posted
I am curious about one thing. Why is there porn on many foot fetish sites? It gives the public a bad perception about foot fetish in that it is linked to porn. It bothers me that I want to look at feet and I end up looking at breasts and butts. I am a foot fetishist, not a butt fetishist. This has got to stop. No wonder people look at foot fetish people as odd.
Posts: 10 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
People look at us as odd because the numerous amounts of desperate guys out there jack off onto sleeping girls feet or lick random women's feet in stores and end up in the news about it.
Posts: 425 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
I'm not really understanding your entire argument here. I'm assuming that you are only into feet and do not like a entire woman's body as a whole and are uncomfortable seeing the "naughty bits." I guess because I was in art school back in my college days having contact with nude models on a daily basis for 4 years got me to the point where it just seemed natural. Now if your're talking about foot fetish sites that have hardcore porn in it with bukakke, anal insertions, etc, I really don't have any use for that. However, who am I to judge though and decide to start a crusade to call for an end to them. I'm sure those folks into that would probably not care to see your favorite supermodel in high heel sandals on the catwalk collection. Although you could most definitlely trade it with us!
Don't worry about the general public's perception on the matter. The general public would be more comfortable with you looking at a Playboy magazine with pics of T & A then "silly pictures of fully clothed women and their bare toes."
posted
I smell what you're stepping in Danyall2003.
Some so called "foot fetish" websites are just porn sites with barefoot models.
To me, the problem issue isn't the presence or porn, it's the lacking attention to the foot fetish.
Mind you, I opt not to show sex or nudity on my site only because that's not the style I choose to portray. I have no quams if a foot guy wants to show sex or nudity on their site.
All I look for in a website is good foot content. If it has sex thrown in, so be it.
quote: Some so called "foot fetish" websites are just porn sites with barefoot models.
Yeah that is rather annoying...you click on a link that says it is a FOOT FETISH website and it is just a bunch of naked girls that just HAPPEN to be barefoot...not much emphasis on the feet really.
I enjoy sites such as anglefoot.com... pedisolejunction.com... coedfeet.com etc. where the FOCUS is actually on the pretty girls feet...seeing their entire naked body is really irrelevant to me. The appeal in websites like the ones listed above is that they have pretty girls that you could actually expect to run into around a college campus or the mall, so the fantasy factor is that much better since it is easy to imagine meeting one of those girls and getting to see/play with their feet in real life (provided you have the ability to converse with girls which I unfortunately lack... )
Posts: 380 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Unfortunately porn sells more than foot fetish does. Also many producers of foot fetish sites are not foot fetish people, therefore they have no clue what to do and they usually show porn which is what they know. My site is pure foot fetish, but then again I have a foot fetish and understand it. No porn on my site, but if I did include porn I would probably get more traffic. Anyway, those of us that are true foot fetish people will do foot fetish and only foot fetish websites. I hope you other foot guys appreciate it!
posted
Because there is no such thing as a foot 'fetish'.
What everybody on Earth knows except for a few dumbasses is that a woman's bare feet are sexy. Every bit as sexy and 'relevant' to arousal as a pair of breast.
-------------------- There's no such thing as a foot fetish. Feet are part of the anatomy, however, I DO have a nylon fetish......
posted
once again it seem to boil down to money making ( As most things do ) And I quote BONDO Some so called "foot fetish" websites are just porn sites with barefoot models. There isnt anything wrong in this. But its up to you to make that decision. Whether or not that you want to view that site, Or move onto another. That is mainly focused on feet, And not showing barefoot models. And classing it as *foot fetish material*
At the end of the day, Sex sells. End of story and if these big players within in the industry can re label something. And then it becomes another area that they will generate sales. They will do so ! Not something that i argree with...
But at the end of the day they are just tapping into another market area...
Jusy my ten pence worth lol
Posts: 1395 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I agree..seeing porn on foot websites is lame..if it's PORN..then keep it PORN...if it's Feet, only have FEET..simple. There's a time and place for everything,just not together that's why my site will always be "porn free" so to speak.
--------------------
Join thousands of our fans on Twitter @Norcalfeetdotco Posts: 18309 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:It gives the public a bad perception about foot fetish in that it is linked to porn.
Well, if you take the definition of "pornography" and apply it to what we foot photographers do, then yes, we do pornography. I am a pornographer and do not deny that fact. Any producer, photographer, or webmaster here that says they do not do pornography is in a state of denial.
People get off watching my work. If that's not pornography, then I don't know what it is. Perhaps you're averse to hardcore pornography linked to the foot fetish type. But really, who's going to stop producers from mixing the two?
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Laugh]](graemlins/laugh.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
)
![[Mad]](cuss.gif)
