Funny, I hoped for such a set of circumstances each time I've flown.
Posted by Michael Pitt (Member # 47716) on :
quote:Originally posted by Wooden Leviathan: Funny, I hoped for such a set of circumstances each time I've flown.
not me, most feet are disgusting and most of the time it's man feet on the airplane
the feet in this video looked old to me
this video is more proof how different it is to be attracted to feet, 5% at most have a foot fetish
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by Wooden Leviathan: Funny, I hoped for such a set of circumstances each time I've flown.
Depending on the feet and who the feet belong to, I hope.
Regardless of who it is, I think it is poor manners and decorum no matter what to have the gall and temerity to prop your feet up right next to someone in such a confined area, such as an airliner in this case. However, depending on if the feet are male or female, the condition of the feet (provided they're female) and what the female actually looks like, determines whether or not I'd complain about it.
quote:Originally posted by Michael Pitt: not me, most feet are disgusting and most of the time it's man feet on the airplane
the feet in this video looked old to me
this video is more proof how different it is to be attracted to feet, 5% at most have a foot fetish
Whenever you see these types of stories, the feet have never been nice looking nor has the female (whenever it is a female) been particularly cute. Like you said, it's usually a guy or a below average looking woman with average at best feet.
Posted by aka.footjoyboy (Member # 32751) on :
I would have started rubbing those. Posted by Meshington (Member # 51122) on :
I may have a foot fetish, but that is just rude. Some of the feet shown in the clip looked cute to me but it doesn't matter. I don't care if you have sexy feet, GET THEM OFF OF MY ARM REST!
Posted by Michael Pitt (Member # 47716) on :
quote:Originally posted by Meshington: I may have a foot fetish, but that is just rude. Some of the feet shown in the clip looked cute to me but it doesn't matter. I don't care if you have sexy feet, GET THEM OFF OF MY ARM REST!
exactly it is very disrespectful, classless, and an invasion of personal space
Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
quote:Originally posted by Michael Pitt:
quote:Originally posted by Meshington: I may have a foot fetish, but that is just rude. Some of the feet shown in the clip looked cute to me but it doesn't matter. I don't care if you have sexy feet, GET THEM OFF OF MY ARM REST!
exactly it is very disrespectful, classless, and an invasion of personal space
I have to agree with you gentlemen. The most beautiful girl with the sexiest feet could be sitting behind me, and I would be very put off if she felt she could just park her feet on my arm rest. People who think they can do stuff like that in public, in my opinion, are disgusting, disrespectful and just don't care about anyone else, which also makes them selfish. Personally, I would hate to have them as neighbors.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
Here's another instance of this that I recalled reading when I saw the topic of this thread:
Even more egregious than simply just propping them on an arm rest, in my opinion.
Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
Geez Louise, some people are inconsiderate beyond belief. Makes you wonder about their upbringing. If I had tried anything even close to that when I was a kid, my parents would have punished me immediately, and they would have been in the right.
Posted by Bri75 (Member # 49955) on :
Lick um. They'll move than.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by Fair Adam: Geez Louise, some people are inconsiderate beyond belief. Makes you wonder about their upbringing. If I had tried anything even close to that when I was a kid, my parents would have punished me immediately, and they would have been in the right.
Right? It's one thing like in the video in original post of the thread to simply place them on someone else's arm rest and "invade" one particular person's arm space per se, but to prop them up on the back of a seat so everyone in your vicinity can "enjoy" them and at the expense of someone else's head being literally right next to them, is unfathomable.
Especially after that person politely asked her several times to remove them, and she essentially just glared at him and kept them there. As if he was the one inconveniencing and being rude to her.
quote:Originally posted by Bri75: Lick um. They'll move than.
Funny, but definitely not. As was mentioned, it's usually a guy who does this or an average at best looking female with average at best looking feet. Though that's not to say that it would then be a good idea to do if it was a good looking female with nice looking feet. Still definitely not.
If it was the scenario in the original post where someone just put them on or near my arm rest and it was a good looking female with nice looking feet, depending on how I felt at that moment and I didn't actually say something to them, I'd probably "bump" into her feet with my hands as many times as necessary until she got the hint that perhaps she should move her feet. That way, I'm getting to touch them and also giving her the hint to move them.
In the scenario of the article that I posted where she propped her feet up on the back of the seat literally next to the guy's head, I'd immediately say something no matter who it was.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
I'd still go with 25 %. And as far as airplane female feet, bring them on.
Posted by 5thgear (Member # 46148) on :
I wouldn't feel disrespected or violated if feet that pretty were next to me. I'd go ahead and violate her back and start rubbing them.
Posted by Kokaith (Member # 22763) on :
Hahahaha I was wondering if this was eventually going to show up here...
Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :
Didn't Britney Spears get told to put her shoes on once in an airplane because someone complained they stunk? I could have sworn I read that on this forum years ago.
Patrick
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by Patrick: Didn't Britney Spears get told to put her shoes on once in an airplane because someone complained they stunk? I could have sworn I read that on this forum years ago.
Patrick
That's correct. If you do a Google search, you'll find various articles regarding that. It happened around 2004 or so. Nothing mentioned though that she actually propped them up on the top of a seat or an arm rest; just that she simply took her shoes off.
However, I think I vaguely recall reading somewhere that was merely a rumor though. I could be wrong on that and it actually did indeed happen, but I just seem to remember reading somewhere that it was false.
Posted by Little feet lover (Member # 46410) on :
I see barefeet in the planes all the time, especially if it's a long flight to Asia. It's only natural during a long flight. Being a foot fetishiasts, I actually like seeing barefooted girls.
That said, if unkept, ugly feet found its way to my arm rest, it would tick me off. How f'n rude.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
Or some fat smelly hairy guy's foot bumping your elbow on the plane, or worse the smell. Eff that. Females should be the only ones legally able to be barefoot on a plane.
Posted by Toetapper (Member # 6473) on :
For as much as I may adore women's feet, I would regard this as a most rude intrusion.
This is a most definite "NO".
Posted by Michael Pitt (Member # 47716) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: Or some fat smelly hairy guy's foot bumping your elbow on the plane, or worse the smell. Eff that. Females should be the only ones legally able to be barefoot on a plane.
no most of them have nasty feet, nobody should be allowed
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
Someone has joined the wrong forum.
Posted by peterjohn (Member # 37637) on :
Not cool. She should have asked first But from a foot fetish point of view what a bonus. What a fabulous view. Dream come true...for me I hope it had a scent. Would have struck up a conversation
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by peterjohn: Not cool. She should have asked first But from a foot fetish point of view what a bonus. What a fabulous view. Dream come true...for me I hope it had a scent. Would have struck up a conversation
I agree that she should have at the very least, asked first.
When you say from a foot fetish point of view, do you mean that you find the feet themselves in that particular article to be attractive to where it would have been a dream come true for you? Or it'd be a dream come true regardless of what the feet looked like, just as long as they belonged to a female, regardless of what she looked like as well?
Posted by Michael Pitt (Member # 47716) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: Someone has joined the wrong forum.
it's called standards, i guess you can't relate
being a female with 10 toes does not mean i have to like you
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:nobody should be allowed
From all rational deductive reasoning, that means nobody even women with nice feet should be allowed to be barefoot on the plane, which in everyone here's estimation is absurd since that's what turns us on is NICE feet. I say allow only nice ones to be and everyone else, no.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: From all rational deductive reasoning, that means nobody even women with nice feet should be allowed to be barefoot on the plane, which in everyone here's estimation is absurd since that's what turns us on is NICE feet. I say allow only nice ones to be and everyone else, no.
I can't really see that as being a rational, realistic rule though. "Everyone is required to keep their shoes on, unless you're a female with nice feet, then you're permitted to take them off". Who would be the judge of that on each and every plane or terminal?
You either have to allow it for everyone, or disallow it for everyone.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
We're not talking about allowing or disallowing as rules states or don't state, it's a hypothetical situation about personal preference as a foot fetishist and saying even women with nice feet can't be barefoot doesn't make sense. If any of us were on a plane, none of us would complain about seeing a hot chic barefoot, if you do..maybe you don't really have a foot fetish at all. Leave it at that.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: We're not talking about allowing or disallowing as rules states or don't state, it's a hypothetical situation about personal preference as a foot fetishist and saying even women with nice feet can't be barefoot doesn't make sense. If any of us were on a plane, none of us would complain about seeing a hot chic barefoot, if you do..maybe you don't really have a foot fetish at all. Leave it at that.
It's an open discussion topic for anyone to participate in. I'm not sure that you get to be the one to impolitely decide when it's over, or even dictate what the topic is for everyone else.
The OP posted a link to a video of a female exhibiting poor decorum, which was the topic. I also followed that up by posting an article of another female exhibiting poor manners, which many people agree that it is. There was nothing hypothetical about that.
For some people, common courtesy and respect for others supersede their own sexual gratification.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
And in the hypothetical situation where we see a hot chic barefoot minus all the other situations mentioned, it would be disingenuous as a man with a foot fetish to say we didn't enjoy the view as well as absurd to say it bothered us in the slightest regardless of any other factor. Leave it at that.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: And in the hypothetical situation where we see a hot chic barefoot minus all the other situations mentioned, it would be disingenuous as a man with a foot fetish to say we didn't enjoy the view as well as absurd to say it bothered us in the slightest regardless of any other factor. Leave it at that.
Very well. You countinue with the hypothetical scenario you introduced and declared that the topic is going to be, in which there is a rule where only female passengers with nice feet on a plane are allowed to remove their footwear, while the rest of us stick to the OP's intended topic and feel that placing your feet on someone else's arm rest or next to their head, is rude and demonstrates a lack of manners, no matter who you are.
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote: while the rest of us stick to the OP's intended topic and feel that placing your feet on someone else's arm rest or next to their head, is rude and demonstrates a lack of manners, no matter who you are.
I never said it wasn't. I'm talking about visually. Leave it there.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: I never said it wasn't. I'm talking about visually. Leave it there.
The topic of the thread isn't what you're talking about though. However, I already politely addressed your hypothetical, albeit quixotic, scenario/topic of a rule being implemented where only females with nice feet are permitted to remove their shoes on planes.
And please stop authoritatively telling me when I can and can't discuss a topic in an open discussion topic.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
"And please stop authoritatively telling me when I can and can't discuss a topic in an open discussion topic."
Bicker Bicker Bicker, Whine Whine Whine. You were warned to stop. U sound like a little bitch who doesn't get her way so please do us all a favor and stfu already.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: "And please stop authoritatively telling me when I can and can't discuss a topic in an open discussion topic."
Bicker Bicker Bicker, Whine Whine Whine. You were warned to stop. U sound like a little bitch who doesn't get her way so please do us all a favor and stfu already.
Otherwise you'll disseminate my, along with others', personal information (strongly implied credit card information) on the Internet. Yes, I know. Which we're all still waiting to see happen.
Anyway. Do you feel one propping their feet on someone else's arm rest or next to their head is impolite decorum on a plane?
Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: "And please stop authoritatively telling me when I can and can't discuss a topic in an open discussion topic."
Bicker Bicker Bicker, Whine Whine Whine. You were warned to stop. U sound like a little bitch who doesn't get her way so please do us all a favor and stfu already.
I just wish for people to respect other's opinions around here and stop picking a fight over nothing. It seems anything innocent anymore always turns into a full scrutiny and accusation fest. This site is collapsing fast. You're right on that last fact though.
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: "And please stop authoritatively telling me when I can and can't discuss a topic in an open discussion topic."
Bicker Bicker Bicker, Whine Whine Whine. You were warned to stop. U sound like a little bitch who doesn't get her way so please do us all a favor and stfu already.
I just wish for people to respect other's opinions around here and stop picking a fight over nothing. It seems anything innocent anymore always turns into a full scrutiny and accusation fest. This site is collapsing fast. You're right on that last fact though.
NorCal, just because there's an exchange of opinions, doesn't mean people don't respect others' opinions. There was nothing inflammatory about this at all:
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: From all rational deductive reasoning, that means nobody even women with nice feet should be allowed to be barefoot on the plane, which in everyone here's estimation is absurd since that's what turns us on is NICE feet. I say allow only nice ones to be and everyone else, no.
I can't really see that as being a rational, realistic rule though. "Everyone is required to keep their shoes on, unless you're a female with nice feet, then you're permitted to take them off". Who would be the judge of that on each and every plane or terminal?
You either have to allow it for everyone, or disallow it for everyone.
It was an honest, genuine reply to your post according to what you stated in your post. However, this reply of yours sounds as if you're essentially saying that you're not going to discuss it, and that simply anyone who doesn't agree with you/your opinion must not have a foot fetish, and that's the end of the discussion:
quote:Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios: We're not talking about allowing or disallowing as rules states or don't state, it's a hypothetical situation about personal preference as a foot fetishist and saying even women with nice feet can't be barefoot doesn't make sense. If any of us were on a plane, none of us would complain about seeing a hot chic barefoot, if you do..maybe you don't really have a foot fetish at all. Leave it at that.
If anything, I would think that would be construed more as not respecting someone else's opinion because it's essentially saying either agree with me, or else you're this or that. As I mentioned earlier, some people don't let their fetish rule their lives and they may value common courtesy and manners for others over their own personal gratification. Doing so doesn't mean you must not really have a foot fetish.
And for the record, despite the similar few threatening PM's I've received over the past few years from a couple of users, I don't think this site is "collapsing" at all. It's the best foot forum on the Internet, in my opinion. There's a lot of good content shared and lately, some interesting topics for discussion.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
Can everyone believe this guy now walking back all his previous inflammatory statements and playing the victim card as soon as he's called out for his douschbaggery? You're the reason no intelligent dialog happens here.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
quote:Originally posted by Bondo: This is hilarious! It's like watching a Three Stooges episode, LOL!!!
I don't think anyone else finds this guys' constant arguing and bickering comical. He's trying to shut down all discussion with his bitchy passive aggressiveness. But hell let's break out the string quartet while the ship sinks if it makes us all more oblivious to the obvious. Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by Bondo: This is hilarious! It's like watching a Three Stooges episode, LOL!!!
quote:Originally posted by Bondo: And it just keeps going, lol!!!!! Where’s Shemp!
^ Right here. Haha.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by Bondo: Someone pass the popcorn, this is going to be a marathon!
With the now addition of Shemp, it will be. Ha.
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: I don't think anyone else finds this guys' constant arguing and bickering comical. He's trying to shut down all discussion with his bitchy passive aggressiveness. But hell let's break out the string quartet while the ship sinks if it makes us all more oblivious to the obvious.
In addition to him coming out of retirement to swear vengeance on and threaten anyone who disagrees with NorCal, he even types like NorCal too; right down to the tawdry, albeit comical, tropes. Interesting. Haha.
[ October 03, 2017, 03:37 PM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by Bondo: Someone pass the popcorn, this is going to be a marathon!
With the now addition of Shemp, it will be. Ha.
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: I don't think anyone else finds this guys' constant arguing and bickering comical. He's trying to shut down all discussion with his bitchy passive aggressiveness. But hell let's break out the string quartet while the ship sinks if it makes us all more oblivious to the obvious.
In addition to him coming out of retirement to swear vengeance on and threaten anyone who disagrees with NorCal, he even types like NorCal too; right down to the tawdry, albeit comical, tropes. Interesting. Haha.
You're just mad someone is there to block your pseudo moral high ground and call out your bullshit. I love all the conspiracy theories, it makes you look pretty rediculous.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: You're just mad someone is there to block your pseudo moral high ground and call out your bullshit. I love all the conspiracy theories, it makes you look pretty rediculous.
He even spells like NorCal too. Haha.
Well, I mean I haven't threatened anyone. And I especially wouldn't on someone else's behalf:
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: You're just mad someone is there to block your pseudo moral high ground and call out your bullshit. I love all the conspiracy theories, it makes you look pretty rediculous.
He even spells like NorCal too. Haha.
Well, I mean I haven't threatened anyone. And I especially wouldn't on someone else's behalf:
So we have a former moderator now turned troll and a dillusional self entitled millennial who thinks there's some correlation between the way i type versus NorcalfeetStudios, like he's a self professed linguistic expert. This site is definitely gone. Sad there's literally no moderation.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: So we have a former moderator now turned troll and a dillusional self entitled millennial who thinks there's some correlation between the way i type versus NorcalfeetStudios, like he's a self professed linguistic expert. This site is definitely gone. Sad there's literally no moderation.
You're the one that decided to create your user name and summarily put that threatening PM in my inbox though. I presume nobody else on this site made you do it. The site isn't responsible for your actions.
And it's not the first time I've received similarly worded messages. From a different user name, though.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: So we have a former moderator now turned troll and a dillusional self entitled millennial who thinks there's some correlation between the way i type versus NorcalfeetStudios, like he's a self professed linguistic expert. This site is definitely gone. Sad there's literally no moderation.
You're the one that decided to create your user name and summarily put that threatening PM in my inbox though. I presume nobody else on this site made you do it. The site isn't responsible for your actions.
And it's not the first time I've received similarly worded messages. From a different user name, though.
So because 2 different people send you a private message that makes both of them the same person? Interesting logic. Let's see you try to prove any of that dribble.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
quote:Originally posted by Bondo: Seriously? You don't see the comedy in all of this? It's like a 3rd grade name calling match. Keep it going, it makes you look really cool, lol!!!
So KounterPunch, what makes you think I'm a former mod? I'm still a mod. Where did you get the idea that I'm no longer a mod? Interesting......
By the way you are so virtuously trolling and egging on people to bicker i am guessing you aren't a moderator anymore since it goes against everything a normal moderator does or how he handles himself on a public forum he's trying to police. Guess I was wrong in assuming otherwise here based on your silly 3 stooges references.
Posted by Little feet lover (Member # 46410) on :
Why is this happening? What's there to argue? Arguing over nothing. Stop this nonsense.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: So because 2 different people send you a private message that makes both of them the same person? Interesting logic. Let's see you try to prove any of that dribble.
I don't know if you're the same person? All I know is that you created your user name and then immediately sent me that threatening PM apparently on NorCal's behalf. I just simply think it's funny that in addition to deciding to come out of retirement to swear vengeance on anyone who disagrees with NorCal, you also decided to type and spell the same way he does as well.
And that it's not the first time I, and others, have received similarly worded messages and threats.
So I couldn't agree more that this is utterly comical. Haha.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: So because 2 different people send you a private message that makes both of them the same person? Interesting logic. Let's see you try to prove any of that dribble.
I don't know if you're the same person? All I know is that you created your user name and then immediately sent me that threatening PM apparently on NorCal's behalf. I just simply think it's funny that in addition to deciding to come out of retirement to swear vengeance on anyone who disagrees with NorCal, you also decided to type and spell the same way he does as well.
And that it's not the first time I, and others, have received similarly worded messages and threats.
So I couldn't agree more that this is utterly comical. Haha.
I sent those on everyone's behalf because you are pissing everybody off here and since the moderators don't want to do their job and ban you. This has absolutely nothing to do with NorCal, he's a big boy he can take care of himself. You're still obviously afraid of whatever info I might have even though I never said exactly what I have just by the way you react to my comments. It's actually pretty funny to watch you get all emotional because I may have something and I may not have something and you're either going to have to call my bluff or deal with it.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: I sent those on everyone's behalf because you are pissing everybody off here and since the moderators don't want to do their job and ban you. This has absolutely nothing to do with NorCal, he's a big boy he can take care of himself. You're still obviously afraid of whatever info I might have even though I never said exactly what I have just by the way you react to my comments. It's actually pretty funny to watch you get all emotional because I may have something and I may not have something and you're either going to have to call my bluff or deal with it.
He even demands moderators to take action for him at his beckoning call and do what he says whenever he snaps his fingers too, just like NorCal. Haha.
And "those?" This is the only PM thread I personally received from your user name:
Nobody else has threatened to disseminate my information (strongly implied financial information), except you in defense of NorCal. So it's baffling why you're attempting to blame the entire forum for your own actions. As I mentioned before, the site isn't responsible for your actions; you are.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
" As I mentioned before, the site isn't responsible for your actions; you are."
MY, how the context of this resembles your own life based on the info I have. See the only difference here is you are ashamed of your actions and I am not, that's why you're "lashing out" (your term from another thread) with empty allegations trying desperately to connect me to another poster here. Well Jack, keep trying you have a long and winding road ahead of you to prove that.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: " As I mentioned before, the site isn't responsible for your actions; you are."
MY, how the context of this resembles your own life based on the info I have. See the only difference here is you are ashamed of your actions and I am not, that's why you're "lashing out" (your term from another thread) with empty allegations trying desperately to connect me to another poster here. Well Jack, keep trying you have a long and winding road ahead of you to prove that.
I haven't threatened you, nor anyone else. However, both you and NorCal, have threatened users on here. Does that mean you're the same person? I don't know. I already mentioned that earlier. I just merely think it's funny that in addition to you suddenly coming out of retirement and creating this mysterious user name to swear vengeance on anyone who simply disagrees with NorCal on a discussion topic, you've also decided to espouse his typing tendencies, spelling tendencies, and the tendency to demand that moderators of a site do whatever you tell them to do, whenever you want them to, at your beckoning call. Even going as far as calling them "trolls" if they don't do what you say. Haha.
Well then what are you waiting for, Esteban? Post whatever information that you're threatening to disseminate of mine (others have asked you to do the same based on the threats you sent them), that you came out of retirement to do on NorCal's behalf in this PM that you summarily sent me right after you created your user name:
It's just a bit odd and humorous that it's not the first time I, or others, have received similarly worded, threatening PM's; not only from KounterPunch:
Another user (whose user name I also won't mention out of deference to them) who received a similar PM, threatening the dissemination of that person's personal information:
I'd imagine there are many people who would find this disconcerting and that it sets a poor example for webmasters in general, with people being concerned for the privacy of their sensitive information, knowing that there is at least one webmaster that you can't trust with it, since either he himself will threaten to disseminate it, or he has connections that will threaten to disseminate it if you ever disagree with him on a discussion topic.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
A vast selection of PM shots there that one could have only gotten if one was the owner of each of the accounts those were sent to. You just proved the rumor that's been floating around the whole time about you having multiple puppet accounts. Trying to expose someone, you got entangled in the very web you tried casting on another hahahaa whiny bitch. You can't even get social security numbers from website billing methods, come on kid get smarter! If you're going to attack someone either me or him with photochopped pics at least get your facts straight. Esteban, HAHAHA dude! This is comedy gold you got little peepers whispering in your ear every Hispanic name in the book thinking I am someone from the Elegant Bare Feet brigade in L.A. Too bad I don't live in L.A.
[ October 03, 2017, 09:21 PM: Message edited by: KounterPunch ]
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: A vast selection of PM shots there that one could have only gotten if one was the owner of each of the accounts those were sent to. You just proved the rumor that's been floating around the whole time about you having multiple puppet accounts. Trying to expose someone, you got entangled in the very web you tried casting on another hahahaa whiny bitch. You can't even get social security numbers from website billing methods, come on kid get smarter! Esteban, HAHAHA dude! This is comedy gold you got little peepers whispering in your ear every Hispanic name in the book thinking I am someone from the Elegant Bare Feet brigade in L.A. Too bad I don't live in L.A.
So, did you come out of retirement just to genuflect at NorCal's feet or something? Very weird reason to come out of retirement. And I couldn't care less where you live, your race, or what your actual name is. All I know is that you've threatened people on here for them simply disagreeing with NorCal on a discussion topic.
We're all waiting.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: A vast selection of PM shots there that one could have only gotten if one was the owner of each of the accounts those were sent to. You just proved the rumor that's been floating around the whole time about you having multiple puppet accounts. Trying to expose someone, you got entangled in the very web you tried casting on another hahahaa whiny bitch. You can't even get social security numbers from website billing methods, come on kid get smarter! Esteban, HAHAHA dude! This is comedy gold you got little peepers whispering in your ear every Hispanic name in the book thinking I am someone from the Elegant Bare Feet brigade in L.A. Too bad I don't live in L.A.
So, did you come out of retirement just to genuflect at NorCal's feet or something? Very weird reason to come out of retirement. And I couldn't care less where you live, your race, or what your actual name is. All I know is that you've threatened people on here for them simply disagreeing with NorCal on a discussion topic.
All the screenshots in the world won't help you in uncovering anything about anyone and IDC what you post about me because I know that's all the ammo you have and you're pulling your hair out right now waiting for any crumb to drop so you can run with it, you're never going to win this. Hint, though you may want to check Twitter or Facebook for clues on the leakage La Informacion RFLMAO. Clearly your tender emotions have gotten the best of you enough to ignore patrick's ban warning and keep this going bcause you can't resist a good argument or bickering fest and suffer from good old' Last Worditus. I heard Herpes medication helps with that hahahahhh.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: All the screenshots in the world won't help you in uncovering anything about anyone and IDC what you post about me because I know that's all the ammo you have and you're pulling your hair out right now waiting for any crumb to drop so you can run with it, you're never going to win this. Hint, though you may want to check Twitter or Facebook for clues on the leakage La Informacion RFLMAO. Clearly your tender emotions have gotten the best of you enough to ignore patrick's ban warning and keep this going.
I haven't posted anything about you, nor do I care to. Like I said, all I know is that both you and NorCal have sent threatening messages to people on here; you creating your user name to do that very thing in defense of NorCal. Like I mentioned, I feel that actions like that set a poor example for other webmasters in potentially scaring off potential customers, knowing that there's webmasters out there who can't be trusted with sensitive information because they will threaten to disseminate it if you ever simply disagree with them on a fair discussion topic. That's not something I feel that should be taken lightly and should be a serious cause for concern.
No, on here. We're all waiting. I would imagine that not everyone, including myself, has a Twitter nor a Facebook. Not to mention you didn't even mention which Facebook page or Twitter account to check.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
Norcal was right in the other thread that got deleted when he mentioned you have a personal vendetta against him. You clearly post a photo of a private message not even related to him then bash him for something he's literally incapable of doing since B.H.E. runs the ENTIRE billing of all their websites, NOT individual owners. They see literally NOTHING when someone purchases a membership I have had dealings with them years ago and would assume Wu II aka Phil still does the same old thing now, so there goes your theories again! You should tell the guy whispering to you in Private that he's wrong and shouldn't lead you on such a wild goose chase. Clearly you are upset over circumstances you won't be able to change here. PhotoShop isn't your forte by the way, all the waves in that link hahahah. Keep this going I've watched so many of these go to the abyss and this one will be no exception but with the added twist of a banning for your efforts.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: Norcal was right in the other thread that got deleted when he mentioned you have a personal vendetta against him. You clearly post a photo of a private message not even related to him then bash him for something he's literally incapable of doing since B.H.E. runs the ENTIRE billing of all their websites, NOT individual owners. They see literally NOTHING when someone purchases a membership, so there goes your theories again! You should tell the guy whispering to you in Private that he's wrong and shouldn't lead you on such a wild goose chase. Clearly you are upset over circumstances you won't be able to change here. PhotoShop isn't your forte by the way, all the waves in that link hahahah. Keep this going I've watched so many of these go to the abyss and this one will be no exception but with the added twist of a banning for your efforts.
You and NorCal recklessly sending messages to users on here that threaten their sensitive information simply because they disagree with NorCal on a fair discussion topic, isn't something I feel should be taken lightly and something that people should be made aware of, due to the reasons explained already.
Regardless of if you're capable of doing it or not is irrelevant; the fact that you're even threatening it, is what's the cause for concern. You have both demonstrated that you can't be trusted with sensitive information of any kind, which by extension may hurt other webmasters due to people being reluctant to submit their personal information for anything foot related. Purchasing a membership to a foot site isn't worth potentially having your sensitive information disseminated by unscrupulous webmasters.
And you said in your PM that you have a C4S store, not a BHE site?
[ October 03, 2017, 10:17 PM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
Norcal doesn't send "reckless" letters threatening anyone, never has and never will he's a Super Good guy in real life from the brief time I met him years ago. Like I said though, your photoshop skills suck anyone can see the waver lines in that example OR you can publicly divulge whose inbox that came from back in 2014 (providing it's real). My guess is it's the same person who is whispering in your ear all the possible names that could identify me, just a hunch.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
"B.H.E. runs the ENTIRE billing of all their websites, NOT individual owners. They see literally NOTHING when someone purchases a membership I have had dealings with them years ago and would assume Wu II aka Phil still does the same old thing now, so there goes your theories again!"
I'll quote myself since you obviously don't understand how the BHE billing process works and you can dispense with the claims anyone has your personal financial information who owns a BHE site.
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: Norcal doesn't send "reckless" letters threatening anyone, never has and never will he's a Super Good guy in real life from the brief time I met him years ago. Like I said though, your photoshop skills suck anyone can see the waver lines in that example OR you can publicly divulge whose inbox that came from back in 2014 (providing it's real). My guess is it's the same person who is whispering in your ear all the possible names that could identify me, just a hunch.
Obviously, he's not the same person on foot forums that he is in person.
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: "B.H.E. runs the ENTIRE billing of all their websites, NOT individual owners. They see literally NOTHING when someone purchases a membership I have had dealings with them years ago and would assume Wu II aka Phil still does the same old thing now, so there goes your theories again!"
I'll quote myself since you obviously don't understand how the BHE billing process works and you can dispense with the claims anyone has your personal financial information who owns a BHE site.
Your actions of even threatening it in the first place, is what's I feel a major cause for concern. Just because you can't actually do it doesn't exonerate you of your actions, as your actions still potentially harm other webmasters for the reasons already explained. As I said, paying for foot content isn't worth being threatened having your sensitive information promulgated by unscrupulous webmasters.
Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :
quote:Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:Originally posted by KounterPunch: Norcal doesn't send "reckless" letters threatening anyone, never has and never will he's a Super Good guy in real life from the brief time I met him years ago. Like I said though, your photoshop skills suck anyone can see the waver lines in that example OR you can publicly divulge whose inbox that came from back in 2014 (providing it's real). My guess is it's the same person who is whispering in your ear all the possible names that could identify me, just a hunch.
Obviously, he's not the same person on foot forums that he is in person.
Maybe he fucks with you and Pitt on purpose since you obviously hate him and rip him every chance you get, to get more signups, drama sells kiddo! Perhaps he's a genius by creating entertainment which draws more people to his website, who knows! I don't really care or know but that may be. I have a self selling Clips4Sale store and no one cares what my opinion is online they just watch the clips. Maybe you should take note.
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)