Foot Fetish Forum: ©Katie is Back! Fresh Bare Feet & Sandals©

This is topic ©Katie is Back! Fresh Bare Feet & Sandals© in forum Foot Pictures at Foot Fetish Forum.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=41;t=038712

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

The set everyone's been waiting for will arrive starting next week on Norcalfeet.com of Katie and her sexy big size 9.5's. Check these samples out..

Posted by Footman44 (Member # 49159) on :

Katie is super stunning. Her big feet are that perfect cherry on top [Bow Down]

Posted by footboy1 (Member # 4549) on :

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...... I would love to have those big beautiful feet on my FACE !!!! [Eek!]

-footboy1

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Footman44:
Katie is super stunning. Her big feet are that perfect cherry on top

Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :

Those huge feet are amazing, can't wait to see more!

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

quote:
Originally posted by KounterPunch:
Those huge feet are amazing, can't wait to see more!

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

Posted by NEWYORKGUY (Member # 47889) on :

KATIE is so beautiful, sexy and amazing! Gorgeous pictures! THANK YOU SO MUCH!

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

quote:
Originally posted by NEWYORKGUY:
KATIE is so beautiful, sexy and amazing! Gorgeous pictures! THANK YOU SO MUCH!

Posted by cwren24 (Member # 49616) on :

What. A. Babe. I'd rub and kiss those huge, gorgeous feet for her any time.

How tall is she?

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

quote:
Originally posted by cwren24:
What. A. Babe. I'd rub and kiss those huge, gorgeous feet for her any time.

How tall is she?

5'9" ish..

Posted by Adam X (Member # 2872) on :

Welcome back Katie, a definite goddess.

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

Posted by KounterPunch (Member # 51542) on :

That last wrinkled sole pic! To die 4 !

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

Posted by cwren24 (Member # 49616) on :

quote:
Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:

quote:
Originally posted by cwren24:
What. A. Babe. I'd rub and kiss those huge, gorgeous feet for her any time.

How tall is she?
5'9" ish..

Agh, I knew she had to be taller than me.

Oh well, that's the magic of the Internet... [Laugh]

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

Posted by FMUK (Member # 48775) on :

This chick has spectacular feet! Awesome to see she has taken to the foot fetish world in her career! [Bow Down]

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

quote:
Originally posted by FMUK:
This chick has spectacular feet! Awesome to see she has taken to the foot fetish world in her career!

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

Posted by Patrick (Member # 1169) on :

Those soles are simply divine.

Patrick

Posted by cwren24 (Member # 49616) on :

quote:
Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:

WOW

Such a shame that summer's ending.

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Patrick:
Those soles are simply divine.

Patrick

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

Posted by HighArchesPT (Member # 45164) on :

Hey Norcal,

I was very surprised to read the private message you sent me babbling about Katie and her adult film endeavors. I was even more surprised to notice that my post that mentioned that same Katie adult film starring in this thread was deleted.

You are the first one to use and abuse of the jerk off icon ( [Jerkoff]

) almost everytime you post and comment about your own pictures and models. This same thread about Katie was obviously not an exception - There it is, the happy cum spurting smiley right at the opening message. Your current signature is also interesting. Let me recall it to you: "I'd rather jerk off to the high quality photos on NorCal, where you can see every wrinkle and every smile, perfectly".

Pure demagogy. You say that Katie has left the adult industry behind, but you keep her post and herself surrounded of public sexual explicit references.

It's kind of naive to try to disassociate foot fetish related content from adult grade material. Sorry mate, it is always sexual and adult oriented (you are not the only one trying this disassociation, though. We see this once in a while).

I prefer to believe that your models are not silly enough to really think that they are modelling their feet like if they were doing some Tommy Hilfiger fashion catalog.

Do you fantasize, and actually have, your models visit this forum and read all the positive foot crew feedback? Hence the panic when I mentioned Katie's adult movie starring? Well, anyone with a brain just a little bit larger than a pea realizes which kind of forum this is, and what kind of exposure they are subject to when they have their pictures shared here.

Well, some of them only realize it after some time being the brand new Wu's foot forum star. We see them coming and later disappearing when they realize what they are doing - especially when they are not Pros.

Please, cut the crap and man up. You are exposing your girls into the adult world. Since this is already being done, I just mentioned that she may also be found on other adult content websites that are more about normal intercourse and less towards feet.

[ September 25, 2017, 05:30 PM: Message edited by: HighArchesPT ]

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

quote:
Originally posted by cwren24:

quote:
Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:

quote:
Originally posted by cwren24:
What. A. Babe. I'd rub and kiss those huge, gorgeous feet for her any time.

How tall is she?
5'9" ish..
Agh, I knew she had to be taller than me.

Oh well, that's the magic of the Internet...

No magic here, it's all shot in proportion and not forced perspective like I see a lot of amateurs doing now with cell phones. [Thumbs Up]

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

I will address this ridiculous post by HighArchesPT point by point now since the moderators it seems have all quit or don't want any part in doing basic cleanup here, no one is fighting this time guys! The privacy and peace of it's members or models a public forum have to be dealt with on an individual level now.

quote:
I was very surprised to read the private message you sent me babbling about Katie and her adult film endeavors. I was even more surprised to notice that my post that mentioned that same Katie adult film starring in this thread was deleted.

Babbling? More like typed. It was deleted as I mentioned due to a virtual gag order by her family and her whenever I posted her foot modeling only material. I'll explain later the specifics.

quote:
You are the first one to use and abuse of the jerk off icon ( [Jerkoff] ) almost everytime you post and comment about your own pictures and models. This same thread about Katie was obviously not an exception - There it is, the happy cum spurting smiley right at the opening message. Your current signature is also interesting. Let me recall it to you: "I'd rather jerk off to the high quality photos on NorCal, where you can see every wrinkle and every smile, perfectly".

The jerk off icon has nothing to do with the content of the material, it signifies what most men do with the photos on their own time in their own homes. Not what is depicted in the photos or insinuated was done with or by the model in question. It also does not connotate or associate any of her photos with Porn.

quote:
Pure demagogy. You say that Katie has left the adult industry behind, but you keep her post and herself surrounded of public sexual explicit references.

The one "shoot" she did in which you reference anything porn related, happened in literally ONE DAY and it was an obvious horrible mistake in her mind (regardless of how it's forever on the internet outside of my website or Wu's Feet Links). If you want to lie to everyone and say she's a career porn actress, that's MIGHTY disingenuous.

quote:
It's kind of naive to try to disassociate foot fetish related content from adult grade material. Sorry mate, it is always sexual and adult oriented (you are not the only one trying this disassociation, though. We see this once in a while).

I don't have to disassociate with anything since there's nothing "Adult Grade" about Norcalfeet other than what photos and video clips of female feet might trigger someone to do on their own time in their own bedroom, that's on THEM not me. There's not one "porn" photo or video depicting sex or private parts or even the insinuation of said material anywhere on Norcalfeet. Fact.

quote:
I prefer to believe that your models are not silly enough to really think that they are modelling their feet like if they were doing some Tommy Hilfiger fashion catalog.

Some of my shoots are actually fashion shoots for catalog and print that I can snag some bare foot and "pose" shots from to use on my site and every model is well aware of what they are modeling for and the guidelines for the material. "It's not porn, but men may be masterbating to the pics" "I don't care, they masterbate to fingers and elbows too, who cares, still isn't porn" is usually their answer, and they are right.

quote:
Do you fantasize, and actually have, your models visit this forum and read all the positive foot crew feedback? Hence the panic when I mentioned Katie's adult movie starring? Well, anyone with a brain just a little bit larger than a pea realizes which kind of forum this is, and what kind of exposure they are subject to when they have their pictures shared here.

Some visit yes, and in this instance your ridiculous comments were noted and deleted. What kind of forum this is..hmm, that's why there's a specific "Adult" thread section that I never post in because nothing I do is "Porn" depicting what I already mentioned above.

quote:
Please, cut the crap and man up. You are exposing your girls into the adult world. Since this is already being done, I just mentioned that she may also be found on other adult content websites that are more about normal intercourse and less towards feet.

I'm not introducing anyone into the Adult World, again..since it's not Porn. What people do with the photos is not tantamount to the material itself since a photo of an elbow can be sexually stimulating to someone and they jerk off. Feet are not genitalia. Go post on social media to your heart's delight if you feel the need to disrespect her. The request was made not to here, respectfully twice.

[ September 26, 2017, 05:43 PM: Message edited by: NorcalfeetStudios ]

Posted by HighArchesPT (Member # 45164) on :

Nope. You are wrong. Your website sells adult content besides your self claims and self produced disclaimers.

Those guys that show up on the news from time to time that ask random women to see/smell/massage her feet, when caught, are charged with sexual offence or sexual harassment. See? No need to have genitalia involved for things to escalate into a sexual level. Sexual desire or stimulation is the key here.

If you ever get into legal trouble about your website, for any arbitrary reason, the judge will classify it as selling adult content without even blinking.

Picking up your example, a website that shows up a random elbow put up into another context, is probably not adult. A website that sells collections of elbow photos for stimulating sexual desire of elbow fetishists, is adult.

A website that shows feces, like the respective Wikipedia article, is not adult. A website that displays collections of pictures of feces targeting shit lovers, is adult.

I could be here forever listing a never ending list. Tongues, armpits, urine... you name it.

Wikipedia also contains sexual articles that actually depict women sucking guys dicks (deepthroat article) and even girls taking a cumshot on her face (cumshot article). Guess what? It's obvious not adult content, even if genitalia is involved - it's educational instead. Now if you have a website that exhibits blowjobs for sexual stimulation of other people, you get into de adult world.

There goes your theory. I was really hoping that you would have somehow figured this by yourself, but you are probably still holding behind that silly self-proclaimed disclaimer that states that you don't sell adult content just in case something goes wrong.

Your have lots of other real life scenarios, for instance the absurdly high number of foot related videos on YouTube that are flagged as adult, even if the video is solely displaying a woman's foot.

You sell content that specifically targets foot fetishists and intentionally triggers sexual desire on those individuals. Your website sells adult content.

You even have a Adults Only warning on your homepage, and I guess that this says everything.

There is nothing much else to say about this, I think.

[ September 27, 2017, 03:11 AM: Message edited by: HighArchesPT ]

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

quote:
Nope. You are wrong. Your website sells adult content besides your self claims and self produced disclaimers

Nope, you are wrong, it doesn't..sorry.

quote:
Those guys that show up on the news from time to time that ask random women to see/smell/massage her feet, when caught, are charged with sexual offence or sexual harassment. See? No need to have genitalia involved for things to escalate into a sexual level. Sexual desire or stimulation is the key here.

Of course, because they are making unwanted advances period..if someone just touches your arm in a heated discussion on the street it's called assault. Like it or not. Laws are strange.

quote:
If you ever get into legal trouble about your website, for any arbitrary reason, the judge will classify it as selling adult content without even blinking.

I'm not ever going to, because nothing is illegal and everything is on the level and everyone knows what they were asked to do, and did it willingly.

quote:
Picking up your example, a website that shows up a random elbow put up into another context, is probably not adult. A website that sells collections of elbow photos for stimulating sexual desire of elbow fetishists, is adult.

A website that shows feces, like the respective Wikipedia article, is not adult. A website that displays collections of pictures of feces targeting shit lovers, is adult.

I could be here forever listing a never ending list. Tongues, armpits, urine... you name it.

Wikipedia also contains sexual articles that actually depict women sucking guys dicks (deepthroat article) and even girls taking a cumshot on her face (cumshot article). Guess what? It's obvious not adult content, even if genitalia is involved - it's educational instead. Now if you have a website that exhibits blowjobs for sexual stimulation of other people, you get into de adult world.

Wrong still not adult.

quote:
You even have a Adults Only warning on your homepage, and I guess that this says everything.

Because by Law I must because there are people out there in the world like you who try to cause legal trouble for people like me by slandering and accusing them of things that simply aren't true. And well, as long as my site remains part in the B.H.E. network it's required. You're right, nothing more to say, never was. Anymore "babble" you can Private message me to continue the conversation, please keep it off the boards ..all of it.

[ September 27, 2017, 09:04 AM: Message edited by: NorcalfeetStudios ]

Posted by HighArchesPT (Member # 45164) on :

I have nothing more to add to what I wrote before. You are free to interpret it in the way you find more convenient to yourself.

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

quote:
Originally posted by HighArchesPT:
I have nothing more to add to what I wrote before. You are free to interpret it in the way you find more convenient to yourself.

I interpret it based on what it is, not based on what it isn't...and it isn't porn. Anything else keep it in private message.

Posted by HighArchesPT (Member # 45164) on :

quote:
Originally posted by NorcalfeetStudios:
I interpret it based on what it is, not based on what it isn't...and it isn't porn. Anything else keep it in private message.

1) In case of doubt, read what I wrote one more time.

2) If doubt still subsists, go back to number 1) and repeat the process.

[ September 27, 2017, 02:45 PM: Message edited by: HighArchesPT ]

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

Again, take it to private message if you have something to say. Although the bumps to my thread just help me promote my new material, so go ahead.

Posted by solemaster1983 (Member # 51210) on :

even the administrators of this forum aqree that these pics are not porn, if not, they would put them to the adult content.

Posted by NorcalfeetStudios (Member # 732) on :

quote:
Originally posted by solemaster1983:
even the administrators of this forum aqree that these pics are not porn, if not, they would put them to the adult content.

Thank you, you are one of many who has contacted me either in public or privately in the past days with the same viewpoint. This forum member is unequivocally wrong about this.

Posted by Footman44 (Member # 49159) on :

Well this turned into a rather interesting thread! [Laugh]

The photos in question, and all that I have seen from Norcal so far, are definitely not porn. End of discussion [Cheers]