So this topic may or may not have been covered a million times but I though it would be fun.
Things your tired of... and the first thing that came to my mind was the term GODDESS.
Seriously, WTF with almost every foot model throwing that around and then when you see her feet or her for that matter you say to yourself, SERIOUSLY?
What is your THING YOU ARE TIRED OF?
[ December 18, 2018, 07:33 PM: Message edited by: Peter, Peter ]
Posted by Toes2Nose1969 (Member # 47961) on :
I don't like dirty, dirt, feet. Sweaty ues, nut mot dirt.
Posted by Mr. Mule (Member # 35514) on :
I hate the financial dom stuff it’s just taking over Instagram. How did we go from original content providers with beautiful models and shoots to random women taking foot selfies in dirty unkept houses asking for simps to sponsor there rent? Lol IG is such a joke.
Posted by myzar21 (Member # 48456) on :
All of this.
Don't like dirty feet, don't like findom, don't like every other chick using the term "Goddess". Goddess is something normally relegated to the "Dom" thing. I also don't like how being a foot partialist is automatically considered submissive.
Posted by 5thgear (Member # 46148) on :
Dominant goddesses who feel entitled to riculous amounts of money bc men pay for it.
[ December 13, 2018, 01:42 AM: Message edited by: 5thgear ]
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Mule: I hate the financial dom stuff it’s just taking over Instagram. How did we go from original content providers with beautiful models and shoots to random women taking foot selfies in dirty unkept houses asking for simps to sponsor there rent? Lol IG is such a joke.
That's the best goddamn statement I think I've ever read on a foot forum. Well said sir! Posted by Mr. Mule (Member # 35514) on :
quote:Originally posted by Groth:
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Mule: I hate the financial dom stuff it’s just taking over Instagram. How did we go from original content providers with beautiful models and shoots to random women taking foot selfies in dirty unkept houses asking for simps to sponsor there rent? Lol IG is such a joke.
That's the best goddamn statement I think I've ever read on a foot forum. Well said sir!
Posted by tintin19153 (Member # 3694) on :
I’m tired of some women, who think that men who are into feet,Are submissive . As much as I enjoy playing with a pretty pair of feet. I also in enjoy taking a woman over my lap and spanking her big ass.
Posted by Bigbbwfeet (Member # 51598) on :
I'm tired of women thinking that if they get their feet wet in closed toed shoes it'll make them smelly. Yeah they'll smell, they'll smell like fucking mildew. So gross. I want SWEATY-SMELLY feet.
Posted by DravenKrill (Member # 52176) on :
Seems like a lot of the "fin doms" are making their way to Twitter now. It's getting hard to find any good foot content without constantly seeing one of them demanding to have her bills paid and whatnot.
Posted by Wooden Leviathan (Member # 51499) on :
quote:Originally posted by tintin19153: I’m tired of some women, who think that men who are into feet,Are submissive . As much as I enjoy playing with a pretty pair of feet. I also in enjoy taking a woman over my lap and spanking her big ass.
Thank. You. Posted by AceCorr (Member # 37554) on :
I hate the mean snooty foot doms. I also hate the financial domination aspect of it. I am cool with a girl playing the dominant role while one plays the submissive. What do you guys think about Subbygirls.com? Overall, I think the best foot videos are 2 or more females worshiping each other's feet by actually wanting to do it and not being forced to do so. I like the "I Want Feet" series on PornHub.
Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
I think you mean you're tired of, that's the proper contraction for "you are" - your indicates possession, as in "That's your sweater" Posted by nodes (Member # 29542) on :
I am definitely not into the female Dom thing and much less being “financially “dominated.” I did a video shoot of a gal this past Wednesday. On Instagram she is very much a dom and talk so much crap to guys but in person she is a total sweet heart. I asked her about it and she said that the reason she is like that is because she doesn’t want to be take advantage of. She meant either physically or monetarily during business. I left it at that. She is great in person but her Insta-personality sucks.
Posted by Feetosopher (Member # 45909) on :
The list of "modern foot-related trends" I am way fed up with is pretty long. The following is just a selection of the ones I hate most..
1) Shitty DIY stuff (especially cellphone pics/vids) starring Ugly Maries, produced by Ordinary Joes and obsessively shared on internet (including on this forum). 2) "Hubbies" obsessively showcasing only the feet of their maybe-not-so-great-faced "wifeys", and obsessively asking for "ratings", "tributes" and similar crap. 3) Dudes obsessively posting on internet (including on this forum) "hot webfinds" of feet/barefoot gals which have been around internet since the Ancient Egyptians.
I know, I know.. I am a hard-nosed, old-school foot porn geezer.. and a bloody S.O.B... Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by tintin19153: I’m tired of some women, who think that men who are into feet,Are submissive .
Pretty much this for me. I think it sums up why a lot of foot models possess the mentalities being mentioned (Goddess, financial domination, etc).
I don't like it either because I don't think having a penchant for female feet invariably means that one is submissive. However, those type of clips do seem to be quite popular and sell well, so I don't blame these foot models for thinking that's where the money is if they're simply in it for the money.
Posted by Alastor79 (Member # 48395) on :
Financial domination and BDSM, we're Foot Fetishists, not slaves!
Posted by Mr. Mule (Member # 35514) on :
I’m tired of threads about plastic boots
Posted by toe the line (Member # 52159) on :
quote:Originally posted by tintin19153: I’m tired of some women, who think that men who are into feet,Are submissive . As much as I enjoy playing with a pretty pair of feet. I also in enjoy taking a woman over my lap and spanking her big ass.
most of them are submissive, they are just catering to the majority of their audience
Posted by toe the line (Member # 52159) on :
i'm mostly tired of the same thing i've been tired of for over a decade
the faceless foot model
i just don't get it and i never will
Posted by Feetosopher (Member # 45909) on :
quote:Originally posted by toe the line: i'm mostly tired of the same thing i've been tired of for over a decade
the faceless foot model
i just don't get it and i never will
I am with you all the way, sir! Feet mean nothing to me if I cannot see the owner's face & body.. Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
quote:Originally posted by toe the line: i'm mostly tired of the same thing i've been tired of for over a decade
the faceless foot model
i just don't get it and i never will
Put me down for this one too, feet are meaningless to me unless I can see the woman they belong to. I also agree that some folks think that just because you're into feet, you're automatically submissive. Anyone who knows me knows the submissiveness is something very foreign to me.
Posted by Kokaith (Member # 22763) on :
So it seems most people here don't care for the findom/bitchy dom stuff...I wonder how profitable it rally is... Personally I've never been a fan myself so I'll agree with most of what's already been said.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by toe the line: i'm mostly tired of the same thing i've been tired of for over a decade
the faceless foot model
i just don't get it and i never will
quote:Originally posted by Fair Adam: Put me down for this one too, feet are meaningless to me unless I can see the woman they belong to. I also agree that some folks think that just because you're into feet, you're automatically submissive. Anyone who knows me knows the submissiveness is something very foreign to me.
Excellent point, I forgot about that one. I’m in this camp as well. Especially when both the faceless foot model and the “Goddess” mentality is combined.
Posted by Bigbbwfeet (Member # 51598) on :
quote:Originally posted by Kokaith: So it seems most people here don't care for the findom/bitchy dom stuff...I wonder how profitable it rally is... Personally I've never been a fan myself so I'll agree with most of what's already been said.
I started an Instagram for this woman I meet a couple weeks ago. In just a few short days she's made over 500$ doing sessions and selling pictures. You can check out her feet if you like I made a thread called Texas foot lovers a couple days ago. From what I see it is VERY profitable if your feet are nice.
Posted by toe the line (Member # 52159) on :
quote:Originally posted by Kokaith: So it seems most people here don't care for the findom/bitchy dom stuff...I wonder how profitable it rally is... Personally I've never been a fan myself so I'll agree with most of what's already been said.
it's extremely profitable which is why the majority of worship videos are domination, maybe the subby foot guys are more willing to pay and that is why it sells better
i don't think a foot fetish alone makes a man submissive, but i do think it is a submissive trait
there is a lot more to being some beta bitch than just liking feet in your face
Posted by ShortLivedTyranny (Member # 36627) on :
I will definitely agree that the Goddness/Findom thing is a little played out, or oversaturated may be a better term for it.
Just because you like feet doesn't mean you don't care about the rest of a person. I like the models who are real people in modeling as they are at home.
Just my preference.
When it comes to faceless pictures, I do get it. Not everyone is willing to be so public, especially with nudity.
I get hesitant about whether to show my face, but the way I view it is IT IS ONLY FEET. I'm not showing anything crazy scandalous. But for women who do choose to show nudity, I can most certainly understand cropping a face out.
Posted by canIsmellYourFeet (Member # 11183) on :
Videos categorized as "foot smelling" but is actually JOI.
Stockings.
I echo the Goddess thing, and would add Mistress. I don't even like typing it it feels so silly in that context. Also agreed liking feet doesn't mean I want to be a sub or want to be dominated. I hate that those two have been folded into foot fetishism instead of being at best a subset.
Posted by coryr (Member # 49869) on :
I don't like videos where the person doing the foot worship doesn't enjoy it, even if it's a humiliation/domination thing. I like worshiping/sniffing feet, so I think it makes that I would want to watch something where the one in the video does as well.
Posted by toe the line (Member # 52159) on :
quote:Originally posted by ShortLivedTyranny: I will definitely agree that the Goddness/Findom thing is a little played out, or oversaturated may be a better term for it.
Just because you like feet doesn't mean you don't care about the rest of a person. I like the models who are real people in modeling as they are at home.
Just my preference.
When it comes to faceless pictures, I do get it. Not everyone is willing to be so public, especially with nudity.
I get hesitant about whether to show my face, but the way I view it is IT IS ONLY FEET. I'm not showing anything crazy scandalous. But for women who do choose to show nudity, I can most certainly understand cropping a face out.
most of them aren't nude and in the social media age where people make everything public this excuse doesn't fly
Posted by ShortLivedTyranny (Member # 36627) on :
quote:Originally posted by toe the line:
quote:Originally posted by ShortLivedTyranny: I will definitely agree that the Goddness/Findom thing is a little played out, or oversaturated may be a better term for it.
Just because you like feet doesn't mean you don't care about the rest of a person. I like the models who are real people in modeling as they are at home.
Just my preference.
When it comes to faceless pictures, I do get it. Not everyone is willing to be so public, especially with nudity.
I get hesitant about whether to show my face, but the way I view it is IT IS ONLY FEET. I'm not showing anything crazy scandalous. But for women who do choose to show nudity, I can most certainly understand cropping a face out.
most of them aren't nude and in the social media age where people make everything public this excuse doesn't fly
I don't think you quite understand it from the point of view over here. But to each their own.
I do not post all my stuff on social media like I have in the past, and refuse twitter and Instagram account to better protect my privacy.
So yes, I do think this reason still applies, and it is all about the model's comfort level.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by ShortLivedTyranny: When it comes to faceless pictures, I do get it. Not everyone is willing to be so public, especially with nudity.
I get hesitant about whether to show my face, but the way I view it is IT IS ONLY FEET. I'm not showing anything crazy scandalous. But for women who do choose to show nudity, I can most certainly understand cropping a face out.
I'm guessing the reason why many faceless foot models are reluctant to show their face, is because they don't want anyone close to them to find out that they posed their feet for a foot fetish site. However, think of it this way: if someone close to you were to come across your foot pictures on the Internet, then that means they just outed themselves as having a foot fetish. So in order to out you, they'd have to out themselves. In order for one to come across your foot pictures, they'd first have to type something feet related in a search engine, click on the subsequent site links that are returned, search the various forums on that site, and click on the subsequent thread links in each forum. If one didn't have a foot fetish, the chances are pretty high that even if they were to "accidentally" come across a foot fetish site, they wouldn't take the time to start exploring it.
Nudity out of the picture (since the majority of foot pictures don't contain nudity), I would think posting pictures of yourself utterly inebriated and out partying with friends at the club would be more embarrassing than simply posting a picture of you showing your feet for fun. Not to mention the former would be way easier to find and would be seen by a lot more people.
Posted by ShortLivedTyranny (Member # 36627) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by ShortLivedTyranny: When it comes to faceless pictures, I do get it. Not everyone is willing to be so public, especially with nudity.
I get hesitant about whether to show my face, but the way I view it is IT IS ONLY FEET. I'm not showing anything crazy scandalous. But for women who do choose to show nudity, I can most certainly understand cropping a face out.
I'm guessing the reason why many faceless foot models are reluctant to show their face, is because they don't want anyone close to them to find out that they posed their feet for a foot fetish site. However, think of it this way: if someone close to you were to come across your foot pictures on the Internet, then that means they just outed themselves as having a foot fetish. So in order to out you, they'd have to out themselves. In order for one to come across your foot pictures, they'd first have to type something feet related in a search engine, click on the subsequent site links that are returned, search the various forums on that site, and click on the subsequent thread links in each forum. If one didn't have a foot fetish, the chances are pretty high that even if they were to "accidentally" come across a foot fetish site, they wouldn't take the time to start exploring it.
Nudity out of the picture (since the majority of foot pictures don't contain nudity), I would think posting pictures of yourself utterly inebriated and out partying with friends at the club would be more embarrassing than simply posting a picture of you showing your feet for fun. Not to mention the former would be way easier to find and would be seen by a lot more people.
Not necessarily the case. I've had friends come across my stuff on the front page of pornhub before. Not a foot guy at all, and while he "appreciated my flexibility, feet are not for him". And this was while I was not modeling. Where you post things is not really where they stay. They float all over the internet. My stuff is on Pinterest lol.
Like I said, yes, it is feet. But we are still modeling knowing full well what guys are going to do to it and society is a long way from accepting that in a widespread manner.
Maybe my boss sees it and laughs it off, but maybe my boss sees it and thinks I'm no longer a good candidate for the HR promotion because the more traditional employees no longer feel comfortable talking to me because of it.
Unlikely, but the risk is there. Not everyone is willing to take those type of risks, but still enjoy the thrill.
These are serious implications you have to think about when you do this. I love modeling because it is a lot of fun for me, but if it were to impact other parts of my life, it would be considerably less fun.
ya know?
Posted by toe the line (Member # 52159) on :
so why model at all?
what "thrill" do you get out of some anonymous dude liking your feet without even knowing what YOU actually look like, especially considering most foot guys have no standards other than wanting there to be 10 toes
is there any other fetish, kink, attraction or whatever it's supposed to be called where it's common for the girl to hide her face?
has any girl ever claimed that she lost a job or anything because of modeling her feet? i think most of these faceless chicks make up nightmare scenarios in their head, when at the end of the day the only reason they hide their face is nothing more than their own insecurity
also i'm not buying that your non foot guy friend saw your stuff on porn hub without looking for it, those foot punk vids don't get huge views it's the footjob videos that make it to the main page, and footjob videos are the only thing i could imagine getting a girl into trouble at work
[ December 20, 2018, 10:31 PM: Message edited by: toe the line ]
Posted by toe the line (Member # 52159) on :
quote:Originally posted by Dannie:
>Tickling in general has never been a thing I liked. I never understood why that's such a huge thing in the foot community.
i'm surprised some don't get it
you're touching her feet which is erotic to a foot guy, she laughs hard and squirms around wiggling and flexing her feet, which also is erotic to a foot guy
what is not to like?
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by ShortLivedTyranny: Not necessarily the case. I've had friends come across my stuff on the front page of pornhub before. Not a foot guy at all, and while he "appreciated my flexibility, feet are not for him". And this was while I was not modeling. Where you post things is not really where they stay. They float all over the internet. My stuff is on Pinterest lol.
Like I said, yes, it is feet. But we are still modeling knowing full well what guys are going to do to it and society is a long way from accepting that in a widespread manner.
Maybe my boss sees it and laughs it off, but maybe my boss sees it and thinks I'm no longer a good candidate for the HR promotion because the more traditional employees no longer feel comfortable talking to me because of it.
Unlikely, but the risk is there. Not everyone is willing to take those type of risks, but still enjoy the thrill.
These are serious implications you have to think about when you do this. I love modeling because it is a lot of fun for me, but if it were to impact other parts of my life, it would be considerably less fun.
ya know?
Fair point. Stuff does get reposted on other sites, such as PornHub, that deals with a broad range of fetishes. So while you may not necessarily be looking for feet, you still may come across feet somehow (though I'm still not really sure how being that when it displays suggestions for related videos, it's generally within the same fetish genre you're currently viewing and searching for). Even then though, in order for someone to say they came across you on the Internet, they'd have to start the conversation by saying, "So I was online browsing PornHub the other night and..." While there are some people who might openly broach that subject, it's still not a common conversation that someone will bring up comfortably.
Now don't get me wrong, I have nothing personal against faceless foot models. If you don't want to show your face that's fine; that's your prerogative and you're entitled to your own reasons for not doing so. I just have no interest in the slightest because seeing a pair of feet without knowing who they belong to means nothing to me, so I just simply skip right over it without a second thought. No harm, no foul. But I think a lot of the excuses/reasons given why they don't show their face, are easily refutable and as was mentioned, usually hyperbolic (a far fetched nightmare scenario).
You just enumerated a myriad of "risk" factors involved with modeling your feet; that you're worried about this or that, what if this, what if that, etc. Friends finding out, losing your job, whatever it be. So why do you model your feet at all then in that case? If there's so much "risk" involved in doing so, then why jeopardize all of that over something as petty as showing your feet? They'll say the "solution" is to just not show your face, but then at that point, what are you personally getting out of just showing pictures of your feet?
One is more likely to get in hot water at a job or stalked over pictures one posts on social media sites that depict yourself not in your finest moment, or the personal information about yourself that you post. So in order to avoid this, you just don't have social media. You even said yourself earlier that you don't have major social media accounts anymore because of risk factors. Same principle with feet. If there's so many "risk" factors involved, then don't post pictures of yourself showing your feet. However, resorting to simply posting feet only pictures though indicate that they're still adamant that they want foot guys to see their feet.
[ December 21, 2018, 12:53 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
Posted by ShortLivedTyranny (Member # 36627) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by ShortLivedTyranny: Not necessarily the case. I've had friends come across my stuff on the front page of pornhub before. Not a foot guy at all, and while he "appreciated my flexibility, feet are not for him". And this was while I was not modeling. Where you post things is not really where they stay. They float all over the internet. My stuff is on Pinterest lol.
Like I said, yes, it is feet. But we are still modeling knowing full well what guys are going to do to it and society is a long way from accepting that in a widespread manner.
Maybe my boss sees it and laughs it off, but maybe my boss sees it and thinks I'm no longer a good candidate for the HR promotion because the more traditional employees no longer feel comfortable talking to me because of it.
Unlikely, but the risk is there. Not everyone is willing to take those type of risks, but still enjoy the thrill.
These are serious implications you have to think about when you do this. I love modeling because it is a lot of fun for me, but if it were to impact other parts of my life, it would be considerably less fun.
ya know?
Fair point. Stuff does get reposted on other sites, such as PornHub, that deals with a broad range of fetishes. So while you may not necessarily be looking for feet, you still may come across feet somehow (though I'm still not really sure how being that when it displays suggestions for related videos, it's generally within the same fetish genre you're currently viewing and searching for). Even then though, in order for someone to say they came across you on the Internet, they'd have to start the conversation by saying, "So I was online browsing PornHub the other night and..." While there are some people who might openly broach that subject, it's still not a common conversation that someone will bring up comfortably.
Now don't get me wrong, I have nothing personal against faceless foot models. If you don't want to show your face that's fine; that's your prerogative and you're entitled to your own reasons for not doing so. I just have no interest in the slightest because seeing a pair of feet without knowing who they belong to means nothing to me, so I just simply skip right over it without a second thought. No harm, no foul. But I think a lot of the excuses/reasons given why they don't show their face, are easily refutable and as was mentioned, usually hyperbolic (a far fetched nightmare scenario).
You just enumerated a myriad of "risk" factors involved with modeling your feet; that you're worried about this or that, what if this, what if that, etc. Friends finding out, losing your job, whatever it be. So why do you model your feet at all then in that case? If there's so much "risk" involved in doing so, then why jeopardize all of that over something as petty as showing your feet? They'll say the "solution" is to just not show your face, but then at that point, what are you personally getting out of just showing pictures of your feet?
One is more likely to get in hot water at a job or stalked over pictures one posts on social media sites that depict yourself not in your finest moment, or the personal information about yourself that you post. So in order to avoid this, you just don't have social media. You even said yourself earlier that you don't have major social media accounts anymore because of risk factors. Same principle with feet. If there's so many "risk" factors involved, then don't post pictures of yourself showing your feet. However, resorting to simply posting feet only pictures though indicate that they're still adamant that they want foot guys to see their feet.
Some women model to indulge or understand their significant other's fetish. That is initially how I started modeling. My boyfriend had the fetish, I do not not. So I researched it because I cared about making him comfortable in the bedroom. Another reason they may model is their own fetish, such as exhibitionism. Also a contributing factor to my persistence with modeling. Being in front of a camera turns me on, which makes the act of modeling more sexualized for me. There are plenty of reasons to model, even if you don't show your face. Feet are a sexual object in this context. The faceless tit pic or ass or whatever are just as prevalent in other fetishes.
I'm here because I enjoy it, and I enjoy the friends I've made. There are definitely drawbacks though. I've always gone by my legal name and shown my face and in the past that has gotten me more attention than I wanted.
I can totally get why someone would feel insecure doing this. Have you seen the inbox of some of these models? VERY negative stuff flies through there. Even someone with a lot of confidence can experience a lot of harassment and cause a shaky self-perception.I had an individual harass me on Facebook starting in 2010 and finally stopped in 2017. Making new accounts every year after I block them just to message me how worthless I am for modeling and putting me down. Sure you can say, "don't take it to heart" but it just does not work that way.
The models are here because you guys have a fetish, and they don't feel like you are wrong for that. If it isn't your thing, scroll, but don't add shame to their plate when they are trying to take that off yours. How does that encourage women to model? I think the best models have more than just money as a motivator.
As for looking up feet to come across it, well, most of my content has a lot more than feet-related tags. I'm a bigger girl so #BBW is associated with all my work. Which is also linked to more harassing comments.
What I'm getting at is the reaction to risk of modeling would be better approached with "thank you for accepting any risk associated" instead of "well why bother modeling then." There has to be a good mutual respect of privacy. I respect my customers/friends privacy in regards to the fetish and in return they respect my boundaries. That respect is the fruit of why I enjoy what I do.
All that aside, I will say since I've been back, I haven't had any issues with harassment and that has been a great change of pace from my earlier years.
[ December 21, 2018, 12:21 PM: Message edited by: ShortLivedTyranny ]
Posted by ShortLivedTyranny (Member # 36627) on :
quote:Originally posted by toe the line: so why model at all?
what "thrill" do you get out of some anonymous dude liking your feet without even knowing what YOU actually look like, especially considering most foot guys have no standards other than wanting there to be 10 toes
is there any other fetish, kink, attraction or whatever it's supposed to be called where it's common for the girl to hide her face?
has any girl ever claimed that she lost a job or anything because of modeling her feet? i think most of these faceless chicks make up nightmare scenarios in their head, when at the end of the day the only reason they hide their face is nothing more than their own insecurity
also i'm not buying that your non foot guy friend saw your stuff on porn hub without looking for it, those foot punk vids don't get huge views it's the footjob videos that make it to the main page, and footjob videos are the only thing i could imagine getting a girl into trouble at work
I'm not going to take the time to respond to this because I feel you are not really trying to understand what I'm saying, but instead arguing with some slight hostile undertones.
I've put some answers to your questions in my other response, if you are so interested in knowing the answers.
But thank you for your time!
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by ShortLivedTyranny: Some women model to indulge or understand their significant other's fetish. That is initially how I started modeling. My boyfriend had the fetish, I do not not. So I researched it because I cared about making him comfortable in the bedroom. Another reason they may model is their own fetish, such as exhibitionism. Also a contributing factor to my persistence with modeling. Being in front of a camera turns me on, which makes the act of modeling more sexualized for me. There are plenty of reasons to model, even if you don't show your face. Feet are a sexual object in this context. The faceless tit pic or ass or whatever are just as prevalent in other fetishes.
I'm here because I enjoy it, and I enjoy the friends I've made. There are definitely drawbacks though. I've always gone by my legal name and shown my face and in the past that has gotten me more attention than I wanted.
I can totally get why someone would feel insecure doing this. Have you seen the inbox of some of these models? VERY negative stuff flies through there. Even someone with a lot of confidence can experience a lot of harassment and cause a shaky self-perception.I had an individual harass me on Facebook starting in 2010 and finally stopped in 2017. Making new accounts every year after I block them just to message me how worthless I am for modeling and putting me down. Sure you can say, "don't take it to heart" but it just does not work that way.
The models are here because you guys have a fetish, and they don't feel like you are wrong for that. If it isn't your thing, scroll, but don't add shame to their plate when they are trying to take that off yours. How does that encourage women to model? I think the best models have more than just money as a motivator.
As for looking up feet to come across it, well, most of my content has a lot more than feet-related tags. I'm a bigger girl so #BBW is associated with all my work. Which is also linked to more harassing comments.
What I'm getting at is the reaction to risk of modeling would be better approached with "thank you for accepting any risk associated" instead of "well why bother modeling then." There has to be a good mutual respect of privacy. I respect my customers/friends privacy in regards to the fetish and in return they respect my boundaries. That respect is the fruit of why I enjoy what I do.
All that aside, I will say since I've been back, I haven't had any issues with harassment and that has been a great change of pace from my earlier years.
What would your significant other having a foot fetish though have to do with you wanting other anonymous men to see your feet? Wouldn't you wanting to understand his fetish be something between you and him? I can see how coming onto a foot fetish forum and getting insight from other foot guys in a discussion about what kinds of things foot guys like would be helpful, but I'm not sure what kind of thrill one would get out of simply wanting other random anonymous men to see your feet. Based on the way you describe it, you make it sound as if there's a myriad of negative ramifications and nightmarish scenarios from doing so, that it doesn't seem worth the risk over something as petty as feet pictures.
And yes, I can imagine some of the harassing messages some of these models receive, and I think that is completely uncalled for. Just because one models does not mean that they deserve to nor are asking to receive messages such as that. However, constructive criticism though, I see nothing wrong with. If you voluntarily post pictures of your feet and openly solicit others' feedback, it's fair game for you to receive both positive and negative feedback. Many times though, these faceless foot models leave in a huff or get bent out of shape whenever they simply receive a comment that wasn't even intended to be malicious in nature, but is simply just constructive criticism.
While it's appreciated that they do share pictures, I don't think foot guys are obligated to feel grateful and owe you gratitude just because you made the decision to post pictures of your feet for anonymous men to see. Nobody forced you to do it (hopefully), you did it on your own volition and are willingly accepting those "risks" involved for your own reasons. There are some guys out there who actually don't invariably like any pair of feet that has 10 toes, simply because they have a foot fetish. However, there are many that do, so I can see how posting feet only pictures would enable one to garner easy attention and be an easy self esteem boost.
Like I mentioned, I personally don't give faceless foot pictures a second thought, regardless of how nice the feet are because feet alone do nothing for me. I just scroll right on by. If someone leaves a comment though merely suggesting you go get a pedicure or do something to make your feet nicer because they don't look that nice in their current state, I don't think that's uncalled for; especially if you are openly soliciting feedback.
Nothing wrong with a respectful thanks, but no thanks.
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
quote:Originally posted by Dannie:
quote:Originally posted by toe the line: i'm surprised some don't get it
you're touching her feet which is erotic to a foot guy, she laughs hard and squirms around wiggling and flexing her feet, which also is erotic to a foot guy
what is not to like?
Dude It's not about getting it, it's just that I'm not into it, because I find it more elementary than actually being aroused sexually.
Massages and rubbing a females feet with lotion is perfectly fine, and I like that a lot because it's more sensual , but the constant tickling and laughing is not the stuff I'm in to because all it does for me is make the girl laugh while flexing her feet. It PERSONALLY doesn't do much for me, and the videos I watch on tickling are not that great.
What's not to like? Last I checked the question being asked was subjective so I can like or dislike whatever I want.
Yes please continue to add your opinion, most people who can be civil around here appreciate hearing honest perspective versus passive aggressive blabber posed by someone who has never gotten within 10 feet of a female foot in their life time.
Posted by Sighfeet (Member # 49758) on :
My wife is a faceless foot model in IG because well... our kids. All 6 of which are social media junkies. We do it so they dont find us, plain and simple.
that said, my/our biggest dislike is humiliation.
both parties in a foot session need to be enjoying it.
Posted by Chaz Fontana (Member # 13717) on :
...just playing "devil's advocate" here. But for what I do, with Hindu Shakti, or "Goddess Worship", that is an appropriate use for "Goddess". In this genre of religion, you are basically saying that you are serving the "Goddess" through the act of foot worship. Basically serving femininity. On the other hand, call me crazy, but I don't think most footies sucking on a woman's foot, are putting any religious aspect into that. I do, but I also serve femininity...
[ December 29, 2018, 08:16 PM: Message edited by: Chaz Fontana ]
Posted by toe the line (Member # 52159) on :
quote:Originally posted by Groth:
quote:Originally posted by Dannie:
quote:Originally posted by toe the line: i'm surprised some don't get it
you're touching her feet which is erotic to a foot guy, she laughs hard and squirms around wiggling and flexing her feet, which also is erotic to a foot guy
what is not to like?
Dude It's not about getting it, it's just that I'm not into it, because I find it more elementary than actually being aroused sexually.
Massages and rubbing a females feet with lotion is perfectly fine, and I like that a lot because it's more sensual , but the constant tickling and laughing is not the stuff I'm in to because all it does for me is make the girl laugh while flexing her feet. It PERSONALLY doesn't do much for me, and the videos I watch on tickling are not that great.
What's not to like? Last I checked the question being asked was subjective so I can like or dislike whatever I want.
Yes please continue to add your opinion, most people who can be civil around here appreciate hearing honest perspective versus passive aggressive blabber posed by someone who has never gotten within 10 feet of a female foot in their life time.
LOL was his post deleted? i can't find it, that's a lot of hostility over nothing
no surprise you can relate NORCAL, and paying for women to allow you to take their pics doesn't count LOL
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
quote:Originally posted by toe the line:
quote:Originally posted by Groth:
quote:Originally posted by Dannie:
quote:Originally posted by toe the line: i'm surprised some don't get it
you're touching her feet which is erotic to a foot guy, she laughs hard and squirms around wiggling and flexing her feet, which also is erotic to a foot guy
what is not to like?
Dude It's not about getting it, it's just that I'm not into it, because I find it more elementary than actually being aroused sexually.
Massages and rubbing a females feet with lotion is perfectly fine, and I like that a lot because it's more sensual , but the constant tickling and laughing is not the stuff I'm in to because all it does for me is make the girl laugh while flexing her feet. It PERSONALLY doesn't do much for me, and the videos I watch on tickling are not that great.
What's not to like? Last I checked the question being asked was subjective so I can like or dislike whatever I want.
Yes please continue to add your opinion, most people who can be civil around here appreciate hearing honest perspective versus passive aggressive blabber posed by someone who has never gotten within 10 feet of a female foot in their life time.
LOL was his post deleted? i can't find it, that's a lot of hostility over nothing
no surprise you can relate NORCAL, and paying for women to allow you to take their pics doesn't count LOL
You are really obsessed with norcal, but thanks for comparing ME to HIM. It makes me feel special, neither of us are anything compared his greatness. I doubt he pays very many of his models, but nonetheless either way, he's getting women's feet and you AREN'T Michael Pitt.
Posted by Robotron2084 (Member # 33263) on :
I always pay models to allow me to photograph their feet. I have nothing else I'm willing to offer.
To answer the main question I'm tired of many foot fetishist wanting quality content for little to no money.
Posted by Feetosopher (Member # 45909) on :
quote:Originally posted by Robotron2084: I always pay models to allow me to photograph their feet. I have nothing else I'm willing to offer.
To answer the main question I'm tired of many foot fetishist wanting quality content for little to no money.
Amen!!! Posted by LovelyLadies (Member # 5079) on :
Not a bad thread. I didn't go through all the pages so sorry for dups but here's my list.
1. Women creating foot pages in attempt to make a quick cash grab on the desperate out there.
2. Women making a cash grab with their foot page and don't really care about feet in general.
3. Women that create an IG page mostly because of their boyfriend and don't have a foot fetish and would typically not do that if it wasn't for their boyfriend.
4. Women that want to be called Goddess and degrade you.
5. Women that over charge if you somehow manage to convince one for a session. They think they are giving out their virginity at the rates they charge.
In the end I blame it on US. We let them because so many are desperate and willing to pay. If you gave them less attention or showed that in the end, it's just f**kin feet and not their pu$$y, they wouldn't charge so damn much for everything.
Every women have feet, not every takes care of them or look good, but a lot of that can be cured. There are better looking feet to be found else where and no one girl has the ONLY perfect feet (in your mind) on the planet. Just keep looking. That perfect pair of feet in your mind can be found on many different women out there.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by LovelyLadies: Not a bad thread. I didn't go through all the pages so sorry for dups but here's my list.
1. Women creating foot pages in attempt to make a quick cash grab on the desperate out there.
2. Women making a cash grab with their foot page and don't really care about feet in general.
3. Women that create an IG page mostly because of their boyfriend and don't have a foot fetish and would typically not do that if it wasn't for their boyfriend.
4. Women that want to be called Goddess and degrade you.
5. Women that over charge if you somehow manage to convince one for a session. They think they are giving out their virginity at the rates they charge.
In the end I blame it on US. We let them because so many are desperate and willing to pay. If you gave them less attention or showed that in the end, it's just f**kin feet and not their pu$$y, they wouldn't charge so damn much for everything.
Every women have feet, not every takes care of them or look good, but a lot of that can be cured. There are better looking feet to be found else where and no one girl has the ONLY perfect feet (in your mind) on the planet. Just keep looking. That perfect pair of feet in your mind can be found on many different women out there.
Good post.
To add to your post, I'll add: people who feel entitled to your money and that you 'owe' them gratitude simply because they decided to take pictures of their own, or other people's feet.
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
quote:Originally posted by LovelyLadies: Not a bad thread. I didn't go through all the pages so sorry for dups but here's my list.
1. Women creating foot pages in attempt to make a quick cash grab on the desperate out there.
2. Women making a cash grab with their foot page and don't really care about feet in general.
3. Women that create an IG page mostly because of their boyfriend and don't have a foot fetish and would typically not do that if it wasn't for their boyfriend.
4. Women that want to be called Goddess and degrade you.
5. Women that over charge if you somehow manage to convince one for a session. They think they are giving out their virginity at the rates they charge.
In the end I blame it on US. We let them because so many are desperate and willing to pay. If you gave them less attention or showed that in the end, it's just f**kin feet and not their pu$$y, they wouldn't charge so damn much for everything.
Every women have feet, not every takes care of them or look good, but a lot of that can be cured. There are better looking feet to be found else where and no one girl has the ONLY perfect feet (in your mind) on the planet. Just keep looking. That perfect pair of feet in your mind can be found on many different women out there.
To add to your post as well: Entitled and Insignificant forum nobodies who have never touched a female foot in their life that demand the highest quality, hottest girls, best feet in the world, non paid, natural non professional foot model photos and content all for free or they whine and complain and project their insecurities on those better than them. That about sums it all up. (But all your other bullet points were dead on). Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by toe the line:
quote:Originally posted by Groth: Yes please continue to add your opinion, most people who can be civil around here appreciate hearing honest perspective versus passive aggressive blabber posed by someone who has never gotten within 10 feet of a female foot in their life time.
that's a lot of hostility over nothing
No kidding.
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
Spliced & Cut to fit the narrative again eh? Looks like my addition to the last posters' list was spot on. One would only find anything mentioned "hostile" if one knew that it was True about oneself enough to comment about it.
Posted by toe the line (Member # 52159) on :
quote:Originally posted by Groth:
quote:Originally posted by toe the line:
quote:Originally posted by Groth:
quote:Originally posted by Dannie:
quote:Originally posted by toe the line: i'm surprised some don't get it
you're touching her feet which is erotic to a foot guy, she laughs hard and squirms around wiggling and flexing her feet, which also is erotic to a foot guy
what is not to like?
Dude It's not about getting it, it's just that I'm not into it, because I find it more elementary than actually being aroused sexually.
Massages and rubbing a females feet with lotion is perfectly fine, and I like that a lot because it's more sensual , but the constant tickling and laughing is not the stuff I'm in to because all it does for me is make the girl laugh while flexing her feet. It PERSONALLY doesn't do much for me, and the videos I watch on tickling are not that great.
What's not to like? Last I checked the question being asked was subjective so I can like or dislike whatever I want.
Yes please continue to add your opinion, most people who can be civil around here appreciate hearing honest perspective versus passive aggressive blabber posed by someone who has never gotten within 10 feet of a female foot in their life time.
LOL was his post deleted? i can't find it, that's a lot of hostility over nothing
no surprise you can relate NORCAL, and paying for women to allow you to take their pics doesn't count LOL
You are really obsessed with norcal, but thanks for comparing ME to HIM. It makes me feel special, neither of us are anything compared his greatness. I doubt he pays very many of his models, but nonetheless either way, he's getting women's feet and you AREN'T Michael Pitt.
we all saw your pics, you get nothing without paying for it greg er i mean "groth"
Posted by toe the line (Member # 52159) on :
quote:Originally posted by LovelyLadies:
3. Women that create an IG page mostly because of their boyfriend and don't have a foot fetish and would typically not do that if it wasn't for their boyfriend.
hardly any page would exist if we only got women that had a foot fetish starting an instagram page, what percentage of women have a foot fetish and would even think about modeling their feet if not for having experience with a foot guy?
what is wrong with having a page to please their boyfriend? at least then we know she's accepting of a foot guy
that's better than just doing it with some fat website owner that paid them to do it, in that case who knows if those girls would even like a foot guy
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
quote:Originally posted by toe the line:
quote:Originally posted by Groth:
quote:Originally posted by toe the line:
quote:Originally posted by Groth:
quote:Originally posted by Dannie:
quote:Originally posted by toe the line: i'm surprised some don't get it
you're touching her feet which is erotic to a foot guy, she laughs hard and squirms around wiggling and flexing her feet, which also is erotic to a foot guy
what is not to like?
Dude It's not about getting it, it's just that I'm not into it, because I find it more elementary than actually being aroused sexually.
Massages and rubbing a females feet with lotion is perfectly fine, and I like that a lot because it's more sensual , but the constant tickling and laughing is not the stuff I'm in to because all it does for me is make the girl laugh while flexing her feet. It PERSONALLY doesn't do much for me, and the videos I watch on tickling are not that great.
What's not to like? Last I checked the question being asked was subjective so I can like or dislike whatever I want.
Yes please continue to add your opinion, most people who can be civil around here appreciate hearing honest perspective versus passive aggressive blabber posed by someone who has never gotten within 10 feet of a female foot in their life time.
LOL was his post deleted? i can't find it, that's a lot of hostility over nothing
no surprise you can relate NORCAL, and paying for women to allow you to take their pics doesn't count LOL
You are really obsessed with norcal, but thanks for comparing ME to HIM. It makes me feel special, neither of us are anything compared his greatness. I doubt he pays very many of his models, but nonetheless either way, he's getting women's feet and you AREN'T Michael Pitt.
we all saw your pics, you get nothing without paying for it
Wrong again Michael Pitt. You will never know who is who and who is playing you with the secret PM's you're getting trying to pin names on the donkey.
![[Cheers]](graemlins/cheers.gif)
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Evil Grin]](graemlins/evilgrin.gif)
![[Nut Kick]](graemlins/nutkick.gif)
![[Violent]](graemlins/violent.gif)
![[Joint]](graemlins/joint.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Bow Down]](graemlins/bowdown2.gif)
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)