Foot Fetish Forum: We Need This In the States ASAP!

This is topic We Need This In the States ASAP! in forum Foot Fetish Talk at Foot Fetish Forum.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=018274

Posted by solefull00 (Member # 44401) on :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWZwBy8-fvo

Posted by Icarus (Member # 46711) on :

Yes!

Posted by TruthBeTold (Member # 47114) on :

OMG yes, and I'd be a daily customer! [Thumbs Up]

Posted by AceCorr (Member # 37554) on :

We already have that and much more! It's called illegal massage parlors that are very seedy. It's everywhere.

Posted by Jota Milagros (Member # 52780) on :

Yes! [Mmm]

Posted by solefull00 (Member # 44401) on :

quote:
Originally posted by AceCorr:
We already have that and much more! It's called illegal massage parlors that are very seedy. It's everywhere.

agreed, although I'm interested in the version of it where I don't have to know the secret lingo or have to worry about a raid ;p;

Posted by AceCorr (Member # 37554) on :

quote:
Originally posted by solefull00:

quote:
Originally posted by AceCorr:
We already have that and much more! It's called illegal massage parlors that are very seedy. It's everywhere.
agreed, although I'm interested in the version of it where I don't have to know the secret lingo or have to worry about a raid ;p;

Do you remember the webpage Backpage? That was taken down in 2018 but guess what it's back up and running but under Bedpage instead of Backpage. It's essentially the exact same thing. These seedy massage parlors are always going to be around due to basic economics. Supply and demand. As long as there is a demand there will be a supply. The pimps and madam's are getting smarter now. Instead of just having a building where it lists massage, they are located in buildings where you can't tell what it is from the outside.

Posted by jediofthefeet (Member # 1463) on :

Wow! Up for two years with no Age-Restriction from YouTube. And they put "foot fetish" in the title.

See how subjective YouTube is about content?

A shirtless guy gave a girl a foot massage while wearing a mask over his face, and it instantly got flagged for Age-Restriction. Guess the gimp aspect of it set off red flags? Or was it the bare chest?