Hello all, We all have a foot fetish so otherwise we would not be on a forum like this. My question is at what age do you draw the line so to speak, what I mean is what age is it morally wrong just to look at a younger girls feet.
I find myself guilty when I have looked at say 15 year old girls footwear and thought this is wrong but we are what we are and the majority of us would try not to gaze at a girl shoeplaying it is just to hard not to look.
The other day I was walking in a shopping arcade, when I could not help but see two girls possibly both 15 or 16 shoeplaying with their ballet flats, now most schoolgirls wear ballet flats and most are always covered feet with socks or tights, trying not to look just at their socked feet in ballet flats, I could not help but notice the one girl had quite well worn black ballet flats, infact they looked covered in sweat, now I felt that I should not be even looking at their shoes, remember their feet are covered in socks.
My question to you all and I would like an honest answer is, could you look away and not even stare at a younger girls feet or admit defeat and say you looked only! I find it very hard having this fetish, I am only interested in women's feet of a certain age but admit to looking only at younger girls 'Covered' feet
Posted by Tyler D. (Member # 11452) on :
there is nothing wrong with looking at the feet of a girl who is underage. afterall, they are objects which are there for the viewing. nothing illegal about noticing something that exists in real life.
the problem becomes when sick men start fantasizing about these underage girls or even worse, start purusing them for their perverted pleasures.
that is when it becomes wrong.
looking at something is harmless, but don't sit there and drool either. us guys may have some explaining to do to the fathers of these young girls if you start doing that kind of crap.
just look and don't dwell.
Posted by Talos (Member # 39913) on :
Yeah, I agree with Tyler. Besides, why would anyone want a younger girl anyway. Cougars FTW!
Posted by catsman (Member # 10269) on :
I definitely look. I see nothing wrong with looking. Agree with Talos, older ladies with fine feet is the ultimate meal for me.
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
Well it's just (I'd assume) you are used to looking down when you see that the person is a woman (or even if there's just a foot in view) probably without even realising her age.
Like if there's even a guy's foot on screen of a TV, your eye instantly goes to it because it's a foot and it's a bit of a synapse reaction. Then you get whiplash looking away :'(
Posted by Toe-fu (Member # 18036) on :
It seems there are a lot of people here who have a phobia against anything under 18, even though they themselves are attracted to it.
If a 45 year old man mentions feet (or ass, or whatever) of an 18 year old, that's fine.
If a 19 year old mentions feet of a 16 year old. OMFGPERVERTPEDOFILE!!!
It's the law, but still, it's not like you're talking about 5 year olds. These girls (16,17) hit puberty a long time ago and are aware of their sexuality. With the way women are dressing nowadays, who's to blame? THE MEN OR THE GIRLS OR THEIR PARENTS?... 12 year olds in this generation are walking around in high heels, lipstick, hairdo, etc trying their best to look older. How do their parents allow them to do such a thing?
[ September 26, 2010, 01:50 PM: Message edited by: Toe-fu ]
Posted by footjoyboy (Member # 26478) on :
Yeah, I'd look, but wouldn't dare touch.
Posted by feetluvr (Member # 1570) on :
I can look at, and appreciate, the feet of girls down to about 10 years of age (roughly) but fortunately the filter in my brain still works that prevents me from lusting after them.
Where the lusting line is drawn is tough to say- most times probably 16 and up.
Toe-fu brings up a true and valid point that girls are hitting puberty much younger now and are dressing and acting much older than they should (IMHO) Even though a 15/16 year-olds feet might be very attractive I STILL would never touch them even if given the chance.
Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :
Well, I DO prefer younger women (I'm 22, so I'm still young myself), but I'll have to draw the line at around 18, or maybe 16 since the AoC here is 16 (yay, Michigan!!).
Posted by riker25 (Member # 31867) on :
I am a little older than most of you guys. Because of my age, I usually feel very guilty looking at young girls feet. I might take a quick glance at a 16 - 17 year old girls feet, but tend to look away very quickly because of the guilt factor.
Posted by baalfootish (Member # 33991) on :
hey dude, you have five senses, so longs as u only use the one you are golden, though i would imaging smelling the sox isnt illegal but just strange
Posted by Ophillia (Member # 29787) on :
boy thats a tough one. i agree with what athena said about you just automatically look down. being a parent part of me screams wtf and then taylor luiteur or whatever that kid from new moon comes on tv half naked and im like OMG im going to hell!
Posted by muleslicker (Member # 3049) on :
Hey guys thanks for the feedback on this, I sure find it difficult to not stare but avert my eyes knowing it is wrong.
Posted by GQguy (Member # 16534) on :
It's natural. But we're in a civilized society...so it's wrong to act. I find that this isn't much of an issue for me because younger women usually don't have the fashion sense that lends me to find them attractive. They also don't take care of their feet the same way a more exposed woman would. Chipped polish, no polish, dirty feet all are turn offs and typically that's what I typically see with younger women.
Posted by DeTrOiT (Member # 37598) on :
I look at the feet of girls that are very young...Maybe around 14 or 15...BUT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING SEXUAL ABOUT IT!!! I think that I may be different, just because I look at and may appreciate a ladies pretty feet DOESN'T MAKE ME THINK OF WANKING OFF OR SEX...I would think more like, "Wow she has cute feet"...Thats where it ends...Infact most times when I look at cute feet and I look at the face second to check for age, then the body, if she's grown...IM HAPPY THAT IM NOT A PERV.lol
Posted by justdaone (Member # 16096) on :
I agree with most people on this. My wife is ok with the looking. But for me I'm more interested in footwear as to feet so that may be a part of it too.
Posted by oppressus (Member # 36433) on :
She is old enough for me if she can sit on the curb and her feet touches the ground.... Posted by TheSeanman (Member # 39562) on :
I think its best to do foot fetish activities with females 18 or up. Even though theres many young girls with attractive feet, It would be wise to stay away. I don't find it wrong to stare at teen girls feet as long as you control yourself.It can't be helped because if feet is beautiful, than its gonna be looked at. I myself would only deal with 18 or older because I don't want to go to prison but I admit I have glanced at younger girls feet quite a few times. Sometimes the guilt factor sets in but then I feel that as long as im not hurting the girl its fine. Since its feet and not a private part, I find nothing wrong as long as the girls are not being messed with in any sexual manner.
Posted by footfreak30 (Member # 41923) on :
I've had this mind battle so many times, for two reasons. 1. I'm a HUGE soles man. I like them soft and perfectly soft and not cracked or calused and any way. and 2. Because I used to have a job where I was always around 14-16 girls who tend to run around barefoot....ALOT. I couldn't help but look....and I have to admit there were SO many times that I wanted to try and sneak in a hopefully seeming innocent quick tickle....but like so many of you said, there has to be a line drawn somewhere. Since I have a daughter now who is about to get to the age of tween, it just makes me think.....I would want to Hurt a guy if I thought he was lusting after her......mind battles.....I think we feet guys have it worst of all because what we LOVE is out there all the time in front of our face!!
Posted by baalfootish (Member # 33991) on :
hey u know im reading this thread and have to call bs. i mean a 16 yo girl can be fucking hot as hell, im 23 and have to keep away. lets not confuse that fact. if any of you guys can really say that u didnt see a group of hot younger girls walk by and say to you freind: "Jailbait" or "damn i wish i was younger" or "two more years" than i say bullshit. there wouldnt be laws in place if men didnt consider it. and it is not unusual. until recent times it wasnt even taboo, but now that most kids mature (mentally) later in life while maturing (physically) early on, there has to be a line drawn. and i agree 100 percent. but again, 5 senses and a mind. if you only use sight and mind, whats the harm? just cuz we are footmen doesnt mean our sexual nature is so much different from others. just think about this:
vanilla people arent into feet, so when they see a young hottie whose underage, they are thinking about doing something else with that young filly which would be much worse. mainly fucking, sucking, etc.
feet? eh, theyre prolly to young to understand it anyways, yet they understand regular sex just fine. so who cares, no harm, no foul
Posted by combine_hunter (Member # 39526) on :
I don't think it's wrong to look, per se. But I certainly wouldn't do anything more than that.
I try not to get involved with women under 21, just to be extra careful.
Posted by Sinnister (Member # 2394) on :
Sorry...I can't even look. Just grosses me out.
Posted by The Lum (Member # 34830) on :
Where I am from technically it would be perfectly legal for a male of any age to talk to a 16 year old girl then if she consented to do what you may desire with her feet. I know my first experiences with female feet were with girls younger than 18 but as old as 16 when anything sexual happened.
To answer the is it wrong then I would agree with most that its wrong to think about actually doing anything to a girl who is underage (whatever that age is where you are) but having a look and thinking they have nice or ugly feet then walking away is fine.
Posted by desmond (Member # 20001) on :
I wil never persue an under agegirl... but we can't fight nature... girls that are 15 o 16 years old are usually almost fully grown physically...
mentally they re little girls and we shouldn't want to try ad be with them, but physically... we can't ignore the physical...!!! our weakness as men is that we are visual creatures... so fullgrown women are always gonna attract our attention... 15 or 16 eyar old girls may dress and act like children, because they still are, but their bodies are usually already grown enough to "distract" us... wether it be feet for us who love feet... or breasts for those who love breasts.. whatever it may be...
bottom line... they are still little girls/children inside... but the outside already looks like a women... which is what attracts our attention...
it's not wrong too look... it's also not something to be proud of, haha, but something to be discussed on a forum like this... no harm in it... as long as you look in a non-disturbing way ofcourse... and as long as you know yourself well enough to know that you aren't going to have a moment of weakness and approach a girl like that and become front page news...
anyway...
hope this was usefull to anybody else...
Desmond
Posted by Plastercast to thank (Member # 827) on :
quote:Originally posted by Tyler D.: [QB] there is nothing wrong with looking at the feet of a girl who is underage. afterall, they are objects which are there for the viewing. nothing illegal about noticing something that exists in real life. the problem becomes when sick men start fantasizing about these underage girls or even worse, start purusing them for their perverted pleasures. that is when it becomes wrong. looking at something is harmless, but don't sit there and drool either. us guys may have some explaining to do to the fathers of these young girls if you start doing that kind of crap. just look and don't dwell. [IMG]http://img250.imagevenue.com/loc491/th_31522_100_4872_122_0/QB]
[/QUOTE]Very good advice.
Posted by Peter, Peter (Member # 40235) on :
I'd say no, but once you see that they clearly fall below the age line then at that point I look the other way.
Posted by foot_sniffer (Member # 36272) on :
I think we have to acknowledge that it's perfectly normal and natural to be attracted to girls in the 15-17 age range, despite societies arbitrary 'acceptable' numbers. I'm not sure how young you mean by young, but if you're talking teen age, high school girls, then hell yeah I've had a look at their feet, among other areas. And any guy who claims he hasn't is full of shit lol The age of consent here is 16, so if I can have sex with someone, I can certainly have a discreet peak at her feet in flip flops in public and not feel guilty about that. So no need to feel guilty OP, there's no biological or physical reason NOT to be attracted to girls that age, and society deciding it's taboo is a relatively recent thing as well.
Posted by Scotty7493 (Member # 13127) on :
I have friends that looked at young girls (16-18) and lust over them. I could never understand it.
But as I get older, I find myself looking ( and lusting) at the same aged girls.
But if they obviously look younger than 16 it's a no no.
Posted by combine_hunter (Member # 39526) on :
quote:Originally posted by foot_sniffer: I think we have to acknowledge that it's perfectly normal and natural to be attracted to girls in the 15-17 age range
I don't acknowledge that at all.
It sounds like a slippery slope to me. Not one I want to be on. And it's "perfectly" normal and natural when you're in high school and college.
Before you deride the age limits as "arbitrary", try pointing us to something that disproves the legitimacy of them.
Posted by Scotty7493 (Member # 13127) on :
Oh c'mon combine_hunter. He just mentioned it's perfectly normal.
How many of us have taken a second look at a hot 16 year old in a mall or something. I'm sure many of us have.
It doesn't mean we're going to act on our impulses though.
Posted by combine_hunter (Member # 39526) on :
Eh, maybe you're right. Not that I'm backing away from what I said, or anything.
I know I have enough willpower not to act on that kind of impulse.
Posted by Scotty7493 (Member # 13127) on :
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: Eh, maybe you're right. Not that I'm backing away from what I said, or anything.
I know I have enough willpower not to act on that kind of impulse.
And that`s perfectly cool.
I`m the same way.
Posted by foot_sniffer (Member # 36272) on :
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: I don't acknowledge that at all.
You don't acknowledge that there is no biological or physical reason whatsoever for a guy not to be attracted to a sexually mature female? Hmm how interesting.
Posted by combine_hunter (Member # 39526) on :
A girl who's 15-17 may be sexually mature, but she's not emotionally mature.
That's an important consideration, even if you're ignoring the fact that they're not legal.
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: A girl who's 15-17 may be sexually mature, but she's not emotionally mature.
That's an important consideration, even if you're ignoring the fact that they're not legal.
I think he's getting at the fact that they're physically mature. You don't act because they're not emotionally mature.
And eh. It's fine, but I prefer older women anyway really Posted by combine_hunter (Member # 39526) on :
I know what he's getting at.
Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: A girl who's 15-17 may be sexually mature, but she's not emotionally mature.
That's an important consideration, even if you're ignoring the fact that they're not legal.
Age of consent laws are different all over. In the U.S. alone, they range from 16 to 18. Here in Michigan the AoC is 16. In some places its lower than 15.
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
quote:Originally posted by Rider Aldebaran:
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: A girl who's 15-17 may be sexually mature, but she's not emotionally mature.
That's an important consideration, even if you're ignoring the fact that they're not legal.
Age of consent laws are different all over. In the U.S. alone, they range from 16 to 18. Here in Michigan the AoC is 16. In some places its lower than 15.
Wasn't Texas something ridiculous like 13?
Posted by foot_sniffer (Member # 36272) on :
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: A girl who's 15-17 may be sexually mature, but she's not emotionally mature.
That's an important consideration, even if you're ignoring the fact that they're not legal.
And really you can't set laws based on emotional maturity. I've known people who are emotionally mature at 14, and 20 year olds who are no where near maturity. And as I said, age of consent here in washington state is 16, some areas it's higher, so it's lower. Hell it's 12 in the Vatican, which is a bit fucked up in my opinion lol. My whole point is that sexual attraction to girls this age is normal, but wether or not you should pursue anything depends on the laws where you live, the persons maturity etc. But please don't go do a 12 year old in the Vatican, because, just no. Posted by combine_hunter (Member # 39526) on :
quote:Originally posted by Andy-Laa:
quote:Originally posted by Rider Aldebaran:
quote:Originally posted by combine_hunter: A girl who's 15-17 may be sexually mature, but she's not emotionally mature.
That's an important consideration, even if you're ignoring the fact that they're not legal.
Age of consent laws are different all over. In the U.S. alone, they range from 16 to 18. Here in Michigan the AoC is 16. In some places its lower than 15.
Wasn't Texas something ridiculous like 13?
As far as I know, it's 18.
Of course, that might not be statewide. And it's possible you have us confused with Kentucky or Alabama. Posted by kevin89 (Member # 41902) on :
i'm still young (21), i like all feet (mature, younger girls) from 16 years the feets are very pretty in my opinion. for me its not very wrong but a older guy like 30/40 it can be a problem if he like very underage feet.
Posted by kingler (Member # 40920) on :
quote:Originally posted by Toe-fu: It seems there are a lot of people here who have a phobia against anything under 18, even though they themselves are attracted to it.
If a 45 year old man mentions feet (or ass, or whatever) of an 18 year old, that's fine.
If a 19 year old mentions feet of a 16 year old. OMFGPERVERTPEDOFILE!!!
It's the law, but still, it's not like you're talking about 5 year olds. These girls (16,17) hit puberty a long time ago and are aware of their sexuality. With the way women are dressing nowadays, who's to blame? THE MEN OR THE GIRLS OR THEIR PARENTS?... 12 year olds in this generation are walking around in high heels, lipstick, hairdo, etc trying their best to look older. How do their parents allow them to do such a thing?
This really is an odd thing, and yes I fully agree with it.
Hell, anyone over 18 can talk about an 18 year olds feet and its fine. I remember when a friend of mine was 19 and was dating a 16 year old. In our country that's totally fine. 16 is the age of consent (or is it 15 now?) but it was abso-friggin-hilarious to read the comments when he posted this on a forum. American members went mad! Talking about how God will be waiting for him, etc.
For the record I'm 25 and my girlfriend is 25. I've never dated anyone more than a year younger or older than me, nor would I want to.
But the point of the matter is that, for normal people (not paedos), we're attracted to what we want to mate with. A child can not mate. I'd say the age of consent should be 14, because that's when we used to have sex. Before the bible and stuff came along we used to have sex and children at those ages.
Posted by Andy-Laa (Member # 31511) on :
quote:Originally posted by kingler: I'd say the age of consent should be 14, because that's when we used to have sex. Before the bible and stuff came along we used to have sex and children at those ages.
...treading on eggshells with that one...
Posted by Jose (Member # 819) on :
hell yeah it is? Posted by Fwrinkledsoles (Member # 101) on :
I keep my looking at mature women feet, but if I see what I think is a younger looking female and she is barefooted. I just look and turn my head because I think it is just wrong.
Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
I have not posted on this thread because I feel no matter what you say, there are people who will say you're not being totally honest or that you're a creep. But this is how I see it.
You all know I have had many girls on my site pose for me within a couple days, if not the EXACT day they turned 18. If I said I hadn't seen their feet before then, I'd be full of crap. But it is looking. It's not sucking on their toes, getting footjobs, etc.
What makes that even harder is the girls themselves are less than a year from their 18th birthday when they tell me they want to pose like their friend did and such. Many times I get the girl pulling her socks/shoes off telling me to look at her feet and asking me what I think. So am I supposed to act like some clown and be like, "Oh no, I am not allowed to look at them."? No, I look and admire. I compliment the girl and sometimes get teased and flirted with.
So I agree with what people are saying here in that you can look and like. Just don't be a dumbass and get yourself in trouble. There are many girls of age and older that will have feet just as cute that are more appropriate to play with.
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Tongue]](tongue.gif)
The age of consent here is 16, so if I can have sex with someone, I can certainly have a discreet peak at her feet in flip flops in public and not feel guilty about that. ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
![[Evil Grin]](graemlins/evilgrin.gif)