Foot Fetish Forum: Which is better?

This is topic Which is better? in forum Foot Fetish Talk at Foot Fetish Forum.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=011697

Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :

A counterpart to that other thread.

A woman worshipping another woman's feet, or a man worshipping a woman's feet?

There seems to be an equal amount of both around, so I'm curious as to which one you all prefer.

...Maybe, with that last thread, we have have a tier list going on.

Posted by Spruce314 (Member # 35412) on :

Personally I prefer a woman worshiping another woman's feet or doing other things with them.

Posted by Toe Sucker II (Member # 1720) on :

I think girl on girl looks too fake. So I will go with another guy worshipping a girls feet. At least you know they are enjoying it.

Posted by ROYALS22262 (Member # 2681) on :

I love girl/girl action the absolute best! I hate to see men in my fantasy material! They do nothing for me. I want to see, and fantasize about sexy women only! If there is the thought of a man, it would only be me!

Posted by DeTrOiT (Member # 37598) on :

As long as its BELLADONNA..It'll be way better than a guy...UNLESS THE GUY IS ME...lol

Posted by footjoyboy (Member # 26478) on :

Though it's still gay (not that there is anything wrong with that), I'd probably lean toward girl/girl.
My reason being that I would then increase my chances of seeing another chick's feet.

[Cool]

Posted by FIASCo (Member # 1899) on :

I prefer seeing a girl worship another girl's feet.

Posted by Toetapper (Member # 6473) on :

I tend toward the girl/girl thing especially if Silvia Saint or Belladonna is involved.

Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :

definitely the guy on girl for sure. makes it more believable as if they didn't all have to be paid to do the scene. well, we can at least assume the male didn't have to be paid LOL, much more believable & therefore masterbatable

i like to see tongues licking flat against the surface area of a female's foot (like a dog tongue hanging out) and i much prefer that likely style as opposed to having the licker smile like a donut and use pursed lips while enduring the taste of her foot. a non-paid performer is more likely to truly enjoy the tast, and more than 9 out of 10 times, a male will like feet more than a female in real life.

it is so much better when the person WANTS to be there to lick and sniff, not like he or she is only doing it for the money. those little nuances can stick out to experienced observers of reality and true foot worship.

[ March 30, 2010, 05:36 PM: Message edited by: Tyler D. ]

Posted by Fwrinkledsoles (Member # 101) on :

I love a guy worshipping a woman feet better and wishing it was me!

Posted by Iowas foot slave (Member # 28971) on :

I prefer guy on girl as opposed to girl on girl.

Posted by lust4latinafeet (Member # 32686) on :

i like the way girl's really worship another girls feet,very erotic.But i think a man worshipping a girls feet is good because you can fantasize that it's you worshipping her feet & that's where a guy should be.At a beautiful girls feet.Bow down & lick feet & suck my toes lol

Posted by dicky5 (Member # 10026) on :

Real girl on girl > real guy on girl > fake girl on girl > fake guy on girl (seen it once, a real shame).

Posted by tom (Member # 223) on :

Guy enjoying a gals feet - no question.

Posted by Diabolicus (Member # 7743) on :

Guy on girl, I can't fantasize about girl on girl foot-worship because I don't have a female genitalia. This rule is void if Belladonna comes in to the picture, I just enjoy seeing her at work.

Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :

quote:
Originally posted by dicky5:
Real girl on girl > real guy on girl > fake girl on girl > fake guy on girl (seen it once, a real shame).

Because it is so simple and direct, I find this to be the best response so far.

I am not certain that I agree that "real-girl-on-girl" beats "real-guy-on-girl," but it's very close. (The problem is that you really don't often see "real-girl-on-girl." You see a simulation of it.)

I agree with TylerD and you, Dicky5, that real is better. I also agree with those who point out that it's harder to "relate" to the scene when it's a girl worshiping the other girl's feet. If it's a guy doing it, I can relate as though "I'm him." That's more satisfying, to me.

Posted by briar (Member # 22228) on :

Definitely guy on girl. Girl on girl just looks unnatural and fake to me.

I'll add that amateur > studio stuff as well IMO.

Posted by Salvy_Mic (Member # 13384) on :

I like both, but I have to say I prefer guy-on-girl more. The one thing about girl-on-girl material is that that somebody always tries to throw the camera a seductive, come-hither look....which oddly enough, kills it for me. Focus on what you're doing, which 9 times out 10, is exactly what a guy ends up doing, as opposed to mugging for the camera. About the only time I don't mind it is if one or both parties are being humorous about it.

Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Pjay:
The problem is that you really don't often see "real-girl-on-girl." You see a simulation of it.

very true, but on the rare occasion that you see a genuine version of it, the worshipping girl is often hideous.

if the end-goal is to perceive oneself in the worshipping role, why imagine ourselves as a hideous female when there are plenty of "gender-corresponding" substitutes that already exist?

aside from the fact that it makes no logical sense, i can see no other reason around it unless one has a fantasy about being a woman (which in and of itself, is more about a different kind of fetish than foot fetish persay).

the two ideas are separate fantasies (licking feet & imagining oneself as a woman) although they may happen to be combined in a girl-girl foot worship scenario.

quote:
Originally posted by briar:
Girl on girl just looks unnatural and fake to me.

I'll add that amateur > studio stuff as well IMO.

i'm with most people who prefer the modern day trend that is migrating more towards reality type programming, which is based on things like statistical likelihoods for the viewer(s). for me (fortunately or not), those statistical likelihoods are material that resembles my avatar [Confused]

[ April 03, 2010, 07:06 AM: Message edited by: Tyler D. ]

Posted by National (Member # 8568) on :

I prefer girl-on-girl. Most of these guys look unkempt, and they don't know what the hell they're doing. They show that while anyone can worship a foot, they lack any artistic element that makes the act look like something that's worth engaging in. That's where the girl-on-girl idea comes into play and saves the art of foot worshiping from the brink of extinction, boredom, and insignificance.

Girl-on-girl looks like it has some foreplay that plays a role into the act. I really, really think that most men can't worship feet properly and they discombobulate the entire meaning of how meaningful worshiping the feet of hot women can be. If I were to worship the feet of an ugly or fat girl (as unlikely as that is), I would look as distasteful as those men do in those guy-on-girl foot worship videos.

With guy-on-girl foot videos, I'm watching a bunch of rookies at work. It reminds me of amateur hour. These women are pros when it comes to worshiping another woman's feet. Girl-on-girl doesn't look so "unreal" to me. They know how to spice up the act.

The only time I don't mind seeing guy-on-girl is in regular sex porn. If I want to see Slimer from the Ghostbusters worship women's feet and see that disgusting tongue and goo infesting the poor lady's feet, then I'll see guy-on-girl.

--National

Posted by Toesucker85 (Member # 16795) on :

guy on guy and girl on girl.

Posted by Toesucker85 (Member # 16795) on :

oops meant guy on girl lol and girl on girl, my bad ppl.

Posted by LovelyLadies (Member # 5079) on :

Guy on girl for sure for me. I like to put myself in that dude's perspective if I could. Girl on girl does nothing for me tbh. I hope that doesn't make me gay lol.