here choose not to show their faces, and I don't think they should be insulted or ridiculed for doing so. I think it's equally pointless for a person to take issue with someone who isn't a fan of "faceless feet" shots.
 

---

Posted by The foot fu**in master (Member # 2152) on :
 
Personally, my preference is to see the face. I also respect the wishes of models who don't want to show their faces and i would never berate them for that. The ladies who post images do so for various reasons, among them, the admiration of us fans of their beauty. We should be grateful that there are many beautiful models who share their intimacies with us whether or not they show their faces.
If I see feet that i'm not into or shots where I would prefer to see a face, I move on to a picture that does it for me. Theres no need to leave nasty comments and offend the model nor those who like the particular shots. That way, no harm is done.
Just my thoughts.
Respectfully

FFM
 

---

Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
 
I like to use my imagination for the "faceless" pics. Adds something to it...such as I can pretend that those feet are of a hot girl that I saw earlier in the day, or a girl I know etc.

As for the debate on posting face pics with the feet I have posted pics of my girls peds on here a couple of times and she asked to not have her face in the picture, which I respected. My girl does not have a job that commands respect or authority by any means, were located in a region that I know of only one footguy..who is about a 5 hour drive away in another province so were covered in that regard but we still don't feel comfortable as of yet to reveal her full identity.

This thread has been by far the most entertaining on Wu's in a long time by the way. Everyone has good arguments, High Arch, thanks for starting the debate, Mike, thanks for continiuing the debate in your awesome humor and to Perfect Peds,all I can say is wow, you have been holding your ground admirably and I am glad you realize that no one is attacking you here,nothing worse then seeing someone run off all pissed off at someone due to a misinterpration of a comment.

Happy New Year to all as well!
 

---

Posted by perfectpeds (Member # 29295) on :
 
Thank you bluetoelover! I don't see a need to get angry over a "topic" - though some comments may be directed to me and my posts - it is just that and not personal. The commentators do not KNOW me. I am open to other opinions and respect each individual's right to express theirs.

This how we learn and are exposed to ideas which we may not otherwise be exposed to.


 

---

Posted by peterindc (Member # 33778) on :
 
90% of the time, I want to see a face and a body. Pics or vids feet only get boring real fast.
 

---

Posted by Dlightful (Member # 20842) on :
 
HAA. Interesting topic. I must say that if you are a "foot fetishist", feet should be what you're looking for. I post pics because my husband has a foot fetish. We don't feel the need to show my face in my pics, for most of the reasons that have already been stated. If you agree with them, great, if you don't move on to the pics where you can see the models face. My husband and I look at both type of pics. If we see something that is qestionable (guy or girl), we might chuckle a little and move on. I don't begrudge people who won't look at pics because my face isn't seen, but you're missing out on a great pair of feet (not just my opinion. LOL). Just my little humble opinion. You go perfectpeds!!
 

---

Posted by National (Member # 8568) on :
 
Enough already!

It's quite evident that faceless models are not wanted. Here's an analogy: A girl gives you a blowjob, and then right before you're about to cum she suddenly stops and tells you that you're on your own. To me that's the kind of stupid and useless games faceless models play. Faceless models give off the message that footguys are ALL freaks, living up to the negative hype the stereotypes place on us as a group of guys who would get off to just ANY foot.

Let me show you why faceless models will NEVER be the preferred types over those who do show their faces. If you go on the internet one night, go to Wus, and realize that all you see are pictures of faceless models. That's it. EVERYwhere you go, EVERY link you click on shows infinite pictures of faceless models, how long will it be before you file a complaint, or throw a fit about wanting to know who these girls are? The answer: two minutes TOPS.

On the other hand, if you go on the internet one night and all you see are pictures of models with faces attached to their bodies, how long will it be before you throw a fit? The answer: NEVER. How long will it be before you bust a nut? The answer: 17 seconds TOPS.

If all you saw were faceless models, you won't get off. For all I know, that faceless model could be an alien.

...okay, I went a bit too far with that alien comment, but you get what I mean.

How you like if all the porn you bought only shows footage of girls doing all the nasty stuff you're into WITHOUT showing the faces of the girls getting fucked? You will not be able to tolerate porn if all the DVDs you bought never shows the faces of the girls. Would you be a happy guy if the only foot porn available were headless women? No, you wouldn't.

If you can understand what I'm saying, then you just came to a realization that feet with a head attached to the rest of the body is really preferred over those without the face.

"Dlightful" mentioned earlier that "If we see something that is qestionable (guy or girl), we might chuckle a little and move on." Now, if we see the face, we wouldn't have any questions at all. We know it's a girl and Bada-bing, bada-boom no controversies.

Notice how there are never controversies when the girl shows face. Because we are all at ease.

This question was posted in the first place because someone keeps fucking around with other foot fetishists feelings.


MY FINALS WORDS:
If you don't mind headless pictures, fine (I, suppose). But face in the pic, ALWAYS better.

-National

P.S. I don't buy the phony excuses as to why they don't want to show their faces either.
 

---

Posted by 2nd. To God In Power (Member # 23391) on :
 
LOL Well said. Faceless pics are LAME. It's funny that somebody would show their whole body on MySpace/Facebook, but ONLY show their feet on a foot forum site. Verrry stupid. LOL
 

---

Posted by National (Member # 8568) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 2nd. To God In Power:
LOL Well said. Faceless pics are LAME. It's funny that somebody would show their whole body on MySpace/Facebook, but ONLY show their feet on a foot forum site. Verrry stupid. LOL

---