So if your browsing the internet looking for some nice hot feet to wack to, do you prefer to pics of feet of people that you actually know so you can actually get a decent perspective of what they might look like or do you go for any randome sexy pair of feet? Personally pics of people I kno get me goin more but I find myself just goin at it to randoms or celebs.
Posted by DancingFool (Member # 3728) on :
To me it doesn't matter. I can get a good enough perspective of what a woman looks like providing that there are several pics in the set, all of which include a face shot. I don't usually go for the faceless pics unless her feet are beyond perfect and in the most perfect pose imaginable.
With that said, there are some celebrities I'm curious about--I assume you meant celebrities and not people we actually know (how would we find such pics?)--for instance, I have never seen a good sole shot of Kim Basinger. Just saw 9 1/2 Weeks for the first time, and there was one quick decent shot of her in 'the pose', but then in that Tom Petty video, 'Mary Jane's Last Dance', they showed what was supposed to be her on a gurney with her feet sticking out, but according to Vh1 Pop Up Video, they weren't her feet.
So she is the only one, along with my all time crush Janeane Garafalo, whose soles I also have never seen. But I've gotten off yer point here, regarding random pics vs. pics of women I know--my answer is it doesn't matter. Besides, if you were to meet a hot chick for the first time, and she asked you in a most horny voice to lick her feet, would you refuse cause you didn't know her that well? I think not!
Posted by scrunchlover (Member # 21542) on :
I really don't care, as long as they have feet I like, or do poses I like. Celebs are pretty, but they all seem to strike the same poses, which hardly ever includes something I like.
Posted by Weekend_Warrior (Member # 2662) on :
I basically go for the High-Res Pics. (i.e. SOLE SHOTS & CLOSE-UPS!) The more detail there is ~ the more likely I'll get off!
Poor pic quality is one of my biggest turn-offs.
Posted by Lyrical (Member # 6603) on :
either or for me or should I say both and.
Posted by Toetapper (Member # 6473) on :
Sexy feet are simply sexy. Sometimes it's photos of feet I know that give me "that feeling" other times it is feet I don't know that are inspiring. It just depends on what/how it strikes me.
Posted by loves2smell (Member # 36190) on :
To me it also doesn't matter. As long as they look tasty and smelly lol.
Posted by Iowas foot slave (Member # 28971) on :
To me, it doesn't matter too much. Just as long as they look nice. Most celebs have the same poses and usually, they're not that good and their feet aren't too good either. The worst though is the models that show their feet and have NO CLUE how to take care of them or what we like. Gotta love the posers.
Posted by octoberbaseball (Member # 20977) on :
To me it doesn't matter, but I love the feeling of a girl I know who never ever shows her feet then coming online and seeing them. Or if a girl who I would see around in flip flops has pictures online of her in the pose. That would be cool.
Posted by feetplease (Member # 36371) on :
Sorry I'm new here and don't know how to do the whole quote thing but dancing fool there is a pic where you can see Kim Basingers soles at feetarchive.com its by far the best site i've found for famous female's feet and they have a HUGE selection =)
Posted by FtLckr26 (Member # 13998) on :
Doesn't matter if its a random pair of feet or a celebrity. As long as the feet were pretty, I could get off to it. That was in the past. Now though, I find that if its not my wife's feet then I can't wack off to another womans feet.
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
(i.e. SOLE SHOTS & CLOSE-UPS!) The more detail there is ~ the more likely I'll get off! ![[Hump]](graemlins/hump.gif)