I have come to the conclusion, and this may go to another subject posted as "picky", but I find that only 10% of women have do-able feet and only 5% are in the gorgeous or perfect category.
But that's just me, what does everyone else think?
Posted by Robotron2084 (Member # 33263) on :
Not sure of the percentage but from my experiences with foot photography the numbers aren't good. I've found most women fall into the "okay" category. Not bad or ugly but not "wow" either.
In my 56 shootings there's four women that fit the "wow" category. Most were simply "okay" with only tiny number I'd call "ugly".
Posted by sportfan85 (Member # 24801) on :
%10? man yall are picky. Which brings me to another topic i think was already discussed as to how the fetish has changed for me at least. When i was young i was kinda picky. but now i'm in my 30s and man its game on if the girls feet look good no matter the age i'm all in.
Posted by Peter, Peter (Member # 40235) on :
I think its all in the eye of the beholder. We all similar tastes but then you get into details and that's where things get complicated. I agree robo, most fall into the okay category
Posted by longhitter04 (Member # 2391) on :
5% are nice.
1% are really nice.
This is on a good day.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
5% sounds about right to me as well.
Personally, I can make an exception for a girl's feet being decent if I find the rest of her to be pretty. While of course I don't want her feet to be busted, I can accept decent feet on what I otherwise think is a pretty girl. Although generally, pretty girls usually equal pretty feet.
However, if a girl has gorgeous feet but I'm just not attracted to the rest of her, that I can't make an exception for. I like pretty girls with pretty feet, not pretty feet on any girl.
Posted by AceCorr (Member # 37554) on :
What do you guys exactly mean by do-able? I say at least 25% of women have nice feet, but not perfect.
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
quote:Originally posted by philgill11@gmail.com: I have come to the conclusion, and this may go to another subject posted as "picky", but I find that only 10% of women have do-able feet and only 5% are in the gorgeous or perfect category.
But that's just me, what does everyone else think?
I am in full agreement with your numbers. The vast, vast majority of women have feet that are not worth even a second look.
Posted by philgill11@gmail.com (Member # 51430) on :
Maybe not here, but there are thousands, maybe millions of guys in the world who marry women who they love and never ever tell them about their FF. With only 5% of women having really fantastic feet, it stands to reason many, many FF guys are with women with less than attractive feet. Yes they still have access to female feet, but it is not at all the type they desire or lust for.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by Michael Pitt: for feet to be "do-able" they have to be attached to a girl that has a good face and body
only 5% at most look good from head to toe
i really don't understand how all these chicks have a man in their life, some guys just want a hole to stick their dick in and nothing else matters
There's that 5% again Interesting.
Posted by longhitter04 (Member # 2391) on :
quote:Originally posted by Michael Pitt: most guys don't have standards, if you are living they think you are "do -able"
tons of desperate chumps out there will take whatever they can get
These two sentences are the absolute truth.
There are guys out there that would fuck a two day old moldy Arby's beef-n-cheddar if it were warm and willing.
Posted by Polar (Member # 47954) on :
lmfao
Posted by Sighfeet (Member # 49758) on :
as long as they are the complete opposite of "feetofme2" on insta, i'll call em "doable"
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by longhitter04:
quote:Originally posted by Michael Pitt: most guys don't have standards, if you are living they think you are "do -able"
tons of desperate chumps out there will take whatever they can get
These two sentences are the absolute truth.
There are guys out there that would fuck a two day old moldy Arby's beef-n-cheddar if it were warm and willing.
The truth indeed.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by philgill11@gmail.com: Maybe not here, but there are thousands, maybe millions of guys in the world who marry women who they love and never ever tell them about their FF. With only 5% of women having really fantastic feet, it stands to reason many, many FF guys are with women with less than attractive feet. Yes they still have access to female feet, but it is not at all the type they desire or lust for.
More than 5%
Posted by Bonze947 (Member # 26935) on :
I am so picky that very few women's feet appeal to me. I would say 5% have nice feet. Whereas I would only estimate 1% or less, have feet I would classify as super sexy.
I have zero interest in most feet. For example, a few years ago I was at The Opryland Hotel to get my continuing education credits. I was sitting on a couch next to a girl who out of the blue put her feet in my lap and asked me if I wanted to rub her feet. I said, No. They were just feet. Nothing appealing about them at all.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by Bonze947: I am so picky that very few women's feet appeal to me. I would say 5% have nice feet. Whereas I would only estimate 1% or less, have feet I would classify as super sexy.
I have zero interest in most feet. For example, a few years ago I was at The Opryland Hotel to get my continuing education credits. I was sitting on a couch next to a girl who out of the blue put her feet in my lap and asked me if I wanted to rub her feet. I said, No. They were just feet. Nothing appealing about them at all.
Great point.
Having an interest in female feet doesn't mean that I like every single pair. Not to mention if I didn't find the girl attractive, then I probably would have no interest in wanting to rub her feet.
Just because a female offers you something, doesn't mean you're obligated to have to say yes.
Posted by longhitter04 (Member # 2391) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by Bonze947: I am so picky that very few women's feet appeal to me. I would say 5% have nice feet. Whereas I would only estimate 1% or less, have feet I would classify as super sexy.
I have zero interest in most feet. For example, a few years ago I was at The Opryland Hotel to get my continuing education credits. I was sitting on a couch next to a girl who out of the blue put her feet in my lap and asked me if I wanted to rub her feet. I said, No. They were just feet. Nothing appealing about them at all.
Great point.
Having an interest in female feet doesn't mean that I like every single pair. Not to mention if I didn't find the girl attractive, then I probably would have no interest in wanting to rub her feet.
Just because a female offers you something, doesn't mean you're obligated to have to say yes.
Well said. I agree with you. You should post more.
However, most guys will settle for anything and be thankful for it. Quite sad.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by longhitter04: Well said. I agree with you. You should post more.
However, most guys will settle for anything and be thankful for it. Quite sad.
Thanks.
And yes, exactly. Many females have no problem turning away a male who they feel isn't an acceptable suitor, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that at all. Nobody owes anyone anything.
So on the same token, if a female shows interest in and wants to go out with you and you're not interested, by no means should you feel obligated to have to reciprocate. If you're not interested, simply say thanks, but no thanks.
Like you said though, a lot of guys would just feel grateful and be elated that a female is even showing interest in them in the first place.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by Bonze947: I am so picky that very few women's feet appeal to me. I would say 5% have nice feet. Whereas I would only estimate 1% or less, have feet I would classify as super sexy.
I have zero interest in most feet. For example, a few years ago I was at The Opryland Hotel to get my continuing education credits. I was sitting on a couch next to a girl who out of the blue put her feet in my lap and asked me if I wanted to rub her feet. I said, No. They were just feet. Nothing appealing about them at all.
Ever occurred to you that you may not even have a foot fetish and more of a foot admiration? Posted by longhitter04 (Member # 2391) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote:Originally posted by Bonze947: I am so picky that very few women's feet appeal to me. I would say 5% have nice feet. Whereas I would only estimate 1% or less, have feet I would classify as super sexy.
I have zero interest in most feet. For example, a few years ago I was at The Opryland Hotel to get my continuing education credits. I was sitting on a couch next to a girl who out of the blue put her feet in my lap and asked me if I wanted to rub her feet. I said, No. They were just feet. Nothing appealing about them at all.
Ever occurred to you that you may not even have a foot fetish and more of a foot admiration?
That's the equivalent of saying that if you're not attracted to all women then you really aren't "into" women.
Seriously though...I'm with Bonze. I'd even take it a step further and say that some girls have feet that completely turn me off.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: That's the equivalent of saying that if you're not attracted to all women then you really aren't "into" women. [Smile]
Seriously though...I'm with Bonze. I'd even take it a step further and say that some girls have feet that completely turn me off.
1) Not really since we're talking about a specialty item where sexual arousal or admirational interest is involved.
2) Yes there are bad feet out there.
Posted by Little feet lover (Member # 46410) on :
I consider myself picky, too, but I think 5 - 10 is low in my opinion. I guess it depends where you are, but the place where I live and work (live in North Orange County, CA & work in South OC), I see so many pretty feet (along with pretty face and body) it has to be at least 30% of the girls. Posted by longhitter04 (Member # 2391) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote: That's the equivalent of saying that if you're not attracted to all women then you really aren't "into" women. [Smile]
Seriously though...I'm with Bonze. I'd even take it a step further and say that some girls have feet that completely turn me off.
1) Not really since we're talking about a specialty item where sexual arousal or admirational interest is involved.
Then, by your definition, you would not be a tit guy unless you were turned on by every pair of tits on the planet. Including geriatric tits that sagged so low they could be tucked into underwear.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by longhitter04:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
quote: That's the equivalent of saying that if you're not attracted to all women then you really aren't "into" women. [Smile]
Seriously though...I'm with Bonze. I'd even take it a step further and say that some girls have feet that completely turn me off.
1) Not really since we're talking about a specialty item where sexual arousal or admirational interest is involved.
Then, by your definition, you would not be a tit guy unless you were turned on by every pair of tits on the planet. Including geriatric tits that sagged so low they could be tucked into underwear.
I didn't define anything there, the first part of the quote was someone else. Tits tucked into underwear..is that what you like? I mean, you're very descriptive.
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
There's that 5% again Interesting.
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Jerkoff]](graemlins/jerkoff.gif)
![[Hump]](graemlins/hump.gif)