This is topic SoleTiger's adventures. Soles bared on the spot in public. in forum Foot Pictures at Foot Fetish Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.wusfeetlinks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=41;t=039622

Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
This guy is one of my new favorite content producers. He's on Instagram and goes by the name of SoleTiger. He has a website as well (footclub) that contains the full galleries and the videos of his encounters, but he posts sample pictures of each of his adventures on Instagram where he tells the backstory in detail of how he approached each girl and what happened during the encounter, things said, etc. The thing I like about him is he's pretty much a no bullshit guy; he approaches these girls and within 30 seconds of approaching them and politely introducing himself and giving off a good impression and a good vibe, usually compliments their shoes to steer the conversation in the direction of their feet and then asks if he can take pictures of their feet right there on the spot for fun, and straight up tells them it's because he has a foot fetish and is compiling a portfolio/gallery of feet if they ask what it's for and shows it to them, figuring that the worst they can say is no. His on the spot shoots usually happen at places such as waterfront walks, outdoor restaurants, Target, Wal-Mart, or the beach.

Here's a mixture of a few of his recent encounters/finds:

 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -

The most interesting thing is that some of these girls go for it either because they like their own feet, or because they've had experience in the past with foot fetishism in some capacity, such as with a previous boyfriend or a guy friend.
 
Posted by Luniuno (Member # 42034) on :
 
I follow this page on instagram. Definitely a Fan of his work. lots of great feet on there! especially them being random females that he approaches.
 
Posted by aka.footjoyboy (Member # 32751) on :
 
[Thumbs Up]
 
Posted by John Jones (Member # 50531) on :
 
I recognize his voice. Hasn't he been producing videos for a while? Seems like the same guy that used to shoot vids from a college campus and got some great vids of a curly haired college professor.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
I know who you're referring to. I don't think they're the same guy though.

I remember seeing that professor video on YouTube like 7 or 8 years ago. Might still be there. I remember the guy who filmed that sounded like a dick, judging by his comments to others in the comment section.

SoleTiger has a really chill and appreciative personality, and has been around for roughly two years or so I think, but has only recently gotten a bit more popular.
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
And just like any smart entrepreneur, he will eventually start an actual pay site when he realizes he can make above $1,000/month for literally no work at all if he enjoys what he does.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
And just like any smart entrepreneur, he will eventually start an actual pay site when he realizes he can make above $1,000/month for literally no work at all if he enjoys what he does.

Is that how much you make per month with your site?

He already does have a site though, as I mentioned. I purchased a membership to it myself, since I like him and his content. It's only $9. Great deal.
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
I don't have a site, but anyone with the ability to do basic math can add the average cost of a standard pay site's membership fees (from the ones I buy from that go roughly for $25-$35/month anyway) and extrapolate it by a median average of memberships given per month according to website data and word of mouth can reach that amount easily in my estimation (if not way more). He should charge at least $30/month, I'd say he's probably easily get it! So if you're listening Sole Tiger, the sky is the limit.

$9 is a great deal and it's nice to know your favorite pay site. I will have to check his out now. Cheers.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
I don't have a site, but anyone with the ability to do basic math can add the average cost of a standard pay site's membership fees (from the ones I buy from that go roughly for $25-$35/month anyway) and extrapolate it by a median average of memberships given per month according to website data and word of mouth can reach that amount easily in my estimation (if not way more). He should charge at least $30/month, I'd say he's probably easily get it! So if you're listening Sole Tiger, the sky is the limit.

$9 is a great deal and it's nice to know your favorite pay site. I will have to check his out now. Cheers.

Or someone that owns a site themselves.

He should charge whatever he wants to charge, not what you tell him to charge. And I wouldn't say the sky is the limit when it comes to charging for foot content. With the amount of free content out there, you're going to have less and less people paying for it, especially if prices increase. In order for website owners to keep their sites in business, at least those such as yourself who do it for the money, they need people to buy memberships; people don't need to buy memberships to their sites.

[ August 11, 2018, 04:25 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
I'm sure someone who actually owns a site would better predict than I about what they make, I am only guessing based on membership costs I see on each site. From what I understand, the pay sites still charging $25-35/month with more content than you can shake a stick at are killing it (value, quantity, quality & demand).

It's a free country and world, and I hope he charges appropriately in the future for the what the market seems to be bearing quite easily.I highly doubt if they were in trouble of going out of business the sites would still be producing content and running. (Hear that Tiger?).

Stay Classy and Civil like your mentor here.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
I'm sure someone who actually owns a site would better predict than I about what they make, I am only guessing based on membership costs I see on each site. From what I understand, the pay sites still charging $25-35/month with more content than you can shake a stick at are killing it (value, quantity, quality & demand).

It's a free country and world, and I hope he charges appropriately in the future for the what the market seems to be bearing quite easily.I highly doubt if they were in trouble of going out of business the sites would still be producing content and running. (Hear that Tiger?).

Stay Classy and Civil like your mentor here.

A free world? Go live in Venezuela in the state they are now, and then tell me how “free” you are. But I digress.

You seem to have a really bad habit in trying to tell people what you want them to do, according to what you see fit for them. But even then, I’d still buy his content at the same price over yours. It has more value to me. It’s better, and he approaches random girls off the street to model their feet for no other reason than for fun, which is what I prefer. I’m not into sites with paid foot models who are looking for paid modeling work, who are recruited off of modeling sites. Not to mention that you threaten to disclose the financial information of people that you claim have purchased a membership to your site, should they ever disagree with you in a foot forum. So there’s also that.

But yes, in a free market economy, such as the USA, you can choose to charge whatever you want; however, people can choose to not buy what you peddle, especially when it’s something as petty as foot pictures, something that’s not a necessity, and that can easily be found in abundance for free. Never forget: in order for your site to keep going, you need memberships to your site. People don’t need memberships to your site.

Such as myself. Have a good day.

[ August 11, 2018, 01:51 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
You can't see past your anger for this norcal person and you've wrapped yourself up into a tizzy fit, lashing out and being uncivil to someone who has no ties to that website for no reason. We WERE discussing Tiger's website and content and you somehow became aggressive and unhinged. They will eventually get tired of you if you can't control yourself.

"Something as petty as foot pictures" yet you're here checking your "foot picture" thread every 5 minutes. HAHA! I hope he prices you out of his group and makes the money he deserves for all his hard work.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
You can't see past your anger for this norcal person and you've wrapped yourself up into a tizzy fit, lashing out and being uncivil to someone who has no ties to that website for no reason. We WERE discussing Tiger's website and content and you somehow became aggressive and unhinged. They will eventually get tired of you if you can't control yourself.

"Something as petty as foot pictures" yet you're here checking your "foot picture" thread every 5 minutes. HAHA! I hope he prices you out of his group and makes the money he deserves for all his hard work.

Norcal, we both know you’re not interested in having a discussion.

And yes, he is making the money he “deserves”. After all, I chose to buy a membership to his site, not yours.

And I say “deserve” because you don’t deserve, nor are entitled to, other people’s money just because you made the choice to take pictures of feet. They choose to give you money based on if they decide what you peddle has value to them or not. You need them. They don’t need you.

[ August 11, 2018, 01:52 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
Do you enjoy those fantasy dialogs in your head imagining random people are someone you hate? They are almost as bad as your take on business 101 haha.

I was trying to have a conversation about the Tiger guy's website, a cordial one where I encourage his work and hope he makes more money but guess you are going to see that doesn't happen. (Well it just did, and I will send him a DM on Instagram now explaining how he can make more money just because you told me I can't). Haha
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Do you enjoy those fantasy dialogs in your head imagining random people are someone you hate? They are almost as bad as your take on business 101 haha.

I was trying to have a conversation about the Tiger guy's website, a cordial one where I encourage his work and hope he makes more money but guess you are going to see that doesn't happen. (Well it just did, and I will send him a DM on Instagram now explaining how he can make more money just because you told me I can't). Haha

Norcal, we both know you’re not interested in having a genuine conversation.

And you only make money, if people decide you make money based on if they decide what you peddle has value to them. That’s not business, it’s economics based on a free market. Charge what you want and do what you want, but people ultimately decide how much it’s worth to them. Never forget that you need them, but they don’t need you. You’re not owed a cent from anyone for choosing on your own volition to take pictures of other people’s feet.

Proof? Here I am, choosing not to give you any money because what you offer and peddle has zero value to me.

[ August 11, 2018, 01:53 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
Pay sites are doing just fine at whatever they are charging, they don't need you to tell them their value. Any other un-civil and no manners comments you are welcome to DM me and let it all loose. Have respect for Wu's and stop bickering mate.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Pay sites are doing just fine at whatever they are charging, they don't need you to tell them their value. Any other un-civil and no manners comments you are welcome to DM me and let it all loose. Have respect for Wu's and stop bickering mate.

Good for them. I don't wish any ill will on pay sites and wish them the best of luck, even yours. They're free to choose to charge whatever they want in a free market economy.

However, I and others are also free to choose not to buy it because it has zero value to me or anyone else, or at what price I or anyone else chooses to want to pay for it based on how much value I or they deem it has.

There's nothing "uncivil" about that. Only to you, simply because you know that you're not going to be getting any of my money because I say you aren't and that I'm in control of that, not you. And that bothers you.

[ August 11, 2018, 01:54 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
I wish I had a site and made a grand per month for taking petty feet pictures, but if you want to send me money for the heck of it I can give you my Paypal address in DM.

I'd also be willing to bet there's 50 people to 1 that would gladly take your spot as a pay stat on any given website because they appreciate normal every day girls that most pay sites share pictures of.

You simply seem to think too highly of yourself if you think one man's $20 makes a difference in keeping a website alive, considering it may (according to the cost and monthly number of members) be bringing in $1000+ per month. Someone not interested in paying for any given site means a fart in the wind to someone making that kind of money.

[ August 11, 2018, 12:36 AM: Message edited by: Groth ]
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
I wish I had a site and made a grand per month for taking petty feet pictures, but if you want to send me money for the heck of it I can give you my Paypal address in DM.

I'd also be willing to bet there's 50 people to 1 that would gladly take your spot as a pay stat on any given website because they appreciate normal every day girls that most pay sites share pictures of.

You simply seem to think too highly of yourself if you think one man's $20 makes a difference in keeping a website alive, considering it may (according to the cost and monthly number of members) be bringing in $1000+ per month. Someone not interested in paying for any given site means a fart in the wind to someone making that kind of money.

Why would I send you money for the heck of it and get nothing in return? I, nor anyone else, owes you anything. I’m not even remotely interested in paying you for access to your site in return.

And good for them. They’re free to decide to spend their money how and on what they choose, including your site.

However, I’m not one of them. I choose to spend mine on content that I deem has value to me. Yours doesn’t.

[ August 11, 2018, 01:54 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
I, We, You, They are all Norcal.(Walking Dead Reference lol). He's a popular guy if his memory occupies this much of your time to argue with some random person. Anyway, to DM if you have any other whining to do.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
I, We, You, They are all Norcal.(Walking Dead Reference lol). He's a popular guy if his memory occupies this much of your time to argue with some random person. Anyway, to DM if you have any other whining to do.

Good for him (you). But you’re still not getting any of my money, because I deem your content as having no value.

[ August 11, 2018, 01:55 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
Every time I try to speak about Tiger and his content you consistently keep bringing up different topics and accusing, pretty clear who doesn't want to have a civil conversation here.

I'll tell you though, he may not get your money as you say but he's made more than a membership's $20 value off your time hating him and bickering about his site. That's the ultimate irony in that, he still got it from ya.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Every time I try to speak about Tiger and his content you consistently keep bringing up different topics and accusing, pretty clear who doesn't want to have a civil conversation here.

I'll tell you though, he may not get your money as you say but he's made more than a membership's $20 value off your time hating him and bickering about his site. That's the ultimate irony in that, he still got it from ya.

Norcal, we both know you’re not interested in having a genuine, civil conversation.

Collecting people’s time on a foot forum doesn’t keep your site going. Collecting money from memberships, does. There’s no moral “victories” on that.

[ August 11, 2018, 01:56 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
Everytime I try to bring a point up about Tiger's site or how it could be making more money, you divert and whine about this Norcal conspiracy. If you would like to cry more, DM me. If you wish to talk about real world topics like Tiger then keep it here.
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
Again, I don't own a site but wish I did. What Tiger does and (everyone else) looks like fun to actually proposition these random girls for pics.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Everytime I try to bring a point up about Tiger's site or how it could be making more money, you divert and whine about this Norcal conspiracy. If you would like to cry more, DM me. If you wish to talk about real world topics like Tiger then keep it here.

quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Again, I don't own a site but wish I did. What Tiger does and (everyone else) looks like fun to actually proposition these random girls for pics.

Then DM me if you want to DM so badly, what’s stopping you? I have no issues with keeping my own money in my pocket.

Foot sites making money or not are now serious “real world topics/issues”? I missed that.

And that’s because it is fun. No money needs to be involved. Hence, why I prefer sites that don’t pay and recruit models, such as your site.

[ August 11, 2018, 01:58 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
Your DM is turned off because you aren't interested in conspiracies behind closed doors. More of an ego boost where people can see right?
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Your DM is turned off because you aren't interested in conspiracies behind closed doors. More of an ego boost where people can see right?

You already knew that. Since your main business account can’t DM, nor could your previous side account that you deactivated.

And no. I’m not interested in paying for your content. That’s about it.

[ August 11, 2018, 01:58 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BareSoles84:

And that’s because it is fun.

My guess is you don't know one thing about taking photos of women's feet & talking to women face to face nor will you ever based on how much hate and anger you have against this forum and it's members. Girls despise those things. Your greatest thrill is posting other people's material and creating baseless conspiracies about people. I think YOU are actually Norcal. Prove you aren't.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
quote:
Originally posted by BareSoles84:

And that’s because it is fun.

My guess is you don't know one thing about taking photos of women's feet & talking to women face to face nor will you ever based on how much hate and anger you have against this forum and it's members. Girls despise those things. Your greatest thrill is posting other people's material and creating baseless conspiracies about people. I think YOU are actually Norcal. Prove you aren't.
I don’t hate this forum, nor its members. I never once said that.

However, I have said that I and others don’t owe you a dime for you choosing on your own volition to take pictures of people’s feet, and that I don’t find the content you peddle to be of any value, so I won’t be giving you any money. And that bothers you because you have no control over it. I do.

I don’t prefer sites that recruit and pay models. So I’ll have to pass on your site.

[ August 11, 2018, 01:59 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
I have never seen someone take up so much of someone else's head than this. I think it qualifies for the Guinness Book of world records. Baseless claims, uncivil attacks and delusions of grandeur. What next. You are your own problem.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
I have never seen someone take up so much of someone else's head than this. I think it qualifies for the Guinness Book of world records. Baseless claims, uncivil attacks and delusions of grandeur. What next. You are your own problem.

I’m my own problem because I choose not to pay for your site, because I say it has no value to me?

How’s that my problem, exactly?

[ August 11, 2018, 02:00 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
My guess is you don't know one thing about taking photos of women's feet & talking to women face to face nor will you ever based on how much hate and anger you have against this forum and it's members. Girls despise those things. Your greatest thrill is posting other people's material and creating baseless conspiracies about people. I think YOU are actually Norcal. Prove you aren't.

I will just keep posting this over and over until you prove any of your conspiracies.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
My guess is you don't know one thing about taking photos of women's feet & talking to women face to face nor will you ever based on how much hate and anger you have against this forum and it's members. Girls despise those things. Your greatest thrill is posting other people's material and creating baseless conspiracies about people. I think YOU are actually Norcal. Prove you aren't.

I will just keep posting this over and over until you prove any of your conspiracies.

Dopey "I know what you are but what am I" behavior sounds about right for you, Norcal. Like I said, we both know you’re not interested in having a genuine, civil discussion.

[ August 11, 2018, 04:21 AM: Message edited by: BareSoles84 ]
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BareSoles84:
Sounds about right for you, Norcal. Like I said, we both know you’re not interested in having a genuine, civil discussion.

And we all know you aren't interested in proving what you claim or disputing you are a stranger to women.

"My guess is you don't know one thing about taking photos of women's feet & talking to women face to face nor will you ever based on how much hate and anger you have against this forum and it's members. Girls despise those things. Your greatest thrill is posting other people's material and creating baseless conspiracies about people. I think YOU are actually Norcal. Prove you aren't."
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
quote:
Originally posted by BareSoles84:
Sounds about right for you, Norcal. Like I said, we both know you’re not interested in having a genuine, civil discussion.

And we all know you aren't interested in proving what you claim or disputing you are a stranger to women.

"My guess is you don't know one thing about taking photos of women's feet & talking to women face to face nor will you ever based on how much hate and anger you have against this forum and it's members. Girls despise those things. Your greatest thrill is posting other people's material and creating baseless conspiracies about people. I think YOU are actually Norcal. Prove you aren't."

And you are correct. That’s because I couldn’t care less what you think.

All that matters to me is that I’m not giving any money to your site because frankly, I think it sucks. And you hate that you’re not in control of that, while I am.

Have a good one.
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
"You are correct"
Yes I know I am about the points I made about you. We all= Everyone watching you make a fool out of yourself with your conspiracies.

Why don't you send him an e-mail if you thinks his site sucks, don't tell me. I don't care.
 
Posted by aka.footjoyboy (Member # 32751) on :
 
"Not to mention that you threaten to disclose the financial information of people that you claim have purchased a membership to your site, should they ever disagree with you in a foot forum. So there’s also that."

[Nut Kick]

P.S. I'd expect Alice W. Wu to come here soon too to tell you how great Norcal's site is. If he was doing so great then he'd be able to quit his warehouse job, and wouldn't have to create fake buzz by creating sock-puppets like this "Groth" here or an "Alice W. Wu." I'd be embarrassed.
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy:
"Not to mention that you threaten to disclose the financial information of people that you claim have purchased a membership to your site, should they ever disagree with you in a foot forum. So there’s also that."

[Nut Kick]

P.S. I'd expect Alice W. Wu to come here soon too to tell you how great Norcal's site is. If he was doing so great then he'd be able to quit his warehouse job, and wouldn't have to create fake buzz by creating sock-puppets like this "Groth" here or an "Alice W. Wu." I'd be embarrassed.

Accusations, no basis claims and delirium getting more and more with each post. Why don't we talk about all 3+ of your sock puppet accounts that all log into the site within minutes of each other padding the post counts?

AKAFOOTJOYBOY
AKAFOOTBOYJOY
foot joy (new one)
Dreamgirls with socks (business account)
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy:
"Not to mention that you threaten to disclose the financial information of people that you claim have purchased a membership to your site, should they ever disagree with you in a foot forum. So there’s also that."

[Nut Kick]

P.S. I'd expect Alice W. Wu to come here soon too to tell you how great Norcal's site is.

Nope. Apparently opted to bump his own thread (again) instead and talk to himself, since nobody else posts in them.
 
Posted by Luniuno (Member # 42034) on :
 
soletiger reminds me of footbear HD. Both great work!
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
Yeah, Footbear was pretty good. I don’t particularly care for a lot of his latest taste in models though.

Regardless, he’s become a bit too arrogant and haughty though, so I don’t bother with him anymore. Plus, on C4S, he charges 10-15 bucks for a 5 minute clip.

No thanks.
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
"Nope. Apparently opted to bump his own thread (again) instead and talk to himself, since nobody else posts in them."

So you've outed yourself looking at his threads. Haha. Irrespective of posts on this dinosaur format of a website it seems their social media pages are buzzing and where the rubber meets the road is in the silent majority of lurkers who buy memberships to all these paysites one certainly can't account for. I applaud Footbear as well for charging what the market will bear (pun intendid).
 
Posted by Luniuno (Member # 42034) on :
 
I never bought any of footbears clips.Not going to lie, there are some clips in there that I wouldn't mind watching. I just enjoyed the pictures posted on his instagram page. There are some footfetish content that catches my attention and i have bought of the C4S to my liking.

talk about C4S. any one know what happened to " In Heaven With Evan " clips store? it's no longer on. was interested in buying a clip in there before it had shutdown
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
Yes new here, but now pretty versed in what type of people we have here (at least 2 of you) who hate someone so much you can't see past the next new person with a differing opinion than you and accuse them all of being in cahoots with your enemy. It was already proven neither me or Alice Wu are second accounts. If you have evidence other, put up or shut up.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
So you've outed yourself looking at his threads.

You do realize that you don’t have to look at a thread to see who last posted in it, right?

Sure you do, since you’re not “new” here. Yours are especially easy to see that you last posted in them, since nobody else does.

quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Yes new here, but now pretty versed in what type of people we have here (at least 2 of you) who hate someone so much you can't see past the next new person with a differing opinion than you and accuse them all of being in cahoots with your enemy. It was already proven neither me or Alice Wu are second accounts. If you have evidence other, put up or shut up.

I don’t hate anyone on here. I just simply like some content, and don’t like other content. Yours is in the latter group because in my opinion, it sucks. And that still bothers you.

Have a good one.
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
Nothing bothers me about anyone else's content since I am not norcal, you are free to like or not like whatever you want I couldn't care less. What does bother me is your lack of evidence of your claims that I am him which in by remaining silent on the issues brands you as a liar, therefore an unreliable source and discredited. (And that still bothers you).
 
Posted by aka.footjoyboy (Member # 32751) on :
 
"It was already proven neither me or Alice Wu are second accounts. If you have evidence other, put up or shut up."
Comment by Norcal


How has that been proven? By a screencap from another sock account on Instagram that you use to try and generate fake buzz there like you do here?

Proven or not (that's up to the moderators, and if they want to let you, Norcal, flout the rules) it's highly suspect that Alice W. Wu, Groth, and Kounter_Punch are Norcal sock puppets. I suspect there are several more besides these. There are reasons that you got banned at the Mousepad.
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy:
"It was already proven neither me or Alice Wu are second accounts. If you have evidence other, put up or shut up."
Comment by Norcal


How has that been proven? By a screencap from another sock account on Instagram that you use to try and generate fake buzz there like you do here?

Proven or not (that's up to the moderators, and if they want to let you, Norcal, flout the rules) it's highly suspect that Alice W. Wu, Groth, and Kounter_Punch are Norcal sock puppets. I suspect there are several more besides these. There are reasons that you got banned at the Mousepad.

Because we are all separate people that HAPPEN to like that website and comment on their threads we are suddenly all determined to be their shill accounts? That also makes you a liar and an untrustworthy source especially since you have 4 accounts here yourself (at least 3 that are verifiable FOOTJOYBOY/FOOTBOYJOY/ FOOT JOY. What a hypocrite calling someone else an alt. account. I have no idea what the mousepad is, but will check into, maybe they are more accepting of new people there than here.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
quote:
Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy:
"It was already proven neither me or Alice Wu are second accounts. If you have evidence other, put up or shut up."
Comment by Norcal


How has that been proven? By a screencap from another sock account on Instagram that you use to try and generate fake buzz there like you do here?

Proven or not (that's up to the moderators, and if they want to let you, Norcal, flout the rules) it's highly suspect that Alice W. Wu, Groth, and Kounter_Punch are Norcal sock puppets. I suspect there are several more besides these. There are reasons that you got banned at the Mousepad.

Because we are all separate people that HAPPEN to like that website and comment on their threads..
So you're "new" here, but yet you know that KounterPunch (also you) commented in Norcal's (your) threads, even though that account was deactivated months before you "joined" and has not posted in Norcal's threads (yours) since you've been here?
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
"So you're "new" here, but yet you know that KounterPunch (also you) commented in Norcal's (your) threads, even though that account was deactivated months before you "joined" and has not posted in Norcal's threads (yours) since you've been here?"

I don't know who that other poster is, I was referring to Alice Wu who you also claimed was in on the conspiracy but was proven not to be. Again, put up or shut up if you have evidence.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
I don’t know who that other poster is, I was referring to Alice Wu...

No. No, you weren’t:

quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
quote:
Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy:
Alice W. Wu, Groth, and Kounter_Punch are Norcal sock puppets.

Because we are ALL separate people that HAPPEN to like that website and comment on their threads?

 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
I don’t know who that other poster is, I was referring to Alice Wu...

No. No, you weren’t:

quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
quote:
Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy:
Alice W. Wu, Groth, and Kounter_Punch are Norcal sock puppets.

Because we are ALL separate people that HAPPEN to like that website and comment on their threads?

Yes, yes I was. Who else was there? The other poster you mentioned was obviously involved in your conspiracies and "we" (Me and Alice Wu) have been wrongfully targeted as objects of your hate. You are a liar and seem butthurt that anyone likes norcal's photos and not yours since obviously your whole thread is one big pissing contest.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Yes, yes I was.

Actually yeah that’s true. Alice Wu is one of the three user names you referred to who all post(ed) in your threads.
 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Yes, yes I was.

Actually yeah that’s true. Alice Wu is one of the two user names you referred to who all post(ed) in Norcal's threads.
There fixed it for you.
 
Posted by BareSoles84 (Member # 45910) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy:
Alice W. Wu, Groth, and Kounter_Punch

1, 2, 3

quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Because we are ALL separate people that happen to like that website and comment on their threads?


 
Posted by Groth (Member # 51956) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BareSoles84:
quote:
Originally posted by aka.footjoyboy:
Alice W. Wu, Groth, and Kounter_Punch

1, 2, 3

quote:
Originally posted by Groth:
Because we are ALL separate people that happen to like that website and comment on their threads?


You're finally right, those 3 names you listed are indeed separate posters though never heard of Kounter_Punch. He must have been another victim of your conspiracy. Well Done.
 
Posted by Rocky @TheSoleMates (Member # 28971) on :
 
This is your guys' final warning. I WILL start banning people if the immaturity and flaming doesn't end. I've locked one thread already, and now this one is locked too. Grow up or be gone!
 


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.0