I guess you need to poll the other members about the new camera, but for me, the pictures are blurry and much too big. After you download them, windows resizes them to fit your screen, but the first time you're looking at them it's very annoying to have to scroll both ways to see the full picture. Anyway, just some food for thought.
Posted by combine_hunter (Member # 39526) on :
I like what I saw of the new camera pictures. I didn't notice any blurriness, and the only time a picture is "too big" is when it's over 3000 pixels in either direction.
If you have the monitor to support larger sizes, it's likely you'll enjoy them more.
Posted by coedfeet (Member # 2738) on :
its still a learning curve. later shoots are better. The new studio has better lighting. There will always be some part of the picture that will be blurred, as it tends to focus clearly on a certain part of the frame. Every camera I've had does that. A depth of field thing. its just it'll be a lot more noticeable on this one. And sometimes the girls just don't hold the pose, they are in constant motion, thus sometimes parts are blurred.
What I could do in the future, is maybe have 2 folders in each zip file. One for the big pics, and one with sizes closer to what I have now?????
But the increased size is in reaction to member feedback liking a bigger picture. i"ll eventually moving to hd video, which will also be bigger frame and file size.
[ June 24, 2010, 12:13 PM: Message edited by: coedfeet ]
Posted by combine_hunter (Member # 39526) on :
Two folders in each zip file seems like a good suggestion, but wouldn't it be a lot of trouble for you?
I think if you kept the picture size closer to the regular ones, maybe 1200x900 would be sufficiently big? Other sites are in that range, so I can't imagine people complaining about it. It's clearly bigger, but it's not monitor-dwarfing.
I took a look at Jordan's set from 2009; those are 1600x1200. Maybe that's big enough?
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)