Okay, so everyone is different; however, I don't see why anyone would pay for porn. Isn't there enough porn on the Internet you can get for free? If all you want are foot fetish videos, YouTube has a ton of stuff. If you want nudity, you can just go to PornHub or YouPorn and then watch and even download most of the videos. So, why would anyone pay for it?
Paying to worship a girl's feet is different because I don't see how you can get it for free...... at least not on a regular basis. I have done it for free but that is EXTREMELY scarce and should been seen as pure luck and not the norm.
Posted by masmak (Member # 49539) on :
Everybody has their own opinion. Me for exactly - I've got some favourite foot sites, but I'd rather like modelling not porn. It doesn't cost much (15-20$ a month) and I know I support my favourite producer so he/she can develop the site, I've got best quality, smooth records. I for example can't imagine paying girl for foot worship as I've never had trouble with that. But I guess everyone's got different situation.
Posted by tintin19153 (Member # 3694) on :
If we all thought like you,then porn would stop being made. The same as music and movies.
Posted by oneagain (Member # 35859) on :
True Ace, there is alot of free porn or stolen porn that is being shared...but sometimes there is a star or some scenes you see snippits of that somewhere but not complete...then yeah, people will pay for that...or maybe a free scene is in poor quality and someone pays to get a higher quality
...and some people that are fans to certain portals or sites like the simplicity of nit having tonsearch all over and in one spot is what they like
Posted by stlgamer1 (Member # 50518) on :
Okay, I started fining free internet porn when I bought my first computer and put it in my bedroom at home. I was a teen and it was a windows 95 machine, that used AOL, over my phone line. It was harder to find porn back then, and I had to go to channels and then to yahoo and then look for the neighborhood that had a porn page. Now, when I have an itch, I go to imagefap and find what I need.
But, foot porn is different for me. I can get the same internal feeling from looking at a sexy foot model, clothed, than I can get from looking at some sexy porn scene. I will say this: while you can find enough free foot porn to choke a whale, I think that the quality foot porn is what is on the paid sites. You can find sun tanned 20 something year old girls in bikinis showing off their feet, but they all have this same "dead inside" look, like they were being paid to show off their feet, but they are not into it. But for the look and for those girls who are into it, I pay. I would pay for the sites that show off Taylor Raz worshiping Honey's feet, or the smiles and teasing looks of the girls from solesofsilk or even the dominating looks of Lil Miss Leah.
Posted by footfunk305 (Member # 50227) on :
I would never pay for porn.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by masmak: Everybody has their own opinion. Me for exactly - I've got some favourite foot sites, but I'd rather like modelling not porn. It doesn't cost much (15-20$ a month) and I know I support my favourite producer so he/she can develop the site, I've got best quality, smooth records.
Posted by Monica_heels_feet (Member # 51359) on :
As a foot model and clip store owner, I think that people must understand the fact that it takes a lot of time, patience, and some investment to produce high quality content no matter if it is porn or just foot fetish content. So I think every model deserve to earn something from that. If nobody would pay for that, nobody would share it too.
Posted by Feetosopher (Member # 45909) on :
quote:Originally posted by tintin19153: If we all thought like you,then porn would stop being made. The same as music and movies.
Being a producer of commercial "foot porn" stuff myself, I would say that your reasoning is correct, sir. However, "DIY amateur foot porn", shared for free on the web by exhibitionist couples etc., is experiencing an unprecedented growth. And - unfortunately for "old-style foot porn geezers" like me - if it's true that most of that stuff is pure crap from a photographic quality standpoint.. this is not true for ALL such stuff (some is deffo good, I have to say). And even most important.. in the era of cellphone pics, "selfies" and social networks.. most people really cannot tell shit from chocholate, as far as photography is concerned. You can see it every day on this forum.. a lot of people here does not give a fuck if the pictures are out of focus, blurred, badly under- or overexposed, terribly framed etc. ... provided that the subject is something vaguely resembling a female foot.. they will go out with a flood of "woah!" "fantastic!", "supersonic!" etc. These are deffo tough times for the Dinosaurs of Foot Porn like me, sir.. Posted by longhitter04 (Member # 2391) on :
quote:Originally posted by AceCorr: Paying to worship a girl's feet is different because I don't see how you can get it for free...... at least not on a regular basis.
Seriously?
Posted by dougiezerts (Member # 6829) on :
I can get off on a yoga DVD! (No offence to the producers.)
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:You can see it every day on this forum.. a lot of people here does not give a fuck if the pictures are out of focus, blurred, badly under- or overexposed, terribly framed etc. ... provided that the subject is something vaguely resembling a female foot..
That's what sets amateurs and professionals apart, and I'm glad for it. There's nothing "dinosaur" about taking pride til the end (whenever that may be) in your craft. There's still a huge gap in function between social media snaps and a professionally taken photo and there's still more people out there who care about the latter than you might realize.
Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote:You can see it every day on this forum.. a lot of people here does not give a fuck if the pictures are out of focus, blurred, badly under- or overexposed, terribly framed etc. ... provided that the subject is something vaguely resembling a female foot..
That's what sets amateurs and professionals apart, and I'm glad for it. There's nothing "dinosaur" about taking pride til the end (whenever that may be) in your craft. There's still a huge gap in function between social media snaps and a professionally taken photo and there's still more people out there who care about the latter than you might realize.
To your point NorCal, I closed my site for several reasons, but one of the main ones was that I don't have the time to shoot the high quality content that I demand of myself. Sure, I'll do the occasional camera phone set with Marien, just for fun when we're hanging out, but that's not the standard of quality that I want to be remembered by...
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: To your point NorCal, I closed my site for several reasons, but one of the main ones was that I don't have the time to shoot the high quality content that I demand of myself. Sure, I'll do the occasional camera phone set with Marien, just for fun when we're hanging out, but that's not the standard of quality that I want to be remembered by...
I remember how just about 2 years ago or more, it was considered the end of a "Professional" (dinosaur's) career if he didn't have the latest greatest, fastest, highest HD, largest .JPEG files on the planet so people could zoom in to see DNA and Mitochondria on the bottom of a foot model's foot.
My my, how times have changed and that old notion (in this business) has turned into a rusted heap in a field due to how Un-demanding and disinterested the younger generation of foot enthusiasts has gotten in quality due to social media snaps. This plateau or "bar" that I set for myself for a certain amount of gear and quality in post production is still (luckily) better by leaps and bounds than the social media snaps yet it's not so advanced that it isolates people from using their Smart Phones to enjoy the photos either. The fine line in the sand has been drawn and it still works.
Posted by Feetosopher (Member # 45909) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote:You can see it every day on this forum.. a lot of people here does not give a fuck if the pictures are out of focus, blurred, badly under- or overexposed, terribly framed etc. ... provided that the subject is something vaguely resembling a female foot..
That's what sets amateurs and professionals apart, and I'm glad for it. There's nothing "dinosaur" about taking pride til the end (whenever that may be) in your craft. There's still a huge gap in function between social media snaps and a professionally taken photo and there's still more people out there who care about the latter than you might realize.
Hello amico.. it goes without saying that I am ultra-proud to be a stubborn.. "Podopornosaurus Erectus"!!! Extinction may come for us, but sure we are gonna put on a brave fight.. And yes, there still are people who appreciate efforts towards giving value for money.. I guess that we have most of them on board in our own paysites.. Posted by Peter, Peter (Member # 40235) on :
I too am torn with this, BEYOND PLENTY of free out there, so the question is "Why pay for porn?".
I think paying for specific porn, or porn that is exactly what you love and want is worth it. I am personally considering vids over pics.
Posted by AceCorr (Member # 37554) on :
quote:Originally posted by Fair Adam:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote:You can see it every day on this forum.. a lot of people here does not give a fuck if the pictures are out of focus, blurred, badly under- or overexposed, terribly framed etc. ... provided that the subject is something vaguely resembling a female foot..
That's what sets amateurs and professionals apart, and I'm glad for it. There's nothing "dinosaur" about taking pride til the end (whenever that may be) in your craft. There's still a huge gap in function between social media snaps and a professionally taken photo and there's still more people out there who care about the latter than you might realize.
To your point NorCal, I closed my site for several reasons, but one of the main ones was that I don't have the time to shoot the high quality content that I demand of myself. Sure, I'll do the occasional camera phone set with Marien, just for fun when we're hanging out, but that's not the standard of quality that I want to be remembered by...
Wait a minute, are you saying there is no more Feet Fair?
Posted by stlgamer1 (Member # 50518) on :
I'm sorry if my post seems a bit archaic, but I had a foot fetish site from 2005 to 2008 and at that time, I was contracting photos from models that had to be at least 520 by 520. That was a large photo, at the time! I had photos that were taken with a camera that maxed out taking 2 mega pixels. Times have changed in the technology field and when you see that I can post a photo now on flickr and someone can zoom in to the actual size of 4928 x 3264, even though that photo was taken 3 years ago! I feel sorry for those in any photography business, and that is what foot fetish site photographers are in. Having to constantly update website code to allow for higher photo standards and drive space and then buy new lenses and new cameras and the line is endless.
At the beginning, all foot sites were amateur, even Lexi, started off on her own page, before the big site took over. I remembered seeing sites on yahoo, geocities, and even aol. Those sites were so small that at the time, the photos were around 240 x 240 pixels at their largest. Yeah, the free pictures I see on imagefap, are mostly people with normal cameras now. They don't have studios or any idea of how light or shadows work so you get these sometimes blurry photos, things out of focus, bad lighting, and then they get offended when you say that the pictures are just okay and not great. I'm guilty, and I'm not afraid to admit it! When my site first started, I had some slightly blurry photos and took pictures wherever I was, not in some well lit studio. Now, I'd rather jerk off to the high quality photos on NorCal or FeetFair, where you can see every wrinkle and every smile, perfectly.
Posted by Doc Ock (Member # 46755) on :
I pay for it. No ashamed. The real good stuff you have to pay. If I was selling porn, good porn at that. I would want someone to pay for my shit.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: Now, I'd rather jerk off to the high quality photos on NorCal or FeetFair, where you can see every wrinkle and every smile, perfectly.
Thank You, glad you enjoy it!
Posted by canIsmellYourFeet (Member # 11183) on :
Its very simple. What I like isn't typically available for free.
I like seeing feet being sniffed, specifically the feet TOUCHING the face, not being held at a safe distance. My avatar is the perfect example of what I'm talking about. But that, by itself, is rare. Any vids that do feature that devolve into slobbering, sucking, and sometimes, SPITTING. Things I cannot stand and frankly ruin the vid for me. Now if other folks like it more power to you, I don't.
So either I go without cause I don't want to pay, or I say the things I do want are available just for a price. I go with the latter.
If what you like is widely available then sure I suppose paying for it doesn't make any sense. But if its not, its the only way, by way of either finding a site that sells it or CUSTOMS.
Posted by John Jones (Member # 50531) on :
I think BTS videos are hot. I love to see models getting their sexy feet photographed. I love to see them posing for foot photos. There are few sites that offer this.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
Why pay for "porn" or foot fetish material? Because someone's efforts and time were put into making it which cost them something expecting a return on said investment and there's a demand for it. The demand for quality foot or "porn" material will never go away and you will pay for the good shit. This concept is truth in all business, trade and commerce.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by AceCorr: So, why would anyone pay for it?
Because one makes the choice whether it's worth it to them or not to spend their money on it.
Or if you like a particular content purveyor and want them to stick around and have longevity, purchasing their content will help acheive that. So like as mentioned, because it's worth it to you.
Posted by theninja (Member # 38411) on :
Same reason you'd buy your favorite bands new album even though you can hear it on spotify free etc.
If I really love a band I want them to continue writing new material. If no one bought their stuff they'd retire and go back to a 9 to 5 job.
As a long time producer I can tell you the majority of money made is pumped straight back into the business in upgrading equipment, upgrading editing, hiring hotter models, traveling to shoot harder to find models etc. Yes, these days custom orders do take the sting of pirated material away a bit, but it can still be very demoralizing to see you're hard work being posted for free after a couple of days of release.
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Cry]](cry.gif)
![[Evil Grin]](graemlins/evilgrin.gif)
![[Nut Kick]](graemlins/nutkick.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Cheers]](graemlins/cheers.gif)
Thank You, glad you enjoy it!