posted
I am curious about what you all think about the whole thing. I can't really believe that it's "that big of a deal". It has been my experience that women that choose to adorn the female body with tattoos and other stuff, are generally more open minded about us, and the delicious little things that we love to do with feet.
That being said, I also can't imagine that it would be a big deal jacking off to it either, if the laws of parallels holds true.
On another note, I have been going to those meetup website meetings, you know, scavenger hunts, speed dating, shit like that, so I'm more active and not doing porn all of the time, lol. But most of the average run of the mill blue collar women out there are just BORING! Which makes me run back again to option one, thinking that it's not really a big deal, if the woman is in fact more openminded, or...?
I personally think that tattoos on the feet are pretty cute too. Although I am biased, most of my girls are of the alternative variety.
In closing, I think Anton LaVey said it best when he stated "“I like raunchiness, not like in a biker-chick sort of a way, but like the girl can't help it. Little bruises, a few hairs out of place, a little stain here and there.”
I think as perverts, we can appreciate this. What say you?
posted
The more and more I see girls with tattoos on their peds I have come to the conclusion that it is more of "just a fad" type of thing. Not trying to paint em' all with the same brush but when you see a girl with say 5 tattoos all in different spots on her body and she has one on her foot then chances are yeah she isn't trying to be "hip" by having a tat on her foot. But when you see a prim and proper looking kind of gal(doesn't necessarily have to be prim and proper) having a tattoo on her foot that says some gay little quote chances are she isn't what I'd call 'open minded'.
Moral of my little rant there was that don't judge a book by its cover.
IP: Logged |
posted
I dont mind tattoos, but just as with any tattoo; what it is and how its placed are important. Example, say I meet the foot model of my dreams and when I look down at those perfect bare feet, there is a tattoo of Obama's face that covers the entire top of her foot! Wtf?! nice toez but I just cant bring myself to kiss on/rub down on the prez
Posts: 30 | Registered: Apr 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
Never used to like tatts on peds but they've grown on me.................. except the Obama one ...lol
-------------------- "When this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit" - Dr Emmit L. Brown (Back To The Future) Posts: 7894 | Registered: Jan 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I myself don't really care for them, at least, not the big, huge ones that damn near cover the entire foot. If there's gonna be a foot tattoo, I prefer it to be small and unobtrusive, and preferably, not a face of any kind. You know, a little star, a little butterfly, a little bird, a little flower, but the key word being little. But foot tattoos by and large turn me off, though again, if a girl with nice feet, but a huge tattoo on one or both of her feet, offered them to me to do whatever I wish with them, I won't say no.
Posts: 2681 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by KaunNarazu: I dont mind tattoos, but just as with any tattoo; what it is and how its placed are important. Example, say I meet the foot model of my dreams and when I look down at those perfect bare feet, there is a tattoo of Obama's face that covers the entire top of her foot! Wtf?! nice toez but I just cant bring myself to kiss on/rub down on the prez
Lol, I hear ya! especially when you put it that way. And rest assured, I would not book a model if the tattoo was so gaudy that it took away from the rest of her foot.
quote:Originally posted by bluetoelover: The more and more I see girls with tattoos on their peds I have come to the conclusion that it is more of "just a fad" type of thing. Not trying to paint em' all with the same brush but when you see a girl with say 5 tattoos all in different spots on her body and she has one on her foot then chances are yeah she isn't trying to be "hip" by having a tat on her foot. But when you see a prim and proper looking kind of gal(doesn't necessarily have to be prim and proper) having a tattoo on her foot that says some gay little quote chances are she isn't what I'd call 'open minded'.
Moral of my little rant there was that don't judge a book by its cover.
Yeah, I thought about that and I was really not trying to generalize. I know what your saying. I do agree with the "fad" thing. I think that it has been pretty popular, especially in the past 15-20 years.
posted
Though I can deeply appreciate the true art of the tattoo and/or the statement it/they make, for the most part I really don't care for larger tattoos anywhere on the body, especially the feet. But to paraphrase Salvy_Mic if you're going to put one on your foot make it small. Personally I would prefer that for any tattoo anywhere on the body. I do generally like very small tattoos on a girl: on their lower abdomen, on their lower back or on their ankle.
Posts: 9728 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Never have been a fan of tats on women or men for that matter. Guess it goes back to me thinking that the only people with tats were old men as both of my grandfathers had them done when they were young and regretted doing it later in life. Talking way back in the 1920's and 30's. The faded splotchy green unrecognizable images on wrinkly skin is what we'll be seeing a lot of on everyone say in a few more decades.