quote:Originally posted by shamda1: Unfortunately porn sells more than foot fetish does. Also many producers of foot fetish sites are not foot fetish people, therefore they have no clue what to do and they usually show porn which is what they know. My site is pure foot fetish, but then again I have a foot fetish and understand it. No porn on my site, but if I did include porn I would probably get more traffic. Anyway, those of us that are true foot fetish people will do foot fetish and only foot fetish websites. I hope you other foot guys appreciate it!
It looks great 7 I plan to check it out as often as possible.
-------------------- I always thought The most sexy feet belonged to Kylie Minogue but that was before I saw my cleaner's feet. Posts: 1071 | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I also happen to agree with you Danyall2003. It does tend to get annoying when some foot fetish photographers give an impression of an obligation to show porn with the foot fetish emphasis. Here is just one angle on it, from my perspective. In a certain sense, I think that society in general still tends to see a general ‘porn fetish’ (such as breasts) as a more ‘normal lust’ fetish, so to speak, but perhaps still doesn’t completely see a ‘foot fetish’ quite as normal (unfortunately). As a result, I think some people with foot fetishes tend to carry an underlying shame. In turn, I think they might be adding porn to perhaps ‘smooth over’ there so-called ‘shame.’ In a way, I think some guys with a fetish seem to give the impression that they might as well go to the full extreme, and include the porn. I’ve actually noticed this with other fetishes, as well.
Posts: 62 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by deserthope2000: I also happen to agree with you Danyall2003. It does tend to get annoying when some foot fetish photographers give an impression of an obligation to show porn with the foot fetish emphasis. Here is just one angle on it, from my perspective. In a certain sense, I think that society in general still tends to see a general ‘porn fetish’ (such as breasts) as a more ‘normal lust’ fetish, so to speak, but perhaps still doesn’t completely see a ‘foot fetish’ quite as normal (unfortunately). As a result, I think some people with foot fetishes tend to carry an underlying shame. In turn, I think they might be adding porn to perhaps ‘smooth over’ there so-called ‘shame.’ In a way, I think some guys with a fetish seem to give the impression that they might as well go to the full extreme, and include the porn. I’ve actually noticed this with other fetishes, as well.
That's A very interesting theory & while I can see were your coming from, I am pleased to say that I like watching my foot-video's without any porn whatsoever, ok with the exeption of watching some tasty model such as, Louise Hodge giving some lucky sod a Foot-job.
-------------------- I always thought The most sexy feet belonged to Kylie Minogue but that was before I saw my cleaner's feet. Posts: 1071 | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I heard a mainstream Hollywood producer the other day come up with some self proclaimed brilliant idea to make a site called tits and toes dot com.
LOL, His premise was simple: they get to see some tits and they get to see some toes.
I so didn't want to say anything so I pretty much kept my mouth shut. But I guess if there is an audience that likes the hybrids, then they can go for it.
Personally, I think pure feet sites are better than porn
But I do envy those lucky bastards who get footjobs from some of my dream girls
Someone was right about what they said earlier when it's the sickos out there who give us fetishists a bad name. Me personally, I just try to think of my 300lb former coworker whenever I start to pop a big hard-on in my pants in a public or inappropriate place.
That way, normal people won't think of me as a sicko either, LOL
quote:Originally posted by Danyall2003: I am curious about one thing. Why is there porn on many foot fetish sites? It gives the public a bad perception about foot fetish in that it is linked to porn. It bothers me that I want to look at feet and I end up looking at breasts and butts. I am a foot fetishist, not a butt fetishist. This has got to stop. No wonder people look at foot fetish people as odd.
actually i think that people look at "us" as odd is because guys like you only seem to like feet and nothing else
no offense
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Nikkis Arches: I dont have "PORN" on my site 99% just feet (and me of course) But I actually get a ton of complements on the fact that I dont go nude.
Nikki
I would take that as them being grossed out by your body
just kidding
I think you should go nude
-------------------- quote: ---------------------------------- posted by Andy - Laa: my posts in this thread are not as good as Michael P's Posts: 3024 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mighty Mike: actually i think that people look at "us" as odd is because guys like you only seem to like feet and nothing else
no offense
i think it is the obsession aspects that get us into the bad image territory and certainly the inability to focus on anything but feet can easily be construed as obsessive.
I've experienced this pre-judgement of girls thinking I'm too obsessed by the reactions of my ex-girlfriends and even some foot models.
posted
Scarlet said it best. They look at us weird because of those creepy guys that pleasure themselves to sleeping girl's feet, in their shoes when they're not looking, kissing their feet under a table, etc. It seems like every month we get a new article about some random foot fetishist gone crazy. Depressing. Yes. D: But, I agree! I have never gone to a foot fetish website looking for anything except for feet, and am dissapointed by the inclusion of anything else.
Posts: 201 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Reinforcedheelstoes: Because there is no such thing as a foot 'fetish'.
What everybody on Earth knows except for a few dumbasses is that a woman's bare feet are sexy. Every bit as sexy and 'relevant' to arousal as a pair of breast.
AMEN to that, brother!
Reinforcedheelstoes,
I've never heard anyone describe it so plain & simple. It makes perfect sense! Makes you wonder why so many closed-minded fools insist that "we" somehow define our so-called fetish.
-------------------- "I do believe they think I am some sort of god!" (C-3PO) Posts: 2474 | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I do not mind seeing a woman's beautiful body along with her beatiful feet as long as ample attention is paid to her feet. It's all a matter of taste. The sites I do not enjoy are the ones that claim to be a foot lovers site, then turn out to be filled with hard core action.
Posts: 506 | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Geez, guys who masturbate to pics/videos of women's feet and chat about it online having problems with "porn"...
...what is this world coming to?
Posts: 26 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
bluetoelover
unregistered
posted
I can see your argument..but on the other hand Im all for seeing a nice pair of tits and a nice ass connected to those feet! It just completes it for me...Id like to be able to see the whole body for me to be able to call the feet "perfect" or hot or whatever.When I go online to look at feet its not just the feet that gets me off its the girl herself. Cant just have the feet and nothing else,in my mind anyways. I also dont appreciate sites claiming to be foot fetish sites when they really have nothing to do with feet.Its almost as if the webmaster just puts on stuff that he thinks is foot fetish material...i.e. toe sucking or a pic of a girl laying down with OMG barefeet!!!!!
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Reinforcedheelstoes: Because there is no such thing as a foot 'fetish'.
What everybody on Earth knows except for a few dumbasses is that a woman's bare feet are sexy. Every bit as sexy and 'relevant' to arousal as a pair of breast.
AMEN to that, brother!
Reinforcedheelstoes,
I've never heard anyone describe it so plain & simple. It makes perfect sense! Makes you wonder why so many closed-minded fools insist that "we" somehow define our so-called fetish.
Agreed!
-------------------- I always thought The most sexy feet belonged to Kylie Minogue but that was before I saw my cleaner's feet. Posts: 1071 | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Danyall2003: Why is there porn on many foot fetish sites? It gives the public a bad perception about foot fetish in that it is linked to porn.
On it's simplest terms I can understand your argument. You're saying that, if foot websites only had barefeet on them, and nothing else, then people would not be as concerned about it.
Can it be done- it certainly can. But the only example I can think of that involces a body part that's highly sexualized but not always linked with porn would be a woman's bare midriff. I'm a total sucker for a nice, tight, flat stomach, and love seeing girls in bikinis. Yet most bikini sites do not have pornography, even though those pictures will be highly arousing and sexualized by most men. I have no doubt that nealry every woman understands that men are not just looking at bikini shots for "fun."
But the few weaknesses I see in this argument are:
- very few non-foot fetish folks are going to be looking for or even come across foot websites. If they do come across them, most of them will not pay them any heed, because they don't want to or can't understand our profound love of feet.
- While having only barefeet on a site certainly would give the outward impression of "innocence" to outsiders, sooner or later, they'd come to realize that we footguys get highly aroused by these photos and they'd be surprised or shocked anyway.
- Similar to other "body part websites" (like breasts and butts), it's a natural outgrowth that because they are sexualized, that there will be sexual/pornographic content.
If we're saying that we don't want webmasters to share and people to realize that feet can be or are seductive, sensual and sexy, then we're continuing to "cower in our closet", which for most of us, is not acceptable.
We all realize that we're dealing with feet, which can be bared in public, while breasts and butts cannot be, but to think, and continue to go along with, the fact that they cannot also be arousing and enjoyed sexually is very wrong to most of us.
Consequently I'm not sure that there's a whole lot to gain from keeping foot sites totally "clean."
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Cheers]](graemlins/cheers.gif)
