Well alright charges, it's time to play "Evaluate That Model"
I recently made contact with a local NYC model who is very interested in doing foot fetish modeling for me, as she has done it in the past, and really enjoys it. She's pretty and slender, and at this point I must mention that she's also a dominatrix, which means that she's pretty fearless. After seeing the picture on the top left, I really became interested in her because she obviously has the type of high arches I love.
So far so good, right? Well, not so much as we were texting for the better part of an hour today, and she confessed to me that she has, in her words "A small, fading, almost invisible tat on my left sole"
Well me being me, I asked her to send me some pics of her feet, including her soles showing her ink. What I go was the pics below, and I couldn't help but to show my disappointment because those of you who know me well, know that I'm not an ink guy, specially on the feet, and particularly not on the soles. So now I have a conundrum, I really like this girl, she's very open to doing nude stuff and foot worship stuff, but oh lordy, I can't get past that ink. She tells me that she can always use concealer, but I have had models do that before, and it doesn't seem to work all that well. So what's a guy to do? Check out some of the pics she sent below and judge for yourself. What do YOU think?
Posted by tofootguy (Member # 38764) on :
She's so hot !
Posted by jpfeet (Member # 49072) on :
The Tat does look a bit stupid (Im not a tat fan) but i think her soles would look lovely wrinkled up.
Posted by Footman44 (Member # 49159) on :
She has some lovely arches that's for sure . Her soles look superb to me although let down by the tat (in not a tat man either!). What size is she?
Posted by solesurvivordragon (Member # 37330) on :
That last pic...I can't help but think that something needs to be in between those arches.
Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
quote:Originally posted by Footman44: She has some lovely arches that's for sure . Her soles look superb to me although let down by the tat (in not a tat man either!). What size is she?
She's size 7.5, and I'm sorry but that tat is just dopey, plus it's also distracting as all hell. So what I'm trying to find out is if you think she's worth shooting, and given the opportunity, would you shoot her yourselves. This is paid situation, guys, so it's not like I have the luxury of overlooking something that I'm not crazy about because I'm getting a free model.
Posted by John Jones (Member # 50531) on :
Adam I'd pass on this one. That dopey tat is a deal breaker considering the time, skill, and money you put into your sessions. If you're having doubts about it there's a good reason why.
Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
quote:Originally posted by John Jones: Adam I'd pass on this one. That dopey tat is a deal breaker considering the time, skill, and money you put into your sessions. If you're having doubts about it there's a good reason why.
I'm leaning that way, JJ, and I texted her to send me a pic or two with concealer on her sole. My experience with concealer is that it's often translucent, and if you apply too much it looks really unnatural, like funeral home makeup. I sent her the pics of Anastasia and Marien so she can see how I love the "clean" look when it comes to soles.
Posted by FMUK (Member # 48775) on :
This is a tough one alright! But those arches do deserve to be seen, I would shoot her and just pretend that she had been on a night out and someone had drawn that on her sole in some pen Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
Well, she texted me earlier today to tell me she has a concealer that really works well, and she promised to send me samples tomorrow. I will keep you guys posted. If she can make that ink "disappear" and make it look natural, we're on.
Posted by SOLEjerX (Member # 48925) on :
Adam, this is nice find!!! Was she a dancer at one time? I ask because of the perfect curve in her arch (Pix #3). Again, nice find. Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
Well OK, so she sent me this pic this morning, with her sole covered up with concealer, and I must admit it looks better than I thought it would, although I'm still not convinced. I guess I won't be licking her soles.
Posted by tarheel (Member # 11590) on :
I wouldn't mind seeing some with and without the concealer. She is an attractive lady. And sometimes having something different isn't a bad thing.
Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
quote:Originally posted by GQguy: You're far more discerning than I am when it comes to women with high arches. I'm a fan! Yes the tattoo is stupid, but it doesn't take away from the beauty of her arch.
That may be, but I just don't shoot arches, as everyone knows, I love real clear, closeup views of clean soles, is all...
Posted by h34026199 (Member # 49409) on :
Adam,it's been a long time I haven't seen Anastasia.Would you please post some Anastaisa's pictures on this forum and introduce her again please~ Since you shut down Feetfair,there is no chance to see any thing about her.So please ~~
Posted by footboy1 (Member # 4549) on :
quote:Originally posted by Fair Adam: Well OK, so she sent me this pic this morning, with her sole covered up with concealer, and I must admit it looks better than I thought it would, although I'm still not convinced. I guess I won't be licking her soles.
I might be talking out of my ass here but that looks like it could be a photoshop job to me. Proceed with caution, Adam.
-footboy1
Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
quote:Originally posted by footboy1:
quote:Originally posted by Fair Adam: Well OK, so she sent me this pic this morning, with her sole covered up with concealer, and I must admit it looks better than I thought it would, although I'm still not convinced. I guess I won't be licking her soles.
I might be talking out of my ass here but that looks like it could be a photoshop job to me. Proceed with caution, Adam.
-footboy1
I actually think she's being honest, but who knows?
Posted by Fair Adam (Member # 13350) on :
BTW, while I deliberate on my new model, I've been talking to awesome Beauty Foster, and we might shoot next week. Beauty is one of my all-time favorite models, and in my opinion, she lives up to her name. To me, she's perfect from head to toe.
Posted by solesurvivordragon (Member # 37330) on :
quote:Originally posted by Fair Adam: BTW, while I deliberate on my new model, I've been talking to awesome Beauty Foster, and we might shoot next week. Beauty is one of my all-time favorite models, and in my opinion, she lives up to her name. To me, she's perfect from head to toe.
Gives new meaning to the words, "sole (soul) sister". Posted by Foot Fetish Artist (Member # 1899) on :
Beauty Foster… I dig the combination of her soles, septum ring and hair!
Posted by h34026199 (Member # 49409) on :
Adam,Anastasia please please please
Posted by Pjay (Member # 35692) on :
Wow. Before I read the posts, I saw the tattoo and thought for a moment that it was just some stupid thing that she had drawn on her sole!
I have to wonder what the hell was going through her mind (strong drugs?) when she decided to get that done as a tattoo! Did she mention how she made that decision?
I don't think that it should be a deal-breaker. It isn't the end of the world; and she does have one tattoo-FREE foot, right? Focus on that one.
I would try to not make her feel bad about it. She probably regrets it enough already.
Posted by Adam X (Member # 2872) on :
People who put tats on girl's soles should be drawn and quartered! I mean what a shame...
That said I'd still love to see more of her even with it, she's a total cutie.
![[Thumbs Up]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
. Her soles look superb to me although let down by the tat (in not a tat man either!). What size is she? 
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
This is a tough one alright! But those arches do deserve to be seen, I would shoot her and just pretend that she had been on a night out and someone had drawn that on her sole in some pen ![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
![[Mmm]](graemlins/mmm.gif)