Would you prefer that footjobs be eliminated in avatars and signatures?
[ June 04, 2010, 09:41 PM: Message edited by: Wu ]
Posted by mmmtoes (Member # 30792) on :
Can't say that I ever really noticed. Now that you ask - I see. but I don't care either way.
Posted by SOLEMAN 13 (Member # 33699) on :
MORE FEET...LESS WIENER! Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
What happened to the other thread of this poll? I see you made the answers less skewered Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :
Personally, I can't stand to see them at all. Yeah, I know that this is essentially a porn forum, but I can't help the way I feel.
Posted by lust4latinafeet (Member # 32686) on :
Well i prefer to look at it as the pretty feet dominating the penis i don't care to look at it.Who cares.I thought you were referring to my sig.Her feet are so pretty.Look at her sole ontop his penis & the position he/she is in.I'd love to be in that position with her, that lucky sob lol
Posted by lust4latinafeet (Member # 32686) on :
Oh who the hell removed my pic!!!!!!! isn't this what this forum is about!!!!!! fj's/foot worship etc.It was probably a result of this topic!!!! It was up for about a week until yesterday this is stupid!
Posted by Martial Law (Member # 2564) on :
There are penises in avatars/signatures? Heh, news to me. I don't have a problem with it, but then I am bi.
*shrugs*
Posted by bluetoelover (Member # 14736) on :
I'm not into nylon clad feet but I see some members have pics of those in their avatars/sigs....should I send a mod a PM to get that taken off too?? Posted by Wu (Member # 1) on :
quote:Originally posted by mmmtoes: Can't say that I ever really noticed. Now that you ask - I see. but I don't care either way.
Pretty much... There really aren't many people with FJ material in their sigs or avatars. I really don't know the last time I've seen it. I'm not even sure why it is an issue.
I deleted the last thread about this because the options were so ridiculous.
Posted by mclaren f1 2003 (Member # 2934) on :
If I had to choose, id say no as I feel it should be left to the adult section of the forums
But in reality, I don't really care haha
Posted by Beautifulfeetonline.com (Member # 13717) on :
And not to be a "party pooper" or anything, but most fj pics I have seen have had the watermark cropped and that is just not cool imho.
Posted by dicky5 (Member # 10026) on :
Image signatures are kind of irritating in general.
Posted by lust4latinafeet (Member # 32686) on :
So Wu is this not allowed or is it ok?Because i have had 2 fj shots in my sig pic for a week or so but i found today that it has disappeared.Is it really an issue.I mean it's not like we haven't seen a penis before & this is a foot fetish forum which does include fj's(feet+PENIS).We're not kids,if you don't like to see it don't stare at it.Surely it's not that big of a deal. I don't really like seeing penises either but, the way i look at it is, the pretty feet that are dominating the penis, which is the turn on for me personally.But i don't hate it to the extent where i'd ask to have it removed!
Posted by Diabolicus (Member # 7743) on :
Avatars/Signatures are supposed to be a reflection of the poster. Yes we all know that you like feet and such, but that doesn't give any insight in to the personality behind the user.
I guess I am all for freedom of choice though, so they can stay I suppose. :S
![[Hump]](graemlins/hump.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Mad]](cuss.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)