posted
Don't agree on the toe thing either. i don't see or want them to be nipples or penis'! I just like them for what they are.
I agree with most of it though. before me and my girlfriend became intimate she used to ask to have her feet massaged.
heh. they were excellent days actually. i realised i liked feet but hadn't met anyone to talk about it with. then suddenly i met her, she was great and all but when i went to her place she walked around barefoot! was great! then she asked for a massage. over time i worked my way up too. she still loves foot massages too. but i guess theres no reason to stop liking them when they feel so good!
Posts: 230 | Registered: Jan 2009
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by LuckyTeen: That view is so closed minded though. It's like can't a man just enjoy sucking a woman's big toe? There doesn't have to be an explanation for it.
Sometimes psychologists are so stupid.
It begs the question, "When a woman sucks on a man's penis, what is it that she is using the penis as a substitute for?"
posted
Sorry - she turned me off from the first paragraph when she claims "But unlike breasts, legs and buns, the charms of feet are rarely examined, except by podiatrists, pedicurists, foot fetishists, foot hedonists and shoe salesmen." I think any woman who has ever had a pedicure, any woman who has ever applied polish to her toes, knows exactly how sexy a foot CAN be. Just like a breast or ass or leg.
Posts: 532 | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
The author is entitled to her views, and I appreciate her sharing them in print. Some conclusions she drew did not seem very feasible. Reading her definition of a foot fetishist, I must comment that most who frequent wu's site are not foot fetishists, but foot lovers. Most of those who would not be interested in the subject matter here would consider it a foot fetish site. Ignorance trumps the dictionary due to convenience. The romantic mind is not a butterfly specimen pinned to a piece of cardboard with a label. The romantic mind is as boundless as the universe, undefinable in a mere article. Deep space stuff, huh?
Posts: 506 | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by lynard: Sorry - she turned me off from the first paragraph when she claims "But unlike breasts, legs and buns, the charms of feet are rarely examined, except by podiatrists, pedicurists, foot fetishists, foot hedonists and shoe salesmen." I think any woman who has ever had a pedicure, any woman who has ever applied polish to her toes, knows exactly how sexy a foot CAN be. Just like a breast or ass or leg.
I totally disagree. Having asked a good number of girls to pose, I've heard quite a few mention that the only reason they wear cute shoes and get pedicures is because they find feet repulsive and wouldn't pose because they just hate feet. That line isn't meant for a foot fetishist, it's meant for the non-foot lover out there who might be reading it. It says, "Hey, ever think about this?"