Reading that thread got me thinking. I can't really think of any positive (or at least favorable) images of foot-fetishism in on television, or film. If foot-fetishism is brought up, it's usually a trope played for laughs. Or it's the motivating drive inspiring criminal and or pathological behavior.
There's nothing particularly negative about the ad I can see. Although one could argue the presence of the foot-model is a non-sequitur that has nothing to do with the advertised vehicle. Otherwise, I was pleasantly surprised to see find it online.
Posted by 5thgear (Member # 46148) on :
That interesting bc they mentioned that they got a foot model. There's something more to this in our favor!
Posted by Toes2Nose1969 (Member # 47961) on :
I remember an episode of Friends, when Monica was explaining about foreplay, it was mentioned, change it up keep her on her toes, and Rachel said "Toes"
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
Actually the Scion ad is semi-counterproductive if you ask me. It uses the word "Weird" twice while the foot is in view "Weirdly Luxurious" & "Weird Right?" seems to be an innuendo against feet (no matter how sexy those toes were). Too bad Scion will be no more after this year's models, everything is being re branded as Toyota for 2017 year models. Just a useless tidbit someone might be interested in Posted by SOLEjerX (Member # 48925) on :
Hey fellow Foot-Soldiers!..Here's the link again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WASX8fCU4kQ Check out the jewels on her toes!!! Posted by PhantomWalker (Member # 43545) on :
quote:Originally posted by Toes2Nose1969: I remember an episode of Friends, when Monica was explaining about foreplay, it was mentioned, change it up keep her on her toes, and Rachel said "Toes"
My professor shared that clip with us in my undergrad human sexuality course. Rachel blurted out "toes!" while Monica outlined the erogenous zones on a woman's/her body. Rachel qualified that outburst by saying "if you're into that sort of thing" after everyone looked at her funny. The scene made me chuckle to myself.
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: Actually the Scion ad is semi-counterproductive if you ask me. It uses the word "Weird" twice while the foot is in view "Weirdly Luxurious" & "Weird Right?" seems to be an innuendo against feet (no matter how sexy those toes were).
I wouldn't say the ad is blatantly counterproductive. I think the use of "weird" twice subverts the presence of the foot model in the ad. As if Scion's marketing team is [rhetorically] asking the audience if the visual of a foot on the deashboard is really that out of place. Considering even non-fetishists could admit those bedazzled toes were attractive. But I guess that notion would be considered "weird."
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: I wouldn't say the ad is blatantly counterproductive. I think the use of "weird" twice subverts the presence of the foot model in the ad. As if Scion's marketing team is [rhetorically] asking the audience if the visual of a foot on the deashboard is really that out of place.
I think the narrator debunked that statement with his first line: "It's weird that a FOOT model..blah blah blah...." regardless if everyone likes the visuals the overtones are fairly negative towards it being a foot model and not mainstream as a hand model.
Posted by hyperion (Member # 39397) on :
Couple thoughts:
1. On 9 MAR 2015 this thread was posted about Phoebe on "Friends" doing some "foot flirting":
It was portrayed as something normal one would do in certain contexts to get a guy's attention, and it worked. Not at all creepy or negative. It helped, of course, that the stand-in had *really* pretty feet.
2. "Weird, right?" isn't just what Scion says in this one ad, it's their little slogan. They underwrite certain podcasts, and the host has to say, "Scion: Weird, right?" Feels like a desperate reach out to hipster millennials who don't want Scions. It's a dumb slogan.
Posted by FootLongSub Zero (Member # 19380) on :
Scion is related to Toyota and I like the look of these cars. In Auz they're named "86" and Subaru have the same car different badge (of course) is the "BRZ". I want one.
I wanna be the recruitment agent for foot models for advertisements and what-not. Now that would be a really good job don't you think Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: Feels like a desperate reach out to hipster millennials who don't want Scions. It's a dumb slogan.
In California, "hipster millennials" are what own the majority of Scions I think. Obviously not enough that now they are out of business and had to merge fully with Toyota in production. To add a foot model anywhere near the word "weird" in advertising is a slight on us IMO. Knowing how big marketing corp works, it's not a coincidence. Just strange.
Posted by nicetoesplease (Member # 49513) on :
One of my favorites is the Ford Escape foot liftgate commercial. The woman wiggles her toes and I was watching this around my friends the first time I saw it and was secretly doing this
quote:Originally posted by nicetoesplease: One of my favorites is the Ford Escape foot liftgate commercial. The woman wiggles her toes and I was watching this around my friends the first time I saw it and was secretly doing this
Nice!! I hadn't seen that ad before, but we don't have the Ford escape in the UK.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
When feet are used in mainstream media as objects of humor with the simple intention to elicit laughter, I personally don't really think that's intended to be demeaning in any way towards foot fetishism and I don't find it to be.
Even as a foot enthusiast, I do concede that feet can be funny. We have to be able to laugh at ourselves a little bit and be able to take a few innocuous jokes, as well as making a few on our own. Being hypersensitive and overly serious about it I feel does actually more harm than good.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
Choosing not to be sensitive about it is a personal choice based on emotion and feelings. It's still interesting how they imply that feet are weird through innuendo type marketing. I would appeal they are trying to get the business of anti-feet people and feet people by catering to both at the same time here.
[ February 28, 2016, 05:07 PM: Message edited by: NorcalfeetStudios ]
Posted by PhantomWalker (Member # 43545) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84: When feet are used in mainstream media as objects of humor with the simple intention to elicit laughter, I personally don't really think that's intended to be demeaning in any way towards foot fetishism and I don't find it to be.
Agreed. When I was in high-school I used to get my feelings when I noticed tropes poking fun at foot enthusiasts. And getting teased by my peers for my preferences didn't exactly seem funny to me. Now I have little issue laughing foot related or inspired jokes. As long as they're actually funny, be the humor light or dark/mean-spirited. This clip from "Born Again Virign" is a good example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N4kDfgteFc
I was snickering to myself when I saw Danielle waving her soles in the context of the episode.
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: Choosing not to be sensitive about it is a personal choice based on emotion and feelings. It's still interesting how they imply that feet are weird through innuendo type marketing. I would appeal they are trying to get the business of anti-feet people and feet people by catering to both at the same time here.
Norcal's also has a point. It is about choice. I've learned not to expect folks to take our fetish/partialism seriously. And not make a big fuss of it. Foot attraction simply isn't promoted like an attraction to more socially-acceptable parts of a woman's body. However Amope commercials seem to promote the idea pretty tootsies are feminine, and can be eye-candy like other body-parts. Perhaps I should have used that as an example instead of the Scion ad.
Posted by Cain (Member # 8492) on :
The idea of toe sucking and footjobs is weird to most women. What they don't realize are the erogenous zones that are triggered in foot massages and fondling as well as getting toes sucked. You will always have your foot lovers and haters but maybe more would accept the idea if they tried it once.
Posted by PhantomWalker (Member # 43545) on :
quote:Originally posted by Cain: The idea of toe sucking and footjobs is weird to most women. What they don't realize are the erogenous zones that are triggered in foot massages and fondling as well as getting toes sucked.
It's weird because from an early age both sexes receive negative reinforcement from their families, peers, and various media about feet and pleasures below the ankle. Women are reinforced to beautify their feet. Doing so can make them feel more attractive, but it's more-so another activity that satisfied their feminine quota. So cognitive dissonance rears it's dichotomous head when some (not all) women encounter a guy that likes their feet.
And you're right. The feet are pretty much erogenous zones. They're quite sensitive due to the 7,000 or so nerve endings spread across several nerve channels. Putting your hands or mouth on a body part with such a dense concentration of nerves will definitely register in one's brain.
Posted by mywifesfeet (Member # 2630) on :
That link to the Scion ad is SO cool! I love seeing commercials like this! Thanks for posting this!
Posted by myzar21 (Member # 48456) on :
In the 1953 film THE MOON IS BLUE, Maggie McNamara takes her shoes off in William Holden's apartment. He says to her, "You have very pretty feet," and she responds by saying "Thank you." I've always thought that was pretty daring, for its time!
Posted by footjoyboy (Member # 26478) on :
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Joint]](graemlins/joint.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Drool]](graemlins/drool.gif)