Foot Fetish Forum: Zooey Deschanel magazine cover

This is topic Zooey Deschanel magazine cover in forum Foot Fetish Talk at Foot Fetish Forum.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=013301

Posted by nusuth (Member # 7372) on :

wtf!!! seriously??
Zooey gives us basically NO foot sightings and her most recent one may be the most maddening yet. she poses barefoot in the famous 'Pose'.. but yet 80% of her feet are covered up by the damn magazine logo!!! then to add insult to injury, her soles are out of focus of course because they want to create some depth.

i say screw artistic integrity and your f'ing logo and give us our barefoot celebs!!!

oh, i forgot to add a link to the pic.
http://cdn.buzznet.com/media/jj1/2011/06/zooey-self/zooey-deschanel-self-july-2011-02.jpg

Posted by combine_hunter (Member # 39526) on :

Well, if that's not a wasted opportunity....

Posted by catsman (Member # 10269) on :

So not there, it's not even worth mentioning on this great forum.

Posted by dougiezerts (Member # 6829) on :

Is she shown barefooted in the article itself?

Posted by Rider Aldebaran (Member # 38525) on :

Well, I came across this on Wikifeet:
http://www.wikifeet.com/pictures/Zooey-Deschanel-Feet-430165.jpg

[Smile]

Posted by octoberbaseball (Member # 20977) on :

To Rider: Great save. This has happened in the past. If I recall correctly Carrie Underwood was on the Self Magazine Cover and had her feet covered by the logo then it turned up online. Hmmm more celebs I'd like to see on that cover minus the logo?

Posted by Keyfeet (Member # 27313) on :

they arent out of focus

Posted by nusuth (Member # 7372) on :

quote:
So not there, it's not even worth mentioning on this great forum.

gee, i'm sorry. i'll go flog myself because my post didnt meet your approval.

screw that, i'm gonna go flog my log for that great find from Rider. thanks! [Smile]

Posted by aka.footjoyboy (Member # 32751) on :

Who is Zooey? [Confused]

Does she sing in a band?

Posted by nusuth (Member # 7372) on :

she is an actress and singer but usually does less mainstream movies and music. her sister is emily deschannel of bones. she actually has a sitcom coming out this fall and it is getting some good buzz. fingers crossed.

and she is very very cute [Wink]

Posted by aka.footjoyboy (Member # 32751) on :

[Thumbs Up]

I asked because I saw a group called (I think) HE AND SHE on a couple of late night shows and thought that she looked like the lead singer.

Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Keyfeet:
they arent out of focus

To me, it looks like the photo was given an out of focus depth touch in Photoshop for the magazine. I've done such things before too for advertising with food. The background was clashing a little bit too much with the logo I placed partially over the image, so I softened the background. To me, the link to the magazine cover looks out of focus when compared to the photo without the overlay of text.

Patrick

Posted by DancingFool (Member # 3728) on :

I just watched '500 Days of Summer' today and there is a primo Zooey sole shot with pajama pants on. First person who could find that clip or still gets a free ice cream.

Posted by XAsheX (Member # 6884) on :

quote:
Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy:
I asked because I saw a group called (I think) HE AND SHE on a couple of late night shows and thought that she looked like the lead singer.

Yep....she sings in She and Him

Posted by foot_sniffer (Member # 36272) on :

It's strange it doesn't look like the kind of fuzzy back round you get from having a low f-stop, it looks more like they either used a crappy lens or decided "Hey, why don't we make the background look shitty in photoshop?"
I like the shallow depth of field look for most portraits and macro shots, but if I was going to do some 'the pose' action I'd go for a well lit area so I could have a tight aperture and get everything in focus. Silly photographers, I should send them a letter lol [Tongue]